| Page 122 of 708 |
|
|
 Posted: Fri, 6th Sep 2013 19:04 Post subject: |
|
 |
| LeoNatan wrote: | | Have you seen Max Payne 3 on consoles? It doesn't look that far off. It's not like models here are very high poly. |
I've tried saying that and was laughed off. Dont even try leo
3080 | ps5 pro
Sin317-"im 31 years old and still surprised at how much shit comes out of my ass actually ..."
SteamDRM-"Call of Duty is the symbol of the true perfection in every aspect. Call of Duty games are like Mozart's/Beethoven's symphonies"
deadpoetic-"are you new to the cyberspace?"
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 6th Sep 2013 19:05 Post subject: |
|
|
Those screens, can u spot the 3d axis placement in the beach screen. Editor bullshots confirmed heehee , pc confirmed lol
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 6th Sep 2013 19:08 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Fri, 6th Sep 2013 19:09 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
russ80
Posts: 4679
Location: Romania
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 6th Sep 2013 19:24 Post subject: |
|
|
Not to mention how many loading zones Max Payne 3 had. It was almost between every room in some maps.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Fri, 6th Sep 2013 19:26 Post subject: |
|
|
@sabin1981 I also said elsewhere, that if done right, it is possible to achieve a similar result. If you look at some of the levels in MP3, a distant Brazil is shown, which look better than most of GTA4. So if their engine is capable of scaling distant graphics properly, it could be done. From everything I've seen so far (videos especially), it looks so.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 6th Sep 2013 19:27 Post subject: |
|
|
And the reason why you're rolling your eyes at me is because?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Fri, 6th Sep 2013 19:28 Post subject: |
|
|
Oh shit, must have cliked on mistake
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 6th Sep 2013 19:28 Post subject: |
|
|
Wasn't a lot in MP3 scripted/stationary though?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Fri, 6th Sep 2013 19:29 Post subject: |
|
|
| Mister_s wrote: | | Wasn't a lot in MP3 scripted/stationary though? |
It was, but from purely graphical standpoint, it was as complex as what should be rendered at a distant GTA. Moving vehicles, characters, buildings, terrain and dynamic skies. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DaLexy
Posts: 3041
Location: Germany
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 6th Sep 2013 19:32 Post subject: |
|
|
All I'm saying is that from what we've seen of GTAV so, it looks incredibly impressive for supposedly running on seven year hardware. When I (and others) mentioned how awesome MP3 looked and ran on the PC, in comparison to GTAIV, and that it gave me hope RS had really optimised the shit out of RAGE, you came back with "small maps" excuse.
| me7 wrote: | I'm excited about the PC version since I expect it to be some sort of "GTA 5 benchmark". If this game runs flawlessly on a decent rig, it could indicate that Rockstar has fixed the PC versio of RAGE.
Imagine GTA 5 with decent performance  |
| LeoNatan wrote: | Huh? This is a linear corridor shooter split into tiny sections divided by videos.  When you are in GTA4 in a building, are you excited you get 60FPS? |
| LeoNatan wrote: | | sabin1981 wrote: | | It certainly gives hope for GTA5, doesn't it? |
No, because this is a closed corridor shooter, while GTA is open. GTA4 also ran 60FPS smooth inside buildings. Let's hope GTA5 is optimized, but I'd take it with a shovel of salt.  |
If they really have updated their engine to such a degree that we can have an open-world game like GTA, combined with the gorgeous visuals of MP3, on seven year old hardware? That's awesome! It gives hope for a better PC version too 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 6th Sep 2013 19:35 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 6th Sep 2013 19:36 Post subject: |
|
|
Well I think the gameplay vids shown were bullshit (i.e. not on current gen consoles). Hopefully I'll be pleasantly surprised.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Fri, 6th Sep 2013 19:36 Post subject: |
|
|
| sabin1981 wrote: | All I'm saying is that from what we've seen of GTAV so, it looks incredibly impressive for supposedly running on seven year hardware. When I (and others) mentioned how awesome MP3 looked and ran on the PC, in comparison to GTAIV, and that it gave me hope RS had really optimised the shit out of RAGE, you came back with "small maps" excuse.
| me7 wrote: | I'm excited about the PC version since I expect it to be some sort of "GTA 5 benchmark". If this game runs flawlessly on a decent rig, it could indicate that Rockstar has fixed the PC versio of RAGE.
Imagine GTA 5 with decent performance |
| LeoNatan wrote: | | Huh? This is a linear corridor shooter split into tiny sections divided by videos. When you are in GTA4 in a building, are you excited you get 60FPS? |
| LeoNatan wrote: | | sabin1981 wrote: | | It certainly gives hope for GTA5, doesn't it? |
No, because this is a closed corridor shooter, while GTA is open. GTA4 also ran 60FPS smooth inside buildings. Let's hope GTA5 is optimized, but I'd take it with a shovel of salt. |
If they really have updated their engine to such a degree that we can have an open-world game like GTA, combined with the gorgeous visuals of MP3, on seven year old hardware? That's awesome! It gives hope for a better PC version too |
Yeap, it's all true, but either they have some very convincing bullvids, or they did the impossible. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
russ80
Posts: 4679
Location: Romania
|
| Posted: Fri, 6th Sep 2013 20:12 Post subject: |
|
|
I don't see how you guys were impressed by the videos shown. They're quite a blurry mess/aliased/crappy textures etc.. compared to all the screenshots so far at least.
Main PC : I7 12700, MSI Ventus RTX 4090 24gb, Alienware AW3423DW QD-OLED
Laptop : I5 4200H @ 3400mhz boost, GTX 850m 2gb Vram DDR3, 4gb RAM DDR3
Derpsole : Playstation 5 disc edition, Ninty Switcherino
TV+audio: LG CX 65" / Sonos ARC + SL ones + Sonos sub 3
VR Headset: Meta quest 2 airlinked
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Fri, 6th Sep 2013 20:25 Post subject: |
|
|
What? Textures in above shots also look low res. So were the textures in MP3 on PC. That's all you gonna get on current gen game.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
russ80
Posts: 4679
Location: Romania
|
| Posted: Fri, 6th Sep 2013 20:27 Post subject: |
|
|
Idk leo i just don't believe those are actual console screenshots.
Main PC : I7 12700, MSI Ventus RTX 4090 24gb, Alienware AW3423DW QD-OLED
Laptop : I5 4200H @ 3400mhz boost, GTX 850m 2gb Vram DDR3, 4gb RAM DDR3
Derpsole : Playstation 5 disc edition, Ninty Switcherino
TV+audio: LG CX 65" / Sonos ARC + SL ones + Sonos sub 3
VR Headset: Meta quest 2 airlinked
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Fri, 6th Sep 2013 20:30 Post subject: |
|
|
Sure, lets hope for leak so we see finally.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tonizito
VIP Member
Posts: 51399
Location: Portugal, the shithole of Europe.
|
| Posted: Fri, 6th Sep 2013 20:49 Post subject: |
|
|
| 4treyu wrote: | | inb4 tonikurwa |
Oooooh the nitpicker is here so I might just as well get in
That PC screen with the axis... 
| boundle (thoughts on cracking AITD) wrote: | | i guess thouth if without a legit key the installation was rolling back we are all fucking then |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
garus
VIP Member
Posts: 34200
|
| Posted: Fri, 6th Sep 2013 21:30 Post subject: |
|
|
snip
Last edited by garus on Tue, 27th Aug 2024 21:56; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JackQ
Non-expret in Derps lagunge
Posts: 14178
Location: Kibbutznik, Israel
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 10th Sep 2013 13:08 Post subject: |
|
|
"We threw 435346546 billion dollars at our game just for marketing! Why doesn't it even break even? WHY?! What did we do wrong?!"
Disgusting...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 10th Sep 2013 13:12 Post subject: |
|
|
the marketing part for gta V is estimated (R* don't tell) to be 100 mil $, making its actual production budget around 165 million $. movies are listed only by production budget, this makes gta V over 100 mil cheaper than avatar and 140 mil. cheaper than potc. (avatar marketing = 150 mil so complete budget for avatar is around 400.000.000$ )
Last edited by Shocktrooper on Tue, 10th Sep 2013 13:21; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 122 of 708 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
