so is the overall performance better than gta 4? which console runs it better? Cause I might just update my jtagged console given the history of multiplats...
worse than gta iv. but playable. seems to be more often in 25fps range than gta iv was
3080, ps5, lg oled
Sin317-"im 31 years old and still surprised at how much shit comes out of my ass actually ..."
SteamDRM-"Call of Duty is the symbol of the true perfection in every aspect. Call of Duty games are like Mozart's/Beethoven's symphonies"
deadpoetic-"are you new to the cyberspace?"
Best GTA yet IMO, what more can I say. It feels good, plays good and runs good. There's a lot of detail, it runs much better than I expected. I like the three characters thing (I only have two though), it gives extra dimensions to the game. Chops is also awesome, I hope I'll see much more of him. I don't know how Rockstar does it, but they almost always amaze me with their grand game worlds. There's much to do and there's so much going on. TLoU was the best game I'd played on the PS3, but it's been kicked in the balls by GTA5
Is the iFruit thing important? It comes up now and then.
agree,
I had this situation when just roaming around in rich district. Somd guys were kidnapping a women, I've chased them and taken em down in the middle of cross section. Woman thanks me and asks to drive her home.
When i am almost there, I get shoot. Some thugs leftovers or backup chased me and shoot me down. that was surprising and somehow really cool
@WaldoJ
At least imo. I even turned on gta iv again and it indeed seems smoother (but looks worse).
Maybe it's just me but I really thinks framerate takes a hit more often than not. + there is no motion blur at all so that low framerate can be felt even more ;/
Game is so enjoyable tho, You should somehow get used to it...
it looks a lot smoother on all the hand camera recordings of the tv, so don't get fooled by those.
It would be wise to wait for digital foundry analysis if You want to buy it
edit: OR maybe my console is bad, idk. There is no way to check if my 360 is working with performance it should ? it's not too hot or anything. I even dusted it some time ago
3080, ps5, lg oled
Sin317-"im 31 years old and still surprised at how much shit comes out of my ass actually ..."
SteamDRM-"Call of Duty is the symbol of the true perfection in every aspect. Call of Duty games are like Mozart's/Beethoven's symphonies"
deadpoetic-"are you new to the cyberspace?"
thats bullshit, on both consoles the game runs much better than gta 4 did, it does drop down to ca. 25 fps sometimes, but you really need to replay gta 4 on 360, often it went to 20 and slightly below (and on ps3 version even 15).
bullshit.
I jsut checked all that... and played gta v all day yesterday. performance is similiar to saints row 3
edit: I am playing on a dell 23 ips pc monitor. Same I have hooked up to my pc. So no "100hz or true motion" bullshit trying to smooth out image.
Actually maybe it would help in this case, because of no god damn motion blur. why rockstar.
30 or less fps games MUST have motion blur. Looks at Dark SOuls or Dead rising. Due to extensive mb, those games almost appear completely smooth
3080, ps5, lg oled
Sin317-"im 31 years old and still surprised at how much shit comes out of my ass actually ..."
SteamDRM-"Call of Duty is the symbol of the true perfection in every aspect. Call of Duty games are like Mozart's/Beethoven's symphonies"
deadpoetic-"are you new to the cyberspace?"
Why? Am I telling something we all don't know ?
The game performance is bad. No need to argue with me about everything I say
Don't even try to tell me that 30fps game looks better without motion blur. Brain does motion blur in real life too You know. Try any game with good motion blur like mentioned dead rising or the darkness. 30fps is much less painfull in those.
And gta V is even lower than 30fps. They had motion blur on screenshots, so why not even give option for release
developers think motion blur smoothes low fps image, movie makers do the same thing, plenty of people to, And me too.
with 60fps - motion blur is barely visible beause there is less space to cover inbetween the frames, unlike 30 or lower.
Crysis on pc uses extensive morion blur. Thanks to it it is playable at 30-40 fps
edit: fuck it, whatever. it wouldnt hurt to have an option would it ? I am going to play now
3080, ps5, lg oled
Sin317-"im 31 years old and still surprised at how much shit comes out of my ass actually ..."
SteamDRM-"Call of Duty is the symbol of the true perfection in every aspect. Call of Duty games are like Mozart's/Beethoven's symphonies"
deadpoetic-"are you new to the cyberspace?"
Argue with you? No, I like my weekend just the way it is, thank you very much.
You keep on going thinking what you want to think, but when everyone says the game runs very smooth, and looks really clean at the same time, while you are the only one complaining about the lack of motion blur and the fact that it runs worse than GTA IV (WTF?!).
However, after reading your latest post in this thread, you clearly have a fetish for motion blur. Whatever, it's your thing, not going to try and debate that, but when you run around out there saying GTA V is similar to SR3, performance wise, you sound like a crazy person. Or a bullshitter because you clearly have not played SR3 on x360/ps3.
But then again SR3 had that shit smeared vaseline effect at low fps witch you love so much, so maybe that explains it.
Maybe I am the only one who doesnt play on tv 2 meters away ? I play it like i would game on pc. Desk and monitor. Maybe that's why I see all the jaggies, low resolution and low fps.
and srsly. Just like having a fov option... how the fuck would it hurt anyone to have motion blur option ? and as far as I know most people prefer motion blur, because it is there in movies and real life too (kinda)
I don't want to argue too. I am just saying my opinion and then peopl jump on me as always.
edit: Oh and about sr3 comparison. I might have exagerated a bit but it really is far from stable 30fps and "clear image"... again. Maybe on huge modern tv. I need to hook up my 360 in other room to a 42 bravia and turn on true motion or smthing.
edit2: Again - is there a way to check my 360 performance somehow?
3080, ps5, lg oled
Sin317-"im 31 years old and still surprised at how much shit comes out of my ass actually ..."
SteamDRM-"Call of Duty is the symbol of the true perfection in every aspect. Call of Duty games are like Mozart's/Beethoven's symphonies"
deadpoetic-"are you new to the cyberspace?"
Last edited by KillerCrocker on Sat, 14th Sep 2013 17:22; edited 2 times in total
Sin317-"im 31 years old and still surprised at how much shit comes out of my ass actually ..."
SteamDRM-"Call of Duty is the symbol of the true perfection in every aspect. Call of Duty games are like Mozart's/Beethoven's symphonies"
deadpoetic-"are you new to the cyberspace?"
Sin317-"im 31 years old and still surprised at how much shit comes out of my ass actually ..."
SteamDRM-"Call of Duty is the symbol of the true perfection in every aspect. Call of Duty games are like Mozart's/Beethoven's symphonies"
deadpoetic-"are you new to the cyberspace?"
My setup right now is about 1m away form tv to couch. And I still think that, especially compared to GTA IV (hell, compared to most x360 games), GTA V performs and looks 10x better.
Ok so here is my problem I got the game from someone because I am out of town for 3 weeks and had no way to get it... and yes I am buying the game but for ps3 anyways, he gave me the game with both discs already converted to god format. I have no computer here to do the conversion back to iso then to xex. Is there any way to work around disc 1 being in god format? Please I have been up all night and just want to play this weekend that im stuck in NC.
My setup right now is about 1m away form tv to couch. And I still think that, especially compared to GTA IV (hell, compared to most x360 games), GTA V performs and looks 10x better.
It must be dependand on the setup.
I agree that it looks fantastic. (low res but fantastic). Some scenes are less aliased than others)
Maybe I am too used to pc games recently
3080, ps5, lg oled
Sin317-"im 31 years old and still surprised at how much shit comes out of my ass actually ..."
SteamDRM-"Call of Duty is the symbol of the true perfection in every aspect. Call of Duty games are like Mozart's/Beethoven's symphonies"
deadpoetic-"are you new to the cyberspace?"
I don't care what anyone else says, the PS3 version of GTAV is not solid 30fps. It's not. It hits 30fps, sure, but it's not solid and it - in the daylight with lots of traffic - spends most time in the 20-25 range. It's noticeable if you're a huge PC gamer and you sit less than 40ft away on your Couch®, but you do "kind of" get used to it when playing.
I don't care what anyone else says, the PS3 version of GTAV is not solid 30fps. It's not. It hits 30fps, sure, but it's not solid and it - in the daylight with lots of traffic - spends most time in the 20-25 range. It's noticeable if you're a huge PC gamer and you sit less than 40ft away on your Couch®, but you do "kind of" get used to it when playing.
enjoy "the game" and dont think about jaggies it will stand you good to do that these days with games. If you enjoy the gameplay AA issues just dissapear, have you ever noticed this
I am shocked, just shocked, that this game doesn't run as well as PC games. Just flummoxed really. It's as if the game was running on older technology that needed to make some compromises to deliver a huge open world experience. . .but no. That can't be it!
I can't speak from experience, I'm afraid, only second-hand knowledge. So far most OBJECTIVE people that have access to both have said that the 360 version is a lot smoother and more stable.
moosenoodles wrote:
enjoy "the game" and dont think about jaggies it will stand you good to do that these days with games.
Yup! It's not ideal but it's not a dealbreaker either and the game is so worth it
I don't care what anyone else says, the PS3 version of GTAV is not solid 30fps. It's not. It hits 30fps, sure, but it's not solid and it - in the daylight with lots of traffic - spends most time in the 20-25 range. It's noticeable if you're a huge PC gamer and you sit less than 40ft away on your Couch®, but you do "kind of" get used to it when playing.
I played the Xbox version first and for about 3 hours. Played the PS3 version today and it didn't feel or quiet look the same. Not sure why yet but i like the 360 version better.
0.27-0.30 - look at the church wall. It looks MUCH better on PS3, there is a cross which is missing on Xbox 360.
And I think KC may be on crack This game run MUCH MUCH MUCH better than GTA4, it looks amazing compared to GTA4 too. I wonder if there is something wrong with your machine dude?
My xbox from 2005 has freezing issues with this game. Buuuuu.
Guess i have to play it on the subpar ps3 version.
My glitched 360 is freezing and crashing too. I find if i turn on and off, it may work. after a few attempts it then works constantly. I think its the glitch doesn't always work
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
instaDisabled 
