NFOHump.com :: View topic - Call of Duty: Ghosts

Page 47 of 86

Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 46, 47, 48 ... 84, 85, 86 Next

JBeckman
VIP Member

Posts: 34614
Location: Sweden

Posted: Mon, 4th Nov 2013 18:59 Post subject:	Quick Quote Quote

RAM usage is currently at 1.9 GB, unsure if it'll continue to grow as the game goes on but maybe it doesn't properly unload those cached resources? (Which isn't good if so.)

Profile
PM

Mr.Tinkles

Posts: 12378
Location: Reino de Suecia

Posted: Mon, 4th Nov 2013 19:00 Post subject:

tonizito wrote:

Prefetian wrote:

sabin1981 wrote:

>Intel® Core i7-3930K
>Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600MHz (16 GB)
>Sapphire Radeon HD 7970 (OC)
>performance is around 35 - 40 FPS on average, seldom over 45 even in smaller scenes like the space station

Sorry JB, I'm not laughing at you mate <3 I guess now we know why the XB has to run at 720

Wait....wat?!?!

It runs at around 40 FPS with your machine?!?
Yeah, drivers might do quite a bit but holy fuck.
I was thinking about maybe actually buying it for the MP just to switch it up a bit from BF3/4 but after reading that...fuck no.

The fact that it absolutely refuses to run with <6 GB of RAM should be enough to sound the "unoptimized piece of shit" alarm Laughing

Yup, was giving this game a thought since it's supposed to be "next-gen" but no, not going to waste my time/money on this when I have BF4.
I tried BO1 which was lagging like ass for me when it came out and barely had any graphical updates to previous games.

No way am I playing a shooter online that barely looks like an upgrade from BO2 and doesn't play at a steady 60FPS (even though 90 is the sweetspot for me).

Profile
PM

JBeckman
VIP Member

Posts: 34614
Location: Sweden

Posted: Mon, 4th Nov 2013 19:03 Post subject:

Prefetian wrote:

tonizito wrote:

Prefetian wrote:

The fact that it absolutely refuses to run with <6 GB of RAM should be enough to sound the "unoptimized piece of shit" alarm Laughing

Performance is now a constant 60+ (~82 in the current scene.) I disabled MSAA which was only at 2x but that solved it, seems driver related.

Profile
PM

prudislav
VIP Member

Posts: 29148
Location: The land of beer and porn

Posted: Mon, 4th Nov 2013 19:05 Post subject:	Quick Quote Quote

Steam006 posted "ramfix" using lumaemu to try on RIN http://i.imgur.com/SYIa3w4.png http://i.imgur.com/PtROKGv.gif Sometimes i just want to see NFOHUMP burn \o/

Profile
PM

consolitis
VIP Member

Posts: 27318

Posted: Mon, 4th Nov 2013 19:08 Post subject:

JBeckman wrote:

Prefetian wrote:

tonizito wrote:

The fact that it absolutely refuses to run with <6 GB of RAM should be enough to sound the "unoptimized piece of shit" alarm Laughing

Yup, was giving this game a thought since it's supposed to be "next-gen" but no, not going to waste my time/money on this when I have BF4.
I tried BO1 which was lagging like ass for me when it came out and barely had any graphical updates to previous games.
I
No way am I playing a shooter online that barely looks like an upgrade from BO2 and doesn't play at a steady 60FPS (even though 90 is the sweetspot for me).

Performance is now a constant 60+ (~82 in the current scene.) I disabled MSAA which was only at 2x but that solved it, seems driver related.

That's more like it Smile

TWIN PEAKS is "something of a miracle."
"...like nothing else on television."
"a phenomenon."
"A tangled tale of sex, violence, power, junk food..."
"Like Nothing On Earth"

~ WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO SAY CAN ONLY BE SEEN ~

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHTUOgYNRzY

Profile
PM

Shocktrooper

Posts: 4484

Posted: Mon, 4th Nov 2013 19:09 Post subject:	Quick Quote Quote

MSAA If I play any games in downsampled from 2100x1314 with SMAA+Sharpen, it usually takes a smaller performance hit than 4xMSAA and looks better than 8xMSAA.

Profile
PM

loladass

Posts: 62

Posted: Mon, 4th Nov 2013 19:09 Post subject:	Quick Quote Quote

i have 6GB of RAM,will it run or appear that error?BTW i dont have the game unlocked yet.

Profile
PM

JBeckman
VIP Member

Posts: 34614
Location: Sweden

Posted: Mon, 4th Nov 2013 19:09 Post subject:

Shocktrooper wrote:

MSAA

If I play games in downsampled from 2100x1314 with SMAA+Sharpen, it takes a smaller performance hit than 4xMSAA and looks better than 8xMSAA.

Depends on the game, but yeah deferred rendering and DX11 (Or 10) then SSAA or downsampling might work better. Smile

(Which is why MSAA didn't work very well in Metro 2033 and was replaced with various SSAA modes in 2034 / Last Light.)

Last edited by JBeckman on Mon, 4th Nov 2013 19:10; edited 1 time in total

Profile
PM

sabin1981
Mostly Cursed

Posts: 87805

Posted: Mon, 4th Nov 2013 19:10 Post subject:

prudislav wrote:

Steam006 posted "ramfix" using lumaemu to try on RIN

Artificial lock is artificial Laughing

Profile
PM

Janz

Posts: 13997

Posted: Mon, 4th Nov 2013 19:11 Post subject:	Quick Quote Quote

lol dafuq? this pos really needs 6gm ram to start? would be bad for those cod kiddies playing on their dads pc ^^

Breezer_

Posts: 10755
Location: Finland

Posted: Mon, 4th Nov 2013 19:15 Post subject:	Quick Quote Quote

JBeckman does it have FOV slider?

Profile
PM

JBeckman
VIP Member

Posts: 34614
Location: Sweden

Posted: Mon, 4th Nov 2013 19:18 Post subject:	Quick Quote Quote

No, I've found nothing like that unfortunately. (I found SMAA in the AA options at the end of the list so I'm using that now over MSAA, there's probably TXAA too when you have a CUDA compatible GPU.) EDIT: You can alter the config file, it's not encrypted like in Black Ops 2

Profile
PM

Claptonvaughn

Posts: 931

Posted: Mon, 4th Nov 2013 19:18 Post subject:

Janz wrote:

lol dafuq? this pos really needs 6gm ram to start? would be bad for those cod kiddies playing on their dads pc ^^

If they're a cod kiddy, they're already on console.

If they're trying to play on PC, there may still be hope for them yet Smile

Profile
PM

MinderMast

Posts: 6172

Posted: Mon, 4th Nov 2013 19:20 Post subject:

sabin1981 wrote:

prudislav wrote:

Steam006 posted "ramfix" using lumaemu to try on RIN

Artificial lock is artificial Laughing

Well, it should be obvious that the lock is artificial, since it simply checks how much RAM you have. Doesn't mean you won't run into any problems once you get around it.

Profile
PM

sabin1981
Mostly Cursed

Posts: 87805

Posted: Mon, 4th Nov 2013 19:21 Post subject:	Quick Quote Quote

Yeah, I'm sure Call of Duty requires a minimum of 6GB of RAM ^_^

Profile
PM

MinderMast

Posts: 6172

Posted: Mon, 4th Nov 2013 19:24 Post subject:

sabin1981 wrote:

Yeah, I'm sure Call of Duty requires a minimum of 6GB of RAM ^_^

That's for history to decide Very Happy

I am just saying that kind of a lock would have to be artificial either way.

Profile
PM

prudislav
VIP Member

Posts: 29148
Location: The land of beer and porn

Posted: Mon, 4th Nov 2013 19:27 Post subject:

MinderMast wrote:

sabin1981 wrote:

prudislav wrote:

Steam006 posted "ramfix" using lumaemu to try on RIN

Artificial lock is artificial Laughing

Well, it should be obvious that the lock is artificial, since it simply checks how much RAM you have. Doesn't mean you won't run into any problems once you get around it.

seems to work Very Happy

Profile
PM

demde

Posts: 6521
Location: Lake Karachay

Posted: Mon, 4th Nov 2013 19:28 Post subject:	Quick Quote Quote

Pretty sure its just a check. As JBeckman reported it used 1.1 GB RAM for him and he is definitely not playing on low. AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D / MSI Gaming X Slim GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER / ASRock B650 PRO RS / Arctic Liquid Freezer III 360 / G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo 2x16GB DDR5-6000 CL30 / Samsung 980 Pro 2 TB / SeaSonic VERTEX GX-850 850W Gold / Lian Li LANCOOL 216

Profile
PM

consolitis
VIP Member

Posts: 27318

Posted: Mon, 4th Nov 2013 19:28 Post subject:	Quick Quote Quote

It's not hard to make it preload assets or whatever into RAM so yeah I expected it to use more than 1.9GB. Also keep in mind asking for 6GB doesn't mean it will use 6GB, maybe 4GB + 2GB OS/apps to be safe. But as it is right now, it's very surprising. Unless RAM usage is higher in MP? TWIN PEAKS is "something of a miracle." "...like nothing else on television." "a phenomenon." "A tangled tale of sex, violence, power, junk food..." "Like Nothing On Earth" ~ WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO SAY CAN ONLY BE SEEN ~ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHTUOgYNRzY Last edited by consolitis on Mon, 4th Nov 2013 19:29; edited 1 time in total

Profile
PM

MOHWGOTY2012
Banned

Posts: 48

Posted: Mon, 4th Nov 2013 19:29 Post subject:	Quick Quote Quote

But the game needs 6 GB

Profile
PM

consolitis
VIP Member

Posts: 27318

Posted: Mon, 4th Nov 2013 19:30 Post subject:

demde wrote:

Pretty sure its just a check.
As JBeckman reported it used 1.1 GB RAM for him and he is definitely not playing on low.

1.9GB actually Smile

Profile
PM

demde

Posts: 6521
Location: Lake Karachay

Posted: Mon, 4th Nov 2013 19:30 Post subject:	Quick Quote Quote

This is a trick! Legit users wont be able to play with less than 6 GB RAM. Pirates will play it and this is excuse to blame PC pirating AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D / MSI Gaming X Slim GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER / ASRock B650 PRO RS / Arctic Liquid Freezer III 360 / G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo 2x16GB DDR5-6000 CL30 / Samsung 980 Pro 2 TB / SeaSonic VERTEX GX-850 850W Gold / Lian Li LANCOOL 216

Profile
PM

JackQ
Non-expret in Derps lagunge

Posts: 14112
Location: Kibbutznik, Israel

Posted: Mon, 4th Nov 2013 19:33 Post subject:	Quick Quote Quote

only 2GB Ram actual use ? "Fuck Denuvo" Your personal opinions != the rest of the forum Last edited by JackQ on Mon, 4th Nov 2013 19:35; edited 2 times in total

Profile
PM

warriormax
Banned

Posts: 3644

Posted: Mon, 4th Nov 2013 19:34 Post subject:	Quick Quote Quote

http://www.xbox360achievements.org/news/news-16571-Infinity-Ward-Explains-Call-of-Duty--Ghosts-Xbox-One---PS4-Resolution-Disparity.html

Profile
PM

ZezoS

Posts: 1937

Posted: Mon, 4th Nov 2013 19:36 Post subject:	Quick Quote Quote

http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/11/04/why-is-call-of-duty-ghosts-is-720p-on-xbox-one-and-1080p-on-playstation "That’s just the way the optimisation came out to. To keep a smooth frame rate we needed to be 720p on Xbox One. That being said, it is being upscaled to 1080p, so it is outputting 1080p on your TV, and for the most part the game does look really good. Some people actually think the textures look a little bit nicer maybe on Xbox than they do on PS4."

Profile
PM

tonizito

Posts: 51175
Location: Portugal, the shithole of Europe.

Posted: Mon, 4th Nov 2013 19:37 Post subject:

ZezoS wrote:

Some people actually think the textures look a little bit nicer maybe on Xbox than they do on PS4."
Laughing

Told you

boundle (thoughts on cracking AITD) wrote:

i guess thouth if without a legit key the installation was rolling back we are all fucking then

Profile
PM

ZezoS

Posts: 1937

Posted: Mon, 4th Nov 2013 19:38 Post subject:

warriormax wrote:

http://www.xbox360achievements.org/news/news-16571-Infinity-Ward-Explains-Call-of-Duty--Ghosts-Xbox-One---PS4-Resolution-Disparity.html Laughing

I loved this part of the article:

""This is the first game on the console and there's a lot for us to learn with the new hardware so it's a long-running process - you compare COD 2 to COD 4 it's a massive leap forward in graphical fidelity."

Yeah, good example, cause there's almost no difference from COD 4 to COD ghosts
Laughing