Oscar nominees 2014
Page 2 of 2 Goto page Previous  1, 2
cirithungol




Posts: 3482
Location: UK
PostPosted: Fri, 17th Jan 2014 14:39    Post subject:
chiv wrote:
Smaug trumps robots and some space debris, so yes.


The molten gold should automatically disqualify it from any award.

Gravity will win, anyway.


chiv wrote:
don't quote me on that
Back to top
VonMisk




Posts: 9471
Location: Hatredland
PostPosted: Fri, 17th Jan 2014 14:46    Post subject:
Let's not forget the wheelbarrow trip. That was some A+ greenscreen.


sar·​casm | \ ˈsär-ˌka-zəm \
1: a sharp and often satirical or ironic utterance designed to cut or give pain
2a: a mode of satirical wit depending for its effect on bitter, caustic, and often ironic language that is usually directed against an individual
b: the use or language of sarcasm
Back to top
monk3ybusin3ss




Posts: 11155

PostPosted: Fri, 17th Jan 2014 14:51    Post subject:
VonMisk wrote:
Unfortunately Smaug is where all the money for FX in Hobbit went.

Pacific Rim all the way. And I'm judging overall effects and not some flying lizard.


It's not even nominated.
Back to top
VonMisk




Posts: 9471
Location: Hatredland
PostPosted: Fri, 17th Jan 2014 14:53    Post subject:
Sad


sar·​casm | \ ˈsär-ˌka-zəm \
1: a sharp and often satirical or ironic utterance designed to cut or give pain
2a: a mode of satirical wit depending for its effect on bitter, caustic, and often ironic language that is usually directed against an individual
b: the use or language of sarcasm
Back to top
WaldoJ
VIP Member



Posts: 32678

PostPosted: Fri, 17th Jan 2014 14:55    Post subject:
VonMisk wrote:
Unfortunately Smaug is where all the money for FX in Hobbit went.

Pacific Rim all the way. And I'm judging overall effects and not some flying lizard.


then gravity because green screen.


pacific rim was shot in Toronto. that's how Toronto looks.


Sin317 wrote:
I win, you lose. Or Go fuck yourself.
Back to top
Saner




Posts: 6877
Location: Uk
PostPosted: Fri, 17th Jan 2014 14:58    Post subject:
So its not a special effect then


ragnarus wrote:

I saw things like that in here and in other "woman problems" topics so...... Am I the only one that thinks some authorities needs to be alerted about Saner and him possibly being a rapist and/or kidnapper ?Smile

Saner is not being serious. Unless its the subject of Santa!
Back to top
B1kudo




Posts: 770

PostPosted: Fri, 17th Jan 2014 15:27    Post subject:
I´v yet to watch a bunch of those, i hope there are good surprises there, but so far:
No Tom Hanks! Gravity!... Sandra Bullock Sad
Back to top
Dustie




Posts: 196

PostPosted: Sun, 2nd Feb 2014 13:33    Post subject:
Anyone know if any good rips of Philomena and Nebraska exists? (frankly I would take a poor quality rip at this point as long as it isn't shot with a cam)


BATMAN: What weighs six ounces, sits in a tree and is very dangerous?
ROBIN: A sparrow with a machine gun!
Back to top
Page 2 of 2 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - Movie & TV Sparks Goto page Previous  1, 2
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group