| Page 14 of 26 |
|
|
 Posted: Sun, 16th Oct 2005 14:11 Post subject: |
|
 |
| Poisonous Mind wrote: | | Starforcefan wrote: | | Poisonous Mind wrote: |
boiling point , anyone ?!? |
lol yea right , boiling point , that scrap . But you prove your point , its possible to do .
and anyway , a linear story if like you play a movie , i dont even have a problem with this . |
but bp aint linear , thats what the fuck i want to see often , im fuckin tired of all half assed shooters , but nah , they rather make another crappy ass shooter dedicated to arcade lovers and they will dick ryde every title cuz this game is amazing , i got 4904854085040 fps |
boiling point is bad joke not a game,cause u gonna need 2gig patch to make it work right 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 16th Oct 2005 14:16 Post subject: It's all marketing |
|
|
They wanted the game to hit the stores before Christmas, well they did make it (^^) And they do that so that it is launched before the new Quake and other shooting crap (^^)
After 2 years of dev and lots of help of game sites and game magazines, it can become a great game, depending on their previews, reviews even if it is as liniar as the sex life of a one day fly...but it should have nice graphs!
Want to play an original shooting game? Ask you daddy if he brings out his old Atari 2600 and start playing Centipede
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 16th Oct 2005 14:31 Post subject: |
|
|
god damit you guys are no help on whether or not i should buy the game  lol
i guess im gona go dl the demo and try it first...
| nightlith wrote: | | lol pirates pretending to be pirates...oh god the irony... |
[quoted from Pirates of the Burning Sea thread]
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 16th Oct 2005 14:43 Post subject: |
|
|
works for me with SR7.Stopv1.0 & latest alcohol WITHOUT win2000 compatiblity, dunno what kinda problems ppl got
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 16th Oct 2005 15:27 Post subject: |
|
|
for me it only worked with SR7.Stop, antiblast 1.6/1.7 didnt work at al (used daemon 3.47)l..different results on different pcs..btw found the game to be too bland too much dirt and too short... any game that takes less than 10 hours to be beaten shouldnt be released.. thats my beef..should be atleast take a month lol.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 16th Oct 2005 15:43 Post subject: |
|
|
To me, none of all that matters. Linear, repeat environments, few different enemies... All that matters to me is... I'm having fun.
Let me just say: I don't like First Person Shooters. I really don't. Half Life, Doom 3, Quake... Haven't liked them since the original Doom and Wolfenstein. (Oh, and the first Star Wars one.)
I"m playing on easy, but I'm not cheating. I find it fun to run around and shoot people, while dealing with the story that's taking place. The graphics are nice, the game is very immersive. In fact, it's so immersive that I can't play for more than about 20 minutes at a time. I have to leave the game and come back now and then.
In the end, it's a game for non-FPS-fanatics, I guess. It sounds like all the hard-core FPSers are disliking this, while those of us who prefer RTS and RPG games are liking it.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 16th Oct 2005 15:44 Post subject: |
|
|
Same here, Antiblaxxx was just crap. Sr7.stop works perfectly fine with the image mounted in DT with all emulation options on.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Swinefur
Banned
Posts: 612
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Sun, 16th Oct 2005 15:56 Post subject: |
|
|
Holy shit, this game sucked.
WAAAAY too short for 2 years of development
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 16th Oct 2005 15:57 Post subject: |
|
|
All of the idiots bashing this game seem jealous of the designers who are trying to do something different for gamers..only to end up bashed by pricks. You bashers have had months of information and even tried the demo before the full game was released to decide "I do not like this game so i will not bother with it". Instead you must grab it and then post within this forum of how you hated it so very much. Well many others state otherwise,the game is selling and will sell for a reason. I was never hyped up about this game. I knew what to expect and what not to expect. I think that they did a good job. Besides..how long can first person shooters last until they are boring anyway? Enough of the bashing god.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 16th Oct 2005 16:01 Post subject: |
|
|
| xxxRIPTERxxx wrote: | | for me it only worked with SR7.Stop, antiblast 1.6/1.7 didnt work at al (used daemon 3.47)l..different results on different pcs..btw found the game to be too bland too much dirt and too short... any game that takes less than 10 hours to be beaten shouldnt be released.. thats my beef..should be atleast take a month lol. |
Sure thing, as soon as people are willing to cough up $200+ to cover the development costs of a game that takes 720 hours to complete. Till then, devs and level designers are still working on a limited budget, so between the coding (engine/ai/sound/compatibility/bugs) and the artistic elements (level/character/weapon design, story, sound, etc.) developers have to choose a balance. In this case, they leaned heavily toward the coding side. At least they got something playable, that looks great, and that at least tries to innovate. I applaud them for it.
As for gameplay, it's an important part of the game but I feel that there's enough AI (this is an FPS, after all), storyline, and scripting to make for a great game. Being linear, I'm afraid, is a necessary evil to get different parts of the story across properly. If every part of the game had only 2 different paths to choose from, the devs would have to make twice the levels, three paths - three times the levels. etc. I think that the amount of level design the devs allowed this game would have made for a 2-3 hour non-linear game. I'd rather have 12 hours of linear gameplay than 2 hours of "choose your own story" gameplay.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 16th Oct 2005 16:09 Post subject: |
|
|
| DarkerIntent wrote: | | All of the idiots bashing this game seem jealous of the designers who are trying to do something different for gamers..only to end up bashed by pricks. You bashers have had months of information and even tried the demo before the full game was released to decide "I do not like this game so i will not bother with it". Instead you must grab it and then post within this forum of how you hated it so very much. Well many others state otherwise,the game is selling and will sell for a reason. I was never hyped up about this game. I knew what to expect and what not to expect. I think that they did a good job. Besides..how long can first person shooters last until they are boring anyway? Enough of the bashing god. |
damn , man , chill the fuck out , u mad or something ? and fear aint orginal , lol , they took so many features from other games and movies , all screens from the suffering , phones and other shit from doom 3 , the bitch from ring and many other things , so dont tell me that fear is orginal
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 16th Oct 2005 16:35 Post subject: |
|
|
Well, I've been playing for an hour now and though I didnt have high hopes, it has lived up to my expectations! My take thus far:
- The graphics: Good use of shadows, and the outdoor scenery has been improved since i played the MP beta considerably. Also the shinyness, though quite unrealistic, appeals to me as I love shiny games ^^ My only quip is that the entire game seems too... err... gloomy? grey? i dunno how to explain it, but it makes even doom3 look colorful.
- The gameplay: Eh, what did you expect? Nothing really out of the ordinary, but I must say that the AI is pretty good. I hate how they just sneak up behind you while you're in the middle of a firefight hehe
- The story: can kiss my ass.
On a misc note, though the game recommends max texture resolution for my setup (a64 3200+ w/ 6800GTOC & 1gb ram), it lags around pretty much every corner like in the demo, and I am forced to bring it down to medium (which isn't so bad). Also the performance could be better in places :\ My card rips through doom3 1028x1024/high/8xAF but puts up quite a struggle with this one at pseudo max-medium 1024x768 w/ 4xAF (and believe me it ain't THAT pretty). I definately see why 7800 owners are more biased to like this game as it justifies owning the card.
What else can I say? When I beat the game maybe I'll give a fuller review ^^ So far enjoying it! Peace,
fear the led zeppelin that was!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
m00h
Posts: 34
Location: Russia / Germany
|
| Posted: Sun, 16th Oct 2005 16:52 Post subject: |
|
|
Are there some cheats for F.E.A.R. ?
That game is boring so I have to play it off with some cheats and then never touch it again.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cohen
Posts: 7155
Location: Rapture
|
| Posted: Sun, 16th Oct 2005 16:53 Post subject: |
|
|
just completed it. its a scary game!
troll detected by SiN
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 16th Oct 2005 17:07 Post subject: |
|
|
finished it !
gfx = 9/10 because of some crappy textures
sound = 10/10 great sounds at the right moment
atmo = 10/10 word 
story = 9/10 good but some holes, maybe there will be FEAR 2
gameplay = 8/10 feels very good with some new features but still a normal FPS gameplay
enemies = 10/10 clever
multiplayer = 8/10 i like it but nothing special
9,1 /10
its a great game but remember its a fps so dont expect a revolution
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Saner
Posts: 6877
Location: Uk
|
| Posted: Sun, 16th Oct 2005 17:23 Post subject: |
|
|
| m00h wrote: | Are there some cheats for F.E.A.R. ?
That game is boring so I have to play it off with some cheats and then never touch it again. |
http://nforce.nl/index.php?menu=quicknav&item=viewnfo&id=96469
| ragnarus wrote: |
I saw things like that in here and in other "woman problems" topics so...... Am I the only one that thinks some authorities needs to be alerted about Saner and him possibly being a rapist and/or kidnapper ? |
Saner is not being serious. Unless its the subject of Santa! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 16th Oct 2005 18:08 Post subject: Re: fear http |
|
|
| offtopic wrote: | | URL REMOVED fear http |
I can't believe you'd try that again.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 16th Oct 2005 19:42 Post subject: |
|
|
The bottom line here is this ..... whoever said they werent affraid at all and it wasnt scary is a lair, every single person that played this game shit their pants on one part or another, so stop trying to look all "tuff".
This game is damn good, just too bad I dont have any "backup" or A.I on my side the whole time, I must admit that the A.I is amazing, some soldiers actually try to recover from a shot or stand aside all dizzy after a nade .. thats awesome, I still havent finished it so I cant comment on this as a whole game yet, but so far its alot better then Doom 3.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fisk
Posts: 9145
Location: Von Oben
|
| Posted: Sun, 16th Oct 2005 19:47 Post subject: |
|
|
| Waffen-SS wrote: | The bottom line here is this ..... whoever said they werent affraid at all and it wasnt scary is a lair, every single person that played this game shit their pants on one part or another, so stop trying to look all "tuff".
|
You are wrong.
I don't consider myself "tuff", I consider this about as scary as the ones who try and prove me wrong when I'm actually expressing my honest opinion.
Yes, yes I'm back.
Somewhat.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 16th Oct 2005 19:52 Post subject: |
|
|
I definitely have never 'shit my pants' over this game, or any other game or movie. If you have, you need serious help and/or should get back on your meds.
I DID however jump a few times at the beginning. I wish they'd carried that through. I haven't beat it yet, though, so there's still a chance of redemption. We'll see.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 16th Oct 2005 20:02 Post subject: |
|
|
People are scared of different things Waffen-SS and aladrinkelahn, it has nothing to do with acting "tuff" or acting all badass, or the need of medication.
I'm sure you 'aladrinkelahn' are scared of lots of things that people here would laugh at.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 16th Oct 2005 20:04 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 16th Oct 2005 20:58 Post subject: |
|
|
yeah this should be in technical but theres about 100 threads and nobody looks at shit.here at least the audience is bigger. my prob is with speach ingame and cutscenes-its non-existent. no other audio probs.tried disabling eax crap in options,no difference. any ideas? i have the latest shit for audigy.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 16th Oct 2005 21:04 Post subject: |
|
|
| pumbertot.1 wrote: | | yeah this should be in technical but theres about 100 threads and nobody looks at shit.here at least the audience is bigger. my prob is with speach ingame and cutscenes-its non-existent. no other audio probs.tried disabling eax crap in options,no difference. any ideas? i have the latest shit for audigy. |
Read Readme.txt this problem is described there and it also has a solution.
Isnt it the first thing you should do if you have technical difficulties?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 14 of 26 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
