You mean CA the character or the movie? If it is the movie, then you are basically saying 95% of the movie was ok
TWIN PEAKS is "something of a miracle."
"...like nothing else on television."
"a phenomenon."
"A tangled tale of sex, violence, power, junk food..."
"Like Nothing On Earth"
Is the first one better than Avengers/Thor? I have it lying on my HDD since forever but I've never had the courage to watch it xD (same for Iron Man 2)
the first one is amazing. it's herpa derpa america fuck yeah on purpose which is just awesome. full on pro propaganda shite. if you watch it for story / performances then it's a typical marvel movie. if you want to be transported back in time and experience a typical run of the mill propaganda movie... then you'll enjoy it
I'll bite then . Leo liked it also so I guess it's really not that bad!
Saw it. I liked it very much. Seeing Cap trying to adjust to the modern times with his outdated way of thinking was interesting. As usual with Marvel movies, lots of snappy one liners, great action, combat is bit more brutal. Acting is what you'd expect. The only one out of place is Redford. Chris Evans showed more emotion than him, and that's a feat.
Spoiler:
Also, how his character got to be one of the Heads of Hydra is beyond me. Just a pencil pusher.
Some pretty major changes to the Marvel movieverse. Can't wait for the ripple effects to appear in Agents of Shield
@Dustie
There are two teasers.
First
Spoiler:
Starts with showing Baron Strucker discussing the events of the movie. It's revealed that he has Loki's staff. He's experimenting with the staff. And one of the products of the experimentation are the twins:Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch. We see them locked in small cells, they seem out of it a bit. Quicksilver is using his speed and slamming into the walls, and Scarlet is manipulating childrens building blocks, then she destroys them.
Second
Spoiler:
Back at the museum, but this time it's the Winter Soldier trying to find out who he is.
Sort of. He doesn't have a body. He stored his mind into a computer.Also, at that point in the movie there's a nice reference to the Wargames movie from 1983. ^^
Starts with showing Baron Strucker discussing the events of the movie. It's revealed that he has Loki's staff. He's experimenting with the staff. And one of the products of the experimentation are the twins:Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch. We see them locked in small cells, they seem out of it a bit. Quicksilver is using his speed and slamming into the walls, and Scarlet is manipulating childrens building blocks, then she destroys them.
Second
Spoiler:
Back at the museum, but this time it's the Winter Soldier trying to find out who he is.
Sweet thanks for the info...
BATMAN: What weighs six ounces, sits in a tree and is very dangerous?
ROBIN: A sparrow with a machine gun!
Watched this last night and found it very very good. Liked how the antagonist was on equal footing with the hero, and action scenes were done very well; seemed more fluid than the first one. Definitely worth watching at least once if you like superhero/action movies.
good movie. and pretty serious for a marvel flick. great action with the shield. nick fury awesome. black widow awesome. cap awesome. and that credits scene. loved it.
8/10
>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ♪ Viva La Vida ♪ <<<<<< <<<<< <<<<<< <<<
I think if you take away the special effects in these marvel movies you get a lot of amateurish camera work that looks like a tv series the arrow or something, thats my opinion, this game is no better than that in those regards..
I couldnt get past at how bad some interior ship scenes looked so cheap in avengers, granted the special effects were top notch, but if u take all that away its barely watchable in most of the parts.
Man of steel, although not liked by many ( i guess die hard superman cannon fans) had some really good cinematography, whenever there werent vfx flying around, the camera work was very solid, and the movie had a good tone and feel, same for the dark knight movies (but those i dont like them so much, they are a bit pretentions imo) i think the middle ground is something like man of steel, good effects, good cinematography, marvel relies a LOT on the effects, its like the director doesnt care for the rest of the visual feel of the movie, i know im coming off as nitpicking, but its no excuse to have this amateurish look on these movies..it turns me off so much, and all the jokes every 2 min that are so flat.., this was not as bad as iron man 2 or 3 but its still in the same vein imo.
Also not many like the xmen movies, and they are saying this movie is the next big marvel thing, but those movies also were very decent movies when it came to the more slow parts, when there wasnt any action going on they had a decent look and tone to them, i guess im alone on this but, i cant get over how bad some scenes look on these movies, and its not just the camera work, its also the actors and the way they behave.
The whole intro to winter soldier looks so low budget.. everything from the choreography to the angles they use and the lighting..they spend the whole budget on the cgi and totaly dont care do get a decent director of photography for these movies, man there is a comic book movie called watchmen, that is how you capture the feel of a true comic book adaptation, not these popcorn money grabs.
I think if you take away the special effects in these marvel movies you get a lot of amateurish camera work that looks like a tv series the arrow or something, thats my opinion, this game is no better than that in those regards..
I couldnt get past at how bad some interior ship scenes looked so cheap in avengers, granted the special effects were top notch, but if u take all that away its barely watchable in most of the parts.
Man of steel, although not liked by many ( i guess die hard superman cannon fans) had some really good cinematography, whenever there werent vfx flying around, the camera work was very solid, and the movie had a good tone and feel, same for the dark knight movies (but those i dont like them so much, they are a bit pretentions imo) i think the middle ground is something like man of steel, good effects, good cinematography, marvel relies a LOT on the effects, its like the director doesnt care for the rest of the visual feel of the movie, i know im coming off as nitpicking, but its no excuse to have this amateurish look on these movies..it turns me off so much, and all the jokes every 2 min that are so flat.., this was not as bad as iron man 2 or 3 but its still in the same vein imo.
Also not many like the xmen movies, and they are saying this movie is the next big marvel thing, but those movies also were very decent movies when it came to the more slow parts, when there wasnt any action going on they had a decent look and tone to them, i guess im alone on this but, i cant get over how bad some scenes look on these movies, and its not just the camera work, its also the actors and the way they behave.
The whole intro to winter soldier looks so low budget.. everything from the choreography to the angles they use and the lighting..they spend the whole budget on the cgi and totaly dont care do get a decent director of photography for these movies, man there is a comic book movie called watchmen, that is how you capture the feel of a true comic book adaptation, not these popcorn money grabs.
Yeah camera work is shit. Nothing even close to this:
Spoiler:
Today I didn't even need to use my AK. I gotta say it was a good day. (c) - Ice Cube
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
I have it lying on my HDD since forever but I've never had the courage to watch it xD (same for Iron Man 2)
so I guess it's really not that bad!
