Tbh I am skeptical about this in car view. I have the strange feeling that its not actual gameplay footage but a setup just for the trailer. It looks to good to be true. Besides why Failsoft never bragged about this such "advanced" feature before?
Tbh I am skeptical about this in car view. I have the strange feeling that its not actual gameplay footage but a setup just for the trailer. It looks to good to be true. Besides why Failsoft never bragged about this such "advanced" feature before?
There's a mini map which is rotating/responding to the wheel moves. That's actual game footage.
Tbh I am skeptical about this in car view. I have the strange feeling that its not actual gameplay footage but a setup just for the trailer. It looks to good to be true. Besides why Failsoft never bragged about this such "advanced" feature before?
They mentioned it multiple times on reddit and twitter replies.
Mister_s wrote:
jackasshole wrote:
Mister_s wrote:
That looks pretty good visually. Where are the people though? Streaming issue maybe?
They removed pedestrians during driving segments because they knew people would just end up trying to run over them.
Are you serious? What a moronic argument from Ubisoft.
No, he's not serious. You can shoot pedestrians in the face if you want to, and you can run them over with your car.
Tbh I am skeptical about this in car view. I have the strange feeling that its not actual gameplay footage but a setup just for the trailer. It looks to good to be true. Besides why Failsoft never bragged about this such "advanced" feature before?
They mentioned it multiple times on reddit and twitter replies.
That dof on the dashboard. I also can't see my dash when driving
5080 | ps5 pro
Sin317-"im 31 years old and still surprised at how much shit comes out of my ass actually ..."
SteamDRM-"Call of Duty is the symbol of the true perfection in every aspect. Call of Duty games are like Mozart's/Beethoven's symphonies"
deadpoetic-"are you new to the cyberspace?"
I wasn't exactly commenting about whether you can kill civilians or not, I was just amazed they used that line as an argument for a (I assume) technical limitation. For a big city, that sequence looks pretty dead/empty.
I thought Ubi said that you *can't* just go around attacking civilians?
I'm pretty sure someone did write that. Depressed the hell out of even me.
Maybe it was referring to melee. Like the game doesn't let you randomly swing your melee weapon, instead it's just contextual "kill moves." That's what I figured, anyways.
The gun, however, you can pull out, aim, and fire as you please.
I thought Ubi said that you *can't* just go around attacking civilians?
I'm pretty sure someone did write that. Depressed the hell out of even me.
Maybe it was referring to melee. Like the game doesn't let you randomly swing your melee weapon, instead it's just contextual "kill moves." That's what I figured, anyways.
The gun, however, you can pull out, aim, and fire as you please.
this, you cant melee pedestrians because its context sensitive, you can shoot them and drive over them though.
Maybe You can on the console too? It would be really bad if not. Thats what the right stick(or mouse) is there for in all driving games , gta etc
5080 | ps5 pro
Sin317-"im 31 years old and still surprised at how much shit comes out of my ass actually ..."
SteamDRM-"Call of Duty is the symbol of the true perfection in every aspect. Call of Duty games are like Mozart's/Beethoven's symphonies"
deadpoetic-"are you new to the cyberspace?"
Sin317-"im 31 years old and still surprised at how much shit comes out of my ass actually ..."
SteamDRM-"Call of Duty is the symbol of the true perfection in every aspect. Call of Duty games are like Mozart's/Beethoven's symphonies"
deadpoetic-"are you new to the cyberspace?"
I thought Ubi said that you *can't* just go around attacking civilians?
Like others said, you can't melee them, since the combat takedowns are context sensitive. You're free to shoot whoever you want however.
Mister_s wrote:
I wasn't exactly commenting about whether you can kill civilians or not, I was just amazed they used that line as an argument for a (I assume) technical limitation. For a big city, that sequence looks pretty dead/empty.
They didn't use that line as an argument, since the line was never said. It came straight out of jackasshole's ass
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
