Gamergate discussion
Page 34 of 231 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 33, 34, 35 ... 229, 230, 231  Next
Steelone




Posts: 1524

PostPosted: Fri, 3rd Oct 2014 15:36    Post subject:
tonizito wrote:
Well... mainstream comics maybe. And even then IMO that is still up in the air.
But everywhere else? No one gives a rat's ass about these dipshits.

TV, movie, book and music industries couldn't care less about them.


TV/Movie has been slightly infiltrated in some areas, but as a whole I would agree. Hopefully it stays that way.
Back to top
djaoni




Posts: 8061

PostPosted: Fri, 3rd Oct 2014 15:40    Post subject:
Back to top
VonMisk




Posts: 9467
Location: Hatredland
PostPosted: Fri, 3rd Oct 2014 17:44    Post subject:
MORPHINEUS wrote:
I still think it's mostly an American thing anyway, they really are a bit warped on some stuff.
Kinda sad when you see there is a whole lot more inequality over there than just this overblown sexism stuff in videogames.

If they'd focus on Education, healthcare and income they'd had a lot more effect on battling inequality as a whole. But that is just my take on the whole inequality thing.


But they are not about inequality, they are about securing their own agenta - that is getting money. Simple as that.
They wouldn't give a fuck about women problems in less developed countries.


Last edited by VonMisk on Fri, 3rd Oct 2014 21:58; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Fri, 3rd Oct 2014 19:35    Post subject:
http://mindlesszombiestudios.com/content/please-stop-erasing-us-your-feminism-or-highway

\o/

and this too!

http://theralphretort.com/doxx-attempt-ends-badly-for-4chan-sjw/

Quote:

You see, when you try to doxx someone who works in the Department of Defense, the Feds do not take that shit lightly. When that person also has a “top secret” security clearance? Well, you end up getting investigated espionage, and possible domestic terrorism. That’s not the spot you want to be in if your some guy from 4chan with extremist feminist ties. Hell, it’s not a spot anyone wants to be in, regardless of background. The FBI doesn’t play around.




But then we have this....



http://www.campusreform.org/?ID=5942

Poker Face This planet Okay
Back to top
Radicalus




Posts: 6422

PostPosted: Fri, 3rd Oct 2014 23:43    Post subject:
You know the real kicker though?

They will study social justice studies, and they won't ever have a normal tax-paying job in their lives, but will get government funds from taxpayers as NGOs.

So you can go on feminism induced guilt trips basically from your own money.
Back to top
Shoshomiga




Posts: 2378
Location: Bulgaria
PostPosted: Sat, 4th Oct 2014 00:08    Post subject: I have left.
I have left.
Back to top
Neon
VIP Member



Posts: 18934
Location: Poland
PostPosted: Sat, 4th Oct 2014 19:15    Post subject:
https://t.co/utyu29uEbA


Wow.


For those without FB:

Back to top
Lopin18




Posts: 3359
Location: US
PostPosted: Sat, 4th Oct 2014 19:48    Post subject:
Shes such a misogynistic cunt for atacking Zoe Quin. I bet shes a trans. A man, go figure. Cool Face
Back to top
Hellifant




Posts: 2008
Location: getMoreMoney
PostPosted: Sat, 4th Oct 2014 19:51    Post subject:
Man, im telling you that Zoe Quinn will fucking bring out a book with her POV of the whole story and ofc she will be the victim/heroine in that book.
Back to top
Steelone




Posts: 1524

PostPosted: Sat, 4th Oct 2014 21:03    Post subject:
Hellifant wrote:
Man, im telling you that Zoe Quinn will fucking bring out a book with her POV of the whole story and ofc she will be the victim/heroine in that book.


Zoe is like a Cleveland Mark Blakemore that people actually take seriously.
Back to top
Radicalus




Posts: 6422

PostPosted: Sat, 4th Oct 2014 21:40    Post subject:
Zoe seemed mentally unstable from the first impression, this only offers more proof.

Wonder when the white knights spring in to action regarding this case.
Back to top
Radicalus




Posts: 6422

PostPosted: Sat, 4th Oct 2014 21:41    Post subject:
Also, imho, she is ugly as fuck, no man would ever want to touch that. Perhaps she fantasizes about being a victim out of lack of desire.
Back to top
ClaudeFTW




Posts: 5074
Location: Bucharest, Romania
PostPosted: Sat, 4th Oct 2014 22:37    Post subject:
Her real name is Chelsea van Valkenburg, daughter of some big family that has a national agency or society or...whatever. Anyway, she's basically destroying the dude that made the zoe post. Sociopathic, compulsive lying bitch cunt.




R7 2700x @4GHz / MSI B450 Tomahawk / beQuiet! Dark Rock 4 / 32GB @3000 MHz / MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z / Samsung 850 EVO 250GB / Western Digital 1TB / Fractal Design Meshify C Dark / SuperFlower Leadex Gold 650W / DELL whatever 27 inch IPS

I usually stream stuff: http://www.twitch.tv/claudeftw
Back to top
consolitis
VIP Member



Posts: 27318

PostPosted: Sat, 4th Oct 2014 22:47    Post subject:
Neon wrote:
https://t.co/utyu29uEbA


Wow.


For those without FB:




You are missing the good part:

Zoe's (then called Locke) admission that she has killed a man (in supposed self defense because he was supposedly raping her) that the author of the FB post claims she was told by Zoe she never reported the incident to police:



TWIN PEAKS is "something of a miracle."
"...like nothing else on television."
"a phenomenon."
"A tangled tale of sex, violence, power, junk food..."
"Like Nothing On Earth"

~ WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO SAY CAN ONLY BE SEEN ~

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHTUOgYNRzY
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Sat, 4th Oct 2014 22:50    Post subject:
She is just a professional victim. She's made a life and career out of playing the victim and getting everyone to feel sorry for her and support her. Manipulative parasite - just like Anita.
Back to top
tonizito
VIP Member



Posts: 51398
Location: Portugal, the shithole of Europe.
PostPosted: Sat, 4th Oct 2014 22:51    Post subject:
Neon wrote:
https://t.co/utyu29uEbA


Wow.


For those without FB:



boundle (thoughts on cracking AITD) wrote:
i guess thouth if without a legit key the installation was rolling back we are all fucking then
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Sat, 4th Oct 2014 23:38    Post subject:
https://twitter.com/RagnarTornquist/status/518505900223762432

*sigh* Sad

And he calls GamerGate an offensive mob, defends Leigh Alexander, is boycotting Intel and flatout states that there is no corruption in journalism. Unfuckingreal. Unfollowed and I certainly won't be purchasing any of his games in the future.


Last edited by sabin1981 on Sun, 5th Oct 2014 00:02; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
harry_theone




Posts: 11210
Location: The Land of Thread Reports
PostPosted: Sat, 4th Oct 2014 23:52    Post subject:
Hooray, more for the army of the dumb!

inb4 2015 main game genre: favoritized female characters Rolling Eyes
Back to top
djaoni




Posts: 8061

PostPosted: Sun, 5th Oct 2014 00:03    Post subject:
I still wonder what world these people actually live in.
Back to top
Morphineus
VIP Member



Posts: 24883
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Sun, 5th Oct 2014 00:19    Post subject:
I feel sorry for the children these people have/will have.
No doubt they will be pushed into a way of thinking instead of letting them decide for themselves.


Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Sun, 5th Oct 2014 00:23    Post subject:
Morphineus wrote:
No doubt they will be pushed into a way of thinking instead of letting them decide for themselves.


Ragnar only lets his daughter play games that portray women positively.

"But daddy, I want to play something else. Can I please play Read Dead Redemption?"
"NO! You'll play what I tell you to play. You need to be educated on what fictionalised games you're allowed to experience. Now shut up and play Gone Home"
Back to top
The_Zeel




Posts: 14922

PostPosted: Sun, 5th Oct 2014 00:31    Post subject:
"boyfriend / spouse / lover" Laughing
Back to top
tonizito
VIP Member



Posts: 51398
Location: Portugal, the shithole of Europe.
PostPosted: Sun, 5th Oct 2014 00:44    Post subject:
harry_theone wrote:
Hooray, more for the army of the dumb!

inb4 2015 main game genre: favoritized female characters Rolling Eyes
Best thing about this are the dumb asses on both sides:

Quote:
There's murmurings in the twitterverse of Intel's shares going up after pulling their ads from Gamasutra...


lol wut wrote:
So just to be clear, Intel pulling out had a bunch of gamers buy a bunch of Intel material, and also had their stocks increase.

Something tells me a bunch of other companies are considering the option way more strongly than previously now.
...fucking idiot Laughing


boundle (thoughts on cracking AITD) wrote:
i guess thouth if without a legit key the installation was rolling back we are all fucking then
Back to top
Lazloisdavrock




Posts: 263
Location: a place
PostPosted: Sun, 5th Oct 2014 05:21    Post subject:
soap opera


Back to top
red_avatar




Posts: 4567

PostPosted: Sun, 5th Oct 2014 09:05    Post subject:
sabin1981 wrote:
Morphineus wrote:
No doubt they will be pushed into a way of thinking instead of letting them decide for themselves.


Ragnar only lets his daughter play games that portray women positively.

"But daddy, I want to play something else. Can I please play Read Dead Redemption?"
"NO! You'll play what I tell you to play. You need to be educated on what fictionalised games you're allowed to experience. Now shut up and play Gone Home"


I don't mind there being strong female characters in games. In fact I welcome them! But what I can't stand, is people who defend hypocritical cunts like Leigh Alexander, who claim GamerGate is about being allowed to be sexist, etc. The true issue is how the media warps the truth, bends over backward to believe even totally psycho bitches like Zoe and lacks any type of "feel" with its own audience.
Back to top
Morphineus
VIP Member



Posts: 24883
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Sun, 5th Oct 2014 09:12    Post subject:
red_avatar wrote:
sabin1981 wrote:
Morphineus wrote:
No doubt they will be pushed into a way of thinking instead of letting them decide for themselves.


Ragnar only lets his daughter play games that portray women positively.

"But daddy, I want to play something else. Can I please play Read Dead Redemption?"
"NO! You'll play what I tell you to play. You need to be educated on what fictionalised games you're allowed to experience. Now shut up and play Gone Home"


I don't mind there being strong female characters in games. In fact I welcome them!


Don't think anyone would mind that, in his case I'm just annoyed that he acts like there are none to little games out there... just to push his agenda.

And I highly doubt his daughter really asked that tbh.


Back to top
harry_theone




Posts: 11210
Location: The Land of Thread Reports
PostPosted: Sun, 5th Oct 2014 11:36    Post subject:
tonizito wrote:
harry_theone wrote:
Hooray, more for the army of the dumb!

inb4 2015 main game genre: favoritized female characters Rolling Eyes
Best thing about this are the dumb asses on both sides:

Quote:
There's murmurings in the twitterverse of Intel's shares going up after pulling their ads from Gamasutra...


That's how you make profit from a totally irrelevant and unnecessary discussion Very Happy
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Sun, 5th Oct 2014 12:34    Post subject:
I have nothing against games with strong female roles, I *welcome* them, but yes.. I'm against people that act like there aren't any just so they can push their own agenda. Of course she didn't ask that (well, perhaps.. who knows? RDR is considered a MASTERPIECE by pretty much everyone... but it has "prostitutes" and "damsels" thus it's something he obviously wouldn't allow his daughter to play. YAY! Let's screen everyone's games unless it conforms! >_>) but I'm really getting sick of the whole "no strong roles" bullshit.

It's irritating and disingenuous.
Back to top
Steelone




Posts: 1524

PostPosted: Sun, 5th Oct 2014 12:38    Post subject:
sabin1981 wrote:
I have nothing against games with strong female roles, I *welcome* them, but yes.. I'm against people that act like there aren't any just so they can push their own agenda. Of course she didn't ask that (well, perhaps.. who knows? RDR is considered a MASTERPIECE by pretty much everyone... but it has "prostitutes" and "damsels" thus it's something he obviously wouldn't allow his daughter to play. YAY! Let's screen everyone's games unless it conforms! >_>) but I'm really getting sick of the whole "no strong roles" bullshit.

It's irritating and disingenuous.


That's pretty much my view on it as well. People should write strong roles for female characters because they want to, not because they're forced to.
Back to top
Radicalus




Posts: 6422

PostPosted: Sun, 5th Oct 2014 14:19    Post subject:
Here's my ultimate argument:

It's established and accepted by even these journos, that violence in games won't make people more aggressive.

Then an anology:

Women presented in a specific way in certain games won't make people draw conclusions about real women IRL.

Simple.
Back to top
Page 34 of 231 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - General chatter Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 33, 34, 35 ... 229, 230, 231  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group