Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare
Page 42 of 50 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 41, 42, 43 ... 48, 49, 50  Next
daimos84




Posts: 187

PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 12:48    Post subject:
Yeah netcode is awesome

See:

even 553 is ok for Activision! I am very angry, as i really enjoed gameplay for some moments. It' funny! May be after a month i shall say another thing, but now i lke it. And this netcode...it's ruinning all gameplay
Back to top
consolitis
VIP Member



Posts: 27318

PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 12:57    Post subject:
KillerCrocker wrote:
So, anyone knows what does filmic ssaa 2tx actually does ? Its ebst aa ive ever seen and I would like to know more


It's probably SMAA T2x but modified with a wider than "normal" resolve filter, like TXAA uses.


TWIN PEAKS is "something of a miracle."
"...like nothing else on television."
"a phenomenon."
"A tangled tale of sex, violence, power, junk food..."
"Like Nothing On Earth"

~ WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO SAY CAN ONLY BE SEEN ~

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHTUOgYNRzY
Back to top
Bob Barnsen




Posts: 31974
Location: Germoney
PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 12:58    Post subject:
Laughing @ the pings man

Peer-to-Peer hosting at its best


Enthoo Evolv ATX TG // Asus Prime x370 // Ryzen 1700 // Gainward GTX 1080 // 16GB DDR4-3200
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 13:15    Post subject:
Consoles are blamed for bad pings, but surely this shit is not acceptable on consoles either. Who can play like that, even with a controller?
Back to top
difm




Posts: 6618

PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 13:24    Post subject:
How to get the proper ping displayed?


i5 6600k @ 4.3 GHz | MSI z170 Gaming M7 | 32GB Kingston HyperX Fury | 850 Evo 500GB | EVGA 1070 SC | Seasonic X-660 | CM Storm Stryker
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 13:25    Post subject:
LeoNatan wrote:
Consoles are blamed for bad pings, but surely this shit is not acceptable on consoles either. Who can play like that, even with a controller?


It was terrible back when I was playing CoD4 on the 360 Sad Nobody was happy with it there either, but Activision were never willing to pay for servers - and even now with Microsoft's "Azure" cloud bullshit, we're still being slammed with p2p/matchmaking.

~edit~

https://community.sledgehammergames.com/community/sledgehammer/blog/2014/11/07/excitement-from-call-of-duty-advanced-warfare-launch-week-and-updates-coming-soon

Quote:
Also, we've been asked several times about the status of dedicated server support. Activision shared this statement earlier this week:

Advanced Warfare employs game servers hosted at data centers globally on all platforms and listen servers as part of our proprietary matchmaking system. Our goal is to ensure the best possible connection and greatest gameplay experience regardless of location and time of day.


Are they fucking serious!? Facepalm
Back to top
cyclonefr




Posts: 7011

PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 13:33    Post subject:
sabin1981 wrote:
dat ping tho

Matchmaking and p2p hosting are the goddamn bane of online shooters. We can thank consoles for THAT, cyclone Sad


Yeah 'cause consoles aren't powerful enough for dedicated servers Rolling Eyes

Or maybe Activision is just cheap ?...
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 13:39    Post subject:
cyclonefr wrote:
sabin1981 wrote:
dat ping tho

Matchmaking and p2p hosting are the goddamn bane of online shooters. We can thank consoles for THAT, cyclone Sad


Yeah 'cause consoles aren't powerful enough for dedicated servers Rolling Eyes

Or maybe Activision is just cheap ?...


Are you serious? Of course consoles are to blame for the lack of dedicated servers, how can you even try and disagree with a straight face? It has nothing do with "power" but you cannot deny that the advent of console multiplayer has been the root cause of why there are so few dedicated servers, instead relying on bullshit "listen" p2p bullshit. Please though, feel free to dazzle me with the list of games on console that have dedicated servers. Activision were obviously too cheap to implement servers for CoD 1-4, BLoPS/BLoPS2, MW3 on PC. You nailed it.
Back to top
monk3ybusin3ss




Posts: 11155

PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 13:48    Post subject:
Blops 1 & 2 had dedicated servers on PC. Treyarch are the only one who has them, even World at War had them.
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 13:50    Post subject:
The first three CoD titles had them on PC (we didn't get CoD3), as did MW3 and the two BLoPS games, yeah. Ghosts and MW2 had the bullshit consolised "listen" server nonsense. Hell, we've had dedicated servers for games ever since Quake 1.
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 13:53    Post subject:
MW1 also had user-runnable dedicated server exe.

I don't get what the problem with consoles is, they could create an EXE or a linux binary to serve as the server logic, and allow people with strong connections to download and run. Then have the console durrs that can't understand a zit don't see a server list but have the game choose the most near server.
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 13:55    Post subject:
It's sad and it's destroying multiplayer shooters with the cheap cop-out bullshit Sad Hell, I don't even play online games but even I know the push for "listen" and matchmaking is killing everything -- and the worst thing is, there's no reason NOT to have them for console either. Just have some other server hosting company take care of it, as happens with every other dedicated server. Activision/EA choosing to run their own servers is just greed and spite which punishes players.
Back to top
Ankh




Posts: 23342
Location: Trelleborg
PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 14:01    Post subject:
Just gave it a spin using bots only...I thought the lag would be gone/less...but nope.


shitloads of new stuff in my pc. Cant keep track of it all.
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 14:02    Post subject:
The fact that it requires net access and authentication even for "offline" Combat Training or LAN is just... Facepalm
Back to top
Yondaime
VIP Member



Posts: 11741

PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 14:10    Post subject:
⁢⁢


Last edited by Yondaime on Mon, 2nd Dec 2024 15:37; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
monk3ybusin3ss




Posts: 11155

PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 14:11    Post subject:
To add insult to injury, there seems to be no anticheat. Not only are the cheaters flooding the game, but now they seem to control it completely. People are already complaining about being thrown in to hacked lobbies and getting 9999XP/kill, etc.

It's MW 2 all over again. Laughing Facepalm
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 14:12    Post subject:
@Yondaime

p2pbeard listenlord Laughing
Back to top
cyclonefr




Posts: 7011

PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 14:12    Post subject:
Ankh wrote:
Just gave it a spin using bots only...I thought the lag would be gone/less...but nope.


I tried it vs bots, there is no lag since you host... Don't spread bullshit kthx. My ping is perfect.

But yeah, other than that the ping is usually terrible because of P2P.

I don't see why console has anything to do with it though. Activision could simply ship dedicated server apps to host from OSX/Windows/Linux, even for consoles.

Yes, dedicated server seems to have stopped with consoles, but it's just a coincidence. P2P wasn't that much used before, and PS360 came during the P2P era, therefore developers thought it was cheaper to make games P2P.

Hell don't you remember PC exclusive games like WarCraft III that are STILL P2P ?...
Back to top
OrignalSpaceJockey




Posts: 2383
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 14:13    Post subject:
escalibur wrote:





Razz


This has killed the game for me.... But I guess it goes both ways?
Back to top
cyclonefr




Posts: 7011

PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 14:16    Post subject:
Yeah. And because the pings are usually terrible, it goes like that. Some games are really bad because you end up with "1 red bar", and all fights end up like this.

Also many noobs are playing with the laser, overpowered weapon...


Back to top
OrignalSpaceJockey




Posts: 2383
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 14:19    Post subject:
cyclonefr wrote:
Yeah. And because the pings are usually terrible, it goes like that. Some games are really bad because you end up with "1 red bar", and all fights end up like this.

Also many noobs are playing with the laser, overpowered weapon...


HATE that laser weapon Evil or Very Mad
Back to top
Radicalus




Posts: 6422

PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 15:12    Post subject:
Essential MP tip, I am aboot to try this out.

http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=336908166
Back to top
beyondthesun




Posts: 275

PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 15:13    Post subject:
What the hell is this bullshit man.. This game manages to load a single linear level (which you can complete in about 10 minutes) longer than, let's say, any sandbox game's open world. Not only that, but the cutscenes are even stuttering while it loads.. Good job effed up CoD engines..
Back to top
JBeckman
VIP Member



Posts: 34968
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 15:15    Post subject:
Turn off the shader cache options, not to be confused with the shadow cache settings.
(If you have it enabled then by default the game will load halfway and then the other half gets loaded when the cutscene has finished playing, you can also enable the second shader cache setting so it loads data during said cutscenes but it can introduce stuttering and it'll still load faster if you disable the caching entirely.)
Back to top
Ankh




Posts: 23342
Location: Trelleborg
PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 17:16    Post subject:
cyclonefr wrote:


I tried it vs bots, there is no lag since you host... Don't spread bullshit kthx. My ping is perfect.


Umm..you know...ive got a kick ass computer and badass internet. it was my FIRST run of the game in multiplayer and I only played with bots.

I dont really care much about your ping or setup..infact..I dont care about you in ANY way, I was clearly just sharing my experience to the thread. If you dont belive I had lag - fine, you dont have to belive me. But dont fucking tell me what I said was bullshit cos I fucking know what I experienced.
Back to top
KamamuraCZ




Posts: 408

PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 17:26    Post subject:
So... what am I doing wrong? I have a Core i5 3570K clocked to 4.2Ghz, GTX 970 slightly overclocked too, 8GB of fast 2100 RAM underclocked to 1600 for less memory latency...

... and yet, the game runs like crap on a FullHD res. I tried to lower the res from Extra to High, everything looks like crap, stutters are here to stay.

The fact that you have to wait a minute or two after you change a single Video option does not help too.

So, where is the trick? What do I disable or lower to get passable, and most importantly, consistent framerate?
Back to top
tonizito
VIP Member



Posts: 51395
Location: Portugal, the shithole of Europe.
PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 17:27    Post subject:
monk3ybusin3ss wrote:
To add insult to injury, there seems to be no anticheat. Not only are the cheaters flooding the game, but now they seem to control it completely. People are already complaining about being thrown in to hacked lobbies and getting 9999XP/kill, etc.

It's MW 2 all over again. Laughing Facepalm
HAHAHA LOL
Pity the fools who grab this on the PC for some MP


boundle (thoughts on cracking AITD) wrote:
i guess thouth if without a legit key the installation was rolling back we are all fucking then
Back to top
cyclonefr




Posts: 7011

PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 18:00    Post subject:
KamamuraCZ wrote:
So... what am I doing wrong? I have a Core i5 3570K clocked to 4.2Ghz, GTX 970 slightly overclocked too, 8GB of fast 2100 RAM underclocked to 1600 for less memory latency...

... and yet, the game runs like crap on a FullHD res. I tried to lower the res from Extra to High, everything looks like crap, stutters are here to stay.

The fact that you have to wait a minute or two after you change a single Video option does not help too.

So, where is the trick? What do I disable or lower to get passable, and most importantly, consistent framerate?


Set textures and shadows to Automatic. That way they will be rendered in real time to the best quality possible for your PC without any stuttering (kinda like Unreal engine does).
Back to top
JBeckman
VIP Member



Posts: 34968
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 18:17    Post subject:
Native would be full res and was how it worked in some of the previous COD games, here it's called Extra.
(Automatic sets them according to your hardware and in this case it's probably very VRAM specific.)
Back to top
Janz




Posts: 13999

PostPosted: Sat, 8th Nov 2014 18:22    Post subject:
have played it for only 10 min, had performance problems and those texture bugs. tried it again with the patch, set everything to high/extra (except supersampling aa) and disabled the shader loading stuff. works fine now without any stutterung (770gtx 2gb)
Back to top
Page 42 of 50 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - PC Games Arena Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 41, 42, 43 ... 48, 49, 50  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group