Interstellar [Nolan/2014]
Page 9 of 13 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13  Next
me7




Posts: 3942

PostPosted: Tue, 11th Nov 2014 20:40    Post subject:
3. AFAIK, by mastering gravity you can bend spacetime to your will and create a warp drive. The film doesn't go into detail how far technology has actually progressed in those 132 years. Maybe someone who understands physics better can elaborate.
4. Too close to earth could affect spacetime on earth too much. Also, Hollywood loves hibernation sleep Wink

1. Very good point, didn't occur to me but you're right. Horrordee, I think you're confusing Miller and Mann.
Back to top
Raccoon




Posts: 3160
Location: Poland
PostPosted: Tue, 11th Nov 2014 23:25    Post subject:
@thudo
 Spoiler:
 

--------------

Retro sci-fi art for Interstellar.



So Much Win

Wish I could find a bigger version. Sad


"Anatidaephobia is the fear that somewhere in the world there is a duck watching you."

Fuck Polish government for oppressing women!

"People are such awful conversationalists that they’ll interrupt you when you’re answering a question they asked."
Back to top
thudo




Posts: 6309
Location: Mellonville North, Canada
PostPosted: Wed, 12th Nov 2014 00:19    Post subject:
 Spoiler:
 


Edit:

Quote:
1. I think they said there was less gravity, not more.
It was 130% Earth Gravity.. just re-watched from home. Still doesn't account for other worlds even with similar Earth gravity where on Earth they required a two-stage rocket. Neutral


MSI GT72S 6QF Dominator Pro S 29th Anniversary Intel i7 6820HK @ 4.0Ghz, 32GB DDR4-2133 RAM, 2x256GB Raid0 Toshiba NVMe 2.5 inch PCIe SSD, Nvidia Geforce GTX 980 OC'ed 200+ Core / 200+ Mem, 17.3 inch LG IPS HD Display @ 75Hz, Intel 7265AC Wifi, Windows 10 Pro BIOS version: .112 EC Firmware version: .105

Current Broadband speed record: 329.1 Mb/sec down // 21.73 Mb/sec up
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/3933292.png


Last edited by thudo on Wed, 12th Nov 2014 01:28; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
Invasor
Moderator



Posts: 7638
Location: On the road
PostPosted: Wed, 12th Nov 2014 00:33    Post subject:
Horrordee wrote:
7/10 for me, and that's being kind.

First half was really really good, I was certainly enjoying it and was excited to see where they'd take it.

Where they took it was down a shitty alleyway I didn't want to walk. Massively dissapointjng bordering on the retarded at points.

Ah well


This is how I feel. A few problems I could ignore (like why would you go to another galaxy, and even worse, through a wormhole, if mars is nearby and it could be terraformed... or that bullshit about love transcending galaxies and blabla), but the library scene was just too much... and why on earth would you be able to move the watch or dust but not a pen to write the fucking equations? Or just write it with the dust anyway...
Not to mention landing in any planet is really unnecessary, they could just fly by and send probes instead, but ok, this is one of the things I can ignore, the whole gigant wave and sparking (jumpstarting, whatever) the engine looked good. Now the blackhole and library stuff was just crap.

Also, did anyone notice the parallels with Contact (1997, carl sagan novel)? It seemed way too similar to be just a coincidence, either it was inspired or just copied from it. I guess inspired, since they even got mcconaughey in it. It's almost the same story, but Interstellar is too exaggerated and less poetic.

P.S. I should say though, it is cool to see a science fiction movie being successful, its nice to see a movie were nasa saves the planet (instead of the military, or whatever), and the audiovisual references to 2001 were really good.


Last edited by Invasor on Sat, 15th Nov 2014 13:26; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
zibz
Banned



Posts: 556

PostPosted: Wed, 12th Nov 2014 01:05    Post subject:
Gonna watch this soon, hated DKR but I have average expectations, Nolan has issues pacing his films.
Back to top
Raccoon




Posts: 3160
Location: Poland
PostPosted: Wed, 12th Nov 2014 01:37    Post subject:
thudo wrote:
however Saturn is 2.5x more dense than Jupiter
wat

Average density:

Jupiter 1326 kg/m³

Saturn 687 kg/m³

Source: http://personal.ph.surrey.ac.uk/~phs2ps/2ess/ess%20lecture9%20printed.pdf

(Sorry to all the guys interested in movie discussion for this slight OT. Embarassed)


"Anatidaephobia is the fear that somewhere in the world there is a duck watching you."

Fuck Polish government for oppressing women!

"People are such awful conversationalists that they’ll interrupt you when you’re answering a question they asked."
Back to top
thudo




Posts: 6309
Location: Mellonville North, Canada
PostPosted: Wed, 12th Nov 2014 03:21    Post subject:
Nevermind.. found another source. I think I was looking at density but used this for my comparisons: http://infographichef.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/planets-3.png

 Spoiler:
 


Edit: Also found this about the ending but cannot substantiate it:
 Spoiler:
 


MSI GT72S 6QF Dominator Pro S 29th Anniversary Intel i7 6820HK @ 4.0Ghz, 32GB DDR4-2133 RAM, 2x256GB Raid0 Toshiba NVMe 2.5 inch PCIe SSD, Nvidia Geforce GTX 980 OC'ed 200+ Core / 200+ Mem, 17.3 inch LG IPS HD Display @ 75Hz, Intel 7265AC Wifi, Windows 10 Pro BIOS version: .112 EC Firmware version: .105

Current Broadband speed record: 329.1 Mb/sec down // 21.73 Mb/sec up
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/3933292.png
Back to top
cirithungol




Posts: 3482
Location: UK
PostPosted: Sat, 15th Nov 2014 00:19    Post subject:
Hellifant wrote:
Anyone know when the OST will be released ? I thought it would come out as soon as the movie hit the theatre´s but i could not find any release so far.


There is a release now Smile

EDIT: Seems to be the standard edition, not the deluxe edition.


chiv wrote:
don't quote me on that
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73226
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Sat, 15th Nov 2014 01:09    Post subject:
Quote:
I don’t care if Interstellar is the most important science fiction film of the last 20 years, having beautiful Anne Hathaway in the cast is sexist and ostracizing to ugly women

That’s one small flow detour for blood, three steps forward for tissue paper manufacturers

A few weeks ago, Paramount Pictures premiered Interstellar, a powerful step forward for film enthusiasts and science fiction alike. However, slightly before the big moment, trailers of the film reminded us how much progress remains to be accomplished back on Earth.

A number of the actors involved on this incredible project were interviewed in the hours leading to the premiere. One of those actors was Anne Hathaway, who chose to dress, for this special occasion, in a dress.

“I got to set every day and my mind was blown day after day after day, just by the sets because we — Oops. I can’t tell you,” she said. “Never mind. Never mind. Never mind.”

No one knows why Hathaway chose to wear a dress on television during a massive press event. From what we can tell, a woman who goes by the name of Donatella Versace in New York made the dress for her, and is just as bewildered as Hathaway must be that anyone might be upset about her creation. Hathaway apologized on Friday during a live Paramount broadcast for wearing the dress, stating that “the dress I wore this week… I made a big mistake and I aroused many people, and I’m very sorry about this.” Still, Hathaway’s personal apology doesn’t make up for the fact that no one at Paramount saw fit to stop her from representing the female community with clothing that makes 80 percent of the world’s female population jealous and 98% of the straight mail population aroused. No one asked her to cover herself in a siberian coat, because presumably they didn’t think about it. It wasn’t worth worrying about.

This is the sort of casual misogyny that stops women from entering certain scientific fields. They see a girl like that on TV and they don’t feel pretty. They see a mental image of greased up men in front of their computers and they know they aren’t attractive. They hear comments about “hotties” while out at a bar with fellow male students, and they decide to perform sex change operations. And those are the women who actually make it that far. Those are the few who persevered even when they were discouraged from filming CSI episodes as dead bodies, made for DVD horror movies where they had to show their breasts, and do meth throughout high school. These are the women who forged on despite the fact that they were told by elementary school classmates and the media at large that girls who want to be attractive to male audiences in movies need to look beautiful. This is the climate women who dream of working at Hollywood or Bollywood come up against, every single day. This dress is representative of all of that, and Paramount has yet to issue a statement or apologize for that.

Quote:
No no ugly feminist women are toooootally making men be attracted to them, just ask all the dudes that loved Anne Hathaway’s dress. http://bit.ly/1EGmBmN http://bit.ly/1qJhr2S
— Brianna Wu (@retardedbutch) November 15, 2014


The “female” game developer Brianna Wu brilliantly captures what that dress on that body represents in a community that continues to struggle , if not outright fail, to be attractive to men.

Update Nov 15, 2:00PM ET: The amazingly talented Anita Sarcasm added some powerful thoughts to this piece that I wish I’d included when it was originally published.


http://thederpreviews.wordpress.com/2014/11/15/i-dont-care-if-interstellar-is-the-most-important-science-fiction-film-of-the-last-20-years-having-beautiful-anne-hathaway-in-the-cast-is-sexist-and-ostracizing-to-ugly-women/
Back to top
thudo




Posts: 6309
Location: Mellonville North, Canada
PostPosted: Sat, 15th Nov 2014 01:39    Post subject:
Are You Serious Reaction


MSI GT72S 6QF Dominator Pro S 29th Anniversary Intel i7 6820HK @ 4.0Ghz, 32GB DDR4-2133 RAM, 2x256GB Raid0 Toshiba NVMe 2.5 inch PCIe SSD, Nvidia Geforce GTX 980 OC'ed 200+ Core / 200+ Mem, 17.3 inch LG IPS HD Display @ 75Hz, Intel 7265AC Wifi, Windows 10 Pro BIOS version: .112 EC Firmware version: .105

Current Broadband speed record: 329.1 Mb/sec down // 21.73 Mb/sec up
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/3933292.png
Back to top
Vladi




Posts: 945

PostPosted: Sat, 15th Nov 2014 12:33    Post subject:
Interstellar 9/10

WOW!!
Back to top
harry_theone




Posts: 11228
Location: The Land of Thread Reports
PostPosted: Mon, 17th Nov 2014 12:49    Post subject:
Yep def 9/10 but GOTG is still my number one this year. What a long movie.
Back to top
Acer




Posts: 3156

PostPosted: Mon, 17th Nov 2014 13:40    Post subject:
3.5/5

Started pretty good but it pretty soon became clear that this was yet another Nolan film. Really well made and well crafted but shallow and a story that went nowhere fast. I kinda had two negative feelings seeing this, one was the fact that it was the same old tired story dressed up as something alot more sofisticated (matt damons character empasized this especially) and the other was that Nolan tried very hard to recreate a modern 2001 space oddysey.


Dont mess with God, he can impregnate your girlfriend/wife without taking his pants off!
Back to top
thudo




Posts: 6309
Location: Mellonville North, Canada
PostPosted: Mon, 17th Nov 2014 20:25    Post subject:
harry_theone wrote:
Yep def 9/10 but GOTG is still my number one this year. What a long movie.
.. but wants extended cut adding 10-30mins More..M-O-A-R!!! NOW!!! [shakes fist into earth!!]


MSI GT72S 6QF Dominator Pro S 29th Anniversary Intel i7 6820HK @ 4.0Ghz, 32GB DDR4-2133 RAM, 2x256GB Raid0 Toshiba NVMe 2.5 inch PCIe SSD, Nvidia Geforce GTX 980 OC'ed 200+ Core / 200+ Mem, 17.3 inch LG IPS HD Display @ 75Hz, Intel 7265AC Wifi, Windows 10 Pro BIOS version: .112 EC Firmware version: .105

Current Broadband speed record: 329.1 Mb/sec down // 21.73 Mb/sec up
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/3933292.png
Back to top
(Nexus)




Posts: 2807
Location: 192.168.1.72
PostPosted: Mon, 17th Nov 2014 20:51    Post subject:
Jessica Chastain Drooling
Back to top
cirithungol




Posts: 3482
Location: UK
PostPosted: Tue, 18th Nov 2014 00:08    Post subject:
The deluxe edition soundtrack is now available, but it still doesn't contain the music from the docking scene Okay Are You Serious Y U No????

There will be a third release called the 'The Illuminated Star Projection Edition' to be released at a later date. I'm so glad I don't pay for music Rage


chiv wrote:
don't quote me on that
Back to top
consolitis
VIP Member



Posts: 27318

PostPosted: Tue, 18th Nov 2014 10:00    Post subject:
"That's my secret girls, I don't pay for anything!" Cool Face


TWIN PEAKS is "something of a miracle."
"...like nothing else on television."
"a phenomenon."
"A tangled tale of sex, violence, power, junk food..."
"Like Nothing On Earth"

~ WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO SAY CAN ONLY BE SEEN ~

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHTUOgYNRzY
Back to top
Hellifant




Posts: 2008
Location: getMoreMoney
PostPosted: Wed, 19th Nov 2014 14:39    Post subject:
cirithungol wrote:
The deluxe edition soundtrack is now available, but it still doesn't contain the music from the docking scene Okay Are You Serious Y U No????

There will be a third release called the 'The Illuminated Star Projection Edition' to be released at a later date. I'm so glad I don't pay for music Rage





https://soundcloud.com/hossam-sarhan/sets/interstellar-ost-full-soundtrack


I think "Coward" is the track from the docking scene
Back to top
cirithungol




Posts: 3482
Location: UK
PostPosted: Wed, 19th Nov 2014 15:32    Post subject:
Hellifant wrote:
I think "Coward" is the track from the docking scene


'Coward' is the fight scene with Mann on the ice planet. According to Zimmer, the missing track was left off the CD due to an error Facepalm and will be made available as a free download.

This is the missing track with sound effects (in partciular, the propulsive rendition of the main theme from 2:25 onwards):



"Come on, TARS!" So Much Win


chiv wrote:
don't quote me on that
Back to top
8ball




Posts: 587

PostPosted: Fri, 21st Nov 2014 21:13    Post subject:
8.5 /10


initial impression right after was a 7.5 but after letting the movie soak in i give it another point because of the dimensional concept, feels a bit like contact towards the end of the movie and i loved that one


i'm kind of the opposite of some of you i thought the first third was meh but enjoyed the 2nd third a lot (space travelling, planet exploration) and the 3rd 3rd was okay



@Yondaime

 Spoiler:
 
Back to top
bani789




Posts: 1436

PostPosted: Sat, 22nd Nov 2014 08:21    Post subject:
8/10 - would be higher if it weren't for some of the following things

 Spoiler:
 


I'd probably have more complaints but I still think overall it was a great movie. Saw it in IMAX too, love IMAX. Don't go there very often.
Back to top
garus
VIP Member



Posts: 34200

PostPosted: Sat, 22nd Nov 2014 10:36    Post subject:
snip


Last edited by garus on Tue, 27th Aug 2024 21:44; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Hellifant




Posts: 2008
Location: getMoreMoney
PostPosted: Sun, 23rd Nov 2014 00:57    Post subject:




So Much Win So Much Win So Much Win So Much Win So Much Win So Much Win So Much Win So Much Win So Much Win So Much Win So Much Win So Much Win So Much Win So Much Win So Much Win So Much Win So Much Win So Much Win
Back to top
cirithungol




Posts: 3482
Location: UK
PostPosted: Sun, 23rd Nov 2014 02:59    Post subject:
So, apparently the film version was altered by the sound mixers during post production with organ and choir elements from 'Mountains' added in, which is why this track sounds like a synth demo.

I Am Disappoint I Am Disappoint I Am Disappoint I Am Disappoint I Am Disappoint I Am Disappoint I Am Disappoint I Am Disappoint


chiv wrote:
don't quote me on that
Back to top
bani789




Posts: 1436

PostPosted: Sun, 23rd Nov 2014 03:06    Post subject:
Hellifant wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3zvVGJrTP8&feature=youtu.be



So Much Win So Much Win So Much Win So Much Win So Much Win So Much Win So Much Win So Much Win So Much Win So Much Win So Much Win So Much Win So Much Win So Much Win So Much Win So Much Win So Much Win So Much Win


That scene was Shocked
Back to top
difm




Posts: 6618

PostPosted: Sun, 23rd Nov 2014 11:50    Post subject:
Hellifant wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3zvVGJrTP8&feature=youtu.be


What the hell? This sounds completely uninspiring compared to the one actually used in the docking scene. Confused


i5 6600k @ 4.3 GHz | MSI z170 Gaming M7 | 32GB Kingston HyperX Fury | 850 Evo 500GB | EVGA 1070 SC | Seasonic X-660 | CM Storm Stryker
Back to top
mug2k




Posts: 698
Location: UK
PostPosted: Sun, 23rd Nov 2014 14:12    Post subject:
Back to top
monk3ybusin3ss




Posts: 11155

PostPosted: Wed, 10th Dec 2014 11:48    Post subject:
Hans Zimmer-Interstellar OST-DELUXE EDITION-WEB-2014-FRAY
Back to top
PumpAction
[Schmadmin]



Posts: 26759

PostPosted: Wed, 10th Dec 2014 13:21    Post subject:
Does it have the proper sound like in the movie?


=> NFOrce GIF plugin <= - Ryzen 3800X, 16GB DDR4-3200, Sapphire 5700XT Pulse
Back to top
difm




Posts: 6618

PostPosted: Wed, 10th Dec 2014 14:48    Post subject:
More or less, yes. Too bad the Docking is not included Sad


i5 6600k @ 4.3 GHz | MSI z170 Gaming M7 | 32GB Kingston HyperX Fury | 850 Evo 500GB | EVGA 1070 SC | Seasonic X-660 | CM Storm Stryker
Back to top
Page 9 of 13 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - Movie & TV Sparks Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group