| Page 112 of 622 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 Posted: Fri, 9th Jan 2015 12:50 Post subject: |
|
|
| Mortibus wrote: | well i'm playing on big ass screen further away on 1080p, better than 900p@30fps
there is a thing Laurentiu499 you can actually connect pc to the big ass screen  |
yeah. and put the pc in the living room>? hell no
the pc near the TV connected vbia VGA/DVI? wtf hell no.
and the playing with a m/kb on the couch? again no.
>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ♪ Viva La Vida ♪ <<<<<< <<<<< <<<<<< <<< |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 9th Jan 2015 12:52 Post subject: |
|
|
I have an HDMI connection to my Plasma. HDMI to AV-Receiver and a wireless Xbox 360 controller. But I usually don't use that shit. Mouse and Keyboard in front of 24inch shit is good enough.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 9th Jan 2015 12:55 Post subject: |
|
|
nice. to each their own. i prefer the console experience.
except bf4 and shooters in general.
>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ♪ Viva La Vida ♪ <<<<<< <<<<< <<<<<< <<<
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 9th Jan 2015 12:58 Post subject: |
|
|
Why? Better graphics and the same shitty controller from the couch but from a PC. What more could you possibly want? A loud console next to you? Why is that? ^^
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
prudislav
VIP Member
Posts: 29148
Location: The land of beer and porn
|
| Posted: Fri, 9th Jan 2015 12:58 Post subject: |
|
|
some people just have too deeply rooted old obsolete habits and biases that they instantly refuse some new options and experiences. There is no point in trying to change their minds , i saw i on myself with gamepads, but i opened my mind and now i am able to paly at least some games on tthe damn thing (mostly racing , twinstick shooters and some platformers - but still prefer Dark Souls on M+K because of free camera) 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 9th Jan 2015 13:42 Post subject: |
|
|
| Mortibus wrote: | most games, well ubi games, don't use more than 2 cores @100% efficiency
FC4 is a good example, i kept switching off cores one by one until i started losing fps and it was when i left only 1 core, so FC4 can perfectly live with just 2 real cores without frame drops
lets not forget that what shitty cpu's consoles have which is lower than any i3 to date |
Majority of the time a CPU bottleneck is not a constant occurrence, unless you have a very weak CPU. Even in FC3 there were areas where my 2500k was bottlenecking hard (45 fps, 70% GPU load). It will also have an effect on minimum framerates and overall frametime consistency. So there is no way I will consider an i3 to be enough. Not for me anyway.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 9th Jan 2015 13:51 Post subject: |
|
|
you completely missed the point, it's not about enough
we talking about bs minimum sys req they always show us, minimum as in able to start/ run and play at lowest settings
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 9th Jan 2015 14:08 Post subject: |
|
|
In that case, we don't really know what their criteria for minimum is. And it's quite possible for the game to be unplayable even with an i3 if it's CPU demanding enough, but I will admit that listing a 2500k is strange and oddly specific. There are other CPUs in the same line that are not that much worse than a 2500k.
My guess is that they are listing some widely known models as a reference point for what they consider to be acceptable performance, making no claims as to how it will perform below that point.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 9th Jan 2015 14:35 Post subject: |
|
|
Dang, won't even run on my rig (only 4GB RAM). Time for a full upgrade this year I guess. I've been very happy so far with AMDs cost/performance ratio, not having to buy a new MB for every CPU and all. Is AMD still viable for the foreseeable future?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 9th Jan 2015 14:36 Post subject: |
|
|
Oh yes you better buy more ram. You buy underwear for your balls as well right? And the pc needs more ram like your eggs need underwear.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 9th Jan 2015 14:43 Post subject: |
|
|
so far not single game used more than 2-3gb of ram, so yeah phantom ram is widely known to be a big bag of old bs
judging by video's and screenshots this has to be one unoptimized turd to require 6gb let alone 8gig
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
konkol84
Posts: 3675
Location: Po(o)land
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 9th Jan 2015 15:21 Post subject: |
|
|
Firefox alone sucks 1 - 1.5GB of RAM from me with about 25 open tabs. Most of the newer games often use 3 GB too. Lords of the Fallen even used up to 4.5GB, but that was because of their crappy coding
Enthoo Evolv ATX TG // Asus Prime x370 // Ryzen 1700 // Gainward GTX 1080 // 16GB DDR4-3200
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 9th Jan 2015 15:23 Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah Wank Dogs uses too much RAM.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 9th Jan 2015 15:24 Post subject: |
|
|
Thing is, the reqs are considering total memory usage, not the game process itself. It's not at all that unusual for my total system memory usage to be above 6GB when I am playing certain games.
8 GB is a perfectly reasonable requirement for recommended specs.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 9th Jan 2015 15:25 Post subject: |
|
|
Crappy coding? Well usually the crappy coding and the crappy ports are the reason the game only uses 2-3gb of Ram. It should use more cause the Ram is fucking fast faster than any SSD. Ram usage is a good thing. Not more than 10gb out of the blue though plz ^^.
But it's good to see modern games use 5-6gb sometimes I don't mind.
Christ Roberts for example recommends 16gb for Star Citizen next year. That is bullshit of course.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 9th Jan 2015 16:11 Post subject: |
|
|
| Supermax2004 wrote: | | Mortibus wrote: | so far not single game used more than 2-3gb of ram, so yeah phantom ram is widely known to be a big bag of old bs
judging by video's and screenshots this has to be one unoptimized turd to require 6gb let alone 8gig |
Man wtf are you writing again bullshit ^^.
BF4, Watch Dogs, Dragon Age use more than 4gb mostly 4,5-6gb. The shitty console ports like unfortunately Metal Gear Solid only use 2-4gb  But fuck me if GTA 5, Witcher 3, Akrham Knight use less than 4gb..... |
i know you being you, just like always, but obviously i didn't mean whole windows combined with you watching pornhub and what not, anyway none of the games you mentioned actually use more than 2gb RAM maxed out @1080p
so yeah go back to your bs
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 9th Jan 2015 18:01 Post subject: |
|
|
Will this game have zombies in it? 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neon
VIP Member
Posts: 18934
Location: Poland
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 9th Jan 2015 18:04 Post subject: |
|
|
Rawr! I want to eat your brainzzzz......!
Those kind of zombies. 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 9th Jan 2015 18:12 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 10th Jan 2015 13:43 Post subject: |
|
|
Tbh after the delay (which prolly wasn't needed but it seems they got scared of GTAV instead of other way around) i stopped caring about this game...now the only thing that bothers me is that because of this delay (and the one coming in May), Cyberpunk 2077 will be pushed even further...
Rig: i7-5820k, MSI X99 Plus, Corsair 16GB DDR4:3000, Inno3d GTX 1080, Samsung 850 Pro 512GB, Corsair 850i PSU, AOC G2460PG.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 112 of 622 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
