I am not rooting for realism, but a multiplayer arcade FPS where you just spray bullets
is no my cup of tea.
Just because you won't have ADS doesn't mean the game will turn to arcade spraying. Counter-Strike or early Rainbow Six games are far from it and don't have ADS (first R6 games didn't even have first person gun models ).
fable2 wrote:
It looks "cooler" and more realistic than just having ur vision zoomed in to get those precise shots.
Zooming in looks weird (although back in the day it didn't bother me at all), but without any kind of scopes or sights, you shouldn't need or be able to zoom in anyway.
With that said, "looks cool" and better visual feedback for weapon recoil/accuracy are probably the main reasons I prefer the ADS system. Though my point is that it's not a game-breaking thing to not have it - it has no bearing on the "realism" of the gunplay and is more of a cosmetic thing.
Finally a competitor for best sound quality (shooting, reverb etc) since Bad Company 2. That game just blew away my headphones back in the day
3080, ps5, lg oled
Sin317-"im 31 years old and still surprised at how much shit comes out of my ass actually ..."
SteamDRM-"Call of Duty is the symbol of the true perfection in every aspect. Call of Duty games are like Mozart's/Beethoven's symphonies"
deadpoetic-"are you new to the cyberspace?"
eeee i don't know. Every explosion and gunshot kinda sound the same in bf3 and 4.
The sound engineering is great but there is something lacking a bit
3080, ps5, lg oled
Sin317-"im 31 years old and still surprised at how much shit comes out of my ass actually ..."
SteamDRM-"Call of Duty is the symbol of the true perfection in every aspect. Call of Duty games are like Mozart's/Beethoven's symphonies"
deadpoetic-"are you new to the cyberspace?"
peaking to Metro UK, DICE’s Patrick Bach admitted that the studio has had problems trying to nail down exactly what a single player mode in Battlefield should be like.
“Trust me, we’ve been thinking a lot about not only how do you make it good but what’s the Battlefield recipe for single-player?” Bach said. “Because we’ve been trying different things to find where the sweet spot is. Because in one way you want to entertain a different part of the audience with the single-player, you don’t want it to be multiplayer. You want it to be different.
“But you also don’t want to be like another game, where people say, ‘Oh, it’s like that game’. You need to find your own personality, and I think we’ve done that with multiplayer and solidified that over the years. But I don’t think we’ve reached as far with single-player.”
They fail because they care about money (see how the objective is "to entertain a different part of the audience"), and not about what people really want.
Battlefield is and always has been a MP game. No one EVER associated it with a good single player experience, and afaik no one really ASKED this. The only good / great SP experience I've had with BF was back with 1942 when I played against bots with a neighbor friend.
Nostalgia warning(!): I still remember, in 1942, with expansions, assaulting with difficulty some Omaha(?) map (Normady Beach) at 3:00 AM yelling in the mike orders and laughing our ass off as I was a tank driver and he was an engineer, fixing my ride and always dying when getting out. He was making the ultimate sacrifice so that my tank would survive the final assault...
eeee i don't know. Every explosion and gunshot kinda sound the same in bf3 and 4.
The sound engineering is great but there is something lacking a bit
BC2 was over the top with all the booms, thumps and bass and just louder overall. It sounded cool, and subjectively I could agree that in some ways it might have been "better" that way, but I definitely don't agree with all "sounded the same" for BF3/4. It was more subdued, but it was cleaner, more realistic and it definitely did not lack in sound variety. With all the stuff they implemented in BF4, objectively speaking it has by far superior sound design and higher quality audio.
$130 Battlefield 1 Collector's Edition Doesn't Come With the Game
Amazon's exclusive collector's edition for Battlefield 1 costs $129.99 and doesn't include Battlefield 1.
Available for all three of the game's formats, the item's listing is pretty specific: "Battlefield 1 Exclusive Collector's Edition - Does Not Include Game".
Battlefield 1 / 8 Aug 2016
$130 Battlefield 1 Collector's Edition Doesn't Come With the Game
Share.
All the glory, none of the guts.
By Joe Skrebels
Amazon's exclusive collector's edition for Battlefield 1 costs $129.99 and doesn't include Battlefield 1.
Available for all three of the game's formats, the item's listing is pretty specific: "Battlefield 1 Exclusive Collector's Edition - Does Not Include Game".
[6 Minutes of Stunning Battlefield 1 4K Gameplay]
6 Minutes of Stunning Battlefield 1 4K Gameplay
06:24
So what does a game-less video game collector's edition include? Let's see (I'll help annotate):
14" statue (not the game)
Exclusive steelbook (not the game)
Cloth poster (not the game)
Deck of playing cards (different game)
Messenger pigeon tube containing exclusive DLC (for the game, but not the game)
Patch (not the game)
Premium Packaging (not the game)
For the price of, well, a full-price video game, you can grab the disc alongside the collector's edition for $189.99. Then there's the $209.99 Deluxe edition, which appears to make the sole addition of the Early Enlister version of the game - as you may have guessed, that's usually $20 more than the base game.
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
).
