| Page 1 of 5 |
|
|
 Posted: Tue, 27th Dec 2005 13:44 Post subject: Reloaded cracked Starforce 3.5 |
|
 |
2005-12-23 Hammer And Sickle (c) Nival Interactive *SFCloneCD* MIRROR
only 2 days later..
2005-12-25 Hammer And Sickle (c) Nival Interactive RELOADED
what made them crack this game so fast?
I'am wondering if reloaded can crack other starforce games..
what do u guys think?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 27th Dec 2005 13:50 Post subject: |
|
|
luck, christmas present. sometimes they found a "hole" in the protection they can exploit.
don't count on rld for every starforce game anytime soon.
edit: don't get me wrong, there's no group deep in the study of starforce as reloaded is, but they should admit that the old way of cracking a game is useless now and try something different
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 27th Dec 2005 14:42 Post subject: |
|
|
Haven't looked but it could have just been the basic wrapper, or might have been poorly implemented.
Part of the security is how well the programmers implement the API, if they mess it up completely it can leave holes.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 27th Dec 2005 14:45 Post subject: |
|
|
| CableMunkeh wrote: | Haven't looked but it could have just been the basic wrapper, or might have been poorly implemented.
Part of the security is how well the programmers implement the API, if they mess it up completely it can leave holes. |
It's done automaticly....
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 27th Dec 2005 14:57 Post subject: |
|
|
| nose wrote: | | CableMunkeh wrote: | Haven't looked but it could have just been the basic wrapper, or might have been poorly implemented.
Part of the security is how well the programmers implement the API, if they mess it up completely it can leave holes. |
It's done automaticly.... |
Really.....
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 27th Dec 2005 16:37 Post subject: |
|
|
Depends on how well the programmer implement the protection.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 28th Dec 2005 19:12 Post subject: |
|
|
2005-12-28 PC Game ISOs Crazy Frog Racer (c) CDV RELOADED
another starforce 3.5 game..its crap but still starforce
maybe they can crack other 3.5 games
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 28th Dec 2005 19:15 Post subject: |
|
|
yes
last one is without VM
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 28th Dec 2005 21:33 Post subject: |
|
|
RLD can only crack simple SF
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 28th Dec 2005 21:36 Post subject: |
|
|
| vodkaLord wrote: | | RLD can only crack simple SF |
mmkay
maybe i-ninja is hard one
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 28th Dec 2005 22:51 Post subject: |
|
|
| vodkaLord wrote: | | RLD can only crack simple SF |
you mean RLD can only crack simple starforce fast and the hard ones taking ages.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
deelix
PDIP Member
Posts: 32062
Location: Norway
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 29th Dec 2005 00:14 Post subject: |
|
|
anyway i would like to see two cracks for X3 and B.O.S. vr1.2
yeah i know how to run then with out the cracks but this two games need a crack
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 29th Dec 2005 03:55 Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | REALOADED PWNING SF Very Happy ? |
hardly, reloaded only cracked a few games using simple SF implementation. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 29th Dec 2005 04:03 Post subject: |
|
|
Lets see Prince of Persia 3 then we will see..but for now thnkz RELOADED much appreciatted.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
d1f2f
Posts: 22
Location: israel
|
| Posted: Thu, 29th Dec 2005 07:24 Post subject: |
|
|
RELOADED know how to crack starforce 3.5 and the newer starforce(3.6) is based on starforce 3.5 so it is only metter of time until POP 3 will be cracked...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 29th Dec 2005 12:11 Post subject: |
|
|
even for the same version, there are many ways for a programmer to implement SF3.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ronhrin
Banned
Posts: 6428
Location: Paradigms are changeable, reality is absolute.
|
| Posted: Thu, 29th Dec 2005 12:20 Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | even for the same version, there are many ways for a programmer to implement SF3. |
But there are none to remove it 
He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither
- Benjamin Franklin - 1759
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 30th Dec 2005 19:51 Post subject: |
|
|
3.6 seems to be too much for them..
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
deelix
PDIP Member
Posts: 32062
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Fri, 30th Dec 2005 19:56 Post subject: |
|
|
looks like the game produsers use more money on the protection than the game, what is this world gonna be....
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 31st Dec 2005 06:05 Post subject: |
|
|
SR7 is just an example of what I guess RLD can do.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 31st Dec 2005 06:37 Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | 3.6 seems to be too much for them.. |
LOOOL, Splinter Cell: Chaos Theory uses SF3.4 and it's not even cracked. Rld is far far from able to crack SF.
| Quote: | | SR7 is just an example of what I guess RLD can do. |
Even Hoodlum was able to crack SF7 (grand theft auto: San Andreas)
| Quote: | | looks like the game produsers use more money on the protection than the game, what is this world gonna be.... |
yep, soon enough, all games will be stored server side, thus unhackable by the masses and require monthly fee. Not really game developers' fault, they are just trying to make a living. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 31st Dec 2005 09:05 Post subject: |
|
|
I am sure the publishers will get a few suckers to buy games online or 'rent' them. Hopefully, very few, although I've heard that one is born every 60 seconds or so.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 31st Dec 2005 11:16 Post subject: |
|
|
server side software is the future, like it or not. All software publishers will move to that business model because it's the only model safe from p2p/warez (since p2p users always tell software publishers to evolve their business model).
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 31st Dec 2005 18:57 Post subject: |
|
|
Blizzard? World of Warcraft is totally not warezable. And you need a valid Diablo I, II, StarCraft, Warcraft CD keys to play these games on Battle.Net.
As for RockStar, they only make money on Console.
Looking Glass Studio made System Shock, where are they now? Bankrupted. Has Grim Fandango, Freedom Force, Terra Nova, Seven Kingdoms generated any profit? Nope.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 31st Dec 2005 19:16 Post subject: |
|
|
vodka... u may not have a clue of what u're talking about concerning protections. the securom used 6 months ago is way weaker than the one used today.
both reloaded and hoodlum were able to crack securom without problems (rld actually was even the first to crack it, hoodlum followed.). same for safedisc... do u really think reloaded all of a sudden forgot how to crack safedisc? today safedisc -when properly used- is way harder than it was 6 months ago.
as for the digital delivery part... i think games in stores will neve cease to exist, but in a hybrid form: a starforceproactive-like online activation. no need to keep the disc in the drive to play, uncracked till now
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 31st Dec 2005 19:52 Post subject: |
|
|
nfs: most wanted is one of the games with safedisk 4.6 and its still not cracked
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 1 of 5 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
