Dunno if anyone else has this issue/glitch, but while Uplay tells me I have Ultra textures installed, the "Premium Store" inside the game tells me it's not installed.
shittingaround wrote:
Drowning_witch wrote:
look into the distance when driving. there's more shimmering from aliasing with temporal ON. but the performance increase is well worth it IMO. little bit of downsampling+ TAA is a wonderful compromise between speed and quality.
You're right about the shimmering after comparing almost half an hour ( and other things of course ) but the diffrence is so minor ( overall as well ) that everybody should enable this option i think for the reasons you mentioned.
Overall I definitely find it better, the one thing that bothers me is the ghosting effect behind my car.
It's very faint in a screenshot, but in-game there's a blur following my trail all the time.
http://i.imgur.com/aQFBgfG.jpg
Can someone explain to me in super layman's language what is downsampeling, what is considered low or most taxing and how to use it to gain more performance or better image quality along with resolution?
this setting has started to become common in games and i still dont get what it means...
Man... that game looks shimmery af. IQ should be a top target for all games nowadays
3080 | ps5 pro
Sin317-"im 31 years old and still surprised at how much shit comes out of my ass actually ..."
SteamDRM-"Call of Duty is the symbol of the true perfection in every aspect. Call of Duty games are like Mozart's/Beethoven's symphonies"
deadpoetic-"are you new to the cyberspace?"
just tested RAM speed impact. holy shit. 20+ fps difference between 1600mhz vs 2400mhz.
uploading vid
You kidding right?
I just "overclocked" my 1333mhz to 1600... Not even sure if those are effective working settings as I just changed clock in bios
3080 | ps5 pro
Sin317-"im 31 years old and still surprised at how much shit comes out of my ass actually ..."
SteamDRM-"Call of Duty is the symbol of the true perfection in every aspect. Call of Duty games are like Mozart's/Beethoven's symphonies"
deadpoetic-"are you new to the cyberspace?"
just tested RAM speed impact. holy shit. 20+ fps difference between 1600mhz vs 2400mhz.
uploading vid
Noice.
Can't wait when i upgrade nearly most of my ancient 2500k PC to the present in the near future.
Thats my question.
I upgraded gpu to gtx 1060.
Did not wanted to upgrade anything else because 2500k is keeping very well at 4.5
I might just get new ram or something then... but my mobo dont support more than 1600 I think and I dont see a point in upgrading.
ram is expensive. Even more expensive is new cpu
3080 | ps5 pro
Sin317-"im 31 years old and still surprised at how much shit comes out of my ass actually ..."
SteamDRM-"Call of Duty is the symbol of the true perfection in every aspect. Call of Duty games are like Mozart's/Beethoven's symphonies"
deadpoetic-"are you new to the cyberspace?"
Last edited by KillerCrocker on Tue, 29th Nov 2016 21:32; edited 1 time in total
@KillerCrocker
For me it means upgrading the CPU: Upgrading MOBO and RAM too, and i want to get a new case too. Though might as well upgrade nearly everything .
But faster RAM really makes a positive difference in more and more games it seems.
I just remember in Fallout 4 faster RAM helped too.
I think DW benchmarked that too?
Enthoo Evolv ATX TG // Asus Prime x370 // Ryzen 1700 // Gainward GTX 1080 // 16GB DDR4-3200
@KillerCrocker
For me it means upgrading the CPU: Upgrading MOBO and RAM too, and i want to get a new case too. Though might as well upgrade nearly everything .
But faster RAM really makes a positive difference in more and more games it seems.
I just remember in Fallout 4 faster RAM helped too.
I think DW benchmarked that too?
Thats exactly what I want
Fractal define 5, new cpu, mobo, ram and psu on top of that... cause mine is not modular...
But right now I am getting benchmark scores about 85-90% of what I see gtx 1060 does in benchmarks on new rigs... so not sure if its worth it... besides I dont have the cash now... I just bought new apartment and gpu
3080 | ps5 pro
Sin317-"im 31 years old and still surprised at how much shit comes out of my ass actually ..."
SteamDRM-"Call of Duty is the symbol of the true perfection in every aspect. Call of Duty games are like Mozart's/Beethoven's symphonies"
deadpoetic-"are you new to the cyberspace?"
Can someone explain to me in super layman's language what is downsampeling, what is considered low or most taxing and how to use it to gain more performance or better image quality along with resolution?
this setting has started to become common in games and i still dont get what it means...
Downsampling -> Using a higher resolution rendered as a lower one. For example, 4k downsampled to 1080p gives you better visuals than standard 1080p. It's using an internally generated resolution and fits it to your set monitor or set resolution (in this case, the common 1920x1080) Of course, this happens at the cost of performance. The method discussed in here is probably downsampling sub 1080p.
Drowning_witch wrote:
just tested RAM speed impact. holy shit. 20+ fps difference between 1600mhz vs 2400mhz.
uploading vid
Aww that would suck if it made SUCH a big difference.
just tested RAM speed impact. holy shit. 20+ fps difference between 1600mhz vs 2400mhz.
uploading vid
You kidding right?
I just "overclocked" my 1333mhz to 1600... Not even sure if those are effective working settings as I just changed clock in bios
Nah, just take a look. it's quite insane. 25% more GPU usage with faster ram. 20 freaking 5.
now it all makes sense why people on the steam forums are getting sub 60 fps with high end cards. even at lowest settings, 1600mhz ram cannot feed 60 fps to my GPU, and CPU usage rises with many of the settings. so a minimum FPS in the CPU limited areas for people with slow RAM will be very low, probably even in the 40's, regardless of their GPU power.
I've been advising people to steer clear of slow RAM since arma 3 and fallout 4, and it seems as we are now in the bad ports era, where most games are CPU hungry as hell, this becomes even more important.
Glad I upgraded 8gb 1600 to 16gb 2400 in the summer.
Man, this game is so fucking good. The amount of chaos you can create just by calling the cops on somebody and then calling gangsters on another random pedestrian.
Have u tried recording using quicksync instead of your gpu? I think it should be less demanding coz theoretically it shouldn't affect your CPU and ,obviously, gpu.
Have u tried recording using quicksync instead of your gpu? I think it should be less demanding coz theoretically it shouldn't affect your CPU and ,obviously, gpu.
nope, I just use GFE to record. there's a less demanding recording tool out there?
How about that RAM speed difference though, how sick is that
there's a less demanding recording tool out there?
It's not about the tool.Geforce experience uses your nvidia GPU to record a game and the more demanding the game and the higher GPU load , the more performance hit you get from recording it.At least it was like this in my experience.
You could try using OBS and set it up to use intel quicksync instead of your dedicated GPU.
ah, I see what you mean. well, it's not just GPU load. it depends on the game engine. here, even at lower load, the hit is higher. in some games 1% of gpu is enough. I think I read somewhere it depends on the amount of shader processing in a game. that's the only reason I mentioned it here, because I've not seen a game recorded with shadowplay have this much of a hit.
Will have to compare with OBS in the future though, thx.
You'll have to enable integrated GPU in bios though and set multi-adapter (or whatever it is called) ON. Oh, and disable preview in OBS, it has a performance hit.+ you can "play" with quicksync recording settings.There are quite a few.
Thanks for letting us know Drowning_witch, I was thinking about replacing my slow RAM, now it makes even more sense.
And the game is great, really, I have only played like few story missions so far, I just hang around doing stupid things or just watch the world around me. Some locations in this game are amazing.
just tested RAM speed impact. holy shit. 20+ fps difference between 1600mhz vs 2400mhz.
uploading vid
You kidding right?
I just "overclocked" my 1333mhz to 1600... Not even sure if those are effective working settings as I just changed clock in bios
Nah, just take a look. it's quite insane. 25% more GPU usage with faster ram. 20 freaking 5.
now it all makes sense why people on the steam forums are getting sub 60 fps with high end cards. even at lowest settings, 1600mhz ram cannot feed 60 fps to my GPU, and CPU usage rises with many of the settings. so a minimum FPS in the CPU limited areas for people with slow RAM will be very low, probably even in the 40's, regardless of their GPU power.
I've been advising people to steer clear of slow RAM since arma 3 and fallout 4, and it seems as we are now in the bad ports era, where most games are CPU hungry as hell, this becomes even more important.
Glad I upgraded 8gb 1600 to 16gb 2400 in the summer.
Pursuing 60fps nowadays is a psychological warfare, which feels almost like tilting at windmills.
I have stopped caring in a sense, since when such couch-based games offer no visual advancements whatsoever whilst requiring tonnes of horsepower, I feel the legal right to stand against this insanity, by waiving my beloved 1600Mhz cane no fuck given mode
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
) but the diffrence is so minor ( overall as well ) that everybody should enable this option i think for the reasons you mentioned.
.
