Gamergate discussion
Page 161 of 231 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 160, 161, 162 ... 229, 230, 231  Next
WaldoJ
VIP Member



Posts: 32678

PostPosted: Wed, 15th Feb 2017 00:21    Post subject:
Oh man I liked his music Sad


Sin317 wrote:
I win, you lose. Or Go fuck yourself.
Back to top
paxsali
Banned



Posts: 18352

PostPosted: Wed, 15th Feb 2017 00:23    Post subject:
⁢⁢


Last edited by paxsali on Thu, 4th Jul 2024 21:16; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
WaldoJ
VIP Member



Posts: 32678

PostPosted: Wed, 15th Feb 2017 00:30    Post subject:
Lol. La... there's something in the water.


Sin317 wrote:
I win, you lose. Or Go fuck yourself.
Back to top
Morphineus
VIP Member



Posts: 24883
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Wed, 15th Feb 2017 02:02    Post subject:
Beyonce... shit her music has become worse with every year. Laughing


Back to top
tonizito
VIP Member



Posts: 51438
Location: Portugal, the shithole of Europe.
PostPosted: Wed, 15th Feb 2017 08:46    Post subject:
WaldoJ wrote:
Oh man I liked his music Sad
You can still like it you kurwa naab Mad

Illinoise Me Gusta


boundle (thoughts on cracking AITD) wrote:
i guess thouth if without a legit key the installation was rolling back we are all fucking then
Back to top
WaldoJ
VIP Member



Posts: 32678

PostPosted: Wed, 15th Feb 2017 12:55    Post subject:
No I can't Sad
It's all sjw propaganda Sad


Sin317 wrote:
I win, you lose. Or Go fuck yourself.
Back to top
tonizito
VIP Member



Posts: 51438
Location: Portugal, the shithole of Europe.
PostPosted: Wed, 15th Feb 2017 12:59    Post subject:
But then you end up looking like those retarded sjw's who like lovecraft and are trying to distance his creations from him because he was a racist Laughing


boundle (thoughts on cracking AITD) wrote:
i guess thouth if without a legit key the installation was rolling back we are all fucking then
Back to top
WaldoJ
VIP Member



Posts: 32678

PostPosted: Wed, 15th Feb 2017 13:17    Post subject:
Laughing


Sin317 wrote:
I win, you lose. Or Go fuck yourself.
Back to top
Interinactive
VIP Member



Posts: 29477

PostPosted: Thu, 16th Feb 2017 23:54    Post subject:
⁢⁢


Last edited by Interinactive on Mon, 4th Oct 2021 10:05; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
VGAdeadcafe




Posts: 22230
Location: ★ ಠ_ಠ ★
PostPosted: Fri, 17th Feb 2017 00:43    Post subject:
Interinactive wrote:
I don't know where to put this, but some people are so fucking stupid.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-02-17/why-i-wont-be-watching-game-of-thrones-this-year/8264940

Heheh is that for real?

Quote:
In making this choice, I am no longer at the mercy of television shows that seem determined to make women like me nothing but pieces of flesh to be destroyed.

Maybe the sheltered little fuck should watch kid cartoons only. Game of Thrones has some ultra violence against men, much more than women. The most shocking event in the series is a dick being cut off (with the help of some women too) and a man being reduced to an automaton.

Now that I think about it, whoever wrote the article probably found that interesting rather than disgusting. But rape, nope, that's where she draws the line Laughing
Back to top
Interinactive
VIP Member



Posts: 29477

PostPosted: Fri, 17th Feb 2017 00:55    Post subject:
⁢⁢


Last edited by Interinactive on Mon, 4th Oct 2021 10:05; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
VGAdeadcafe




Posts: 22230
Location: ★ ಠ_ಠ ★
PostPosted: Fri, 17th Feb 2017 00:58    Post subject:
Did she just engage in victim blaming?

I am so triggered right now
Back to top
Mr.Tinkles




Posts: 12378
Location: Reino de Suecia
PostPosted: Fri, 17th Feb 2017 01:03    Post subject:
Who the fuck is Laura Hartnell and why should I care if she watches GoT or not?


Back to top
Interinactive
VIP Member



Posts: 29477

PostPosted: Fri, 17th Feb 2017 01:17    Post subject:
⁢⁢


Last edited by Interinactive on Mon, 4th Oct 2021 10:05; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Mr.Tinkles




Posts: 12378
Location: Reino de Suecia
PostPosted: Fri, 17th Feb 2017 01:43    Post subject:
Here's a pro-tip, stop visiting those sites and reading those articles.


Back to top
Interinactive
VIP Member



Posts: 29477

PostPosted: Fri, 17th Feb 2017 01:46    Post subject:
⁢⁢


Last edited by Interinactive on Mon, 4th Oct 2021 10:05; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Mr.Tinkles




Posts: 12378
Location: Reino de Suecia
PostPosted: Fri, 17th Feb 2017 01:57    Post subject:
Interinactive wrote:
a thread that was created to discuss these waffles.

Fucking Mr.Tinkles.


No, this thread mutated into this and was about something different from the start although a similar subject. And to say that people are discussing here is a bit of a stretch as it's mostly just that someone posting links to something and then you have 2-3 comments about how bad feminism is. But ok for the sake of argument, I guess that could pass for a discussion.
Either way, you're the one doing yourself in by reading it and you're also giving her clicks. So good job.


Back to top
Interinactive
VIP Member



Posts: 29477

PostPosted: Fri, 17th Feb 2017 02:03    Post subject:
⁢⁢


Last edited by Interinactive on Mon, 4th Oct 2021 10:05; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Mr.Tinkles




Posts: 12378
Location: Reino de Suecia
PostPosted: Fri, 17th Feb 2017 02:12    Post subject:
Interinactive wrote:
Mr.Tinkles wrote:
Either way, you're the one doing yourself in by reading it and you're also giving her clicks. So good job.


Apply the statement to 99% of posts/sources/articles/discussions in this thread (when it was on topic or before it mutated) and... oh, we're here again...


I'm curious, what would constitute for that one percent?
Also, kind of why I stopped reading most of what's being posted here, I only stop by from time to time.


Back to top
Interinactive
VIP Member



Posts: 29477

PostPosted: Fri, 17th Feb 2017 02:16    Post subject:
⁢⁢


Last edited by Interinactive on Mon, 4th Oct 2021 10:05; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Mr.Tinkles




Posts: 12378
Location: Reino de Suecia
PostPosted: Fri, 17th Feb 2017 02:21    Post subject:
Interinactive wrote:
Mr.Tinkles wrote:
I'm curious, what would constitute for that one percent?


It's a scapegoat in case anyone actually bothers to check Dude Wink

Mr.Tinkles wrote:
Also, kind of why I stopped reading most of what's being posted here, I only stop by from time to time.


Stop visiting these threads and reading those posts. You're the one doing yourself in by reading it and you're also giving the thread clicks. So good job.


As soon as you realize that her article, and articles like hers, generates money while this thread doesn't, is when you realize how quickly your rebuttal falls apart. Smile


Back to top
Interinactive
VIP Member



Posts: 29477

PostPosted: Fri, 17th Feb 2017 02:33    Post subject:
⁢⁢


Last edited by Interinactive on Mon, 4th Oct 2021 10:05; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Mr.Tinkles




Posts: 12378
Location: Reino de Suecia
PostPosted: Fri, 17th Feb 2017 02:36    Post subject:
Interinactive wrote:
Lucky for me I edited that post before you replied!

And what does 'doing yourself in' have to do with generating money? Laughing

Just stop.



Like, giving yourself a headache is what I meant by doing yourself in.
And I just looked it up and it doesn't mean what I thought it meant, meant something about suicide which I wasn't talking about. Sorry about that if you thought I meant that you should kill yourself, I really thought it meant that you give yourself a headache.

Edit:
Ohh and what I meant was, you're giving yourself a headache and she's making money off of it.


Back to top
randir14




Posts: 4950

PostPosted: Fri, 17th Feb 2017 17:17    Post subject:
Milo will be on Bill Maher's show tonight. Another guest canceled in protest.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/15/arts/bill-maher-jeremy-scahill-milo-yiannopoulos.html
Back to top
VGAdeadcafe




Posts: 22230
Location: ★ ಠ_ಠ ★
PostPosted: Fri, 17th Feb 2017 17:35    Post subject:
Would they be in the same panel? If so, I understand why he backed down, everyone gets destroyed by Milo in any debate.
Back to top
Nui
VIP Member



Posts: 5720
Location: in a place with fluffy towels
PostPosted: Fri, 17th Feb 2017 17:39    Post subject:
Maybe for the best. Someone who just gets offended or disgusted by someone is unlikely to contribute to a discussion. I'm intrigued if milo even gets to the venue and isn't just blocked by some overly friendly and tolerant people
Back to top
Morphineus
VIP Member



Posts: 24883
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Fri, 17th Feb 2017 18:05    Post subject:
Inaction is to be applauded how brave of them! Razz
It's his choice to make though.

Maybe they can get a stronger debater in, would make it more entertaining than just one side being heard.


Back to top
WaldoJ
VIP Member



Posts: 32678

PostPosted: Sat, 18th Feb 2017 00:51    Post subject:
oh god this is gonna be awful.


Sin317 wrote:
I win, you lose. Or Go fuck yourself.
Back to top
randir14




Posts: 4950

PostPosted: Tue, 21st Feb 2017 00:42    Post subject:
Looks like Milo has gone too far. Someone released a clip from when he was on the Drunken Peasants podcast, where he said he was okay with 13 year olds being in a gay relationship with older men.

Now he's been uninvited as a speaker at CPAC and his book deal is canceled:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/20/us/politics/cpac-milo-yiannopoulos.html

And he might get fired from Breitbart:
http://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/2017/02/20/breitbart-news-may-boot-milo-yiannopoulos-over-sex-comments.html

Here's a couple posts where he tried to defend himself:

https://www.facebook.com/myiannopoulos/posts/851263248344905
https://www.facebook.com/myiannopoulos/posts/851826321621931


Last edited by randir14 on Tue, 21st Feb 2017 00:45; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
freiwald




Posts: 6968

PostPosted: Tue, 21st Feb 2017 00:44    Post subject:
randir14 wrote:
Looks like Milo has gone too far. Someone released a clip from when he was on the Drunken Peasants podcast, where he said he was okay with 13 year olds being in a gay relationship with older men.

Now he's been uninvited as a speaker at CPAC and his book deal is canceled:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/20/us/politics/cpac-milo-yiannopoulos.html

And he might get fired from Breitbart:
http://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/2017/02/20/breitbart-news-may-boot-milo-yiannopoulos-over-sex-comments.html


good news Very Happy
Back to top
Page 161 of 231 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - General chatter Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 160, 161, 162 ... 229, 230, 231  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group