| Page 2 of 4 |
Seaman
Posts: 160
Location: Hungary
|
 Posted: Wed, 18th Jan 2006 18:11 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ispep
VIP Member
Posts: 4117
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Jan 2006 18:18 Post subject: |
|
|
That sand dune one or whatever it is runs at 0 fps for me.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Jan 2006 18:19 Post subject: |
|
|
| Ispep wrote: | | That sand dune one or whatever it is runs at 0 fps for me. |
not got the dl yet.what gfx card/cards you got mate?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ispep
VIP Member
Posts: 4117
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Jan 2006 18:32 Post subject: |
|
|
AMD AthlonXP 2400+
Asus Radeon X850XT 256mb AGP
I think the test I'm on about is called Red Valley... it's listed under CPU tests. Anyone know the one I'm on about?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Jan 2006 18:37 Post subject: |
|
|
| Ispep wrote: | AMD AthlonXP 2400+
Asus Radeon X850XT 256mb AGP
I think the test I'm on about is called Red Valley... it's listed under CPU tests. Anyone know the one I'm on about? |
axp 2400+ and cpu test = about 0 fps. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Jan 2006 20:05 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Jan 2006 20:06 Post subject: |
|
|
But it says 0.3 in your compare url lol 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Jan 2006 20:18 Post subject: |
|
|
got about 3758 or so 3Dmark06 score
on normal basic version settings (not registered)
amd 64 x2 4400
nvidia GF7800GT 256mb
1Gb OCR ram
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Jan 2006 21:30 Post subject: |
|
|
edited score is so bad
Last edited by muhahahaha on Sun, 22nd Jan 2006 12:34; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Seaman
Posts: 160
Location: Hungary
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Jan 2006 22:01 Post subject: |
|
|
over 4000 points... would have more if I restarted my pc...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Jan 2006 22:38 Post subject: |
|
|
| pumbertot.1 wrote: |
yep but you are acting very smug with your willy waving 512mb gtx.my sli blows yours away, willy wave that in yer face.  |
muhahahah dream on, i have superior machine compared to your junk muhahahahah.
you probably have commodore 64 and you are 12 year old child of some poor family.
and please dont be so jealous! muhahahahhahahahahaha |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Jan 2006 22:55 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rzooq
Posts: 536
Location: "Mexico of Europe"
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Jan 2006 23:02 Post subject: |
|
|
1862...
Abit KV8 Pro K8T800 Pro Socket 754
Athlon 64 2GHz/512KB L2 Socket 754
1GB RAM DDR 400MHz (Single channel)
GeForce 6800 AGP 128MB @385/700 (12x1,6xVP)
ForceWare 81.85
Me waits for:
- fooking keygen so i can bench in fooking 1024x768 not a fooking 1280x1024
- new drivers, there are always new ones after 3DMark is released and they usualy give a nice boost :]
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Jan 2006 23:16 Post subject: |
|
|
| Rzooq wrote: | 1862...
Abit KV8 Pro K8T800 Pro Socket 754
Athlon 64 2GHz/512KB L2 Socket 754
1GB RAM DDR 400MHz (Single channel)
GeForce 6800 AGP 128MB @385/700 (12x1,6xVP)
ForceWare 81.85
Me waits for:
- fooking keygen so i can bench in fooking 1024x768 not a fooking 1280x1024
- new drivers, there are always new ones after 3DMark is released and they usualy give a nice boost :] |
the 81.98 forcewares gave me a 500 boost over the 81.85 in 3dmark05. give them a try.
some good reports of 82.12 also though the 82.65 seem a bit weird. find them all here (if you didnt already know): http://downloads.guru3d.com/download.php?id=10
oh yeah and those 81.97 also seem good.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 18th Jan 2006 23:17 Post subject: |
|
|
| highfe wrote: | | muhahahaha wrote: | | pumbertot.1 wrote: |
yep but you are acting very smug with your willy waving 512mb gtx.my sli blows yours away, willy wave that in yer face. |
muhahahah dream on, i have superior machine compared to your junk muhahahahah.
you probably have commodore 64 and you are 12 year old child of some poor family.
and please dont be so jealous! muhahahahhahahahahaha |
Biggest kiddie around here > muhahahahah
You are so an moron just you bought your pc new you dont need to make your dick longer than it actually is  |
Yes i have huge, strong and healthy penis, you dont need to remind me about it.
http://www.allthingsorange.com/albums/beyond/Beyond_8.sized.jpg |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 19th Jan 2006 00:22 Post subject: |
|
|
| ELIZ wrote: | | weird0 wrote: | what are you trying to tell us ELIZ? 
it's a benchmark, and as a benchmark it does what it should: max out current high-end machines |
max out so bad so u will enjoy reading magazine more than watching this benchmark lol
this of course if u don't have at least 7800 or higher  |
This is not a program to show you cool graphics at blazzing speed if you want that your shit out of luck with 3dmark it's supposed to be a tool to determine on a scale how your pc is rated against others. Also it shows how much an overclock can really improve your score. It does have cpu tests aswell. Sorry it's not all pretty pictures and flowing camera moves. This is not a product for you I guess so don't download it then. Others see it's purpose so don't try to nag people about something you don't understand (or maybe your broke and jealous of people with actual systems that can run this program) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 19th Jan 2006 01:18 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 19th Jan 2006 01:21 Post subject: |
|
|
The keygen is out. Futuremark 3DMark06 v1 0 2 WinALL Keygen Only READ NFO-ViRiLiTY
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
upstart_69
Posts: 1094
Location: Right behind you!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 19th Jan 2006 02:07 Post subject: |
|
|
Looks like shit, sure as hell ain't worth the crap performance.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 19th Jan 2006 03:35 Post subject: |
|
|
wonder how much money ATI and Nvidia pumped in to get this baby out. Think about it. All these expensive technolgies, SLI, Crossfire, zillion pipelines, SM3, 512 MB Ram, etc, etc and not one game to take real advantage of it all. So why would someone invest money into their heavyduty cards? By having such benchmarks which affect you psychologically. Already we can see people with more than sufficient cards like 6800 and above talking about time to upgrade. Upgrade for what, a few thousand points in a totally synthetic benchmark which has zero dollar value and bragging rights...truly sad
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 19th Jan 2006 03:51 Post subject: |
|
|
if this program forces you to buy a 500 dollar video card then my friend you are a moronic tool that would buy a pile of shit if some hot big boobed chick was standing right next to it. If you don't want to take it as it is (which is a benchmarking tool) then don't but for us strong minded people who like to see where our systems are rated on the scale of everyone elses then let it be. I am upgrading my pc soon to a 300 dollar video card and a 400 dollar cpu but i havn't ran a benchmark in years. This is my hobby though I love computers and it's something I like to keep up with. Not everyone that buys shit is a tool to this commercial society. Also the graphics look spectacular your just running a old video card so you can't have it all on full blast.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 2 of 4 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
