"Cyberpunk 2077 is legit. I can’t even imagine this being current gen. Like holy shit. It’s like Deus Ex + Crysis + Witcher at a scale and level of detail that I’ve never seen. It’s the kind of game I’ve dreamt of for ages. That was one hell of an hour".
When someone mentioned a possible downgrade and compared it to Watch Dogs E3 demo:
"Unlike that demo, there were plenty of technical hitches and flaws. You can tell it’s a legit, in development build. It was played on a PC. Slowdown, glitches and other minor things popped up but didn’t take away from the experience".
When asked if he thinks Xbox One X could handle it:
"Probably yeah. They may well be targeting those machines. I don’t know. It’s just that it has the detail of Mankind Divided (or more) but at 1000x the scale and size. This isn’t just another open world. It feels like a real city".
When asked if it's PC only or console strangled:
"Ha ha, it’s not console strangled. There’s nothing like this on PC right now. Not even close".
I wonder if my i5 2500k will actually manage to get past the main menu without enabling a ghetto nuclear fission (Hopefully if there won't be any global catastrophes I'll have upgraded by then, maybe)
The_Zeel wrote:
Quote:
Eurogamer: So maybe multiplayer will come post-launch?
Patrick Mills: Maybe, no promises. Nothing at launch. At launch we're concentrating on the single-player game. That's what we want to give you.
Cyberpunk 2077: What we learned in the most mind-blowing game demo we've ever seen
Quote:
Bottom line
The question, I guess, is whether this E3 demo is at all indicative of what we can expect from the final game. As I said, there are a lot of aspects here that I thought were not possible right now. Aspects that, were any other studio to put them in an E3 demo, I’d argue were far-fetched.
I remember seeing a demo of The Witcher 3 back in 2013 though and having that same “They can’t possibly pull this off” feeling. And while The Witcher 3 did change quite a bit before release, it was mostly minor nitpicks—I remember forum threads about the stone walls being less detailed. The core of The Witcher 3, the parts I thought were impossible, ended up just as CD Projekt said.
So I don’t know. I’d certainly like to believe that everything I saw in this Cyberpunk 2077 demo was real, not just part of some elaborate “vertical slice” hoodwink. Because as I said, this is the most impressive demo I’ve ever seen. And if CD Projekt can make the game that CD Projekt claims it’s making? The game it showed to us? We’re all in for a real treat.
But don't misunderstand me, I'm hoping to be wrong and for the game to come out sooner than I'm expecting while at the same time prepared for the worst
boundle (thoughts on cracking AITD) wrote:
i guess thouth if without a legit key the installation was rolling back we are all fucking then
I didn't know Mike Pondsmith was this much involved with the game. I assumed he had some very small role. Or does the Joe guy mean something else with "director"?
Do they assume gamers are not smart enough to know this is an early build
when the dumb masses see gameplay, they automatically think the game is finished and will complain about the bugs and other issues.
We got early gameplay videos of Witcher 3 which was nice but we were also promised that the graphics would be even better in the final game. Which was absolutely false. Here they are doing the right thing, they are creating extreme hype from the press instead, but fans will not be able to go back and compare.
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
