|
|
| Page 1 of 1 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Saner
Posts: 6877
Location: Uk
|
 Posted: Sat, 4th Feb 2006 11:53 Post subject: |
|
|
Prolly just the DVDscr
| ragnarus wrote: |
I saw things like that in here and in other "woman problems" topics so...... Am I the only one that thinks some authorities needs to be alerted about Saner and him possibly being a rapist and/or kidnapper ? |
Saner is not being serious. Unless its the subject of Santa!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Elazul
Posts: 550
Location: Jönköping, Sweden
|
| Posted: Sat, 4th Feb 2006 12:54 Post subject: |
|
|
DVDSCR but with the Property Warnings cropped of.
"Thats no prob kanee! Suck your cock! A Firmware flash is more than fucking enough!" - Supermax2004
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 4th Feb 2006 13:31 Post subject: |
|
|
hehe lol, what a losers they are then, read the nfo
I used to suck dicks for coke
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chiv
Posts: 27530
Location: Behind You...
|
| Posted: Sat, 4th Feb 2006 15:22 Post subject: |
|
|
are you people just guessing or do you know? i did some comparison images between the 2, and if anything, the 'dvdscr' is overcropped on the sides.
if this IS a dvdscr, then all they did was crop JUST the 'property of...' sequences, and then splice them back in... if thats the case, then BOOOOOO at them for their dvdrip bs, but reasonably sized props to their creativity in removing an annoyance, without causing any collateral damage to the rest of the film.
here are the comparison images i took, from cd1, 1st rar. dvdscr on top, 'dvdrip' on bottom.
the only 'adjusting' i did,was i resized the dvdrip images to the same resolution as the dvdscr, for a better comparison.
| Code: | | http://img92.imageshack.us/img92/4459/comp16ub.jpg |
| Code: | | http://img137.imageshack.us/img137/14/comp29xo.jpg |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 4th Feb 2006 15:40 Post subject: |
|
|
| chiv wrote: | are you people just guessing or do you know? i did some comparison images between the 2, and if anything, the 'dvdscr' is overcropped on the sides.
|
when you use your brain , then you know , that this release is not a real dvdrip .
- the movie started worldwide on december 2005 in the cinemas
- 5-6 months later ( from the cinema start ) come the dvd
- this release ist 23.97 fps ( ntsc )
- the date for the ntsc retail dvd is not confirmed yet , this mean the retail dvd is not pressing yet
- the ntsc dvd will come may/june ( for a real date for the dvd start you look from time to tiome here : http://www.dvdactive.com/home/ )
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chiv
Posts: 27530
Location: Behind You...
|
| Posted: Sat, 4th Feb 2006 16:02 Post subject: |
|
|
i never claimed it was retail, simply questioning if the source was the same... i also offered up the likely solution that only parts were cropped... so no need to get upset about it fenris.
either way it doesn't matter, its free, enjoy it for what it is, king kong with 5.1 audio.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 4th Feb 2006 17:04 Post subject: |
|
|
| tezmo wrote: | | fenris wrote: | | the date for the ntsc retail dvd is not confirmed yet , this mean the retail dvd is not pressing yet |
the rls for the r1 in fact is set at march 28th - see here: http://www.davisdvd.com/news/news.html
) |
march 28th is a rumor .you will see that davisdvd will cancel this date. this is not a first time that they write rumors
the fact ist universal studio have not yet confirm a date
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 4th Feb 2006 17:12 Post subject: |
|
|
| chiv wrote: | are you people just guessing or do you know? i did some comparison images between the 2, and if anything, the 'dvdscr' is overcropped on the sides.
if this IS a dvdscr, then all they did was crop JUST the 'property of...' sequences, and then splice them back in... if thats the case, then BOOOOOO at them for their dvdrip bs, but reasonably sized props to their creativity in removing an annoyance, without causing any collateral damage to the rest of the film.
here are the comparison images i took, from cd1, 1st rar. dvdscr on top, 'dvdrip' on bottom.
the only 'adjusting' i did,was i resized the dvdrip images to the same resolution as the dvdscr, for a better comparison.
| Code: | | http://img92.imageshack.us/img92/4459/comp16ub.jpg |
| Code: | | http://img137.imageshack.us/img137/14/comp29xo.jpg |
|
Did you do the comparison between DVDSCR and DVDRIP , when the messages are on the dvdscreener .
Maybe it is zoomed in just only when those messages are on the screen .
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 4th Feb 2006 17:34 Post subject: |
|
|
| tezmo wrote: |
ffs
its no rumour
|
for your is this not a rumor , for me is this a rumor. ok?
| Quote: |
| davisdvd wrote: | | Well, it's official. Universal Studios will release Peter Jackson's King Kong on March 28th. |
|
yes i read this on davisdvd. a me wondering , why know davisdvd not about extras , menue etc? me wondering why write universal studio not , that they have confirm a date ?
oh wait , why they not list in here tech details , about extras . because they know this not lol
in 7 weeks is march,28 and nobody know not about menues and extra for the retail dvd? when a studio confirm a date , they say too about the extras 
you will see the date 28 march will been cancel
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chiv
Posts: 27530
Location: Behind You...
|
| Posted: Sat, 4th Feb 2006 18:45 Post subject: |
|
|
seems my original assumption that it was a unique unmarked screener *seems* to be correct, take a look:
| Code: | http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/9928/godscreener4bz.jpg
http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/1592/dvlscreener6js.jpg |
now can we all just accept that its not a retail dvdrip, but it is most likely an unmarked and possibly PRIVATE dvd... okie?
so yeah, enjoy these latest comparisons, they are NOT mine as i dont have the whole thing yet, but i thought id bring them to you guys so you can feel confident in grabbing this MOST excellent release.
laters.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 4th Feb 2006 18:57 Post subject: |
|
|
Quit complaining wether or not it's retail. It looks good enough, what's the big deal.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 5th Feb 2006 01:16 Post subject: |
|
|
I'm sorry I just cant decipher this shit. Learn some proper english before you come back - in the meantime, you'll have to be satisfied with swallowing some humble pie on march the 28th.
| fenris wrote: | | tezmo wrote: |
ffs
its no rumour
|
for your is this not a rumor , for me is this a rumor. ok?
| Quote: |
| davisdvd wrote: | | Well, it's official. Universal Studios will release Peter Jackson's King Kong on March 28th. |
|
yes i read this on davisdvd. a me wondering , why know davisdvd not about extras , menue etc? me wondering why write universal studio not , that they have confirm a date ?
oh wait , why they not list in here tech details , about extras . because they know this not lol
in 7 weeks is march,28 and nobody know not about menues and extra for the retail dvd? when a studio confirm a date , they say too about the extras
you will see the date 28 march will been cancel |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 5th Feb 2006 01:31 Post subject: |
|
|
This has to be fake. It was reported on CNN that King Kong is going to only be released on HD-DVD to jumpstart the sale of HD-DVD players and start the war between HD and BR.
If anyone has news otherwise please post it.
dead_man007
- The one who laughs last, thinks slowest.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 5th Feb 2006 02:26 Post subject: |
|
|
dosn't mean it's only going to be released on hd-dvd though it will be on dvd and anyhow HD-DVD is looking at being released by June
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 5th Feb 2006 02:41 Post subject: |
|
|
| psychoace wrote: | | dosn't mean it's only going to be released on hd-dvd though it will be on dvd and anyhow HD-DVD is looking at being released by June |
June sounds about right for Kong to hit store selves.
dead_man007
- The one who laughs last, thinks slowest.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hahe
Posts: 1685
Location: US
|
| Posted: Sun, 5th Feb 2006 04:07 Post subject: |
|
|
Your both wrong about June and HD-DVD only. Comes out end of March. The 28th to be exact. Will be available in both a single disc version and a 2-disc version. http://www.davisdvd.com/news/news.html scroll down and you'll see it. And remember it's 2006. Movies usually take like 4 months or less to come out on dvd now.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chiv
Posts: 27530
Location: Behind You...
|
| Posted: Sun, 5th Feb 2006 04:59 Post subject: |
|
|
it would be financial suicide to release such a huge expensive movie on a brand new format that will take a while before it becomes established...
whats with all this complaining anyway? what are we trying to decide? dvd release date, or quality of the release? should it be nuked? im not sure on the rules but i guess it should be nuked for not being a retail dvd source, but the bottom line is that this is a flawless rip from a blemish free dvd source,and is of such high quality that can easily compete with most dvdrips... id be happy for it to be unnuked everywhere, because they didn't try to decieve by overcropping or any of that crap
this is a flawless release, and will be the BEST you will see till the retail dvdrip... and even then, i doubt it would look any better than this release, heck, it'll probably be a 2cd release again, without ac3... no thanks...
side-note, single disc and double disc releases surprise the hell out of me for a film of this scope... i expect to see a late november deluxe release to really milk this film... a nice 3 or 4 disc set with heaps of extras, probably many from the KK diaries dvd set. ill wait for that.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hahe
Posts: 1685
Location: US
|
| Posted: Sun, 5th Feb 2006 05:19 Post subject: |
|
|
| chiv wrote: |
side-note, single disc and double disc releases surprise the hell out of me for a film of this scope... i expect to see a late november deluxe release to really milk this film... a nice 3 or 4 disc set with heaps of extras, probably many from the KK diaries dvd set. ill wait for that. |
I wouldn't really be surprised if they release a 4 disc set later on with the production diaries. But I don't really care for them.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chiv
Posts: 27530
Location: Behind You...
|
| Posted: Sun, 5th Feb 2006 07:46 Post subject: |
|
|
yeah well i love movies and i love seeing the talent that goes into making them, especially visual and practical effects, so ill definately be waiting for the deluxe edition near the end of the year.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hahe
Posts: 1685
Location: US
|
| Posted: Sun, 5th Feb 2006 07:53 Post subject: |
|
|
Oh yeah I do too and I buy the best edition of a movie. But the production diaries are already out so a 4 disc set with them I wouldn't rush out to buy it.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tobycoaster
Harry Potter
Posts: 598
Location: Under the stairs
|
| Posted: Sun, 5th Feb 2006 12:56 Post subject: |
|
|
Argueing over its actual DVD retail date is pointless ,
as we have seen in the past with Shrek 2 , the retail dvdrip dvdr hit the scene at around the same time as it hit cinemas , there was a cam a TS then BOOM a dvdrip.
so films retail date aint really a good judge on when we get a rip
be nice if it was real , but i am holding judgement till i see a dvdr
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chiv
Posts: 27530
Location: Behind You...
|
| Posted: Sun, 5th Feb 2006 14:51 Post subject: |
|
|
i can tell you now, this is not a retail dvd source. its unmarked dvdscr (not a tc as someone actually suggested...  ), check cd3, zoom in on kongs face. i see a slight shifting happening in the image as it zooms in, like its degrading or having problems keeping the motion smooth... this isn't retail... so for THIS reason alone, the release should be nuked, because 'dvdrip' to me, means retail, which this isn't... overcropping or oversized, are pathetically stupid reasons for nuking this in my opinion.
if your a perfectionist, youll probably buy the super ultimate dvd near the end of the year like i will be. if you love quality but cant download too much and need to be picky in what you dl, wait till mid march and download the 'r1 retail real dvdrip', but if you want to watch this now in BRILLIANT visual quality and full 5.1 surround sound... well, if you wanted that, youd have given the finger to the nukers, and downloaded this allready...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hahe
Posts: 1685
Location: US
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|
|
 |
|
. I've visit dvdactive.com, davisdvd.com, thedigitalbits.com, etc. often and they are usually never wrong. thedigitalbits.com also says 3/28. Movie studio's web sites usually don't update it until the official press release which has all the extras, cover art, etc. All we have now is an official date. While looking at that list I saw Jarhead. I remember the same thing happened with the date. Date was announced, no extras or cover shown, couple of weeks later we finally get the cover and extras. Hell March 28th isn't unrealistic. Walk the Line comes out February 28th. Hell even with that go to fox.com and go to the dvd section. It's not even listed there yet even though the date, cover and extras have been anounced/shown.
