Ghostbusters: Afterlife [R]
Page 7 of 7 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
VonMisk




Posts: 9517
Location: Hatredland
PostPosted: Tue, 12th Oct 2021 20:42    Post subject:
Frant wrote:
VonMisk wrote:
Frant wrote:
Reviewer scores are worthless to me since they're often shills. Audience reviews, with a large enough sample size, is much more trustworthy.


If you inquire more than the tomatometer than the reviews give mostly mediocre scores of 6/10 or C.


Which is basically a good measure of most movies on average. Some will enjoy it a lot while others may not like it as much. Really crappy movies usually get slaughtered by audience scores while pro reviewers tend to give higher scores or even VERY high scores to a lot of that crap.

In essence, there's no true score since we all have different taste, different tolerances for flaws and plot holes, different interests etc.


I agree. I would like to write something smart but I notice I get tired by nowadays fits of culture and I get really grumpy when it comes to enjoying most things that creators fart in our general direction.

I rarely get surprised by any kind of pop culture, everything is recycled, remade or "safe" in sake of profit and catering to the lowest common denominator.
Movies are remade and/or raped en masse right now. TV series I get invested are usually cancelled or if run long enough turned into crap.
I mostly switched to less mainstream comic books published by Image, Dark Horse, Vertigo in other words not superhero crapolla but this year is a year of woke and mediocre. A high decline in quality of stories and focus on equality that well usually not equals quality.
What a shitty time to trudge through that awful existence when your escape options are massive turds made by talentless hacks...


sar·​casm | \ ˈsär-ˌka-zəm \
1: a sharp and often satirical or ironic utterance designed to cut or give pain
2a: a mode of satirical wit depending for its effect on bitter, caustic, and often ironic language that is usually directed against an individual
b: the use or language of sarcasm
Back to top
monk3ybusin3ss




Posts: 11154

PostPosted: Mon, 18th Oct 2021 18:45    Post subject:
Back to top
Stormwolf




Posts: 24121
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Mon, 18th Oct 2021 20:01    Post subject:
fucking kids. I'm not very optimistic
Back to top
VonMisk




Posts: 9517
Location: Hatredland
PostPosted: Mon, 18th Oct 2021 20:39    Post subject:
Stormwolf wrote:
fucking kids. I'm not very optimistic

How dare you. Do you not recognise:
Ecto
The Terror Dog
The Trap
The Proton Pack
The PKE Meter
The Uniform
The Stay Puft (that was fucking very situational entity)
The fucking love work of the original directors child
The FUCKING WORK OF LOVE
The Original Ghostbuster (that are still alive)
The Slimer

Why are you not nostalgic? Did you not had a childhood? Why you don't love ghostbuster?



 Spoiler:
 


The whirrly whirl portal of doom in the sky(tm)!


sar·​casm | \ ˈsär-ˌka-zəm \
1: a sharp and often satirical or ironic utterance designed to cut or give pain
2a: a mode of satirical wit depending for its effect on bitter, caustic, and often ironic language that is usually directed against an individual
b: the use or language of sarcasm
Back to top
headshot
VIP Member



Posts: 37541
Location: UK
PostPosted: Wed, 5th Jan 2022 03:39    Post subject:
Ghostbusters.Afterlife.2021.2160p.WEB-DL.x265.10bit.HDR.DDP5.1.Atmos-CM


May the NFOrce be with you always.
Back to top
JackQ
Non-expret in Derps lagunge



Posts: 14310
Location: Kibbutznik, Israel
PostPosted: Wed, 5th Jan 2022 05:42    Post subject:
Wonder if it's worth waiting for Dolbyy vision version.


"Fuck Denuvo"

Your personal opinions != the rest of the forum
Back to top
AmpegV4




Posts: 6248

PostPosted: Wed, 5th Jan 2022 09:57    Post subject:
⁢⁢


Last edited by AmpegV4 on Mon, 23rd Feb 2026 09:02; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
M4trix




Posts: 9484

PostPosted: Wed, 5th Jan 2022 17:34    Post subject:
..


Last edited by M4trix on Fri, 29th Mar 2024 17:59; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
speedgear




Posts: 2697
Location: portugal
PostPosted: Thu, 6th Jan 2022 12:55    Post subject:
1º the tried the lbgt version, now the kids to try to milk it more


Sin317 wrote:
while you can't "turn gay", you can cut off your balls. believe me, you'll never think of women again.


zmed wrote:
Or just a defense mechanism. If you fart, you'll most definitely smell it so your brain tells you it ain't bad as strangerfarts.
Back to top
jackbomb




Posts: 2563
Location: Tortilla de patatas
PostPosted: Thu, 6th Jan 2022 14:45    Post subject:
You know what's sad? The first half of the movie is good, enticing even! But the nostalgia second half trip to memory lane is not. And it's a shame because it's the fucking trend nowadays
this... this, could've been proper.
Back to top
StEFaN7




Posts: 6066
Location: them swamps
PostPosted: Thu, 6th Jan 2022 22:58    Post subject:
wtf are you on about, apart from the ending cameos it is a good movie, was going low expectation given rlm but was plesently surprised. i dont care about nostalgia, all that shit wasnt in my face


I can see your soul at the edges of your eyes..
Back to top
Ankh




Posts: 23437
Location: Trelleborg
PostPosted: Fri, 7th Jan 2022 06:01    Post subject:
StEFaN7 wrote:
wtf are you on about, apart from the ending cameos it is a good movie, was going low expectation given rlm but was plesently surprised. i dont care about nostalgia, all that shit wasnt in my face


...but is it better than a Zack Snyder movie? Wink


shitloads of new stuff in my pc. Cant keep track of it all.
Back to top
StEFaN7




Posts: 6066
Location: them swamps
PostPosted: Fri, 7th Jan 2022 08:51    Post subject:
yes, jason reitman is a great director


I can see your soul at the edges of your eyes..
Back to top
hitmanuk




Posts: 929

PostPosted: Fri, 7th Jan 2022 21:18    Post subject:
Watched it tonight with little lad 4/10 .. last half an hour was ok rest was a bit crap
Back to top
jaapie18




Posts: 2497
Location: Holland
PostPosted: Fri, 7th Jan 2022 21:21    Post subject:
StEFaN7 wrote:
yes, jason reitman is a great director


Hes not.
Back to top
StEFaN7




Posts: 6066
Location: them swamps
PostPosted: Fri, 7th Jan 2022 21:56    Post subject:
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0718646/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0

Nominated for 4 Oscars. Another 63 wins & 69 nominations. See more awards »

lol wut


I can see your soul at the edges of your eyes..
Back to top
jaapie18




Posts: 2497
Location: Holland
PostPosted: Fri, 7th Jan 2022 22:25    Post subject:
StEFaN7 wrote:
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0718646/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0

Nominated for 4 Oscars. Another 63 wins & 69 nominations. See more awards »

lol wut


So ? I don't care
Back to top
todd72173




Posts: 2403

PostPosted: Sat, 8th Jan 2022 01:52    Post subject:
Harold Ramis is rolling in his grave


RYZEN 5 2600|RADEON 570| |ASRock X370 Killer|DDR4@2800Mhz||Corsair SPEC-05 Case|AOC G2590FX 24.5''144hz 1ms|
Back to top
Frant
King's Bounty



Posts: 24813
Location: Your Mom
PostPosted: Sat, 8th Jan 2022 12:25    Post subject:
So far I barely lasted 20 minutes before I lost interest and did something else. It felt really boring and lacked all the energy of the first two movies. Perhaps it gets better after that? I guess I'll check out the rest of the movie later.. but I'm not really feeling like it at the moment.


Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn!

"The sky was the color of a TV tuned to a dead station" - Neuromancer
Back to top
WaldoJ
VIP Member



Posts: 32678

PostPosted: Tue, 11th Jan 2022 15:28    Post subject:
todd72173 wrote:
Harold Ramis is rolling in his grave

Nah he's not. They just cg'd him and didn't give him any dialogue so it worked.
Movie was ok. A serious-ish take on Ghostbusters.
Really enjoyed the look of it. Would love more in this tone.


Sin317 wrote:
I win, you lose. Or Go fuck yourself.
Back to top
DXWarlock
VIP Member



Posts: 11549
Location: Florida, USA
PostPosted: Tue, 11th Jan 2022 15:39    Post subject:
@WaldoJ
I had the opposite take. Wife wanted to see it so got the yarr version and I lost interest in about 30 minutes.

This weird mix of coming of age/science fiction mystery thriller genre, didnt tickle my ghostbusters want. And the visual & audio nostalgia grabs made it worse, not better, for me. It had a "Incase you forgot because it so wildly different than the core of the franchise, this is a ghostbusters movie" vibe to the prop placement.
It had the same overall movie atmosphere like they took the movie "Signs" or such tossed in a bit of fall flat TV sitcom comedy, painted it with ghostbusters merchandise, and made it with kids growing up to "hit ALL the target audiences".

Be like if they took the police academy movies, and reframed it in the genre that the movie Scream was in. Both pretty good franchise movies on their own, but a let down to both when trying to re-make and old comedy into a psycho thriller.


-We don't control what happens to us in life, but we control how we respond to what happens in life.
-Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times. -G. Michael Hopf

Disclaimer: Post made by me are of my own creation. A delusional mind relayed in text form.
Back to top
WaldoJ
VIP Member



Posts: 32678

PostPosted: Tue, 11th Jan 2022 17:47    Post subject:
See maybe I enjoyed it cause I wasn't a huge GB fan to begin with.
The memberberry moments were just reminders to me lol.

Like remember this part from the movie you rewatched recently and you didn't really enjoy because you don't understand why a long ass SNL skit was made into a movie? I watched it as a kid but didn't have any emotional connection to it. So it didn't feel like a butchering of a franchise. All Whamen reboot did though because of how forced it was. If Whamen reboot was more structured, it would have worked.


Sin317 wrote:
I win, you lose. Or Go fuck yourself.
Back to top
DXWarlock
VIP Member



Posts: 11549
Location: Florida, USA
PostPosted: Tue, 11th Jan 2022 18:03    Post subject:
I'm not a huge fan either, but I'm not a real huge fan of movies overall. So the few I'd go "meh I'd watch that if it was on again" is special, I guess? As most I rarely want to see once much less a second time.
80's comedy movies are probably the closest I get to a 'genre type' I favor.
Even then my 'favorite' on a normal persons scale would be a 5 out of 10, I max out at 5...(Dunno I just can't get into movies, I need more than 1 1/2 hours to care about the story or characters, but any movie longer than that is 'too long' for me to sit thru...a self oxymoron I think).
Like star wars, seen them all. But never any individual one in its entirety in one sitting, or in order. It's usually when its on and someone was already watching it, or TV was left on it it happen to be on and a part I hadn't seen yet.

Why this seems extra bad to me I think. It was the quintessential 80's action comedy franchise with simple yet overly colorful trope character types that made it what it is, and they made it into a coming of age 'serious characters' mixed with sci fi drama.


-We don't control what happens to us in life, but we control how we respond to what happens in life.
-Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times. -G. Michael Hopf

Disclaimer: Post made by me are of my own creation. A delusional mind relayed in text form.
Back to top
Page 7 of 7 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - Movie & TV Sparks Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group