Page 3 of 3 |
|
Posted: Thu, 19th Aug 2004 05:02 Post subject: |
|
 |
SkylineGTR wrote: | FEAR graphics, surpass Doom 3 graphics by a mile, it was obvious from some of the pictures and the video clips. |
It's very unsurprising that one year-off game surpass the game that just came out now in graphic-wise.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mutantius
VIP Member
Posts: 18594
Location: In Elektro looking for beans
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Thu, 19th Aug 2004 06:57 Post subject: |
|
 |
Well before you guys tear each others heads off over what game has the best graphics blah blah, what i want to know is what kind of video card was used to render those SS's of FEAR at the beginning of this thread. I mean if its an X800 XT, on an athlon FX-53 with 1Gig of ram (or more), then im not that impressed, its just more of the same old Doom teasing's. And we all know now that Doom is just the newest gaming benchmark now and for a few years to come, just to judge the latest greatest cards now, and down the line. Now if those FEAR shots are using say an ATi 9700-9800 pro, or Nvidia equivalent, with a cpu of around 1.5G, then HELL yea im impressed. Who the fuck can afford an X800 XT and FX-53, or a 6800 ultra and 3.4EE (mix and match the components all you want, you still know what i mean ((top of the line shit))? 
Windows 7|Enermax1100w|ASUS Rampage III X58|Core i7 990X@ 4.5G|DDR3 3X 2 Mushkin @ 1850mhz |A-Data 256mb SSD|Asus 16X dvd |Nvidia 580XT|Dell Ultrasharp 2405 24" LCD|Creative X-Fi|Logitec Z-680
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Phluxed
VIP Member
Posts: 4911
Location: Oakville, Ontario, Canada
|
Posted: Thu, 19th Aug 2004 14:29 Post subject: |
|
 |
AnimalMother wrote: |
Well you're stupid then. It's obvious why people are impressed by this, even if you're not impressed youself. |
I wasnt all that impressed, especially the sudden hype that it was given in the beginning of the post. So if we are comparing future games, OMG, FEAR < UNREAL3 !!!
*sighs*
Oh and why did Skyline put engine in quotes seemingly implying that the doom 3 engine isnt really an engine. People please. Yes, we've established there are better graphics out there coming up than Doom 3, but as previously mentionned, Doom 3 is out now, and its graphics are absolutely fantastic, and the fact it can look so wonderful on a lower end machine just makes it a better, heres a zing, "engine".
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
gobo
Posts: 217
Location: Cambodia
|
Posted: Thu, 19th Aug 2004 16:10 Post subject: |
|
 |
D3 was nothing special I liked T3 better.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Thu, 19th Aug 2004 16:44 Post subject: |
|
 |
in my eyes, farcry is still a little bit better than doom3.Offcours the monsters in doom3 are looking amazing, but the suroundings in farcry are even better
Do your thing, share everything!
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Thu, 19th Aug 2004 17:04 Post subject: |
|
 |
Well, you can't really compare Far cry engine to Doom 3 engine.
While farcry engine focuss on outer doors, the doom engine is more inside doors.
Through all the doom game, you go outside 3 times and you don't really see much.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
e_ddi_e
Posts: 105
Location: kossan.mu [sWe]
|
Posted: Thu, 19th Aug 2004 23:53 Post subject: |
|
 |
Who cares which game looks best? (well a lot of ppl obiously).
But the "official movie 5" video left me stunned, without a doubt it will be one of the greatest gaming experiences ever so far in the fsp genre.
... but even worse, it releases satan.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Godlikez*
Banned
Posts: 2722
Location: In Your Illusions
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mr.Ed
Posts: 14
Location: back alley ^^
|
Posted: Wed, 25th Aug 2004 05:01 Post subject: |
|
 |
well I dont see it looking better then doom3
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lutzifer
Modzilla
Posts: 12740
Location: ____________________ **** vegan zombie **** GRRAAIIINNSS _______
|
Posted: Thu, 26th Aug 2004 03:18 Post subject: |
|
 |
6Samiel6 wrote: | Kilko wrote: | Project IGI sucked balls... |
...BIG time!!! |
perhaps that is why i liked it so much 
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Thu, 26th Aug 2004 08:11 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Thu, 26th Aug 2004 10:12 Post subject: |
|
 |
Poor 56krs..you need to put a 56k alert on this thread.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lutzifer
Modzilla
Posts: 12740
Location: ____________________ **** vegan zombie **** GRRAAIIINNSS _______
|
Posted: Thu, 26th Aug 2004 12:58 Post subject: |
|
 |
i highly doubt that 56kers would visit a forum where the main interest is to download iso releases 
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Phluxed
VIP Member
Posts: 4911
Location: Oakville, Ontario, Canada
|
Posted: Thu, 26th Aug 2004 14:12 Post subject: |
|
 |
Touche Lutz..
Anyway, Im looking at the screens more carefully with an objective view. While the modelling and rendering for the most part are strong, the textures are blurry and the bumpmapping seems weak. The animations for the most part look good, but not quite on par with the artistic animations in doom3. Seeing as though this game is a year off, there will be much better looking games, take a game that heavily modifies the Doom3 engine. Though modifying engines is sometimes frowned upon, lets remember Valve stole their first engine, and made half life look rather good compared to Quake 1.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Thu, 26th Aug 2004 14:16 Post subject: |
|
 |
Yeah, now that you mention it, bumpmapping does look kinda weak compared to Doom 3 or Far Cry, but if you look at the chopper you can see very sharp textures with very stron bumbmapping.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lutzifer
Modzilla
Posts: 12740
Location: ____________________ **** vegan zombie **** GRRAAIIINNSS _______
|
Posted: Thu, 26th Aug 2004 14:21 Post subject: |
|
 |
mmmh, i d wait for the final product. Monolith have always released games that werent forrunners in terms of graphics, but they are very good in making enjoyable games, so no matter how up to date the game will be visually, it more then likely will be a good and enjoyable game
And dont forget that they also still have a year to make the game better looking 
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Page 3 of 3 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |