| Page 7 of 49 |
|
|
 Posted: Mon, 13th Nov 2006 12:08 Post subject: |
|
 |
| zk1nner wrote: | Mr_Sora,
now 730mb of RAM used. I have 2 IE's opened, icq, mirc, windows sidebar, daemon-tools, steam, and ms word 2007 opened.
Realdeal,
no, it's just tells you used evaluation key to activate. But your windows is full anyway, don't worry. We all have that report, and don't know how to clear it 
--
Oh, i forgot to add Symantec Antivirus Corporate, it eat's much i think  |
try to disable aero, use classic visual theme like win2000, disable everything that do more appearance, so you will have less memory usage, and tell us the difference, would you? thank you
by the way: Microsoft.Windows.Vista.Corp-ZWTiSO] » [17mins 47secs / 13.11.2006]
WHAT THE HELL IS THAT?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 13th Nov 2006 12:25 Post subject: |
|
|
Okay, i used classic skin with no effects, then rebooted, killed everything in tray. Then i entered task manager and killed some procs such as search engine, some windows media bars, dunno it's some additional vista stuff.
Now RAM use is 450mb. I don't think i can make less.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 13th Nov 2006 12:54 Post subject: |
|
|
[Microsoft.Windows.Vista.Corp-ZWTiSO] » [17mins 47secs / 13.11.2006] »
Fake, maybe?
there are like 2 or 3 releases like this, and all these releases are 3.5Gb
I heard Microsoft bought a lot of stock options from ram makers... lol
Vista is taking 400~500mb idle and up to 700mb when i start loading browser and other crap
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 13th Nov 2006 13:03 Post subject: |
|
|
The last info i got now is that the BillGates release is homemade or modified iso. I use it now and have no problems but it's not original (differs from MSDN RTM). Yeah, that's true. Some files are really from RC1 (activation ones).
There is some releases (non-scene) which are surely real of Enterprise Corporate edition. It doesn't ask for CD-key on installation, but requires activation. Who has this ones it's recommended to install them.
MICROSOFT.WINDOWS.VISTA.ENTERPRISE.EDITION.X64.VOL-MSDN
MICROSOFT.WINDOWS.VISTA.ENTERPRISE.EDITION.X86.VOL-MSDN
I got them and will try x86 soon.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 13th Nov 2006 13:09 Post subject: |
|
|
so how much RAM it take if I turn everything on?
Why the hell is it so heavy anyway? Someone pls rip DX10 and make it installable for XP pls
Sig too big.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Parallax_
VIP Member
Posts: 6422
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Mon, 13th Nov 2006 13:12 Post subject: |
|
|
| Tutukun wrote: | | Why the hell is it so heavy anyway? Someone pls rip DX10 and make it installable for XP pls |
LOL, you can't do that. DX10 was rewritten from scratch and will only work on Vista, so forget about "ripping it" or any homemade cracks for it... EVER! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ankh
Posts: 23228
Location: Trelleborg
|
| Posted: Mon, 13th Nov 2006 13:22 Post subject: |
|
|
| Parallax_ wrote: | | Tutukun wrote: | | Why the hell is it so heavy anyway? Someone pls rip DX10 and make it installable for XP pls |
LOL, you can't do that. DX10 was rewritten from scratch and will only work on Vista, so forget about "ripping it" or any homemade cracks for it... EVER! |
Thats why dx9L will come..as a substitute (I guess..could be wrong)
shitloads of new stuff in my pc. Cant keep track of it all.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Parallax_
VIP Member
Posts: 6422
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Mon, 13th Nov 2006 13:27 Post subject: |
|
|
| Anthirs wrote: | | Thats why dx9L will come..as a substitute (I guess..could be wrong) |
Yes, you are wrong. DX9L (L = Longhorn/Legacy) is the DX9 version that will be run on Vista. I can't remember what the last DX9 version on XP will be, but it won't have any DX10 features. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ankh
Posts: 23228
Location: Trelleborg
|
| Posted: Mon, 13th Nov 2006 13:31 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 13th Nov 2006 13:35 Post subject: |
|
|
yep, since dx10 emulates dx9, microsoft is going to release a dx9 version to vista
(lol this is what i think at least)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 13th Nov 2006 13:37 Post subject: |
|
|
I don't want to be rude but nobody gives a damn about your DX10 problems in this thread... please open a separate discussion for that matter.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Parallax_
VIP Member
Posts: 6422
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Mon, 13th Nov 2006 13:38 Post subject: |
|
|
| touf wrote: | | I don't want to be rude but nobody gives a damn about your DX10 problems in this thread... please open a separate discussion for that matter. |
Big difference between nobody and you. Besides, DX10 is very closely related to Vista, why can't we have a word or two about it in here again? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 13th Nov 2006 13:39 Post subject: |
|
|
touf it has all to do with vista
fuck off
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 13th Nov 2006 13:42 Post subject: |
|
|
Parallax_ this thread is named "Microsoft.Windows.Vista.Final-BillGates" and it's not a windows vista discussion unlike "Vista RTM" thread but a release discussion thread.
and tulioanjos go see your mom to learn politeness.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ankh
Posts: 23228
Location: Trelleborg
|
| Posted: Mon, 13th Nov 2006 13:43 Post subject: |
|
|
| Parallax_ wrote: | | Big difference between nobody and you. Besides, DX10 is very closely related to Vista, why can't we have a word or two about it in here again? |
/Agree
shitloads of new stuff in my pc. Cant keep track of it all.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
[sYn]
[Moderator] Elitist
Posts: 8374
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 13th Nov 2006 15:12 Post subject: |
|
|
How does the crack work? Is it an online activation? if so then it's a just a crack of the moment because it uses the beta activation in order to work. Really soon they are going to eliminate the beta activation.
Another question. I have read on a forum that updating vista you recieved also the proper language pack of your country. Is that true? Are there avaible language packs somewhere?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
Banned
Posts: 73193
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Mon, 13th Nov 2006 17:31 Post subject: |
|
|
About the dudes complaining about Vista being heavy on the memory, read, learn and STFU!
| Quote: | SuperFetch is a new technology that speeds up the loading of commonly-used files and programs by pre-loading them into memory.
The intent is to improve performance in situations where running an anti-virus scan or back-up utility would result in otherwise recently-used information being paged out to disk, or disposed from in-memory caches, resulting in lengthy delays when a user comes back to their computer after a period of non-use.
While the necessary files by default are loaded into main memory, Windows Vista has the ability to instead use alternate storage methods, such as USB flash drives, which, though not as fast as RAM, often can be significantly faster than a hard disk drive; thereby freeing up main memory.
SuperFetch also keeps track of what times of day that applications are used, which allows it to intelligently pre-load information that is expected to be used in the near future.
|
What it does is actually keep the most used programs in memory, so "fetching" them would be much much faster. So Vista takes some of the unused RAM and puts that data there. The good thing about SuperFetch is the memory is freed when needed. If you have 1GB ram, and need 768Mb of it for an app, Vista will free (not it in page file). The even better thing about SuperFetch is it make the system much faster and responsive.
Another thing you can notice is Vista tries to limit its memory usage (real usage + SuperFetch) to 1/2 or less the RAM avaible on the system.
When you open task manager, the figure you see is the real usage + SuperFetch. Vista will shrink when you need the RAM.
Now, ask why the hell would it take so much more memory. Why not? Do you have those sticks of RAM for the beauty of it? If the memory can be put to good use to make the system much faster, why not use it?
More on SuperFetch: http://channel9.msdn.com/showpost.aspx?postid=242429
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Horrordee
Soderator
Posts: 8852
Location: England
|
| Posted: Mon, 13th Nov 2006 17:39 Post subject: |
|
|
So has anyone tried some games yet?!
Space for rent. Contact me for rates!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 13th Nov 2006 17:41 Post subject: |
|
|
chill man, I wasn't complaining, i was asking because i didn't know. You ddon't have to be all defensive like that. Bill... is that you?
Sig too big.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
Banned
Posts: 73193
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Mon, 13th Nov 2006 17:55 Post subject: |
|
|
| Tutukun wrote: | | chill man, I wasn't complaining, i was asking because i didn't know. You ddon't have to be all defensive like that. Bill... is that you? |
Not defensive, angry. Over at Neowin, every 5 mins a morons opens a thread like "Vista is using 500MB of my ram, omg vista sux, bill gates blows, linux/xp rulz" bla bla bla. I'm just tired of it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
boffa86
Posts: 155
Location: sväärje
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 13th Nov 2006 18:18 Post subject: |
|
|
Just to confirm, are the releases that are 3.4GB and claim to be Vista RTM Ultimate fakes then? Has anyone tried one to confirm? Ive seen two simular ones up on the net they are both the same size but by different groups.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 13th Nov 2006 18:43 Post subject: |
|
|
saaaaa,
Removing the movies folder should do the trick with Carbon I read in another thread.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 7 of 49 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
