quad core vs dual core for gaming?
Page 1 of 1
hurley




Posts: 688

PostPosted: Wed, 22nd Nov 2006 16:53    Post subject: quad core vs dual core for gaming?
http://www.anandtech.com/tradeshows/showdoc.aspx?i=2868&p=1


interesting article about valve's point of view on quadcore vs dual core mulithreading.
Seems they dismiss core 2 duos and wait for quad cores to develop on it.
benchmarks are also quit impressive.
worth to wait quad cores affordable and buy? or jump happily on the core2duo bandwagon ?

voice your opinion Smile
Back to top
Mortibus




Posts: 18053
Location: .NL
PostPosted: Wed, 22nd Nov 2006 18:09    Post subject:
jump happily coz it might take some time Wink
Back to top
poullou




Posts: 1746
Location: Internet Express
PostPosted: Wed, 22nd Nov 2006 21:02    Post subject:
http://www.nfohump.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=28280 Wink


Ἢ τὰν ἢ ἐπὶ τᾶς - Μολὼν λαβέ
Today is a gift. That's why it's called the present.
Back to top
s_hole




Posts: 765

PostPosted: Thu, 23rd Nov 2006 06:28    Post subject:
valve are just shooting their load on the gaming press
"we're fucking gamedev gods!"
the truth is VERY few games today even utilise multithreading AT ALL
two/more cores/processors is an awesome thing.. it smooths out the whole computer
but not speed it up
go dual - the quad advantage is miniscule
perhaps with the next generation quad might be worth it when programmers really wake up to multithreading
Back to top
Parallax_
VIP Member



Posts: 6422
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Thu, 23rd Nov 2006 10:25    Post subject:
You will see a big boom in multithreaded games in 2007. All games running on UE3 supports it, although not all uses it to their advantage. Crysis supports multithreading as well, and so does Alan Wake (which takes a huge advantage of quad core).


Upcoming PC games 2009 and onwards
Bravery is not a function of firepower.
Back to top
hurley




Posts: 688

PostPosted: Thu, 23rd Nov 2006 11:28    Post subject:
From what i read, intel&amd plan to deliver more quadcores during 1st quarter 2007.

http://www.hothardware.com/viewarticle.aspx?articleid=905&cid=8

its a review of incredible rig:
intel quadcore QX6700 processor
nforce680i striker extreme
2x1GB Corsair Dominator Twin2X2048
2xgeforce 8800gtx in SLI

*drools*
Back to top
IpwnU
Banned



Posts: 584

PostPosted: Thu, 23rd Nov 2006 13:47    Post subject:
well go for the quad core. the games will take advantage of it in the near future.
ie alan wake's physix calculations are done by the other cores. you don't need a physix card for that.
Back to top
deelix
PDIP Member



Posts: 32062
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Thu, 23rd Nov 2006 15:21    Post subject:
Thank god, physix is BS.
Back to top
Parallax_
VIP Member



Posts: 6422
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Thu, 23rd Nov 2006 16:19    Post subject:
Physics are now calculated on the GPUs as well (8800, don't know if ATIAMD will follow up). Also Havok will add an API to calculate physics on the GPUs.


Upcoming PC games 2009 and onwards
Bravery is not a function of firepower.
Back to top
hurley




Posts: 688

PostPosted: Tue, 28th Nov 2006 09:23    Post subject:
new comparison with core 2 quad (Q6700) vs core 2 duo (x6800)

http://www.bcchardware.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3301&Itemid=40

result: best bucks/performance is core 2 duo!
Back to top
poullou




Posts: 1746
Location: Internet Express
PostPosted: Tue, 28th Nov 2006 09:55    Post subject:
Sure, it will be dual cores. Remember last year's benchs with single against dual cores? Who were the winners: single cores! FX57 to be exact.

This is all about the future. Buy a C2D for today and maybe tomorrow, but in 1-2 years quad cores will benefit a lot from multi-threading.

Conclusion: that comparison(which I didn't go through Razz) talks about the current state of processing(serial) where fewer cores win. Multi-cores won't win you today's comparisons. Smile


Ἢ τὰν ἢ ἐπὶ τᾶς - Μολὼν λαβέ
Today is a gift. That's why it's called the present.
Back to top
Parallax_
VIP Member



Posts: 6422
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Tue, 28th Nov 2006 10:33    Post subject:
Regardless, let's see who are on top of today's benchmarks. That's right, Core2Duo. Things are changing faster than you know Smile


Upcoming PC games 2009 and onwards
Bravery is not a function of firepower.
Back to top
hurley




Posts: 688

PostPosted: Tue, 28th Nov 2006 11:43    Post subject:
thanks for your input guys. The bottom point is what should be the attitude of the consumer towards new technologies.
For instance core 2 duo has been on market from july-august 2006, and now intel is planning new entries next year on the mainstream core 2 duo line & core quad line,probably dropping prices.. wait more and more? when must one decide to buy to get very good performance without being ripped?
Back to top
poullou




Posts: 1746
Location: Internet Express
PostPosted: Tue, 28th Nov 2006 12:03    Post subject:
I would say buy a C2D today or buy a not-top-end quad core in ~6 months. Today there is no reason to buy quad core. Those who buy them have the money to buy octa cores in a year or so. However, we don't know what the price will be for mid-range quad-cores in a few months...so we might stick to dual cores even then.


Ἢ τὰν ἢ ἐπὶ τᾶς - Μολὼν λαβέ
Today is a gift. That's why it's called the present.
Back to top
Hfric




Posts: 12017

PostPosted: Tue, 28th Nov 2006 13:32    Post subject:
don`t know you guys but its up to games if they will use it or not ...
remember P4 HT or AMD 64bit ... all the world said WOW i can run my games 4x or 8x times faster , my games will be awesome
/ to this day they are only 6 games that use HT or amd 64bit technology Laughing /

Programs will run faster but if games will , i say don`t bet on it , maybe 5 or 9 will use the power of the other cores ... anyway on the PC more and more power is transfered to GFX and not to the processor , but if games would be made processor dependent for physic hmmm ... Well we all have seen that the new line of Ge-force will have a physic processor so don`t bet on it that games will be processor dependent like it was showed in Alan Awake , becoz the gfx will do the physic... Rolling Eyes

anyway todays technology goes to the wrong direction , yes i like the performance but what about power consumption , we got a GFX that will eat 430w and a dualcore 75w or quadro 130w ... if they will go in this direction i will play only consoles becoz having a PC that need a 2kw PSU just misses the point , sorry but i am not a billionaire


Back to top
remek




Posts: 126

PostPosted: Tue, 28th Nov 2006 14:50    Post subject:
hmm yeah its strange ... i had been running an amd 64 4000+ cpu for a while
& got the chance of an amd 64 fx-60 x2 i took it cause it was skt 939 same as mine
i had to bios update the board for it to work ... i got a boost of about 3000 points
in 3dmark2001se .. but fuck thats the only benifit i have seen on it . Sad

& like most of U guys i do a lot of unraring & its just the same
video encoding aint much faster if any
Back to top
poullou




Posts: 1746
Location: Internet Express
PostPosted: Tue, 28th Nov 2006 15:00    Post subject:
Maybe its only me. I really want to convince myself to upgrade to quad core than dual core. Very Happy


Ἢ τὰν ἢ ἐπὶ τᾶς - Μολὼν λαβέ
Today is a gift. That's why it's called the present.
Back to top
hurley




Posts: 688

PostPosted: Wed, 29th Nov 2006 10:09    Post subject:
that damn E6600+geForce8800gtx is dam tempting...but i will resist!!!! till past holidays at least.. well I hope Very Happy
Back to top
Epsilon
Dr. Strangelove



Posts: 9240
Location: War Room
PostPosted: Wed, 29th Nov 2006 15:49    Post subject:
Parallax_ wrote:
Crysis supports multithreading as well, and so does Alan Wake (which takes a huge advantage of quad core).

At a recent semipublic demonstration of Crysis for hexus.net members the lead developer said that sadly they did not support quad core. Wink
Back to top
Parallax_
VIP Member



Posts: 6422
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Wed, 29th Nov 2006 16:04    Post subject:
Epsilon wrote:
At a recent semipublic demonstration of Crysis for hexus.net members the lead developer said that sadly they did not support quad core. Wink

As I'm sure you have learned to read, the quad core comment was about Alan Wake.


Upcoming PC games 2009 and onwards
Bravery is not a function of firepower.
Back to top
CaptainCox
VIP Member



Posts: 6823
Location: A Swede in Germany (FaM)
PostPosted: Wed, 29th Nov 2006 19:09    Post subject:
My 5 cents...get a "cheap" C2D, like the E6300 or somet, clock the shit out of it and get GOOD! ram and a kick as Gracard. Save the big bucks for maybe fall 2007. but then again I always say buy the best know and be King for 2-3 month, couse in 2-3 month there will be another guy on the hill, but at least u get to be King Wink


Back to top
hurley




Posts: 688

PostPosted: Thu, 30th Nov 2006 10:41    Post subject:
ive been too many times king of the month and 2 month later the king of the ripped noobs Laughing
the E6300 is cool, but i'd like to reach 3Ghz overclocked and still have a margin, so the temperature won't become a huge issue. moreover i dont want to spend weeks finetuning, so I think 6600 is good enough. money isnt the problem,BUT time,performance and 'getting ripped' is the problem to me Laughing
Intel will introduce in 1st quarter '07 more core2duos in their line. combined to the xmas promotions, february should be the time to buy. But maybe i'm wrong in my assumptions Very Happy
Back to top
Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - Hardware Zone
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group