| Page 14 of 183 |
|
|
 Posted: Sun, 3rd Dec 2006 10:39 Post subject: |
|
 |
To me stalker looks average, but still impresive even after few years. In case of the tire, yeah it wasnt that good, but you could see that it just blows up and pieces are flying away really fast, why i dont know, but its sure is not realistic. To me the graphics look very nice, even awsome. But i wont be seeing it in the full beauty because im not gonna buy a dx10 card just yet. Also the video was kind of low quality, if you watch the dx10 flyby in hq the evnironment looks impressive, dont know how it will look on an average computer, but hopefully not worse than farcry.
Sig too big. -Nothing is too big for Fedor. Expect a nasty armbar.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Parallax_
VIP Member
Posts: 6422
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Sun, 3rd Dec 2006 10:54 Post subject: |
|
|
STALKER looks like shit compared to Crysis. It is obvious that it has suffered graphically because of all the delays. The first thing you notice is the lack of normal mapping, lighting quality seems very low at places (and Im not just talking about shadows).
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 3rd Dec 2006 10:57 Post subject: |
|
|
i am thinking of getting mid range card like 8600GT when it will be around..i guess it wil cost 150-200$...and i will replace my 66ooGT. big games like crisis and project offset and alanawake , will ask for strong cards..it will run well on older cards, but if i am about to buy new one' i will go for directx 10 crad:)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Parallax_
VIP Member
Posts: 6422
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Sun, 3rd Dec 2006 11:02 Post subject: |
|
|
Of course it might run well on older cards, but then again that means you will have to sacrifice graphics for performance.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 3rd Dec 2006 11:08 Post subject: |
|
|
| Parallax_ wrote: | | STALKER looks like shit compared to Crysis. It is obvious that it has suffered graphically because of all the delays. The first thing you notice is the lack of normal mapping, lighting quality seems very low at places (and Im not just talking about shadows). |
as mutch as the time pass, they have less chance to do something decent, but i saw some new screenshots few days ago on gamershell.com and i loved what i saw.
(old ingame movies and screenshots looked medium minus..thats right)
i just hope it will be fine...should be aoubt q1 2007...lets hope no more deleys.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 3rd Dec 2006 11:08 Post subject: |
|
|
Stalker sometimes looks very nice, but only sometimes. It really shines and looks photorealistic in urban areas, but vegetation sucks big time. Because vegetation requires higher polycount that the engine cannot render so fast. The only thing the devs can do is to create physics like in HL2. Hl2 had crappy textures, but physics were shining.
I wonder how frozen area looks like in Crysis. We've seen only few seconds of it and only in distance. Also you will be able to throw barrels at other players in SP and MP.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 3rd Dec 2006 11:27 Post subject: |
|
|
This new vid doesn't even showcast crysis' full technical ability because it merely shows a MP map. Sp maps have much more details and physically interactive elements, they don't need to be balanced to avoid lag issues like mp maps, where speed is what counts more.
And yeah crysis is what I'm going for when it comes to graphics, but Bioshock sure looks incredibly well done. The first game which I feel deserves to be a true successor of Deus Ex.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 3rd Dec 2006 11:40 Post subject: |
|
|
| saddamhussein wrote: | | but Bioshock sure looks incredibly well done. The first game which I feel deserves to be a true successor of Deus Ex. |
Yea, Bioshock definitely got it with graphics, but if you look at the shootouts and the ragdoll system...arrrrr! No damage textures, no F.E.A.R-like particle effects and the ragdoll puppets are cheaply flying through the air screaming like in games from 2002. Its finally time for the devs to inplement realistic, loud, effective and (yes) violent shootouts with death animations+ragdoll, cause thats whats really making a good shooter. (see: SOF2, F.E.A.R, Crysis, Stranglehold)
4GB i7 860 @3.0 GTX275 AMP
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Karmeck
Posts: 3345
Location: Sweden
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 3rd Dec 2006 12:33 Post subject: |
|
|
lol thats so stupid why would they do that they had all the vehicle physics n shit going on... fuck stalker
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Parallax_
VIP Member
Posts: 6422
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Sun, 3rd Dec 2006 12:53 Post subject: |
|
|
| Sedolf wrote: | Yea, Bioshock definitely got it with graphics, but if you look at the shootouts and the ragdoll system...arrrrr! No damage textures, no F.E.A.R-like particle effects and the ragdoll puppets are cheaply flying through the air screaming like in games from 2002. Its finally time for the devs to inplement realistic, loud, effective and (yes) violent shootouts with death animations+ragdoll, cause thats whats really making a good shooter. (see: SOF2, F.E.A.R, Crysis, Stranglehold)
|
Well, they are still far from release. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
deelix
PDIP Member
Posts: 32062
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Sun, 3rd Dec 2006 14:43 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 3rd Dec 2006 14:50 Post subject: |
|
|
Did they kill all vehicles in Stalker? Is there no Lada or some fuck?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Parallax_
VIP Member
Posts: 6422
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Sun, 3rd Dec 2006 15:29 Post subject: |
|
|
| d3rd3vil wrote: | | Did they kill all vehicles in Stalker? Is there no Lada or some fuck? |
There are still vehicles models in the game, but you can't drive 'em anymore. However, the code for the vehicles are left in the game, so people can easily mod it back. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Karmeck
Posts: 3345
Location: Sweden
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Parallax_
VIP Member
Posts: 6422
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Sun, 3rd Dec 2006 16:02 Post subject: |
|
|
| Karmeck wrote: | Dont fuking stat talking staker in here make ure own thread about that.  |
I'm sorry, but this thread has been going off/on-topic for a long time.  Besides, you won't see Crysis until Summer 2007 earliest. They haven't even entered alpha stage yet. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CaptainCox
VIP Member
Posts: 6823
Location: A Swede in Germany (FaM)
|
| Posted: Sun, 3rd Dec 2006 16:37 Post subject: |
|
|
http://pc.ign.com/articles/748/748443p1.html
"IGN: Is Crysis still on track for a Q3 2007 release? How likely is that date to change?
Cevat Yerli: We are working hard to bring it out at the highest quality level as soon as possible. It will be here before you know it but we are not at liberty to discuss an exact date currently."
Done when its done hey!....like always 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 3rd Dec 2006 16:48 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Parallax_
VIP Member
Posts: 6422
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Sun, 3rd Dec 2006 17:02 Post subject: |
|
|
| CaptainCox wrote: | | It will be here before you know it but we are not at liberty to discuss an exact date currently." |
Alpha -> RC = +/- 6 months usually. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 3rd Dec 2006 19:10 Post subject: |
|
|
It's not out for at least another 9 months! I thought it was due out in march or something. I wasn't that impressed with the video which showed the multiplayer map, did you see the way the car just went straight through the bushes, I though Crysis had eliminated that kind of stuff.
Also, they keep making out that the whole environment is destructable, but i'm willing to bet the larger structures can't be damaged, even with a rocket launcher.
"Techniclly speaking, Beta-Manboi didnt inject Burberry_Massi with Benz, he injected him with liquid that had air bubbles in it, which caused benz." - House M.D
"Faith without logic is the same as knowledge without understanding; meaningless"
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
swebarb
Posts: 2154
Location: Vikingland
|
| Posted: Sun, 3rd Dec 2006 20:53 Post subject: |
|
|
Me too. that is for real Q3 2007 ???? lol are they waiting for next gen graphics cards or something... shit.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 3rd Dec 2006 21:01 Post subject: |
|
|
No, they dont release it yet because its probably not finished. Who wants another bug ridden game, which 2006 had lots of. I hope they polish it well, and release it when its really done. BUt i also i believe you need vista to run dx10? And there is only one card right now that supports dx10, 8800 series. When it is finaly released we will have several dx10 cards so at least some kind of a choice.
Sig too big. -Nothing is too big for Fedor. Expect a nasty armbar.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Karmeck
Posts: 3345
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Sun, 3rd Dec 2006 21:27 Post subject: |
|
|
| Krest wrote: | | No, they dont release it yet because its probably not finished. Who wants another bug ridden game, which 2006 had lots of. I hope they polish it well, and release it when its really done. BUt i also i believe you need vista to run dx10? And there is only one card right now that supports dx10, 8800 series. When it is finaly released we will have several dx10 cards so at least some kind of a choice. |
Yes you need Vista for dx10 but you dont need dx10 to run crysis since it will suport both.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 3rd Dec 2006 21:37 Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah but if you want most out of it, you do need dx10. THe gameplay is probably just like in farcry. Crysis is boasting so much about their graphics, i hope they wont forget that gameplay matters too.
Sig too big. -Nothing is too big for Fedor. Expect a nasty armbar.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 4th Dec 2006 06:36 Post subject: |
|
|
What Gears of War was for 360, Crysis will be for Vista next year
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 4th Dec 2006 13:44 Post subject: |
|
|
| 21021 wrote: | | What Gears of War was for 360, Crysis will be for Vista next year |
a hype fest? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
WaldoJ
VIP Member
Posts: 32678
|
| Posted: Mon, 4th Dec 2006 13:47 Post subject: |
|
|
Ooooh!
insulting both pc and x360 audience with one blow. Niice!
| Sin317 wrote: | | I win, you lose. Or Go fuck yourself. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ankh
Posts: 23342
Location: Trelleborg
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 4th Dec 2006 21:05 Post subject: |
|
|
If it's flyby then yes I guess we all have seen
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 14 of 183 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
watch and drop your jaw!
