|
|
| Page 46 of 96 |
|
|
 Posted: Mon, 4th Dec 2006 18:27 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 4th Dec 2006 19:46 Post subject: |
|
|
my computer can run CS:source smooth but not Arma 
c'mon even my radeon9700pro ran CSS smooth 
| Quote: | | PC awesome button = Uninstall! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 4th Dec 2006 20:27 Post subject: |
|
|
The german version had performance issue due to Securom and not any kind of game optimization.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 5th Dec 2006 02:12 Post subject: |
|
|
look on the right side menu, at the top. you should be able to select INTRO OUTRO etc from there, and you can put in your mission text and such
you can look up OFP editing, since it is essentially the same editor, if there is not a WIKI on armed assault yet.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 5th Dec 2006 02:21 Post subject: |
|
|
e6700 @ 3.2 Ghz, Gforce 7950 with 512mb, 2gigs of ram everythign is with latest drivers ofcourse, and runs like total shit here. Its the chez version btw, and 1.1 patch.
Sig too big. -Nothing is too big for Fedor. Expect a nasty armbar.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
-=Cartoon=-
VIP Member
Posts: 8823
Location: South Pacific Ocean
|
| Posted: Tue, 5th Dec 2006 02:36 Post subject: |
|
|
WOW
The admins need to learn how to clean up shit.... and ban people
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 5th Dec 2006 04:28 Post subject: |
|
|
| Krest wrote: | | e6700 @ 3.2 Ghz, Gforce 7950 with 512mb, 2gigs of ram everythign is with latest drivers ofcourse, and runs like total shit here. Its the chez version btw, and 1.1 patch. |
FAKE.
otherwise, try on lower resolution. 1280 aa 4x .
disable SSAA and trans AA.
with a such high CPU , shadow should not be a problem on high.
and wait ....
7950GX2 512MB is 256MB PER GPU .
so texture quality => normal.
period
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 5th Dec 2006 04:59 Post subject: |
|
|
SexyJesus, you're da man. Thanks!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 5th Dec 2006 06:56 Post subject: |
|
|
Without aa and normal textures it looks like crap. I limited the viewdistance, in some firefights its ok, but in others fps really drops. I did disable shadows because i do not really care about them, and fps was improved but not by much. Don't scream fake if you dont know shit. IMO farcry has better graphics, larger viewdistance (on default) and runs flawlesly. Farcry is only for size comparison, nothing to do with the gameplay. Im not dissing on the game because im enjoying it, but its kind of hard to shoot when you get low fps, few hits and you are pretty much dead here.
Sig too big. -Nothing is too big for Fedor. Expect a nasty armbar.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mutantius
VIP Member
Posts: 18594
Location: In Elektro looking for beans
|
| Posted: Tue, 5th Dec 2006 08:24 Post subject: |
|
|
Armed Assault is a way better game then Far Cry, It was innovating its in OFP days and still maintain an unique gameplay experience and with Armed Assault it brought clean graphics which could compete with other FPS on the market. Optimizations & tweaking will help bring this game to life. Bohemia knows what to do and they are throwing patches out to fix those probs.
"Why don't you zip it, Zipfero?" - fraich3
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 5th Dec 2006 10:02 Post subject: |
|
|
The funny thing is:
If it had been EA or Atari releasing this piece of software, there would be endless bashing for releasing it in this alpha state... but now it's ok and even the argumentation for some people that there will be patches and even fanmods that will bring Arma to a state it can finally be played... wow...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 5th Dec 2006 10:13 Post subject: |
|
|
| Krest wrote: | | Without aa and normal textures it looks like crap. I limited the viewdistance, in some firefights its ok, but in others fps really drops. I did disable shadows because i do not really care about them, and fps was improved but not by much. Don't scream fake if you dont know shit. IMO farcry has better graphics, larger viewdistance (on default) and runs flawlesly. Farcry is only for size comparison, nothing to do with the gameplay. Im not dissing on the game because im enjoying it, but its kind of hard to shoot when you get low fps, few hits and you are pretty much dead here. |
your 7950GX2 is a shit .... i dont know , really.
CZ version 1.01
my X1900XT make me able to play in 1280x960 AA6x texture high , VD 2500 or even 3000m, object distance high , shadow off, aniso 16X quality .
and when is say play well , it's MINIMUM 20 22 fps . in weapons aimsight , in forest of north .
usually 30 35fps in large city.
ps: vsync on , tripple buffering forced , texture high = 420MB video ram filled.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ispep
VIP Member
Posts: 4117
|
| Posted: Tue, 5th Dec 2006 10:34 Post subject: |
|
|
| Kater Mikesch wrote: | The funny thing is:
If it had been EA or Atari releasing this piece of software, there would be endless bashing for releasing it in this alpha state... but now it's ok and even the argumentation for some people that there will be patches and even fanmods that will bring Arma to a state it can finally be played... wow... |
This is because they didn't compromise on the gameplay in order to satiate streamlining for big bucks. Quality overrides everything. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
deelix
PDIP Member
Posts: 32062
Location: Norway
|
| Posted: Tue, 5th Dec 2006 10:47 Post subject: |
|
|
drafak: of course its not the gfx card...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 5th Dec 2006 12:48 Post subject: |
|
|
How are you guys finding the chopper controls. I have a hard time controlling the chopper even with the joystick. Any tips ??
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 5th Dec 2006 16:10 Post subject: |
|
|
| Kamikaze666 wrote: | my computer can run CS:source smooth but not Arma
c'mon even my radeon9700pro ran CSS smooth |
LOOOOOOOOOOL. no it cant, now stfu.
| Krest wrote: | | e6700 @ 3.2 Ghz, Gforce 7950 with 512mb, 2gigs of ram everythign is with latest drivers ofcourse, and runs like total shit here. Its the chez version btw, and 1.1 patch. |
yeah i have the same prob too.
amd64 3800+
2gb ram kingston dual channel
xfx 7900gt
=/
| Krest wrote: | | Without aa and normal textures it looks like crap. I limited the viewdistance, in some firefights its ok, but in others fps really drops. I did disable shadows because i do not really care about them, and fps was improved but not by much. Don't scream fake if you dont know shit. IMO farcry has better graphics, larger viewdistance (on default) and runs flawlesly. Farcry is only for size comparison, nothing to do with the gameplay. Im not dissing on the game because im enjoying it, but its kind of hard to shoot when you get low fps, few hits and you are pretty much dead here. |
i did the same, total agree with you!
btw there are ppl that dont care if the game runs like shit or looks like shit, because they have crappy Pcs.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 5th Dec 2006 19:25 Post subject: |
|
|
The missions do not showcase the power of this game. You can quickly put together a battle in the editor that is more pulse-pounding than any of the stock missions, with air support, tanks, amphibious assult, etc.
EDITOR TIP: if you play with placement radius for enemy units, you can randomize their starting position and also the chance for initial spawn. So you can create a scenario which will play very different each time, and do this in just a few minutes.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 5th Dec 2006 20:07 Post subject: |
|
|
Mutantius, as ive said, i was only refering to farcry because of the size and graphics, nothing to do with the gameplay. I myself like games that are not tottaly arcadish but on the other hand not totally hard core realistic. But im still enjoying AA, gameplay>>graphics, but good fps>gameplay.
drafak, it could be my video card, or it could be that the game is not optimized well. it runs everything on high right now, even gothic 3, which eveything agrees pretty demanding game. At first i wanted to buy the latest ati card, but i just didnt have enough money so had to settle for this.
Sig too big. -Nothing is too big for Fedor. Expect a nasty armbar.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 5th Dec 2006 21:10 Post subject: |
|
|
| Krest wrote: | Mutantius, as ive said, i was only refering to farcry because of the size and graphics, nothing to do with the gameplay. I myself like games that are not tottaly arcadish but on the other hand not totally hard core realistic. But im still enjoying AA, gameplay>>graphics, but good fps>gameplay.
drafak, it could be my video card, or it could be that the game is not optimized well. it runs everything on high right now, even gothic 3, which eveything agrees pretty demanding game. At first i wanted to buy the latest ati card, but i just didnt have enough money so had to settle for this. |
you have a good PC. and good nvidia card, is not your pc, is the game.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 5th Dec 2006 21:23 Post subject: |
|
|
shh, lol, i know, but if i say its totally the games fault, all the fanbois will attack me. See they cant say that my computer sucks, because i know it doesnt, so VC, CPU, Memory are all must be broken or something.
Sig too big. -Nothing is too big for Fedor. Expect a nasty armbar.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mutantius
VIP Member
Posts: 18594
Location: In Elektro looking for beans
|
| Posted: Tue, 5th Dec 2006 21:52 Post subject: |
|
|
| Krest wrote: | Mutantius, as ive said, i was only refering to farcry because of the size and graphics, nothing to do with the gameplay. I myself like games that are not tottaly arcadish but on the other hand not totally hard core realistic. But im still enjoying AA, gameplay>>graphics, but good fps>gameplay.
drafak, it could be my video card, or it could be that the game is not optimized well. it runs everything on high right now, even gothic 3, which eveything agrees pretty demanding game. At first i wanted to buy the latest ati card, but i just didnt have enough money so had to settle for this. |
Sorry ^^, The issues will be dealt with (just like the previous game has proven) then we will have a strong game which can and will compete with other games.
"Why don't you zip it, Zipfero?" - fraich3
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 5th Dec 2006 21:56 Post subject: |
|
|
Thats exactly what im hoping for. Im waiting for the US version to arive, so i can buy. Hopefully by that time, we will have several patches that fix some bugs and optimization, then it'll be perfect.
Sig too big. -Nothing is too big for Fedor. Expect a nasty armbar.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NoFace.
Posts: 259
Location: Streets
|
| Posted: Wed, 6th Dec 2006 00:01 Post subject: |
|
|
hmmm...when is UK or US Version coming out?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 6th Dec 2006 02:10 Post subject: |
|
|
US should be out Q1 2007. I'm hoping for a January window but you never know.
It would be nice to know who will be the US Publisher?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 6th Dec 2006 02:44 Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Bohemia Interactive, the developers of "Operation Flashpoint", have signed a deal with UK-based publisher 505 Games to release their latest soldier sim, "Armed Assault", in Q1 2007. Though Codemasters officially owns the "Operation Flashpoint" brand, "Armed Assault" is a follow-up to that game in all but name. Bohemia had been struggling to find a publisher until recently, but it would seem that 505 will be publishing the game in Europe, excluding Eastern Europe and Germany for some reason. No word yet on a US publication date, but with a European release secured, a US release becomes an inevitability sooner or later |
http://www.505gamestreet.com/
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Wed, 6th Dec 2006 05:43 Post subject: |
|
|
Well at least we can import the UK version once it's out.
One thing for sure, by the time ArmA is out in UK, we will most probably have a fixed date or a fixed release window for ArmA US so depending on that time, it indeed might be worth it to import from UK or wait for US.
One cool thing I'm still amazed by; I got shot in the leg and I just couldn't stand, I had to crawl up to a tank, ride it back to my black hawk and fly back to my base to get healed.
It is also important to know that this feature might also become a real bitch, if you get shot in the leg at the beginning of a mission, the rest of the mission will become frustratingly annoying and you might as well just restart.
How do Field Hospitals work?? I placed one on my map. I shoot a fellow in the chest and order him to get Healed at Field Hospital, he gets in there and nothing happens. While if I ask the same injured fellow to get Healed at Medic, it just works!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 46 of 96 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|
|
 |
|
