Tony and Gordon's new idea
Page 1 of 1
ginge51
Banned



Posts: 1692
Location: England - Manchester
PostPosted: Thu, 8th Feb 2007 05:08    Post subject: Tony and Gordon's new idea
http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/traveltax/

Sorry if this has been posted before.

Tony and Gordon plan on getting us to buy tracking devices for our cars
The tracking device will cost about £200 and in a recent study by the BBC, the lowest monthly bill was £28 for a rural florist and £194 for a delivery driver. A non working Mum who used the car to take the kids to school paid £86 in one month.

On top of this massive increase in tax, you will be tracked. Somebody will
know where you are at all times. They will also know how fast you have been going, so even if you accidentally creep over a speed limit you can expect and additional fine with your monthly bill.

There is an online petition which can be signed at http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/traveltax/ if you want to show your displeasure at such a crooked breach of our rights

this is an absolute disgrace the sooner these twats are out of power the better Twisted Evil
Back to top
nouseforaname
Über-VIP Member



Posts: 21306
Location: Toronto, Canada
PostPosted: Thu, 8th Feb 2007 06:36    Post subject:
Good public transportation infrastructure should be in place before this kind of thing, which from what I hear, it isn't.


asus z170-A || core i5-6600K || geforce gtx 970 4gb || 16gb ddr4 ram || win10 || 1080p led samsung 27"
Back to top
Reg67




Posts: 5432

PostPosted: Thu, 8th Feb 2007 08:49    Post subject:
nouseforaname wrote:
Good public transportation infrastructure should be in place before this kind of thing, which from what I hear, it isn't.


You are right, and as for the mum, the bloody lazy brats should walk to school - too many fat kids about nowadays grumble grumble Smile

I can never feel sympathy for car drivers that use the car soley for 10 min journeys that are unnecessary.. of course delivery drivers are a different matter.. A good idea would be to charge cartax depending on your car.. ie: a flash git in a Porche pays 70% more than grandad in his morris minor.. and company cars should be charged a hell of a lot more as they contribute more to pollution.

This of course would be very difficult to put in place unfortuantely.. and of course every govt licks that arse of big business and cuts the throat of the man in the street Sad
Back to top
Jenni
Banned



Posts: 9526
Location: England.
PostPosted: Thu, 8th Feb 2007 10:45    Post subject:
On the other side of the coin. Won't petrol/diesel tax be abolished?


Back to top
ginge51
Banned



Posts: 1692
Location: England - Manchester
PostPosted: Thu, 8th Feb 2007 16:35    Post subject:
so has any1 actually signed the petition?
Back to top
UserFriendly7
Moderator



Posts: 1471
Location: England
PostPosted: Thu, 8th Feb 2007 16:50    Post subject:
dupe, tho good to keep open and alive Razz

http://www.nfohump.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=30875


 Spoiler:
 
Back to top
nouseforaname
Über-VIP Member



Posts: 21306
Location: Toronto, Canada
PostPosted: Thu, 8th Feb 2007 16:57    Post subject:
Quote:
The UK Government is to unveil satellite-based 'pay-as-you-go' plans for national motor taxation this week, with a test of the technology due in five to six years, and implementation (if it goes ahead) after the next election. The planned approach seems broadly in line with the conclusions of the Department for Transport's feasibility study on road pricing, published last year, but is being touted as "revenue-neutral", i.e. the overall level of motor taxation will remain the same. Honest.

That promise flies in the face of the advice of several Labour Party think tanks, and given the likely costs of implementing the technology, may be a difficult one to keep. The Government's stated intent at the moment is to reduce congestion, but effects on traffic levels of varying charging by road, time and congestion level will be difficult to predict, and studies in the past few years have suggested that car use - and hence, congestion - will continue to climb without the discouragement of higher taxation.

The anticipated scheme would cover the whole of the UK, and would use GPS to fix the precise location of all vehicles, with cost at the moment anticipated to range from 2p a mile for deserted stretches of road to £1.30 for the busiest. In principle such a scheme could replace fuel and road tax, but a 'vanilla' implementation would obviously miss gas guzzlers, as price would be entirely distance- rather than consumption-based, so the retention of some form of vehicle-related taxation would appear necessary.


OK, so they are replacing one tax with another, but this article has a point: aren't they treating a fuel efficient little car the same as a giant gas guzzling SUV?


asus z170-A || core i5-6600K || geforce gtx 970 4gb || 16gb ddr4 ram || win10 || 1080p led samsung 27"
Back to top
Noob
Banned



Posts: 791

PostPosted: Thu, 8th Feb 2007 21:58    Post subject:
Public transport and it's a waste of money to do this. Fuel emissions correlate to environmental damage. Therefore, tax that it's fuckin cheap to do so. Retarded
Back to top
Page 1 of 1 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - General chatter
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group