| Page 20 of 31 |
Baleur
Posts: 2343
Location: South Sweden
|
 Posted: Thu, 8th Feb 2007 23:37 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
Banned
Posts: 73193
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Fri, 9th Feb 2007 00:56 Post subject: |
|
|
Whaaat? I liked CoH, TDU, R6V... Well, that's it for now. 
Don't blame me, though... So much crap is being released these days! And even if I was to hate everything, I should be able to post whatever I want without Epsilon (or you) censoring me.
And anger is my middle name. Just because I answer politely on some of the questions in the Vista thread (or some of the PMs I get), doesn't mean I don't get angery at them too.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 9th Feb 2007 03:21 Post subject: |
|
|
Well I agree with Inatan there, why would only people who like the game post in this thread? If Epsilon wants to be in a thread full of fanboys and hear nothing but praise for the game so be it but I enjoy reading any kind of comment (positive or negative).
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Epsilon
Dr. Strangelove
Posts: 9240
Location: War Room
|
| Posted: Fri, 9th Feb 2007 09:17 Post subject: |
|
|
| FnF wrote: | | Epsilon wrote: | | CaptainCox wrote: | Ditto (yep I am trying to get my post count to reach 2000 by Sunday  |
You are aware that you aren't awarded vip just because you reach 2000 posts right? |
You are below 2000 too  |
Yes so I didn't become vip because of that as I have not yet reached that mark |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 9th Feb 2007 10:26 Post subject: |
|
|
its safe to agree that commander and conquer redefined the rts norm. its not olbivion graphics, but we actually can see many units fighting and enjoy it. unfortunately unlike SC.
In SC its impossible to see the details of your units and enemy units participating to a battle. the zoom is a failure in that aspect. if you zoom to see detail, you miss the action. if you zoom out, you get the action but with blocky unit graphics. BAD!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
swebarb
Posts: 2154
Location: Vikingland
|
| Posted: Fri, 9th Feb 2007 11:08 Post subject: |
|
|
Omg the hud is horrible it takes up almost half the screen.. no thanks feels so odd playing it.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ispep
VIP Member
Posts: 4117
|
| Posted: Fri, 9th Feb 2007 12:22 Post subject: |
|
|
| swebarb wrote: | | Omg the hud is horrible it takes up almost half the screen.. no thanks feels so odd playing it. |
Press ALT + UP ARROW KEY and you can get a better, more traditional sidebar instead. It still takes up a lot of screen but it is less jarring in my opinion. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 9th Feb 2007 13:18 Post subject: |
|
|
how do you move the view? alt or altgr doesnt work and ctrl+v doesnt do anything either(demo)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 9th Feb 2007 15:08 Post subject: |
|
|
| jackass88 wrote: | | how do you move the view? alt or altgr doesnt work and ctrl+v doesnt do anything either(demo) |
Press the Delete key it will rotate the screen.
MD
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 9th Feb 2007 15:30 Post subject: |
|
|
Well, I had something cool, but kind of pissed me off happen LOL! I was playing last night and I was turtling BIG TIME! I created the experimental units Monkey Lord and the Flying Beast (Damn, cannot remember the name again! LOL!). I put the Monkey Lord at the bottom of the island closing it off to the enemy. I put the Flying Beast at the top. They started to attack me with there walkers in the north section of the map. I sent in the Flying Beast and he destroyed their walkers in glorious graphically impressive explosions. Not to mention the phenomenal sound effects!! Wow, the graphics and sound are just unreal!
Now the thing that upset me......I took the Flying Beast and inched my way into the outer base of the enemy destroying everything! I inched a little further and started getting pummeled by anti-air fire. I started to destroy the anti-air emplacements but my Flying Beast was at half health so I started to pull him out of the battle. I zoomed out and zoomed in on my Gunships. I sent them to assist along with some workers to repair the Flying Beast. I know you can control - 1 to set your Gunships on the 1 key but had not done that yet. When I zoomed back to my Flying Beast I saw this HUGE explosion as my retreating Flying Beast destroyed what looked like a Power Reactor. This explosion started a chain reaction that destroyed all small Power Reactors. At that point I was like WOA!!!!! But then it happened.....a small nuclear explosion sprung out of no where. Then the Victory message appeared! Uhhhgggg, I had destroyed the enemies Commander out of blind luck. I was turtling and trying to build this awesome society and I destroyed the Commander! It was a chain reaction explosion that hit the Commander as he stood by one of the Power Reactors. This sucked big time as I lost all that I had built due to the game ending. I had the game in hand and would have won because I had prepared for the enemies experimental units. But......just imagine if it was a stalemate and we were exchanging blows! What a cool way to tip the scales. It was cool, I just didn't want my game to end at that point. The moral of the story is, keep your Supreme Commander away from anything that can blow up! LOL!
MD
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 9th Feb 2007 15:37 Post subject: |
|
|
how powerfull must be the PC for this game????
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
thudo
Posts: 6309
Location: Mellonville North, Canada
|
| Posted: Fri, 9th Feb 2007 16:47 Post subject: |
|
|
I usually play against a MEDIUM AI now.. working up to HARD AI now and I find it easy to take over all the main island + the 2 smaller islands and just hold the AI to his own. I usually build a whole lot of Tier1 subs to screw him over then have minor defenses in the mid section of the map building up to Tier3 goodies until the Tier3 battleships (man are they incredible) and then the Fixed Heavy Artillery Building (too bad a*s!!) then Nukes (gawd like!!).
I don't even need experimental units to win. I totally forgot that secondary commanders have access to em due to upgrades. Ugh! So yep.. love this game.. just insane destruction with a decent AI. The mod community alone for SC will make this VERY WORTHY TA successor a PC classic!
MSI GT72S 6QF Dominator Pro S 29th Anniversary Intel i7 6820HK @ 4.0Ghz, 32GB DDR4-2133 RAM, 2x256GB Raid0 Toshiba NVMe 2.5 inch PCIe SSD, Nvidia Geforce GTX 980 OC'ed 200+ Core / 200+ Mem, 17.3 inch LG IPS HD Display @ 75Hz, Intel 7265AC Wifi, Windows 10 Pro BIOS version: .112 EC Firmware version: .105
Current Broadband speed record: 329.1 Mb/sec down // 21.73 Mb/sec up
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/3933292.png
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 9th Feb 2007 16:56 Post subject: |
|
|
| Sajuuk_Khar wrote: | | how powerfull must be the PC for this game???? |
Google -> Systemrequirements Supreme Commander?
PC: Yes. Console: No.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
$n@ke
Posts: 917
Location: the Netherlands
|
| Posted: Fri, 9th Feb 2007 20:58 Post subject: |
|
|
Why did they change the camera controls/movement.
I wanna tilt the camera when my nuke hits the enemy's mase fgs.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 9th Feb 2007 21:07 Post subject: |
|
|
| $n@ke wrote: | Why did they change the camera controls/movement.
I wanna tilt the camera when my nuke hits the enemy's mase fgs. |
Hold Space bar, and move the mouse.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 10th Feb 2007 22:42 Post subject: |
|
|
Epsilon, any news on the multiplayer edit?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 10th Feb 2007 23:33 Post subject: |
|
|
| swebarb wrote: | | Omg the hud is horrible it takes up almost half the screen.. no thanks feels so odd playing it. |
totally agree. tried the demo and uninstalled it at once.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
thudo
Posts: 6309
Location: Mellonville North, Canada
|
| Posted: Sun, 11th Feb 2007 04:09 Post subject: |
|
|
Play SC @ 1600x1200 and tell me the Hud is too big?!? Then again.. this "next-gen" RTS ain't meant for slow machines. Just the price of progress.
Regardless, the devs mentioned they are gonna reduce the Hud for the release or in a patch afterwards. Further, someone will mod the hud to be 2x as small and likey 2x as informative at the same time. 
MSI GT72S 6QF Dominator Pro S 29th Anniversary Intel i7 6820HK @ 4.0Ghz, 32GB DDR4-2133 RAM, 2x256GB Raid0 Toshiba NVMe 2.5 inch PCIe SSD, Nvidia Geforce GTX 980 OC'ed 200+ Core / 200+ Mem, 17.3 inch LG IPS HD Display @ 75Hz, Intel 7265AC Wifi, Windows 10 Pro BIOS version: .112 EC Firmware version: .105
Current Broadband speed record: 329.1 Mb/sec down // 21.73 Mb/sec up
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/3933292.png
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 11th Feb 2007 04:12 Post subject: |
|
|
yeah the hud is way too big,especially at lower res. you need to play at 1280x1024 or bigger to see more of the game.
shit 10 frames
| TheBugulous wrote: | There is only 1 Mega Awesome title coming & that is Chris Taylor's latest opus ... <drum roll>
S U P R E M E C O M M A N D E R !!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 11th Feb 2007 05:13 Post subject: |
|
|
| Vodka-Redbull wrote: | | swebarb wrote: | | Omg the hud is horrible it takes up almost half the screen.. no thanks feels so odd playing it. |
totally agree. tried the demo and uninstalled it at once. |
This game is a garbage, ridiculously over hyped by a bunch of muppet fan boys.
C2D E6750 @ 3.2Ghz, 4GB 800MHz DDR2 4-4-4-12, GeForce GTX 260 c216 OC 896MB, 3.2TB, Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Xbox 360 Elite, PS2 Slim, Xbox
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ispep
VIP Member
Posts: 4117
|
| Posted: Sun, 11th Feb 2007 13:24 Post subject: |
|
|
| thudo wrote: | Play SC @ 1600x1200 and tell me the Hud is too big?!? Then again.. this "next-gen" RTS ain't meant for slow machines. Just the price of progress.
Regardless, the devs mentioned they are gonna reduce the Hud for the release or in a patch afterwards. Further, someone will mod the hud to be 2x as small and likey 2x as informative at the same time. |
Why would I play it at that resolution? There's no tangible image quality benefit.
Even at 1280x1024 the HUD is ridiculously large.
That means they've made a mistake and forgotten that half, if not three quarters of their intended audience will have enough trouble to be able to reach that resolution let alone any higher. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 11th Feb 2007 13:54 Post subject: |
|
|
Hud is very normal....play the game more , rather than writting here, and you will see that everything is o.k.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ispep
VIP Member
Posts: 4117
|
| Posted: Sun, 11th Feb 2007 14:06 Post subject: |
|
|
Actually, it's very abnormal. It serves precisely the same function as other game huds but takes up at least three, maybe four times as much dead space (and even more if you consider the popups). Of course you can manage with it, but that doesn't alter the fact it's too large and a hindrance.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 11th Feb 2007 14:54 Post subject: |
|
|
the devs will resize the hud, not that it matters.. i dont even see it as very big anymore
i only care about balance and gameplay.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 20 of 31 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
You were helpful with the vista thing, but geeez stop flaming every single game thread just because people like a game!! Why be an asshole when you can be a helpful dude instead?? That i dont understand.
