| Page 86 of 183 |
proekaan
VIP Member
Posts: 3648
Location: Finland
|
 Posted: Sat, 27th Oct 2007 11:09 Post subject: |
|
 |
| spajdr wrote: | | proekaan wrote: | | spajdr wrote: | | i will wait until NVIDIA or ATI releases new gfx card, its just unplayable for me, i dont wanna set some options down, since then it doesnt then look much better then original farcry. Not even SLI will help here, huge letdown at optimization! or maybe just one year G80 really show its age. |
huh...weird,since it runs smoothly for me,no hick ups or anything with all settings maxed.
You sure you running the latest gfx drivers?
ps.Great game. first EA game worth a buy in a long time...maybe. |
Does 18-22fps sounds smooth for you? for me it dont yes i have 169.01 forceware. Just seeing that red flashlight not so far from start seeing it drops to 12-16fps suggests how it will perform at heavy fight, when a farcry got released it also wasnt much smooth and it takes some times to enjoy full eyecandy without much slowdowns. At least there is no point to use AA at all, since postprocessing effects takes most of jagged edges away. |
Well tbh,I didn't check fps when i played,but I did play it with 163.75 drivers and now after testing 169.01 it feels like it ran better on the older driver,but since I didn't check the fps I can't be totally sure...but it looks like it.
oh and I ran it on XP,so don't know about vista performance.
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X 4,7 GHz
Asrock X670E Steel Legend
G.Skill Trident Z5 32 GB DDR5 6400Mhz
Asus TUF RTX 4090 24 GB GDDR6X
NZXT Kraken Z73 RGB
Corsair HX1500i Platinum
NZXT H7 Flow
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 27th Oct 2007 11:13 Post subject: |
|
|
Benchmarked again, with no AA and AF forced in drivers 
DirectX: 10
Resolution: 1680x1050
Settings: Very High (all)
Antialiasing 4x
CPU Benchmark: 12,24
GPU Benchmark 13,15
DirectX: 10
Resolution: 1680x1050
Settings: Very High (all)
Antialiasing 0x
CPU Benchmark: 15,11
GPU Benchmark 16,75
DirectX: 10
Resolution: 1680x1050
Settings: Very High (Texture Quality = High, Shadows Quality = Low)
Antialiasing 0x
CPU Benchmark: 17,71
GPU Benchmark 19,05
DirectX: 10
Resolution: 1280x768
Settings: Very High (all)
Antialiasing 4x
CPU Benchmark: 18,51
GPU Benchmark 19,99
DirectX: 10
Resolution: 1280x768
Settings: Very High (all)
Antialiasing 0x
CPU Benchmark: 22,39
GPU Benchmark 25,05
DirectX: 10
Resolution: 1280x768
Settings: Very High (Texture Quality = High, Shadows Quality = High)
Antialiasing 0x
CPU Benchmark: 23,55
GPU Benchmark 26,19
Just increase framerate on my dx10 screenshots for 22-23%, because they are captured with 16Q AA and 16xAF too 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 27th Oct 2007 11:24 Post subject: |
|
|
| RubberChicken wrote: | The demo is really good. All the foilage and details in the game made my jaw drop, and thats a long time a game has been like that for me.
I like how the trees and buildings come apart. You can play the demo for a long time just to check out the graphics etc.
Cant wait for the full game |
agree..very nice atmospher, you almost feel like you are in the erea.
i had some graphic issue..some untextured items here and there (specialy on the beach)
i have 8800GTS and i am using the latest driver(163.71)
anyone els got this graphic issue? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chiv
Posts: 27530
Location: Behind You...
|
| Posted: Sat, 27th Oct 2007 11:26 Post subject: |
|
|
nope none. try the 169 beta drivers.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 27th Oct 2007 11:30 Post subject: |
|
|
ok thanks..i'll switch drivers
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CaptainCox
VIP Member
Posts: 6823
Location: A Swede in Germany (FaM)
|
| Posted: Sat, 27th Oct 2007 11:31 Post subject: |
|
|
| LeoNatan wrote: | | Have you tried ALT+ENTER? |
Cheers Leo, that did it...should have know that one  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
Banned
Posts: 73193
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
upstart_69
Posts: 1094
Location: Right behind you!
|
| Posted: Sat, 27th Oct 2007 12:42 Post subject: |
|
|
Holy shit that was about the best 4.5 hrs of gaming I've had in a looong time. And just from a demo, too...I'm fucking blown away. Anyways the only thing that sucks about this game is that it will be hard to enjoy everything else coming out soon until playing the Full Crysis experience...
Oh well and the hardware reqs kinda suck I agree...the first game that made my lil lappy(2.0c2d & 2x8600m gt's) feel very inadequate running :'(
Hopefully with some patches it will run much much smoother...I have faith in the Crytech guys.
Oh and anyone else keep thinking how 100x badass this game would be with a co-op mod? Just hope it is possible to made like it was with the original far cry..
Core i7 920 @ 3.8Ghz | 6GB OCZ DDR3 8-8-8-24 @ 1600mhz | eVga x58 Mobo | 2 x eVga GTX 460 SLI | Intel X25-M + 3x Seagate + WD Black = 2.75TB | X-Fi Titanium | PCP&C Silencer 750 | G15 KB | G5 Mouse | G35 Headset | Z-5500 Digital | Samsung T260HD
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 27th Oct 2007 12:45 Post subject: |
|
|
This game is awsome ... first one deserving to be played in a long time. Optimization seems ok for what the game offers
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CaptainCox
VIP Member
Posts: 6823
Location: A Swede in Germany (FaM)
|
| Posted: Sat, 27th Oct 2007 12:58 Post subject: |
|
|
If you wanna have a kick ass game with kick ass graphics then you also have to have a kick ass rig...or? makes sense no?  ppl that expect to play this on oldish HW and have the full experience...well go figure
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
spajdr
Posts: 1842
Location: Czechia
|
| Posted: Sat, 27th Oct 2007 13:18 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HoLyMaN
Posts: 1000
Location: With the survivors of a plane crash
|
| Posted: Sat, 27th Oct 2007 13:30 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ankh
Posts: 23236
Location: Trelleborg
|
| Posted: Sat, 27th Oct 2007 13:34 Post subject: |
|
|
Nice graphics, but dull gameplay. Won't bother with this game.
shitloads of new stuff in my pc. Cant keep track of it all.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
upstart_69
Posts: 1094
Location: Right behind you!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CaptainCox
VIP Member
Posts: 6823
Location: A Swede in Germany (FaM)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chiv
Posts: 27530
Location: Behind You...
|
| Posted: Sat, 27th Oct 2007 13:40 Post subject: |
|
|
| HoLyMaN wrote: | | spajdr wrote: | | CaptainCox wrote: | | If you wanna have a kick ass game with kick ass graphics then you also have to have a kick ass rig...or? makes sense no? ppl that expect to play this on oldish HW and have the full experience...well go figure |
Make sense, but even if got money i cant spend it on something that will play crysis smoothly, since nothing that powerful exists, thats sucks hard |
Dude you have 8800Ultra and thats not enough pfff....
this is way fucked up...i knew G88 will be a let down in DX10 just lame.
OVERALL the game have the best graphics ever!!!thats for sure but the big problem there is no hardware to run it normally in dx10 and im not talking about dx9 that runs average..
i hope i'l play it in a year or two better with better hardware...but right now crysis doesn't fit to todays hardware. |
that was the intention, to create a game that would last... its definately a unique idea i think, creating a game that looks good on current hardware, but will really shine a year down the road when the hardware catches up to the game. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 27th Oct 2007 13:58 Post subject: |
|
|
Ok so I guess people around there who are saying the game is fast are using the DX9 version of it. (add -dx9 to the exe) because with my 8800GTS 640MB the game is slow as hell in DX10, and sometimes it feels laggy as if i had a bad ping as someone reported earlier.
But in DX9 it's 40fps min in HIGH, so it's definitly playable.
Anyhow I feel sad to have bought a 8800GTS to play DX10 games if I can't even actually play a game in DX10 because it's too slow. It's like having a 8600GT, a DX10 card for nothing...
Oh, and am I the only one who gets like 5fps if i put CSAA 8X ? even FSAA 4x = 10FPS.. It's a shame and those who are saying the game is optimized are wrong, else FSAA wouldn't take down my FPS that much.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
upstart_69
Posts: 1094
Location: Right behind you!
|
| Posted: Sat, 27th Oct 2007 14:01 Post subject: |
|
|
| Anthirs wrote: | | Nice graphics, but dull gameplay. Won't bother with this game. |
Dude did you even know about or try the nano suit functions? Yeah if you go from point A to point B without sneaking around/throwing enemies/tearing down houses/jacking vehicles/ect ect, yeah I guess it is pretty dull gameplay. To me, it felt like an awesome sandbox to play in that also just happened to be one of the best fps I have played in recent years.
Core i7 920 @ 3.8Ghz | 6GB OCZ DDR3 8-8-8-24 @ 1600mhz | eVga x58 Mobo | 2 x eVga GTX 460 SLI | Intel X25-M + 3x Seagate + WD Black = 2.75TB | X-Fi Titanium | PCP&C Silencer 750 | G15 KB | G5 Mouse | G35 Headset | Z-5500 Digital | Samsung T260HD
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 27th Oct 2007 14:08 Post subject: OMFG |
|
|
I have directx 9 and even I was blown away.... at the end of the demo I was like... NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO NOT THE EEEEND... KEEP GOING DAMMIT
lol
This one is going in my buy book
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chiv
Posts: 27530
Location: Behind You...
|
| Posted: Sat, 27th Oct 2007 14:10 Post subject: |
|
|
upstart, dont waste your time, if he wants to write the game off for whatever reason, then thats his loss.
presonally i thought the game was awesome, the gameplay was intense and strategic, and the multiplayer, with the inclusion of a massive area and the suit, makes for one hell of a deep tactical and skillfull playing experience. im so looking forward to the retail.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 27th Oct 2007 14:14 Post subject: |
|
|
i tried to run the game from vista x64bits
in director Bin64 there is executabil but don;t start the game...to see any dif on 64 vs 32 bits
this is because is the demo version? go to someone? or in the final release will going?
thanks
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 27th Oct 2007 14:30 Post subject: |
|
|
| Robert77 wrote: | i tried to run the game from vista x64bits
in director Bin64 there is executabil but don;t start the game...to see any dif on 64 vs 32 bits
this is because is the demo version? go to someone? or in the final release will going?
thanks |
You need a 64-bit operating system to run it.
| upstart_69 wrote: | | Anthirs wrote: | | Nice graphics, but dull gameplay. Won't bother with this game. |
Dude did you even know about or try the nano suit functions? Yeah if you go from point A to point B without sneaking around/throwing enemies/tearing down houses/jacking vehicles/ect ect, yeah I guess it is pretty dull gameplay. To me, it felt like an awesome sandbox to play in that also just happened to be one of the best fps I have played in recent years. |
I think the nano-suit functions are pretty limited, it seems like it doesn't take more than 1 shot or 2 shots to deplete your suit making it very unusable in combat overall.
But you're definitely right about the sandbox-thing, pretty cool.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 27th Oct 2007 14:40 Post subject: |
|
|
well im running it at 1280x720 everything on very high
Q6600
4gbram
vista 32
8800gtx 163.69
it ran very well without any problems or bad fps
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ankh
Posts: 23236
Location: Trelleborg
|
| Posted: Sat, 27th Oct 2007 14:47 Post subject: |
|
|
| upstart_69 wrote: | | Anthirs wrote: | | Nice graphics, but dull gameplay. Won't bother with this game. |
Dude did you even know about or try the nano suit functions? Yeah if you go from point A to point B without sneaking around/throwing enemies/tearing down houses/jacking vehicles/ect ect, yeah I guess it is pretty dull gameplay. To me, it felt like an awesome sandbox to play in that also just happened to be one of the best fps I have played in recent years. |
Ofcourse I did - Sure those things are in it, but its still a bloody boring fps game imo.
The physics arent enough for me to go Whooppiedooa.
| chiv wrote: | | upstart, dont waste your time, if he wants to write the game off for whatever reason, then thats his loss.. |
Damn right it is - Im happy that some people like the game, it's just that Im not one of them. It's as easy as that.
shitloads of new stuff in my pc. Cant keep track of it all.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 27th Oct 2007 15:16 Post subject: |
|
|
i download demo now to see if i like game. if action good i like
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lutzifer
Modzilla
Posts: 12740
Location: ____________________ **** vegan zombie **** GRRAAIIINNSS _______
|
| Posted: Sat, 27th Oct 2007 15:17 Post subject: |
|
|
| CaptainCox wrote: | | If you wanna have a kick ass game with kick ass graphics then you also have to have a kick ass rig...or? makes sense no? ppl that expect to play this on oldish HW and have the full experience...well go figure |
people have been force-fed the "you have to upgrade to enjoy shit" attitude ever since the pc came out. Most noticed years ago, that in most part that is nonsense. If it wasnt for constant leaps in the gaming-industry and an increase in video / multimedia-enthusiasts (dvd-encoding), there wouldnt be much need for faster systems.
The gaming enthusiasts are the ones that drive the market nowadays and even those dont always understand why one should be forced to upgrade every half year to a new generation of expensive hardware and often enough jump to consoles.
Be happy if you have a rig that plays the latests games and dont give those on a different upgrade path untoward attitude.
Especially since there always will be games from a-list companies that will kick the living shit out of the respective "enthusiast-level" hardware upon release as well, because they want to ensure a longer product cycle and have the wow-factor associated with their company's name.
FarCry was the same thing. It ran on slower hardware but scaled well beyond contemporary hardware. So people expect from the company similar scalability with Crysis and will try it out on older hardware to see if it runs.
There are games out there with kick-ass gfx and kick-ass gameplay that arent that taxing on the hardware, so alot of people (the majority of gamers has 1-3 year old hardware) will complain about crysis being sluggish or fugly in comparison to those that run well and look great. And not without merit imo because performance and butt-fuglyness is always subject to optimization-strategies and target-plattforms, so everybody has a right to criticize or at least discuss Crytek-decisions.
I ll try the demo this weekend and give you a short review of it on shitty hardware, that can run the latest u3-engine-based games just fine, so the voice of the "omgwtf it doesnt run on teh 5 year old hardwarez" isnt overheard!
But since i was a huge fan of Farcry i ll buy the game anyways and enjoy it perhaps a year from now with a better system too |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Surray
Posts: 5409
Location: Europe
|
| Posted: Sat, 27th Oct 2007 15:17 Post subject: |
|
|
yeah. if you're not that much into shooters then crysis won't change anything and you probably won't like it. it may look better than any other shooter but it's still a shooter. and the nanosuit doesn't exactly turn it into an adventure or anything.
Likot Mosuskekim, Woodcutter cancels Sleep: Interrupted by Elephant.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 86 of 183 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
