DreamWorks next movie : TRANSFORMERS
Page 9 of 10 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
membre999




Posts: 394

PostPosted: Sun, 28th Oct 2007 09:48    Post subject:
720p DVD7.5 (lol) by Septic and and a DVD5 out


Last edited by membre999 on Sun, 28th Oct 2007 09:50; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Nakitu




Posts: 1144
Location: Croatia
PostPosted: Sun, 28th Oct 2007 09:49    Post subject:
Ok Septic is out with RIP and there are some other no name rel. which are smaller.
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Sun, 28th Oct 2007 10:23    Post subject:
Septic are the worst HD encoders out there. Razz Wait for a proper release.
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Sun, 28th Oct 2007 11:07    Post subject:
 Spoiler:
 
Back to top
[EviL]




Posts: 228

PostPosted: Sun, 28th Oct 2007 11:59    Post subject:
[quote="LeoNatan"]Septic are the worst HD encoders out there. Razz Wait for a proper release.[/quote]

how so?

All the rips I saw from them where great and they seem to be the only one with a proper pre retail suppliers, only other ok group is reveille maybe.

All the rest is crap like sinners, CDDHD and worst of all is -hV all they do is lame proper like what they did on the transformers rls wtf, stop waisiting some bw
Back to top
membre999




Posts: 394

PostPosted: Sun, 28th Oct 2007 15:27    Post subject:
but this time i think the proper is appropriate, as i noticed the fat heads in the septic release aswell. plus it's full dvd9, so i wouldn't waste space when burning to a dl Very Happy
Back to top
[EviL]




Posts: 228

PostPosted: Sun, 28th Oct 2007 15:41    Post subject:
I didnt checked any of the two, but the -hV got nuked everywhere, they transcoded audio and a proper for 2 pixel i a bit lame, also the didnt rared/sfv there so called evidence .png...

anyway I need to watch it, it must rock in HD
Back to top
elcomo




Posts: 170

PostPosted: Sun, 28th Oct 2007 16:19    Post subject:
Holy S*** Transformers on HD is pure sweetness, i could watched it over and over again. Never saw something like this on HD ,amazing Very Happy
Back to top
chiv




Posts: 27530
Location: Behind You...
PostPosted: Sun, 28th Oct 2007 16:42    Post subject:
yeah the 3d is. but at the end of the day, its everything that ISNT cgi (acting, dialogue, story, characters...) thats pure shit. nice, shiny, impressive cgi shit Smile


Back to top
elcomo




Posts: 170

PostPosted: Sun, 28th Oct 2007 19:33    Post subject:
why is the septic release 6,7gig and hv 8,5 gig ?
Back to top
ElFenomeno




Posts: 20

PostPosted: Sun, 28th Oct 2007 20:14    Post subject:
because when u watch the hv release Megan Fox is giving you a lapdance.


Sunt urmarit general
pentru ca port ilegal
prea multa inteligenta
si sparg orice audienta
Back to top
Nakitu




Posts: 1144
Location: Croatia
PostPosted: Sun, 28th Oct 2007 20:32    Post subject:
elcomo wrote:
why is the septic release 6,7gig and hv 8,5 gig ?


You are joking right? Its because of video or audio bitrate. The higher the bitrate the bettar the picture/sound is at least if they put correct settings in coder.
Back to top
elcomo




Posts: 170

PostPosted: Sun, 28th Oct 2007 20:36    Post subject:
Nakitu wrote:
elcomo wrote:
why is the septic release 6,7gig and hv 8,5 gig ?


You are joking right? Its because of video or audio bitrate. The higher the bitrate the bettar the picture/sound is at least if they put correct settings in coder.


Upps didn´t see that Sad

btw: can someone help, i have to folders here "ADV_OBJ" and "HVDVD_TS" and they are complete, but powerdvd and windvd won´t play it.Sorry, but i´m new to this HD shit Sad
Back to top
Nakitu




Posts: 1144
Location: Croatia
PostPosted: Sun, 28th Oct 2007 21:00    Post subject:
elcomo wrote:
Nakitu wrote:
elcomo wrote:
why is the septic release 6,7gig and hv 8,5 gig ?


You are joking right? Its because of video or audio bitrate. The higher the bitrate the bettar the picture/sound is at least if they put correct settings in coder.


Upps didn´t see that Sad

btw: can someone help, i have to folders here "ADV_OBJ" and "HVDVD_TS" and they are complete, but powerdvd and windvd won´t play it.Sorry, but i´m new to this HD shit Sad


What ver. of Power dvd you have? Older ver. didnt work with HD dvd.
Back to top
elcomo




Posts: 170

PostPosted: Sun, 28th Oct 2007 21:07    Post subject:
Nakitu wrote:
elcomo wrote:
Nakitu wrote:


You are joking right? Its because of video or audio bitrate. The higher the bitrate the bettar the picture/sound is at least if they put correct settings in coder.


Upps didn´t see that Sad

btw: can someone help, i have to folders here "ADV_OBJ" and "HVDVD_TS" and they are complete, but powerdvd and windvd won´t play it.Sorry, but i´m new to this HD shit Sad


What ver. of Power dvd you have? Older ver. didnt work with HD dvd.


7.3 (ultra)
Back to top
Nakitu




Posts: 1144
Location: Croatia
PostPosted: Sun, 28th Oct 2007 21:12    Post subject:
elcomo wrote:
Nakitu wrote:
elcomo wrote:


Upps didn´t see that Sad

btw: can someone help, i have to folders here "ADV_OBJ" and "HVDVD_TS" and they are complete, but powerdvd and windvd won´t play it.Sorry, but i´m new to this HD shit Sad


What ver. of Power dvd you have? Older ver. didnt work with HD dvd.


7.3 (ultra)


What movie release you have? Full name.
Back to top
elcomo




Posts: 170

PostPosted: Sun, 28th Oct 2007 21:30    Post subject:
Nakitu wrote:
elcomo wrote:
Nakitu wrote:


What ver. of Power dvd you have? Older ver. didnt work with HD dvd.


7.3 (ultra)


What movie release you have? Full name.


There is no release name Sad

btw: now i have sound under windvd but no picture Sad
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Tue, 30th Oct 2007 18:46    Post subject:
Dear lord, what a piece of shit! I generally like the over the top melodramatic style of Bay, but ffs, this is a stupid kids movie, much more than other Bay films. At one point, when the parents were talking of the masturbation, I had to check I was still watching Transformers and had not switched to "American Pie: Hot Fox" by mistake. Yeah, like I figured from watching the trailer, the only grace point of the movie was Megan Fox (Razz). Sure she's a brick when it comes to acting, but she was hot (she didn't have an annoying voice), and looking from the dull story points she was given, she wasn't there to enrich the story, so that's OK.

2/10 - Bla
Back to top
|IcedFreon|




Posts: 3700
Location: World 8-3
PostPosted: Tue, 30th Oct 2007 21:33    Post subject:
LeoNatan wrote:
DAt one point, when the parents were talking of the masturbation, I had to check I was still watching Transformers and had not switched to "American Pie: Hot Fox" by mistake.

2/10 - Bla


yes the movie sucked for a good 15 minutes when they went home to get the glasses, plus that sector 7 bullshit.


Back to top
chiv




Posts: 27530
Location: Behind You...
PostPosted: Wed, 31st Oct 2007 00:19    Post subject:
actually everything except the robot battles sucked, so its more like an hour and 30 minutes that sucked...

and yeah, ok, we get it... he likes the chick... but to focus over a third of the film on it, and turn parts of it into a bad soft porn movie wheres hes eyeing her up n shit... come on... TRANSFORMERS MOVIE, mickey!! ROBOTS SMASHING SHIT, thats what we came for... if i want porn, ill go see whats new on the net.

seriously, editing this film down to 90 minutes, would fix a lot of problems.

oh and btw, did i see septic bitching about hv's proper, and them saying who is to say whats high action and whats not, and what is suitable for 4'ish gb etc etc... well youve got to be pretty fucking retarded to think a 2 hour 20 minute movie with big budget cgi characters, is acceptable to put into a dvd5 sized file, i mean come ON...

but seriously... how hard is it to make rules for hd releases? if its 90 minutes, dvd5. if its over 90, dvd9. bam, theres your rules, now get to work dammit.


Back to top
Unauthorized




Posts: 2070
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Wed, 31st Oct 2007 03:15    Post subject:
LeoNatan wrote:

2/10 - Bla


LeoNatan wrote:
Tutukun wrote:
The transformers 6/10 nice visual and fast pace action, but the rest is pretty average

C'mon man, Megan Fox makes it an 8/10.



So, what happened - You became gay, right?
Back to top
chiv




Posts: 27530
Location: Behind You...
PostPosted: Wed, 31st Oct 2007 06:06    Post subject:
i think he gave it an 8 from the stills and trailers, then a 2 when he realised just how fucking shit the movie actually was.


Back to top
dirtymurt




Posts: 1030

PostPosted: Wed, 31st Oct 2007 10:12    Post subject:
Great film, love it. 8/10 easy....I'm not sure why people can't suspend their disbelief these days and enjoy a film for what it is 1.5 - 2hrs of entertainment that doesn't require a critique afterwards and doesn't need comparing to citizen Kane and battleship potempkin and directors like Bay villanised, he's more akin to george Lucas than Uwe boll for gods sake.

take the film for what it is, cars/planes that transform into robots and have big fights.


No advertising.
Back to top
chiv




Posts: 27530
Location: Behind You...
PostPosted: Wed, 31st Oct 2007 10:33    Post subject:
take the film for what it is, cars/planes that transform into robots and have big fights.
-fuck, IF ONLY!! thats only like 25% of the film for shits sake. thats the stuff we love! its the rest of the rubbish we cant stand... the cgi robots battling were the only good bits!

i dont think you get it. we dont dislike the movie because we cant suspend disbelief... its just that the characters/dialogue/70% of the events that DONT include THE ROBOTS THAT ARE THE FREAKIN FOCUS (or supposed to be) just plain suck.



and dont get me started on just how bad of a director george lucas is... comparing bay to him certainly wouldnt be a positive thing.


Back to top
dirtymurt




Posts: 1030

PostPosted: Thu, 1st Nov 2007 10:09    Post subject:
chiv wrote:
take the film for what it is, cars/planes that transform into robots and have big fights.
-fuck, IF ONLY!! thats only like 25% of the film for shits sake. thats the stuff we love! its the rest of the rubbish we cant stand... the cgi robots battling were the only good bits!

i dont think you get it. we dont dislike the movie because we cant suspend disbelief... its just that the characters/dialogue/70% of the events that DONT include THE ROBOTS THAT ARE THE FREAKIN FOCUS (or supposed to be) just plain suck.



and dont get me started on just how bad of a director george lucas is... comparing bay to him certainly wouldnt be a positive thing.


You are right of course Gearge Lucas is a bad director, he only made the biggest grossing Movie Franchise in history, what are you saying that BILLIONS of people around the planet are all wrong and you are right.

Transformers is an amazing film, it is funny with tongue firmly in cheek. And how refreshing to see a movie with no motherfucker this and cocksucker that every second sentance.

As for 70% of the film sucking because it doesn't feature the robots, what a crock, there are hardly any moments in the film where there isn't some robot action going on, even the bit where they go back for the glasses has the robots all over the garden.

Stop fucking whining, suspend your disbelief and enjoy the film for fucks sake!
Back to top
chiv




Posts: 27530
Location: Behind You...
PostPosted: Thu, 1st Nov 2007 10:22    Post subject:
starwars was OK

empire strikes back was excellent, return of the jedi was also great. neither were directed by lucas

episode 1 sucked
epsiode 2 sucked
episode 3 sucked but had really good visual effects.

lucas is a fucking rubbish director and scriptwriter. dont confuse his ability to round up good actors and an interesting original premise, with an ability to direct.

that bit where he was at his house with the robots was pathetic, im guessing you were one of those people who giggled at the masturbation bit because you thought it was sooooooo funny, or having the autobots act like completely inept and moronic gimps was also clever and funny, well no.. it wasnt..

i swear, you must be like 12 or some shit, because you keep spouting this 'suspend your belief' rubbish, when i clearly have told you suspension of belief is not the reason this movie was rubbish - one more time, it had horrible dialogue, bad acting, crappy characters (both humans AND robots), boring, clumsily edited... but hey... noones debating it definately had nice visuals, and THAT is what people are voting it highly for.

you want to see a good robot movie? go see the original transformers movie. its 20x the movie this is... but i spose youll dislike it because it doesnt have any expensive cgi in it, chicks in tight clothing to beat off too, or any talk of masturbation to giggle at...

the film wasnt about robots. it was about a guy who wanted to fuck some good looking chick, with some robots thrown in on the side... i dunno why, but i kinda expected more from bay.


Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Thu, 1st Nov 2007 12:43    Post subject:
dirtymurt wrote:
Transformers is an amazing film

Laughing You say this and expect to be taken seriously?

Seriously?
Back to top
dirtymurt




Posts: 1030

PostPosted: Thu, 1st Nov 2007 12:59    Post subject:
Have you lost your mind?

Lucas is godlike. Star Wars - OK? the film that coined the term blockbuster, you must be 12 mate

I am not 12, I am a big fan of the original transformers and loved transformers the movie, favourite epsiode from the 80's Starscreams ghost, brilliant stuff I even had the toys back then. Which is why I feel qualified to stop all this Transformers 2007 bashing.

Yes I did giggle at the masturbation gag, it was funny (a'la American Pie, cringe-worthy stuff).

The film wasn't about some guy looking to fuck a good looking chick, it was about robots (In disguise) with a love interest sub plot (much like Star Wars)


Last edited by dirtymurt on Thu, 1st Nov 2007 13:01; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
dirtymurt




Posts: 1030

PostPosted: Thu, 1st Nov 2007 13:00    Post subject:
LeoNatan wrote:
dirtymurt wrote:
Transformers is an amazing film

Laughing You say this and expect to be taken seriously?

Seriously?

Not by film snobs no! I leave you to your David Lynch or Keneth Branagh
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Thu, 1st Nov 2007 13:47    Post subject:
I'm not a real fan of the second SW trilogy, but comparing this shit to any of the SW films (yes, even to the awful Ep1) is "wtf mate," and ffs, I'm not a film snob, I just have standards. Rolling Eyes
Back to top
Page 9 of 10 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - Movie & TV Sparks Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group