Ghost In The Shell - 2011
Page 1 of 2 Goto page 1, 2  Next
Ronhrin
Banned



Posts: 6428
Location: Paradigms are changeable, reality is absolute.
PostPosted: Mon, 21st Apr 2008 19:30    Post subject: Ghost In The Shell - 2011
The superb Manga and Anime Novel "Ghost In The Shell" will be adapt to a live action movie by Steven Spielberg.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1219827/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghost_in_the_shell#Films

Quote:
Ghost in the Shell has been adapted into numerous anime adaptations, all of which were produced by Production I.G.

The series was first adapted into a theatrical anime film adaptation in 1995, entitled Ghost in the Shell, directed by Mamoru Oshii. The film was followed by another theatrical movie sequel, Ghost in the Shell 2: Innocence, produced in 2004, which was also directed by Oshii and places the character of Batou in the lead role. A third film, Ghost in the Shell: S.A.C. Solid State Society, was created after the TV series and directed by Kenji Kamiyama. This film, however, is based on the TV storyline and does not connect with either of Oshii's works.

As of 2008, DreamWorks acquired the rights to produce a live-action film adaptation of the original manga with Steven Spielberg tipping the scales in DreamWorks favor. So far, Avi Arad and Steven Paul are confirmed producers and Jamie Moss will be adapting the manga into a screenplay.
Back to top
dominae
Banned



Posts: 2425

PostPosted: Mon, 21st Apr 2008 20:30    Post subject:
Steven Spielberg? OMFG =(

I'd rather watch Uwe Boll do it.


I also think fisk should be unbanned.
Back to top
Ronhrin
Banned



Posts: 6428
Location: Paradigms are changeable, reality is absolute.
PostPosted: Mon, 21st Apr 2008 20:51    Post subject:
dominae wrote:
Steven Spielberg? OMFG =(

I'd rather watch Uwe Boll do it.


LOL, I had that exact same thought, as much as I love "Ghost in the Shell" knowing that Steven Spielberg will be directing it, I can't stop remembering "War of the Worlds".

in 2011 "Ghost in the Shell" will go from Masterpiece to Americanized piece of shit.
Back to top
s_hole




Posts: 765

PostPosted: Mon, 21st Apr 2008 22:16    Post subject:
spielberg's company, not directed by
it's still blashemy, but atleast it won't be minority report 2
Back to top
liansk




Posts: 1460

PostPosted: Mon, 21st Apr 2008 22:16    Post subject:
What the hell are you people smoking?
comparing Steven Spielberg to Uwe fucking Boll?! It looks like the whole pre-GTA 4 retardation is starting to affect some of the older members.


Back to top
xarr




Posts: 119

PostPosted: Mon, 21st Apr 2008 22:57    Post subject:
liansk wrote:
What the hell are you people smoking?
comparing Steven Spielberg to Uwe fucking Boll?! It looks like the whole pre-GTA 4 retardation is starting to affect some of the older members.


Yeah, that was worrying me as well. I hope to god it was mostly a joke.
Back to top
chiv




Posts: 27530
Location: Behind You...
PostPosted: Tue, 22nd Apr 2008 07:13    Post subject:
heard about this a week ago... pathetic... this is going to be a mess. pity they cant delay it 3 or so years and give it to james cameron to direct.


Back to top
dominae
Banned



Posts: 2425

PostPosted: Tue, 22nd Apr 2008 08:22    Post subject:
liansk wrote:
What the hell are you people smoking?
comparing Steven Spielberg to Uwe fucking Boll?! It looks like the whole pre-GTA 4 retardation is starting to affect some of the older members.


I'm not smoking anything.
And yes I'm comparing them, and yes there is a huge humor exaggeration involved.
I think Spielberg is one of the most overrated directors of all time. He is such a goody two shoes "oh look at my morals lol", and in my opinion his movies are some of the cheesiest pieces of crap out there.

With that said though, some of his movies DO have entertainment value, they just lack depth, it's like all of his movies were made with a child's naivety and lack of perspective. For instance, one of his most praised movies Schindler's List, I think is a bunch of "oh us poor jews"-hokum. While the movie has good pacing, a decent story, but I dislike it for it's rhetoric.

Having Spielberg direct a story such as Ghost in the shell in my opinion is like having Uwe Boll direct it, their similarities are their complete lack of depth in how they do their character portraits, and how they understand the depth of a story. Spielberg tends to use stereotypes and shallow surfaces, and in a philosophical movie such as the current, he would make another A.I. out of it.

If indeed he isn't directing or producing it, I am very happy. He would be my last choice of all today's director's. My first choice would be Darren Arronofsky.
Back to top
Parallax_
VIP Member



Posts: 6422
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Tue, 22nd Apr 2008 08:33    Post subject:
dominae wrote:
My first choice would be Darren Arronofsky.

Darren makes really smart movies that are full of debt. His talent would be a big waste for something as simple as a live action movie.

As for Steven Spielberg, yes he does make some childrens movies, but he also has some great ones on his list: Catch Me If You Can, Minority Report, Saving Private Ryan, Schindler's List (yes, really, it is), Empire of the Sun, Raiders of the Lost Ark, Close Encounters of the Third Kind, etc...


Upcoming PC games 2009 and onwards
Bravery is not a function of firepower.
Back to top
chiv




Posts: 27530
Location: Behind You...
PostPosted: Tue, 22nd Apr 2008 08:37    Post subject:
arronofsky, screw that.. his films may have some depth but they are slow and boring as hell UNLESS your looking for extremely slow paced 'talky' and metaphorical films, then sure, but gits is a drama thriller that there is no way he would ever be suited too... he couldnt direct a thriller to save himself

i think they should just let oshii direct it... its the ONLY way your going to get a good end result. or ill say again, james cameron if they HAVE to use an american director.


Back to top
dominae
Banned



Posts: 2425

PostPosted: Tue, 22nd Apr 2008 12:02    Post subject:
Parallax_ wrote:
dominae wrote:
My first choice would be Darren Arronofsky.

Darren makes really smart movies that are full of debt. His talent would be a big waste for something as simple as a live action movie.

As for Steven Spielberg, yes he does make some childrens movies, but he also has some great ones on his list: Catch Me If You Can, Minority Report, Saving Private Ryan, Schindler's List (yes, really, it is), Empire of the Sun, Raiders of the Lost Ark, Close Encounters of the Third Kind, etc...


Didn't see Requiem for a dream then I take it? It had (at least parts of it) the pacing of an action movie, except it had depth.

Like I said, Spielberg makes entertaining movies, and nearly all of those you listed have entertaining parts. But his movies tend to be less than the sum of it's parts, he has good visual effects, awesome sound and image quality, but most of his stuff are very much overrated and lack that completeness of the really talented movie makers.

Schindler's list is a very cliché perspective that's been overdone. This entire idea that a group of people are worth the worlds pity, no I'm sorry... pity are forced upon the world, "OMG have some conscience, cry for these poor people". The movie is well made, but the political and ethnical bias makes me nauseous.

Minority port is a very bland Sci-Fi flick with one of the world's most overrated main actors (they are a good team in that way).

Saving Private Ryan has the best opening scene of any war movie I've ever seen. But that's it, the rest of the movie doesn't go anywhere, and the plot is a simplistic pile of dung full of americanized propaganda (a la Band of Brothers (which is a lot better tho)).

Empire of the sun is alright. Not really memorable, and not really a standout movie that you'll remember. Quite alright, and it's cool to see Bale in his starting as an actor.

Close Encounters is a memorable movie, and a classic. I agree with you here. I am biased about it because I watched it as a kid so I can't really view it objectively.

As for the Indiana Jones movies, they're awesome entertaining adventure movies. But not much more than that.


In a way he (Spielberg) has the same flaw as Peter Jackson, they both have a nack for "something", and they attract some talented actors. But somehow both of them make flawed movies that (in Jackson's case) lack that final "oomph". Lord of the rings was entertaining, a very good example (I'd compare it to Spielberg's Indiana Jones-series, except it actually had quality writing behind it) - what made Lord of the Rings a letdown in many ways was that Jackson refused to go into the really knitty gritty of it, and had to let Philippa Boyens come and make things a "family movie" with romance and clean clothing. It's like Spielberg and Jackson take their directing very seriously, but then coats everything with cheese to appeal to the masses.
Back to top
xarr




Posts: 119

PostPosted: Tue, 22nd Apr 2008 12:20    Post subject:
Have you seen Munich, dominae?
Back to top
dirtymurt




Posts: 1030

PostPosted: Tue, 22nd Apr 2008 13:29    Post subject:
Spielberg ROCKS! can you say JAWS


No advertising.
Back to top





Posts: 3074
Location: San Diego, CA
PostPosted: Tue, 22nd Apr 2008 13:52    Post subject:
erm speilberg is a legend. never thought hed take this on, cant wait!
Back to top
chiv




Posts: 27530
Location: Behind You...
PostPosted: Tue, 22nd Apr 2008 14:10    Post subject:
oh come on... yeah minority report wasnt bad, but he hasnt done anything really great since jurassic park ffs

doesnt look like hes directing this (yet) but i wish he wasnt involved in this... he produced transformers, and that was rubbish... i can just see this as being another loud stupid film with loads of pointless sex scenes and braindead action sequences... and while in some cases i wouldnt mind those braindead action sequences, i wish theyd keep em the hell away from gits. i mean the akira americanisation was fucking bad enough, im just dreading what theyre going to be ripping off next... ninja scroll? vampire hunter d? ugh.


Back to top





Posts: 3074
Location: San Diego, CA
PostPosted: Tue, 22nd Apr 2008 14:33    Post subject:
saving private ryan....
Back to top
bringiton




Posts: 3637

PostPosted: Tue, 22nd Apr 2008 14:43    Post subject:
dominae, I couldn't agree more. IMO you are absolutely right about Spielberg.
His movies are fun, but nothing more. He never gets down to the "dirty" and unpleasant stuff, he always treats them like family movies.
Munich was quite a harsh movie from him, but still it was really lacking the depth...
Back to top





Posts: 3074
Location: San Diego, CA
PostPosted: Tue, 22nd Apr 2008 14:48    Post subject:
i never laughed so hard when that guy stuck the knife into the invaders head. people looked at me funny in the kino Sad
Back to top
chiv




Posts: 27530
Location: Behind You...
PostPosted: Tue, 22nd Apr 2008 14:56    Post subject:
MasterJuba wrote:
saving private ryan....
was junk... a really fun opening beach sequence which admittedly was great visually, but everything else was pretty average.


Back to top
s_hole




Posts: 765

PostPosted: Tue, 22nd Apr 2008 23:42    Post subject:
dirtymurt wrote:
Spielberg ROCKS! can you say JAWS

can you say 33 years?


aronofsky would surely be great for the mood, atleast
gits2 and the series had a lot more in common with films like the fountain than jack bauer or minority report
Back to top
dirtymurt




Posts: 1030

PostPosted: Wed, 23rd Apr 2008 02:19    Post subject:
s_hole wrote:
dirtymurt wrote:
Spielberg ROCKS! can you say JAWS

can you say 33 years?



And it's still fucking awesome.
Private Ryan is also awesome
Transformers (not directed by) was awesome
Duel awesome
Scindlers list awesome
Indie Awesome
ET awesome
Twighlight zone the movie awesome
Empire of the sun awesome
Amistad awesome
AI - A bit shit
Close encounters - didn't get it and i still don't to this day
Minority report - awesome
Jurrasic Park - Awesome
Munich - pretty great, needed tighter editing to make it shorter

That there, is a serious body of work and they're the only ones I can think of right now. That stands up to anyones work.

Haters - leave it out, you are obviously ' having a laugh'


No advertising.
Back to top
Cohen




Posts: 7155
Location: Rapture
PostPosted: Wed, 23rd Apr 2008 02:56    Post subject:
liansk wrote:
What the hell are you people smoking?
comparing Steven Spielberg to Uwe fucking Boll?! It looks like the whole pre-GTA 4 retardation is starting to affect some of the older members.


FUCKING +111111.

Dissing spielberg is reason enough for a mighty banhammer Laughing

Jurassic Park, ET, fuck it im not gonna mention anymore cos thats enough, ALSO, he wrote the entirity(scripts) of the Medal Of Honnor games which im sure most had no clue about.

The guy is a fucking genius, Uwe Boll isnt fit to shine his dead grandmothers coffin handles ffs.


troll detected by SiN
Back to top
chiv




Posts: 27530
Location: Behind You...
PostPosted: Wed, 23rd Apr 2008 06:57    Post subject:
id like to just say thanx for backing me up that his early stuff is the only crap hes done thats worth mentioning. his earlier stuff was great. later stuff was pretty crappy (cept minority as i said...)


Back to top
dominae
Banned



Posts: 2425

PostPosted: Wed, 23rd Apr 2008 09:16    Post subject:
watergem wrote:

The guy is a fucking genius, Uwe Boll isnt fit to shine his dead grandmothers coffin handles ffs.


You have to be a retard to call him a genius. He's average at best.
Back to top
dirtymurt




Posts: 1030

PostPosted: Thu, 24th Apr 2008 02:48    Post subject:
dominae wrote:
watergem wrote:

The guy is a fucking genius, Uwe Boll isnt fit to shine his dead grandmothers coffin handles ffs.


You have to be a retard to call him a genius. He's average at best.


Whatever!


No advertising.
Back to top
Cohen




Posts: 7155
Location: Rapture
PostPosted: Thu, 24th Apr 2008 02:49    Post subject:
oh gosh


troll detected by SiN
Back to top
LeoNatan
Banned



Posts: 73193
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Thu, 24th Apr 2008 03:03    Post subject:
Fisk is angry at Spielberg because he probably saw him in some interview using Vista. Razz
Back to top
scarfacew3




Posts: 1169
Location: ::1
PostPosted: Thu, 24th Apr 2008 09:38    Post subject:
chiv wrote:
oh come on... yeah minority report wasnt bad, but he hasnt done anything really great since jurassic park ffs

doesnt look like hes directing this (yet) but i wish he wasnt involved in this... he produced transformers, and that was rubbish... i can just see this as being another loud stupid film with loads of pointless sex scenes and braindead action sequences... and while in some cases i wouldnt mind those braindead action sequences, i wish theyd keep em the hell away from gits. i mean the akira americanisation was fucking bad enough, im just dreading what theyre going to be ripping off next... ninja scroll? vampire hunter d? ugh.


All movies are above average.


CCIE
Back to top
dominae
Banned



Posts: 2425

PostPosted: Thu, 24th Apr 2008 10:28    Post subject:
LeoNatan wrote:
Fisk is angry at Spielberg because he probably saw him in some interview using Vista. Razz


Angry? No, calling someone average isn't angry. He's horribly overrated, much like VISTA. Good comparison.
Back to top
Big_Gun




Posts: 3017
Location: My mother's womb originally. . .
PostPosted: Fri, 2nd May 2008 23:09    Post subject:
dominae wrote:
LeoNatan wrote:
Fisk is angry at Spielberg because he probably saw him in some interview using Vista. Razz


Angry? No, calling someone average isn't angry. He's horribly overrated, much like VISTA. Good comparison.


The difference is people aren't forced to see Spielberg movies... while they are being forced to use Vista. So if he makes tons of money at the theaters because people want to pay to see his movies, then i would say he is rated highly and rightfully so.

Do I think he could pull of a Ghiost In The Shell adaptation? Possibly... but not likely.
Back to top
Page 1 of 2 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - Movie & TV Sparks Goto page 1, 2  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group