Page 6 of 57 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Wed, 30th Jul 2008 17:44 Post subject: |
|
 |
Crysis Warhead: No more special DirectX 10 effects
As we interviewed Bernd Diemer, the producer of Crysis Warhead, he confirmed that the "very High” settings are renamed to "Enthusiast” and will be available for DirectX 9, too.
Bernd Diemer: The former "very high2 settings are now called "enthusiast” and this option is now available for DX9, too. We removed this exclusiveness and thought: If people want to run this on their system, why should we restrict it?
PCGH: So there are no visual differences between the DX9 and DX10 version anymore?
Bernd Diemer: If the system can display it, because it has the performance, this is right.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Wed, 30th Jul 2008 18:04 Post subject: |
|
 |
cheers, no more dx10 marketing crap...
Quote: | PC awesome button = Uninstall! |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JBeckman
VIP Member
Posts: 34998
Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Wed, 13th Aug 2008 17:15 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Wed, 13th Aug 2008 17:51 Post subject: |
|
 |
streetunder wrote: | Crysis Warhead: No more special DirectX 10 effects
As we interviewed Bernd Diemer, the producer of Crysis Warhead, he confirmed that the "very High” settings are renamed to "Enthusiast” and will be available for DirectX 9, too.
Bernd Diemer: The former "very high2 settings are now called "enthusiast” and this option is now available for DX9, too. We removed this exclusiveness and thought: If people want to run this on their system, why should we restrict it?
PCGH: So there are no visual differences between the DX9 and DX10 version anymore?
Bernd Diemer: If the system can display it, because it has the performance, this is right. |
AAAAHAHAHAHAHAH! VISTA PWNAGE! FUCK YOU M$ AND YOUR DX10 BULLCRAP! xD
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73238
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel 🇮🇱
|
Posted: Wed, 13th Aug 2008 18:21 Post subject: |
|
 |
Flowmo,

|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Wed, 13th Aug 2008 18:58 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Wed, 13th Aug 2008 19:25 Post subject: |
|
 |
15GIg ???!!! for a stand alone addon , new WORLD RECORD
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Karmeck
Posts: 3348
Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Wed, 13th Aug 2008 20:45 Post subject: |
|
 |
Maybe it is not stand alone and then it would be like 7gb +7gb.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Wed, 13th Aug 2008 22:42 Post subject: |
|
 |
Karmeck wrote: | Maybe it is not stand alone and then it would be like 7gb +7gb. |
=Ea sucks at giving the right info
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Wed, 13th Aug 2008 22:54 Post subject: |
|
 |
Leo,
LOL 
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Wed, 13th Aug 2008 23:10 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ankh
Posts: 23350
Location: Trelleborg
|
Posted: Thu, 14th Aug 2008 00:12 Post subject: |
|
 |
Isnt FS X and Vanguard pretty much the same size on the hd?
shitloads of new stuff in my pc. Cant keep track of it all.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Thu, 14th Aug 2008 05:41 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Thu, 14th Aug 2008 07:48 Post subject: |
|
 |
Haha. Now let's see them try to make the game scale well on that.
Then when they've fixed their unoptimized code they should look to making the game, you know, fun.
Gustave the Steel
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Thu, 14th Aug 2008 12:49 Post subject: |
|
 |
An X800!?!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! Oh my giddy aunt .. if people honestly fall for that like they fell for it with the first Crysis .. then it will simply confirm what I've felt, in my heart, for years; Humanity is doomed.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Thu, 14th Aug 2008 12:50 Post subject: |
|
 |
AKofC wrote: | Then when they've fixed their unoptimized code they should look to making the game, you know, fun. | Yeah, more like COD4, more linear and on rails you know, much more fun.
sabin1981 wrote: | An X800!?! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! Oh my giddy aunt .. if people honestly fall for that like they fell for it with the first Crysis .. then it will simply confirm what I've felt, in my heart, for years; Humanity is doomed. | On minimum, not on ultra high.
Last edited by Freakness on Thu, 14th Aug 2008 12:51; edited 1 time in total
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Thu, 14th Aug 2008 12:51 Post subject: |
|
 |
Freakness wrote: | AKofC wrote: | Then when they've fixed their unoptimized code they should look to making the game, you know, fun. | Yeah, more like COD4, more linear and on rails you know, much more fun. |
I hope you're not serious about that comment.
CoD4 was infinitessimally more fun than Crysis! On EVERY conceivable level!
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Thu, 14th Aug 2008 12:53 Post subject: |
|
 |
sabin1981 wrote: | Freakness wrote: | AKofC wrote: | Then when they've fixed their unoptimized code they should look to making the game, you know, fun. | Yeah, more like COD4, more linear and on rails you know, much more fun. |
I hope you're not serious about that comment.
CoD4 was infinitessimally more fun than Crysis! On EVERY conceivable level! | Beachhead 2000 was more fun than COD4. Though COD4 has better graphics.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Thu, 14th Aug 2008 12:54 Post subject: |
|
 |
We'll just have to agree to disagree then, because I believe CoD4 was the epitome of an FPS shooter. Magnificent in every regard except longevity .. at least in the SP campaign, as the MP is godlike and I'm still playing it now, a year after release.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Thu, 14th Aug 2008 12:54 Post subject: |
|
 |
With reqs given by them it's very much playable on low @ 1024, as I had similiar system and it wasn't bad on low.
sabin1981 wrote: | Fuck you troll. Fuck you and your entire aids-infested family. Get cancer and die. Slowly. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mutantius
VIP Member
Posts: 18594
Location: In Elektro looking for beans
|
Posted: Fri, 15th Aug 2008 00:19 Post subject: |
|
 |
Freakness wrote: | AKofC wrote: | Then when they've fixed their unoptimized code they should look to making the game, you know, fun. | Yeah, more like COD4, more linear and on rails you know, much more fun.
|
Non-linearity doesnt always equal great gameplay. COD4 delivers a cinematic experience which has great action and an awesome multiplayer. Crysis on the other hand featured both bad multiplayer and a tame SP experience. Still of course we are talking about taste here and that differs ofc.
"Why don't you zip it, Zipfero?" - fraich3
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Fri, 15th Aug 2008 01:37 Post subject: |
|
 |
Mutantius wrote: | Freakness wrote: | AKofC wrote: | Then when they've fixed their unoptimized code they should look to making the game, you know, fun. | Yeah, more like COD4, more linear and on rails you know, much more fun.
| Non-linearity doesnt always equal great gameplay. COD4 delivers a cinematic experience which has great action and an awesome multiplayer. Crysis on the other hand featured both bad multiplayer and a tame SP experience. Still of course we are talking about taste here and that differs ofc. | Yeah like you would know. You havent even played Crysis till at least the half of the game so stfu. Cod4 is a stupid spawner shooter where you shoot shit on rails, then see a cutscene, then shoot another army of spawning shit in an area and this goes on forever. Boring trigger crap.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Page 6 of 57 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |