Class Action Lawsuit Arises Over Spore DRM
Page 1 of 2 Goto page 1, 2  Next
Karmeck




Posts: 3345
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Wed, 24th Sep 2008 18:45    Post subject: Class Action Lawsuit Arises Over Spore DRM
Quote:
Class Action Lawsuit Arises Over Spore DRM Whenever you find large numbers of unhappy people, you're bound to find a lawyer. In this case it's Alan Himmelfarb with KamberEdelson of Vernon, California, who has filed a class-action suit against EA over the DRM in EA's Spore. The suit, filed Monday with the Northern California District Court on behalf of plaintiff Melissa Thomas and "all consumers globally who have purchased the Spore computer game", addresses complaints that consumers are not fully aware of what exactly SecuROM does on their system, and also cites a separate program that installs on the control center of the computer and can disrupt system functions.


Plaintiffs demand disgorgement of unjust profits and damages for trespass, interference, unfair competition and consumer law violations.

You can see the full suit in PDF form over at Courthouse News. It's rather lengthy, containing excerpts from EA's FAQ as well as quotes from Amazon.com reviews, oddly enough. Looks like someone's done his homework. EA might even have to assign two lawyers to deal with this one.


http://kotaku.com/5054175/class-action-lawsuit-arises-over-spore-drm
Back to top
Karmeck




Posts: 3345
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Wed, 24th Sep 2008 18:46    Post subject:
Some nut head finally went ahead and did it, I be damned. This will surly make more ppl whine and think they can demand what ever they want just because they paid for something.

It's that kinda behavior that crate the story's that you have to put it in the manual that you may not put you're cat in the micro wave, or you can get sued by the one that accentually do it just because it did not tell them not to.


Back to top
Raap




Posts: 956

PostPosted: Wed, 24th Sep 2008 18:58    Post subject:
This is good, actually. Worst case scenario, nothing really changes, but it might make them reconsider using such DRM in the future. Consumer wins.
Back to top
Lutzifer
Modzilla



Posts: 12740
Location: ____________________ **** vegan zombie **** GRRAAIIINNSS _______
PostPosted: Wed, 24th Sep 2008 19:33    Post subject:
copy-protection isnt a bad thing per se. It becomes a bad thing, when it fucks up operating systems. And some actually do. Dunno about the latest securom, but when the media-mafia sues pirates (i.e. their customers) regularly i dont see why customers shouldnt sue them for a change...
Back to top
Ronhrin
Banned



Posts: 6428
Location: Paradigms are changeable, reality is absolute.
PostPosted: Wed, 24th Sep 2008 19:36    Post subject:
I still remember when starforce came out and people claimed it to be a virus or a trojan Laughing


Last edited by Ronhrin on Wed, 24th Sep 2008 19:37; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Namarie




Posts: 707

PostPosted: Wed, 24th Sep 2008 19:37    Post subject:
Good thing, DRM's don't exactly stop piracy in the end, just hassles legit customers.

I am so glad that the folks behind GALCIV2 managed to get a little debate going, hope it keeps up.
Back to top
Newty182




Posts: 10805
Location: UK
PostPosted: Wed, 24th Sep 2008 20:02    Post subject:
at least a lot more ppl will become aware of this crappy protection (online activation). u cant sell what ppl dont want


Ryzen 5 5600, ASUS ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING WIFI II, Corsair Vengeance RGB RT 32GB 3600MHz C16, MSI RTX 5070 Ti Ventus 3X OC , Corsair RMx Series RM750x. AOC AGON AG324UX - 4K 144Hz 1ms
Back to top
nightlith




Posts: 744
Location: Land of Bagged Milk
PostPosted: Wed, 24th Sep 2008 20:10    Post subject:
Good. It's nice to see people still have nads enough to stand up for their rights. Like Raap said, worst case nothing happens, though I'm hoping for a more beneficial outcome.

Unlike with Starforce, I doubt EA will drop Securom. This little outburst likely won't create enough bad publicity for that. Still, kudos to the people willing to fight Smile


i can has computar?!
Back to top
Mister_s




Posts: 19863

PostPosted: Wed, 24th Sep 2008 20:13    Post subject:
I doubt this will have any effect on EA.
Back to top
SpykeZ




Posts: 23710

PostPosted: Wed, 24th Sep 2008 21:57    Post subject:
Ronhrin wrote:
I still remember when starforce came out and people claimed it to be a virus or a trojan Laughing


no but it was notorious for fucking shit up. UBI got boycotted here in the states when they released chaos theory with starforce (RS6 lockdown previously but no one cared), and it was quite funny cause as well done as the game was done, it got boycotted, and it was right then and there when ubi stopped giving a shit about their PC department


Back to top
darthmalak




Posts: 420
Location: Argentina
PostPosted: Wed, 24th Sep 2008 22:08    Post subject:
Newty182 wrote:
at least a lot more ppl will become aware of this crappy protection (online activation). u cant sell what ppl dont want


but let me get it

the system DRM make the user the only owner of his own cd key and is imposible to sell the cd key to some one else

So, with the protection system of activation online ¿who were gonna do? Because always the cd-keys are of some else, ¿except the ones generated on key generator?
Back to top
Newty182




Posts: 10805
Location: UK
PostPosted: Wed, 24th Sep 2008 22:39    Post subject:
is that you Boundle?


Ryzen 5 5600, ASUS ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING WIFI II, Corsair Vengeance RGB RT 32GB 3600MHz C16, MSI RTX 5070 Ti Ventus 3X OC , Corsair RMx Series RM750x. AOC AGON AG324UX - 4K 144Hz 1ms
Back to top
moosenoodles




Posts: 18411

PostPosted: Wed, 24th Sep 2008 23:10    Post subject:
looking at the crappy way its written, it has a high probablility Newty...
Back to top
DumKopf




Posts: 42
Location: New Zealand
PostPosted: Wed, 24th Sep 2008 23:42    Post subject:
I'm sure this has been covered, but I'm sure it takes just as much effort for the end user to crack a game with a simple CD check scheme, than it does with some mega DRM. I don't blame them for sticking in a simple check, it'll stop a lot of people from sharing the game around that doesn't know how to obtain a crack. But if you know where to find the crack, it doesn't matter how robust the DRM is.

I spose they use the mega DRM schemes to slow down the actual game hackers, but it doesn't stop them, and sure pisses off the end user who legitly bought the game.


Back to top
Mister_s




Posts: 19863

PostPosted: Thu, 25th Sep 2008 00:16    Post subject:
CP's are usually meant to stop 0-day piracy. Everyone knows it'll get cracked eventually, but the longer it takes the better the sales. This was apparent with many games which took some days to crack.
Back to top
Sin317
Banned



Posts: 24322
Location: Geneva
PostPosted: Thu, 25th Sep 2008 00:31    Post subject:
Mister_s wrote:
CP's are usually meant to stop 0-day piracy. Everyone knows it'll get cracked eventually, but the longer it takes the better the sales. This was apparent with many games which took some days to crack.


show me numbers ... i don't believe that any game sold better because it wasn't cracked right away ..
Back to top
gingerninjaaaaaa
Banned



Posts: 1998

PostPosted: Thu, 25th Sep 2008 01:04    Post subject:
What people forget is what would you do if yo make a +aaa title and tried selling it thinking it was going to make you ex million pounds and then find out 1 million people downloaded the game illigaly therefore you only makes say 10.000 pounds from sales?
It would piss you right off, all that hard work for no reward what so ever.
Back to top
djaoni




Posts: 8061

PostPosted: Thu, 25th Sep 2008 01:09    Post subject:
And what AAA game did that happen to?
Back to top
gingerninjaaaaaa
Banned



Posts: 1998

PostPosted: Thu, 25th Sep 2008 01:19    Post subject:
djaoni wrote:
And what AAA game did that happen to?

I was just saying if whoever did make a +aa title and that happened, you wouldn't be best please wud you?
Therefore there tryiing all these things to stop it from happening, but i agree with the part that fucks our comps up that goota be removed.
Back to top
djaoni




Posts: 8061

PostPosted: Thu, 25th Sep 2008 01:22    Post subject:
And when it gets cracked they should remove the DRM in a patch IMO.
Back to top
tainted4ever
VIP Member



Posts: 11336

PostPosted: Thu, 25th Sep 2008 01:31    Post subject:
Sin317 wrote:
Mister_s wrote:
CP's are usually meant to stop 0-day piracy. Everyone knows it'll get cracked eventually, but the longer it takes the better the sales. This was apparent with many games which took some days to crack.


show me numbers ... i don't believe that any game sold better because it wasn't cracked right away ..
Just go read the Aitd thread...
Back to top
Lutzifer
Modzilla



Posts: 12740
Location: ____________________ **** vegan zombie **** GRRAAIIINNSS _______
PostPosted: Thu, 25th Sep 2008 02:59    Post subject:
Sin317 wrote:
Mister_s wrote:
CP's are usually meant to stop 0-day piracy. Everyone knows it'll get cracked eventually, but the longer it takes the better the sales. This was apparent with many games which took some days to crack.


show me numbers ... i don't believe that any game sold better because it wasn't cracked right away ..


i have read that elsewhere aswell. Cant remember the numbers or the game, but i think the first two to four weeks are the ones that really matter. If a copy-protection holds out that long, its really seen in the publishers pockets. But the game-quality also hugely matters. Shitty games will always sell bad, no matter what protection they use. But on the other hand good games will always sell, even if they have no protection at all.

And i m not even shure if it pans out financially as the gain they have with the protection has to be weighted against the money they pay for it per game.
Back to top
darthmalak




Posts: 420
Location: Argentina
PostPosted: Thu, 25th Sep 2008 06:08    Post subject:
moosenoodles wrote:
looking at the crappy way its written, it has a high probablility Newty...


nope my english sucks.............

i have to work on that, sorry guys..

This i was trying to say

Let me understand

The DRM system makes the user bearer of the original disc's only owner ¿true?
Then it would be impossible for the user to sell the serial number to some one else?

So, with the system of protection online¿ How are we going to do? Because always the serial numbers are of someone else, except those generated by the key generator

Its better now?

pd: who is bundle? Look on my ip
Back to top
madmax17




Posts: 19313
Location: Croatia
PostPosted: Thu, 25th Sep 2008 12:48    Post subject:
Lutzifer wrote:
Sin317 wrote:
Mister_s wrote:
CP's are usually meant to stop 0-day piracy. Everyone knows it'll get cracked eventually, but the longer it takes the better the sales. This was apparent with many games which took some days to crack.


show me numbers ... i don't believe that any game sold better because it wasn't cracked right away ..


i have read that elsewhere aswell. Cant remember the numbers or the game, but i think the first two to four weeks are the ones that really matter. If a copy-protection holds out that long, its really seen in the publishers pockets.

and that is the single dumbest thing I ever read, ea themselves hinted that activation limits and drm are not there to stop pirates but RESALE in the future which means that they are forcing people not to buy Spore from their friend, from an add, or ebay but from them at full price a year or two from now, that tells you that they are counting on future sales, if you can't wait a month for a cracked release (and that's top waiting time) and you can't hold it any longer so you go buy the original instead you are a gaming junky and you have a problem, those type of people are a minority like 0.000000001% they have nothing to influence sales.
Back to top
Mister_s




Posts: 19863

PostPosted: Thu, 25th Sep 2008 13:01    Post subject:
madmax17 wrote:
Lutzifer wrote:
Sin317 wrote:


show me numbers ... i don't believe that any game sold better because it wasn't cracked right away ..


i have read that elsewhere aswell. Cant remember the numbers or the game, but i think the first two to four weeks are the ones that really matter. If a copy-protection holds out that long, its really seen in the publishers pockets.

and that is the single dumbest thing I ever read, ea themselves hinted that activation limits and drm are not there to stop pirates but RESALE in the future which means that they are forcing people not to buy Spore from their friend, from an add, or ebay but from them at full price a year or two from now, that tells you that they are counting on future sales, if you can't wait a month for a cracked release (and that's top waiting time) and you can't hold it any longer so you go buy the original instead you are a gaming junky and you have a problem, those type of people are a minority like 0.000000001% they have nothing to influence sales.

And this is the single dumbest thing I ever read. So I'm a junky if I can't wait a month to leech a game Confused . Downloaders may believe they'll buy the game if its good, but that's rarely the case. When a game's played, you rarely get the urge to buy it anyway unless it has some MP component which requires a CD-key.
If you have a great game on your hands as a dev, you'll want to delay the cracking process as much as possible. If your game's good and gets good numbers in reviews, people will want it. Now if you can delay the crack just by a week, many people will probably decide to buy it. Bioshock is the most recent example of this. You may call those people junkies, retards, idiots. I call them customers.
Back to top
madmax17




Posts: 19313
Location: Croatia
PostPosted: Thu, 25th Sep 2008 13:10    Post subject:
And again, you are putting people that pirate games regularly and people that buy games regularly in the same pot, those that buy regularly will buy it anyway if they like it, those that like to pirate stuff will wait one fucking week then download it, I did wait a few months for Bioshock until that cat release and six months for Oblivion just for the mods and a patch. And an insignificant minority will buy the original just because there was no cracked release in a few days Laughing yes the junkys or addicts.
Back to top
The_Leaf




Posts: 1542
Location: Italy
PostPosted: Thu, 25th Sep 2008 14:40    Post subject:
Am I the onyl one that finds a one-time online activation less annoying than inserting the dvd every fucking time?

I didn't play spore, so I don't know what restrictions apply here, but as long as there is a tool/way to deactivate it in order to reactivate it on another pc if you need it, I don't see the problem with this activation method.
Back to top
JBeckman
VIP Member



Posts: 34968
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Thu, 25th Sep 2008 15:18    Post subject:
Some games with this protection has had such tools released, most titles don't however though EA might release such a utility later on based on what I've read.
Back to top
discworld




Posts: 507

PostPosted: Thu, 25th Sep 2008 18:08    Post subject:
Mister_s wrote:
madmax17 wrote:
Lutzifer wrote:


i have read that elsewhere aswell. Cant remember the numbers or the game, but i think the first two to four weeks are the ones that really matter. If a copy-protection holds out that long, its really seen in the publishers pockets.

and that is the single dumbest thing I ever read, ea themselves hinted that activation limits and drm are not there to stop pirates but RESALE in the future which means that they are forcing people not to buy Spore from their friend, from an add, or ebay but from them at full price a year or two from now, that tells you that they are counting on future sales, if you can't wait a month for a cracked release (and that's top waiting time) and you can't hold it any longer so you go buy the original instead you are a gaming junky and you have a problem, those type of people are a minority like 0.000000001% they have nothing to influence sales.

And this is the single dumbest thing I ever read. So I'm a junky if I can't wait a month to leech a game Confused . Downloaders may believe they'll buy the game if its good, but that's rarely the case. When a game's played, you rarely get the urge to buy it anyway unless it has some MP component which requires a CD-key.
If you have a great game on your hands as a dev, you'll want to delay the cracking process as much as possible. If your game's good and gets good numbers in reviews, people will want it. Now if you can delay the crack just by a week, many people will probably decide to buy it. Bioshock is the most recent example of this. You may call those people junkies, retards, idiots. I call them customers.


I never buy crap games. Even this bioshit -> i just waited for the crack. I dint give a F if it comes or not. Same goes for the Alone in The Shitter.

But I have bought good games even when they don't need a cd key etc. Like Witcher.... I just wanted the original one way or the other (steam or retail). And YES I had the pirated copy and I have finished the game already.

People are IDIOTS that can be easily manipulated and they always will be. So there's always a dumbshit fuck that protects the companies that are destroying everything... wheres shitler when you need him to kill some stupid shits.


Back to top
White_Knight




Posts: 132

PostPosted: Fri, 26th Sep 2008 18:49    Post subject:
the thing i cant stand about this common use nowadays of online activation and shit from like Direct2drive, etc, is what happens when the company goes out of business and I want to play the game on a newer computer some years down the road...how the fuck can i if there is no crack released?? you mean i cant play a game down the road that i legally paid for in the first place...
Back to top
Page 1 of 2 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - PC Games Arena Goto page 1, 2  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group