Grand Theft Auto IV
Page 115 of 165 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 114, 115, 116 ... 163, 164, 165  Next
WaldoJ
VIP Member



Posts: 32678

PostPosted: Tue, 2nd Dec 2008 23:55    Post subject:
looooooooooooool gj rockstar!


Sin317 wrote:
I win, you lose. Or Go fuck yourself.
Back to top
djaoni




Posts: 8061

PostPosted: Tue, 2nd Dec 2008 23:56    Post subject:
xtralong wrote:
wtf happen during the port from x360?


It wasn't supposed to be a port even or so I've heard.. It seems they didn't try the game before releasing or something.
Back to top
WaldoJ
VIP Member



Posts: 32678

PostPosted: Tue, 2nd Dec 2008 23:58    Post subject:
that's the prob with every gta game tho. they pack it with shit, they don't do a lot of testing. every gta release was flawed. Bugs. Slowdowns. Crashes. Glitches. Etc. Etc. Etc. They just get the game done, mash it up, release it, and that's that. There's yet to be a perfect GTA game.


Sin317 wrote:
I win, you lose. Or Go fuck yourself.
Back to top
qrdel_daywalker




Posts: 389
Location: World's a$$.
PostPosted: Tue, 2nd Dec 2008 23:58    Post subject:
Well, putting aside R* being obvious punks when porting, maybe it's driver-related? The performance I mean? Maybe nV and AMD have to release some never drivers written specially for GTA?


x3 720 @ 3.0 Ghz @ 1,2v / MA770T-UD3P / 4GB DDR3 1333 / 8800GT 512 DDR3 / 1,25tB SATA2 / CM590 / Corsair VX 550W
Back to top
base61




Posts: 38

PostPosted: Tue, 2nd Dec 2008 23:59    Post subject:
A shame that a company like rockstar could sink so low... Shocked
Back to top
noxxle




Posts: 500

PostPosted: Tue, 2nd Dec 2008 23:59    Post subject:
So is it even playable online with 32 people?
Back to top
xtralong




Posts: 1759
Location: Portugal
PostPosted: Wed, 3rd Dec 2008 00:00    Post subject:
next time maybe they will test first lol what a bunch of idiots. $$ ftw!


''The mind and body must be subjected to extreme stimulus, by means of drugs and music.'' - Hunter S. Thompson
Back to top
Epsilon
Dr. Strangelove



Posts: 9240
Location: War Room
PostPosted: Wed, 3rd Dec 2008 00:00    Post subject:
qrdel_daywalker wrote:
Well, putting aside R* being obvious punks when porting, maybe it's driver-related? The performance I mean? Maybe nV and AMD have to release some never drivers written specially for GTA?

Theres internal Q&A sorting out this, working together with companies like nvidia and amd, sending bug reports and stuff like that when theres bugs relating to drivers.
Theres no excuse for this mess they call an 'epic game'.
Back to top
qrdel_daywalker




Posts: 389
Location: World's a$$.
PostPosted: Wed, 3rd Dec 2008 00:04    Post subject:
True enough, was just lurking for some 'normal' explanation of this epic ga... *ekhm*, fail.


x3 720 @ 3.0 Ghz @ 1,2v / MA770T-UD3P / 4GB DDR3 1333 / 8800GT 512 DDR3 / 1,25tB SATA2 / CM590 / Corsair VX 550W
Back to top
Epsilon
Dr. Strangelove



Posts: 9240
Location: War Room
PostPosted: Wed, 3rd Dec 2008 00:08    Post subject:
qrdel_daywalker wrote:
True enough, was just lurking for some 'normal' explanation of this epic ga... *ekhm*, fail.

Come now, theres people with GTX 280 cards only being reported by the game as having 512 mb ram thus not allowing them to set high graphics without the -norestrictions parameter.
I myself have 4gb GDDR5 ram, 2gb on each card. But due to probably rockstar messing up it will only use 1gb on one card and thus also only using 1 gpu out of 2 possible on that card.
A friend of mine have 3x280GTX in a trisli system but he only gets reported as having 1gb ram so sli isn't working either.
Face it, this game shouldn't have been released in the state it is, it's only passable as a playable beta.
Back to top
xtralong




Posts: 1759
Location: Portugal
PostPosted: Wed, 3rd Dec 2008 00:09    Post subject:
Rush = Christmas = $$ = Epic Fail FTW!


''The mind and body must be subjected to extreme stimulus, by means of drugs and music.'' - Hunter S. Thompson
Back to top
Raap




Posts: 956

PostPosted: Wed, 3rd Dec 2008 00:11    Post subject:
In other words, nothing unexpected here.
Back to top
escalibur




Posts: 12148

PostPosted: Wed, 3rd Dec 2008 00:12    Post subject:
Grand.Theft.Auto.IV.PROPER.CRACK.ONLY-ViTALiTY

and

Grand.Theft.Auto.IV.PROPER-ViTALiTY


Fakes/not working aswell?


Ryzen 9800X3D CO ~-26/+200 | Freezer III 360 A-RGB & 3x Phanteks T30 | Strix X670E-F WiFi | MSI GeForce RTX 5090 Ventus OC | Fury Beast 64GB (2x 32GB) DDR5 5600MHz C40 @ 6000MHz C28 | 970 EVO Plus 2 TB | 38GN950-B | S.M.S.L RAW-MDA1 & HiFiMAN Arya Organic | Lancool III Snow White + 4x be quiet! Silent Wings Pro 4 140mm | RM1000x (2021) Gold | G Pro X SUPERLIGHT 2 & POWERPLAY | Win 11 Pro | Logitech MX MECHANICAL

Sometimes I publish YouTube videos: https://www.youtube.com/@RandomTechChannel
Back to top
mails
Banned



Posts: 155

PostPosted: Wed, 3rd Dec 2008 00:18    Post subject:
Quote:
Fakes/not working aswell?


both fakes. VITALITY don't go to release cracks without an iso then
Back to top
AKofC




Posts: 4359

PostPosted: Wed, 3rd Dec 2008 00:20    Post subject:
Well, at least now we know that the magazines and sites that gave this game a 10 are crap and were probably paid.

Because how could they not have notice this poor performance across the spectrum?


Gustave the Steel
Back to top
zagy




Posts: 26

PostPosted: Wed, 3rd Dec 2008 00:22    Post subject:
reloaded wil be fix the game they fix nfs they can fix gta
Back to top
mails
Banned



Posts: 155

PostPosted: Wed, 3rd Dec 2008 00:23    Post subject:
Quote:
reloaded wil be fix the game they fix nfs they can fix gta


maybe they can but gta is different from nfs. nfs like all EA games don't use live online. i guess if gta don't used ms live it's now was already proper cracked


Last edited by mails on Wed, 3rd Dec 2008 00:27; edited 4 times in total
Back to top
WaldoJ
VIP Member



Posts: 32678

PostPosted: Wed, 3rd Dec 2008 00:23    Post subject:
impossible to fix gta. Very Happy R* rushed it. It was already buggy on the consoles. It's just lot worse of the pc. Very Happy


Sin317 wrote:
I win, you lose. Or Go fuck yourself.
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Wed, 3rd Dec 2008 00:26    Post subject:
This is just sad!

 Spoiler:
 


Last edited by LeoNatan on Wed, 3rd Dec 2008 00:31; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
dontgiveafuck




Posts: 116

PostPosted: Wed, 3rd Dec 2008 00:27    Post subject:
i have the game too

Back to top
rshizle




Posts: 58

PostPosted: Wed, 3rd Dec 2008 00:28    Post subject:
iNatan wrote:
This is just sad!

 Spoiler:
 


damn hard fail Razz
Back to top
Lutzifer
Modzilla



Posts: 12740
Location: ____________________ **** vegan zombie **** GRRAAIIINNSS _______
PostPosted: Wed, 3rd Dec 2008 00:28    Post subject:
WaldoJ wrote:
that's the prob with every gta game tho. they pack it with shit, they don't do a lot of testing. every gta release was flawed. Bugs. Slowdowns. Crashes. Glitches. Etc. Etc. Etc. They just get the game done, mash it up, release it, and that's that. There's yet to be a perfect GTA game.


the first three were awesome and pretty bugfree for me. Rockstable too. Vice City and San Andreas were also pretty bugfree and ran fine.

most recent games - like for a year now - have had a tendency to suck though, when it comes to crashes and bugs. I guess QA is either getting harder or getting overlooked more
Back to top
mails
Banned



Posts: 155

PostPosted: Wed, 3rd Dec 2008 00:28    Post subject:
Quote:
This is just sad!

Spoiler:

http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/6682/gta401wc8.jpg


u have bought it or it's a 360 image?


Last edited by mails on Wed, 3rd Dec 2008 00:30; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
appiehappie




Posts: 136

PostPosted: Wed, 3rd Dec 2008 00:29    Post subject:
WaldoJ wrote:
impossible to fix gta. Very Happy R* rushed it. It was already buggy on the consoles. It's just lot worse of the pc. Very Happy


No problems whatsoever here Rolling Eyes
Back to top
xtralong




Posts: 1759
Location: Portugal
PostPosted: Wed, 3rd Dec 2008 00:29    Post subject:
iNatan wrote:
This is just sad!

 Spoiler:
 


lol another pic with the same bug! R* FTW!


''The mind and body must be subjected to extreme stimulus, by means of drugs and music.'' - Hunter S. Thompson
Back to top
AndreaSpooky




Posts: 1260

PostPosted: Wed, 3rd Dec 2008 00:29    Post subject:
few laughs in the meantime


Back to top
WaldoJ
VIP Member



Posts: 32678

PostPosted: Wed, 3rd Dec 2008 00:31    Post subject:
Lutzifer wrote:
the first three were awesome and pretty bugfree for me. Rockstable too. Vice City and San Andreas were also pretty bugfree and ran fine.

most recent games - like for a year now - have had a tendency to suck though, when it comes to crashes and bugs. I guess QA is either getting harder or getting overlooked more


They played fine. You could beat the game, here and there. but they were glitchy. All of them. Playable. Fun. Everything. But still all glitchy and with bugs. Laughing Sad


Sin317 wrote:
I win, you lose. Or Go fuck yourself.
Back to top
anti-flag




Posts: 246
Location: Brazil
PostPosted: Wed, 3rd Dec 2008 00:32    Post subject:
AKofC wrote:
Well, at least now we know that the magazines and sites that gave this game a 10 are crap and were probably paid.

Because how could they not have notice this poor performance across the spectrum?


DUH!!!!!
Don't you know all reviews were made at NASA?
Back to top
Lutzifer
Modzilla



Posts: 12740
Location: ____________________ **** vegan zombie **** GRRAAIIINNSS _______
PostPosted: Wed, 3rd Dec 2008 00:38    Post subject:
WaldoJ wrote:
Lutzifer wrote:
the first three were awesome and pretty bugfree for me. Rockstable too. Vice City and San Andreas were also pretty bugfree and ran fine.

most recent games - like for a year now - have had a tendency to suck though, when it comes to crashes and bugs. I guess QA is either getting harder or getting overlooked more


They played fine. You could beat the game, here and there. but they were glitchy. All of them. Playable. Fun. Everything. But still all glitchy and with bugs. Laughing Sad


from what i remember the pc versions were less glitchy than their console-counterparts, so as a pc gamer, i m fine with that. Hopefully it s the same with the new one. And if the performance will be better with a cracked version, i salute that as well Very Happy
Back to top
zagy




Posts: 26

PostPosted: Wed, 3rd Dec 2008 00:42    Post subject:
yes just we need to wait when proper releaes comes out all will be fine.but wait
Back to top
Page 115 of 165 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - PC Games Arena Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 114, 115, 116 ... 163, 164, 165  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group