Lord.Of.The.Rings.Battle.For.Middle.Earth.DVD-HOODLUM
Page 3 of 8 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Pizda2




Posts: 3028

PostPosted: Sat, 11th Dec 2004 23:19    Post subject:
G-Unit Soldier wrote:
WTF, how stupid can i be.....I totally forgot the crack. thx


LOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

Can anyone tell me something about tactics, i mean i know that archers suck against sword infantry in melee combat duh...., but is it like numbers win...... or like counter the archers with swordsmen, counter the swords men with cavalery, counter the cavalery with pikemen?


Back to top
sTo0z
[Moderator] Babysitter



Posts: 7449
Location: USA
PostPosted: Sat, 11th Dec 2004 23:30    Post subject:
A head honcho for BFME over at EA had this to say:
Quote:
Folks,

Some of you have been asking about post product support for B4ME, especially given the notes that we are thinking of an expansion pack and working on RA3.

Rather than get into arguments and debates about how much support there has been on Red Alert 2 or Generals and then whether people will be happy with support for B4ME, I thought I would give a bit of the bigger picture going forward.

The key thing to note is that we're going to have a dedicated team for B4ME going forward. This differs from our past process of having a our one team jump from product to product(i.e. Red Alert 2, Yuri's, Generals, Zero Hour, B4ME). The very nature of having this team means that the landscape for support and development of B4ME games has changed from how things have worked in the past.

Next thing, is that we are going to support the product (and already have) because we know it's important and it's the right thing to do.

Because the product has been out for about a day, it's too early to outline all of the things we have planned and instead I suggest to everyone that they just watch and participate in the support going, giving feedback about things you appreciate as well as things you don't appreciate.

For those of you who are skeptics or like to post negative comments about everything(especially those posting from guest accounts), you should watch and keep a record of the things we've done and then post those with your comments and conclusions. You guys can do a great service to the community by helping to ensure that everyone is exactly aware of what's really happening or not.

Hope this helps explain the bigger picture for everyone.

Basically, the time for words and debates support has past. Instead, we'll let our actions speak for themselves.

Have fun,
Mark


I guess they want to make amends for their past horrid support.. do we believe them? Wink


Back to top
gutyreader




Posts: 365

PostPosted: Sat, 11th Dec 2004 23:50    Post subject:
Quote:
I guess they want to make amends for their past horrid support.. do we believe them? Wink


Got any reaosn to? then by any means don't.

This game is pretty lacking in the strategy department for a 'RTS'

Well, it's EA.. Somehow, even if they only publish (well I think) everything they touch feels like an empty shell.
Back to top
Qontact




Posts: 122
Location: City of Angels
PostPosted: Sun, 12th Dec 2004 00:33    Post subject:
yeah the stragetic part sucks ass :r
Back to top
petrescu




Posts: 4

PostPosted: Sun, 12th Dec 2004 00:47    Post subject: The cracked game is time limit?
The Game when 3-5 minutes in the campaign or skirmish my all men is die and lost the mission.It is a crack problem or what?Any people have this problem?
Hoodlum Dvd version.
Back to top
sTo0z
[Moderator] Babysitter



Posts: 7449
Location: USA
PostPosted: Sun, 12th Dec 2004 00:57    Post subject:
Wow that sounds exactly like what happened in Generals too.

I think it was caused by switching your cd key after you installed. You didn't edit your cd key in the registry or anything did you?


Back to top
petrescu




Posts: 4

PostPosted: Sun, 12th Dec 2004 01:23    Post subject: Ohoho
Thats great i installed windows again and the registry is deleted that possible i want to install again the game and work fine.Thanks Laughing
Back to top
CoFran




Posts: 117

PostPosted: Sun, 12th Dec 2004 02:09    Post subject:
i dont want to install it again, any quick fix for that bad crack matter?
Back to top
sTo0z
[Moderator] Babysitter



Posts: 7449
Location: USA
PostPosted: Sun, 12th Dec 2004 02:10    Post subject:
If it's what I think it is (relating to the Generals thing long ago) a re-install was the only way to fix it.


Back to top
CoFran




Posts: 117

PostPosted: Sun, 12th Dec 2004 02:13    Post subject:
hmmm, irritating, will that happen again? i mean, i didnt burn that rls already, so is this a redundant prob?
Back to top
sTo0z
[Moderator] Babysitter



Posts: 7449
Location: USA
PostPosted: Sun, 12th Dec 2004 02:19    Post subject:
To tell you the truth the only thing I remember was back in Generals all of peoples' buildings would explode after like 3 minutes of playing.

I don't remember that exact cause, something about the registry I think, but I could be wrong.

The only thing I remember to help it was to re-install.

Of course this problem could be something else, so.. I dunno, could happen again, not sure why it even happened to you two at all.

So good luck with it. Razz Hopefully someone else has a better answer.


Back to top
upstart_69




Posts: 1094
Location: Right behind you!
PostPosted: Sun, 12th Dec 2004 02:20    Post subject:
i wonder why so many are bitching about the lack of strategy.. did anyone at all complain at lack of strategy for any blizzard rts games? even back then they had deep, involving strategy games, believe it or not, of course most were turn-based games which of course require patience. and personally i think this game blows warcraft3 out of the water as far as fast-paced rts go with a focus on story and heros-an rts with a bit of rpg. anyways This is not ROME:tw people, get over it.

and as far as bad developers/publishers go, ea is definitely Not the worse. would jowood or atari or activision do any better job with the lotr liscence? i dont think so. their products would be bugged so bad it wouldnt be playable. at least ea games are playable, if not totally unique and filled with character-these days you have to look to some small russian dev for that.

anyways i would recommend this game to anyone, especially taking into account 2 massive campaigns and a very decent multiplayer. they just need a few patches to get multiplayer better running and put in a few more options and its a classic. also did anyone check out all the ini files inside the big file? you can edit almost EVERYTHING about this game. oh and plus you can extract all the lotr music..rock on.


Core i7 920 @ 3.8Ghz | 6GB OCZ DDR3 8-8-8-24 @ 1600mhz | eVga x58 Mobo | 2 x eVga GTX 460 SLI | Intel X25-M + 3x Seagate + WD Black = 2.75TB | X-Fi Titanium | PCP&C Silencer 750 | G15 KB | G5 Mouse | G35 Headset | Z-5500 Digital | Samsung T260HD
Back to top
pallebrun




Posts: 2052

PostPosted: Sun, 12th Dec 2004 02:54    Post subject:
Hmm I havent had time to try this yet but is this game a story driven game, much like warcraft 3 with heroes and crap?
I thought it was going to be a classic strategy game like warcraft 2 or the command & conquer games and not something like warcraft3 which i thought sucked badly. Sad
Back to top
Sn00ze




Posts: 6

PostPosted: Sun, 12th Dec 2004 03:23    Post subject:
Ok,

Anyone Having USB problem with this game? Everytime I play this game my Logitech MX500 keep disconnecting/reconnecting. So to mouse freeze while I'm playing the game and I need to reconnect it or restart the game. This is VERY annoying. I tried different USB Port...

I have a CLEAN WindowsXP SP2 install from yesterday, With lastest VIA Hyperion Driver,
1GB Muskin PC 3200,
ATI X800XT, Catalyst 4.12Beta
Athlon64 3200+,

I don't have the USB to PS/2 adapter to try if the problem persist in PS/2 mode. And I don't have the "MouseWare" driver from logitech installed... I just hate these driver since MOUSE4 & MOUSE5 doesn't work in the majority of my games.
Back to top
sTo0z
[Moderator] Babysitter



Posts: 7449
Location: USA
PostPosted: Sun, 12th Dec 2004 03:37    Post subject:
pallebrun wrote:
Hmm I havent had time to try this yet but is this game a story driven game, much like warcraft 3 with heroes and crap?
I thought it was going to be a classic strategy game like warcraft 2 or the command & conquer games and not something like warcraft3 which i thought sucked badly. Sad


Well, the Good side follows (for the most part) the travels of the Fellowship. There are some classic "build a base, build an army, slaughter the other d00d" missions in between the familiar travels of the Fellowship.

I don't get what your comparison is though, even Command & Conquer had a story...

As far as heroes, yes they are there. They gain ranks, which could be compared to levels, and as they gain rank they gain more special abilities. There has been a hero in every level I've played so far.

In the skirmish missions, and in MP, your main building can pump out the heroes, comparable to WC3 I guess.

So if you're looking for straight standard RTS, I guess you won't find it because of the heroes.

Not sure what you meant by the story driven part.... Hopefully I said something useful back there. Razz


Back to top
pallebrun




Posts: 2052

PostPosted: Sun, 12th Dec 2004 03:56    Post subject:
When I say story I mean a real story that have some meaning. The story in the earlier command & conquer games did absolutley nothing, every mission was build a base and fight Smile Same with warcraft 1 and 2.
And that's what I thought this would be.

Thanks for the info, now I know I dont have to bother with this.
Back to top
sTo0z
[Moderator] Babysitter



Posts: 7449
Location: USA
PostPosted: Sun, 12th Dec 2004 04:26    Post subject:
Ah I get it. Yah it is not set up a base and fight every mission. There are always different objectives going on.

There are some build a base and fight missions though. Razz

Sorry to hear you won't be bothering with this, it is extremely enjoyable, but if you're not into heroes then you aren't into heroes.

Hopefully the next C&C game that just got announced will do it for ya. Wink


Back to top
BoZo_




Posts: 207
Location: Uranus
PostPosted: Sun, 12th Dec 2004 04:39    Post subject:
On Evil Campaign all but two missions I've played has been build base and kill (I'm on level 11.5).


don't copy that floppy
Back to top
hiatus_gsw
Banned



Posts: 807

PostPosted: Sun, 12th Dec 2004 06:17    Post subject:
awesome, first I get my war of the Ring board game and now I get this, this could be one hell of a christmas, way to go Mr. Tolkien
Back to top
thudo




Posts: 6309
Location: Mellonville North, Canada
PostPosted: Sun, 12th Dec 2004 10:21    Post subject:
Slider wrote:
HAs anyone tried LAN, I can connect to the Lobby ok, but when I try to join the game it just says connection timed out.
We are trying to connect using GIT.


Why not use BattleLan? That should work! Plus.. BfmE, like Generals/ZH wasn't really Router/NAT friendly.. ya have a Router/NAT? If so, try removing it from the system and connect directly to your high-speed connection then try.


MSI GT72S 6QF Dominator Pro S 29th Anniversary Intel i7 6820HK @ 4.0Ghz, 32GB DDR4-2133 RAM, 2x256GB Raid0 Toshiba NVMe 2.5 inch PCIe SSD, Nvidia Geforce GTX 980 OC'ed 200+ Core / 200+ Mem, 17.3 inch LG IPS HD Display @ 75Hz, Intel 7265AC Wifi, Windows 10 Pro BIOS version: .112 EC Firmware version: .105

Current Broadband speed record: 329.1 Mb/sec down // 21.73 Mb/sec up
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/3933292.png
Back to top
Nailbiter
PUNK



Posts: 6061

PostPosted: Sun, 12th Dec 2004 12:00    Post subject:
Acer wrote:
RubberChicken wrote:
Acer wrote:
Do you have to burn this or what? The serials doesent work, I've tried all of em getting the error message that I've entered a wrong serial...


in the end of the serials it says xxxx-HLM0 or something be aware that the 0 is a zero and not a O



Thnx m8 Smile


copy, then paste. Cool
Back to top
zoki_007




Posts: 54
Location: Australia
PostPosted: Sun, 12th Dec 2004 14:47    Post subject:
any of you guys reakon there will be cracked servers soon or in the near future ?
Back to top
sTo0z
[Moderator] Babysitter



Posts: 7449
Location: USA
PostPosted: Sun, 12th Dec 2004 15:35    Post subject:
zoki_007 wrote:
any of you guys reakon there will be cracked servers soon or in the near future ?


How would that even work? You'll never be able to log in to their official service with a cracked copy, and LAN should already work.

Not much they can crack. Razz


Back to top
Bob Barnsen




Posts: 31974
Location: Germoney
PostPosted: Sun, 12th Dec 2004 15:58    Post subject:
try kali. my friend played there online with some other people some hours ago.


Enthoo Evolv ATX TG // Asus Prime x370 // Ryzen 1700 // Gainward GTX 1080 // 16GB DDR4-3200
Back to top
zoki_007




Posts: 54
Location: Australia
PostPosted: Sun, 12th Dec 2004 16:40    Post subject:
sTo0z wrote:
zoki_007 wrote:
any of you guys reakon there will be cracked servers soon or in the near future ?


How would that even work? You'll never be able to log in to their official service with a cracked copy, and LAN should already work.

Not much they can crack. Razz


VPN connection, thats how it was done with C&C Generals. Wonder if it'll work with this.

deathangel will try it out, thanx
Back to top
sTo0z
[Moderator] Babysitter



Posts: 7449
Location: USA
PostPosted: Sun, 12th Dec 2004 16:52    Post subject:
Don't you have to pay for kali to get it to run custom games? I swear I tried to use kali once and it was like "unregistered version not allowed to run custom games!" or something like that.

Are we thinking of the same kali?

My friend and I are about to try battleLAN 0.5.


Back to top
zoki_007




Posts: 54
Location: Australia
PostPosted: Sun, 12th Dec 2004 16:59    Post subject:
sTo0z if it works well, let us know plz
Back to top
eRaideR




Posts: 102
Location: Toronto, THAT'S RIGHT! EH!?
PostPosted: Sun, 12th Dec 2004 18:18    Post subject:
This game is great. Works fine for me. Very Happy weeeeeeeee


If you wear a selafone suite, people clearly see your nuts.
Back to top
sTo0z
[Moderator] Babysitter



Posts: 7449
Location: USA
PostPosted: Sun, 12th Dec 2004 19:08    Post subject:
So close with battleLAN but no cigar.

We were able to see the game, and join, but we couldn't hear eachother in the chat room and we were not able to start the game.

One of us is stuck behind a router, and we forwarded ports 8088 THROUGH 28088 as it mentions these ports in the README.

Couldn't get it working though. I bet if we were both on pure connections (not behind router or anything) it would work. But as it stands, we couldn't figure out the port forwarding crap to work with battleLAN.


Back to top
thudo




Posts: 6309
Location: Mellonville North, Canada
PostPosted: Sun, 12th Dec 2004 19:18    Post subject:
And you probably won't get it to work either behind a Router/NAT! Remember, Generals/ZH and how bad that was for Routers/NAT? Blame EA for such absolutely shiet netcode as per usual. They just reuse the crap from before kuzz its cheaper than investing in new net technology.

Anyway try this (it may work as it does for DoW's nasty NAT problems when trying to connect with more than 3 players in DirectIP):

Used Router(s): Linksys 4 or 8 Port - should also work with D-Link/Netgear or most modern day Routers/NATs!

a) Go to http://www.whatismyip.com/ to get your WAN IP address (you can also get this in your Router).
b) Log into your Router and get the Router's Gateway and DNS entries.
c) In your Windows 2000/XP, Go to your Network Connections Area then Local Area Connection, then TCP/IP..
d) Click SPECIFY and add IP of, say, 192.168.1.20 (for example)
e) Subnet should be 255.255.255.0
f) Gateway should be 192.168.1.1 (or whatever the IP is to log into your Router/NAT or what your wrote from b)
g) DNS should be the two entries you wrote down from b) OR just leave the second DNS entry blank
h) Now click advanced and under IP click ADD then add the IP you wrote down from a). Subnet is not important. Click OK
i) Go back into your Router and under the DMZ specify the IP you used in d)
j) Done!

Now, essentially, what you did was fool the game into using the LOWER IP address (you real WAN IP) instead of the higher one (192.168.xxx.xxx LAN IP) which is where some games screw up when NATs are involved. Stupid? Yes. Developer laziness and failure to acknowledge that most people these days WILL use NATs especially due to increased hackers on the Net? MOST DEFINITELY!

It is KEY that your WAN IP (mine starts with 70.xxx.xxx.xxx) is lower than your Router's LAN IP (usually 192.xxx.xxx.xxx) for this to work. If yer running DSL you may have a higher WAN IP. In this case, you'll need to force your WAN IP lower down passed the LAN IP. I've heard it can be done but since I don't own DSL I cannot experiment.

Note: Ensure no OS firewalls are running when running this! When updating to WinXP SP2 a firewall is automatically set to run so ensure its OFF!

The key thing is the ability to log into your Router and not only get the info from b) but to set the IP you specify to the DMZ.

*NOTE*
Make sure after playing yer game you disable DMZ in your Router! You don't want to be in the DMZ thus allowing possible net attacks to befall you! A friendly reminder!


MSI GT72S 6QF Dominator Pro S 29th Anniversary Intel i7 6820HK @ 4.0Ghz, 32GB DDR4-2133 RAM, 2x256GB Raid0 Toshiba NVMe 2.5 inch PCIe SSD, Nvidia Geforce GTX 980 OC'ed 200+ Core / 200+ Mem, 17.3 inch LG IPS HD Display @ 75Hz, Intel 7265AC Wifi, Windows 10 Pro BIOS version: .112 EC Firmware version: .105

Current Broadband speed record: 329.1 Mb/sec down // 21.73 Mb/sec up
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/3933292.png


Last edited by thudo on Mon, 13th Dec 2004 03:27; edited 5 times in total
Back to top
Page 3 of 8 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - PC Games Arena Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group