Cousins added that DICE's move towards the free-to-play market arose out of a business trip to South Korea, where web-based and free-to-play games flourish in a region dominated by piracy.
EA bought neowiz(or one of the other companies which makes AVA like almost 2 years ago..the game is unreal 3 based on free to play with microtransactions (but not for guns that I'm aware of). They shouldn't have needed a trip here to figure that out. Its part of their damn company.
too lazy to make new thread with template and all that -_-
Well it's obvious that BF:BC2 is gonna be a console port but looks like so will BF1943. And latter isn't even a full game if I understand correctly, just a stand alone BF2 booster back equivalent with pathetic 24 player console limit.
Glottis, did you ever get into the beta of Heroes? I wanted to try it, but wasn't lucky enough for the first beta (and hell, the game was originally due for a Summer 2008 release)
Yeah, but we're all pirates here. Things like NDAs aren't gonna stop us from talking about our games (especially non-legally binding NDAs that haven't been signed )
Yeah, but we're all pirates here. Things like NDAs aren't gonna stop us from talking about our games (especially non-legally binding NDAs that haven't been signed )
You can have a legally-binding contract, without physically signing a piece of paper.
Yeah, but we're all pirates here. Things like NDAs aren't gonna stop us from talking about our games (especially non-legally binding NDAs that haven't been signed )
You can have a legally-binding contract, without physically signing a piece of paper.
Are you sure? I've seen plenty of sites/answers like this that all say the same; No.
Yeah, but we're all pirates here. Things like NDAs aren't gonna stop us from talking about our games (especially non-legally binding NDAs that haven't been signed )
You can have a legally-binding contract, without physically signing a piece of paper.
Are you sure? I've seen plenty of sites/answers like this that all say the same; No.
He could well be right, but if so.. why not just post a link or two SHOWING it, rather than acting all affronted? The info *I've* managed to dig up suggests otherwise, but then... I couldn't give a toss about American law
They're worth a lot more than just your "word" mate, which so far has shown or proven nothing :-\
Are you fucking kidding me? A couple of unrelated legal claims prove that the only sort of contracts that count, are ones you physically sign?
sabin1981 wrote:
He could well be right, but if so.. why not just post a link or two SHOWING it, rather than acting all affronted? The info *I've* managed to dig up suggests otherwise
Of course I'm right. You're here trying to tell us that the EULAs which are used by just about every commercial software company, and have been for decades, don't count, because you don't put pen to paper. And by extension, you're discounting verbal contracts, which have proven legally-binding for centuries in many places. What you're claiming is nearly-comical, dude.
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
