Grand Theft Auto IV
Page 88 of 156 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 87, 88, 89 ... 154, 155, 156  Next
Glottis
Banned



Posts: 6313

PostPosted: Wed, 25th Mar 2009 18:42    Post subject:
Fake, RZR didn't pre such release.


C2D E6750 @ 3.2Ghz, 4GB 800MHz DDR2 4-4-4-12, GeForce GTX 260 c216 OC 896MB, 3.2TB, Windows 7 Ultimate x64

Xbox 360 Elite, PS2 Slim, Xbox
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73238
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Wed, 25th Mar 2009 19:44    Post subject:
How to run game:

Install game
Apply Razor crack
Install patch through Live
Copy xliveless content to game dir
Run LaunchGTA.exe and it all works.
Back to top
.:RzA:.




Posts: 84

PostPosted: Wed, 25th Mar 2009 20:05    Post subject:
iNatan wrote:
How to run game:

all works.


not Multiplayer
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73238
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Wed, 25th Mar 2009 20:34    Post subject:
Didn't find it all that great, so I don't care about that. All SP works.
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73238
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Wed, 25th Mar 2009 21:06    Post subject:
iNatan wrote:
All SP works.

Nope, this is not true. There are some problems with missions for hacked launcher. Sad
Back to top
cnZ
Banned



Posts: 3091

PostPosted: Wed, 25th Mar 2009 21:24    Post subject:
uninstalled it already, forgot that i dont like sandbox games that much tbh:d


yes
Back to top
anti-flag




Posts: 246
Location: Brazil
PostPosted: Thu, 26th Mar 2009 00:02    Post subject:
Newty182 wrote:
anti-flag wrote:
 Spoiler:
 


This is fake isnt it? I know you can actually download it but its not a Razor 1911 release right? it uses the live.dll and after quiting it crashes the .exe just like before


Well i found that somewhere and i tought it was worth mentioning... the launcher and 1911.dll files do have exactly the same size they had on 1.02 crack, but it does work now with the xlive.dll file included...

Also for those like me who use windows XP, the savegames are located at
X:\Documents and Settings\User\Local Settings\Application Data\Rockastar Games\...
Back to top
Newty182




Posts: 10810
Location: UK
PostPosted: Thu, 26th Mar 2009 19:20    Post subject:
What a fucking a dick, the info is inaccurate aswell

The game is/or was only £9.99 at Morrisons.


Ryzen 5 5600, ASUS ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING WIFI II, Corsair Vengeance RGB RT 32GB 3600MHz C16, MSI RTX 5070 Ti Ventus 3X OC , Corsair RMx Series RM750x. AOC AGON AG324UX - 4K 144Hz 1ms
Back to top
tonizito
VIP Member



Posts: 51432
Location: Portugal, the shithole of Europe.
PostPosted: Thu, 26th Mar 2009 20:02    Post subject:
Well I'm finally able to run this game decently on my hunk of junk PC with the lastest patch(with both shadows and reflections turned off, of course).
Now I'll just have to wait for a proper crack to start the story.

iNatan could you be more specific on what problems you have on the missions when using the razor crack + xliveless0.95?


boundle (thoughts on cracking AITD) wrote:
i guess thouth if without a legit key the installation was rolling back we are all fucking then
Back to top
IvanGrozny
Banned



Posts: 258

PostPosted: Sun, 29th Mar 2009 01:53    Post subject:
looking for russian lyrics from song from VLADIVODSTOK station in the game.
Song is MAMA played by BASTA.
Cant find russian , only english.
Back to top
asbogdan




Posts: 174

PostPosted: Sun, 29th Mar 2009 16:11    Post subject:
For me the game works fine with 102 patch even when going to an internet.
If I upgrade to 103 will I be still abel to log? Do we have to wait for a proper dox?
Thanks

I've installed 103 allready and it works fine with no securom trigers.Cheers m8s
Back to top
Breezer_




Posts: 10826
Location: Finland
PostPosted: Mon, 30th Mar 2009 20:30    Post subject:
Damn just reinstalled and wanted to try this new patch. Runs so good now on my computer. Very Happy

Texture quality: high
Reflection quality: high
Water quality: Very high
Shadow Quality: High
Texture filtering quality: Very high
View Distance: 42
Detail distance: 70
Vehicle density: 100
Shadow density: 10
Definition on
Vsync on

Never drops below 30Fps, runs unbeliavable good now Razz Gj Cockstar! before this patch this was a slideshow even on minimum settings -_-
Back to top
Teniak




Posts: 2602
Location: Tic Tac
PostPosted: Mon, 30th Mar 2009 21:47    Post subject:
Run fucking good too here , but with my old e6300 and 8800 U.
About 30/40 fps texture med> everything else very high < vd 20 dd 20 vd 20

Multi is realy good / fun ...

A little video showing a fight this night on TDM.
http://wuapi.com/e/video/gtaiv-multi
Back to top
Breezer_




Posts: 10826
Location: Finland
PostPosted: Mon, 30th Mar 2009 22:22    Post subject:
Teniak wrote:
Run fucking good too here , but with my old e6300 and 8800 U.
About 30/40 fps texture med> everything else very high < vd 20 dd 20 vd 20

Multi is realy good / fun ...

A little video showing a fight this night on TDM.
http://wuapi.com/e/video/gtaiv-multi


Had earlier when i played GTA4 constantly, E6420 @ 3,2Ghz, 8800GTX and shit. Got like 25fps max, destroyed gameplay experience so much ;< after i upragaded to quad, fps raised like 15-20 but then 8800gtx broke Very Happy
Back to top
Breezer_




Posts: 10826
Location: Finland
PostPosted: Mon, 30th Mar 2009 22:25    Post subject:
But anyways, GTA4 is so damn good game. I have reinstalled this like 4-5 times because of the dev´s flaws, always wanted to play with good FPS. But now, god damn cockstar, it runs like a dream like dream game should run Razz
Back to top
Glottis
Banned



Posts: 6313

PostPosted: Mon, 30th Mar 2009 22:35    Post subject:
I feel like finishing all the side stuff that I got left and playing some MP, so waiting for real crack continues :/


C2D E6750 @ 3.2Ghz, 4GB 800MHz DDR2 4-4-4-12, GeForce GTX 260 c216 OC 896MB, 3.2TB, Windows 7 Ultimate x64

Xbox 360 Elite, PS2 Slim, Xbox


Last edited by Glottis on Mon, 30th Mar 2009 23:02; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Teniak




Posts: 2602
Location: Tic Tac
PostPosted: Mon, 30th Mar 2009 22:59    Post subject:
Breezer_ wrote:
But anyways, GTA4 is so damn good game. I have reinstalled this like 4-5 times because of the dev´s flaws, always wanted to play with good FPS. But now, god damn cockstar, it runs like a dream like dream game should run Razz


yup its a fucking good game ! my best for many reason ( except perf ..bug etc ).
im under W7 (7068x64) and perf are increase (vs vistax64) , increase again with last driver for W7 (and only this one >>) 181.71 . With another drivers , perf are SHIT shit shit ( about 10/20max outdoor)!!!
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Mon, 30th Mar 2009 23:02    Post subject:
Drop back a driver version?
Back to top
Glottis
Banned



Posts: 6313

PostPosted: Mon, 30th Mar 2009 23:05    Post subject:
Teniak wrote:
yup its a fucking good game ! my best for many reason ( except perf ..bug etc ).
im under W7 (7068x64) and perf are increase (vs vistax64) , increase again with last driver for W7 (and only this one >>) 181.71 . With another drivers , perf are SHIT shit shit ( about 10/20max outdoor)!!!

I forgot your spec but wasn't your CPU outdated? GTA4 is very CPU hungry game so having old CPU would explain your bad performance.

And what bugs do you speak of? I finished the game with patch 1.0.2.0 and encountered no bugs.


C2D E6750 @ 3.2Ghz, 4GB 800MHz DDR2 4-4-4-12, GeForce GTX 260 c216 OC 896MB, 3.2TB, Windows 7 Ultimate x64

Xbox 360 Elite, PS2 Slim, Xbox


Last edited by Glottis on Mon, 30th Mar 2009 23:06; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
Teniak




Posts: 2602
Location: Tic Tac
PostPosted: Mon, 30th Mar 2009 23:05    Post subject:
What sabin ? (sorry i dont undersand some english"expression" :/ Question

Glottis wrote:

I forgot your spec but wasn't your CPU outdated? GTA4 is very CPU hungry game so having old CPU would explain your bad performance.
And what bugs do you speak of? I finished the game with patch 1.0.2.0 and encountered no bugs.


yup , i need a new Cpu but it's enought for many game for the moment , i wait a bit more to upgrade my spec .My cpu is e6300 (1.Cool oc 2.8 with 6gb ddr2 800 /8800u.
About bug.. not for me , i'm talking about people who have it.


My Youtube Channel - -


Last edited by Teniak on Mon, 30th Mar 2009 23:10; edited 4 times in total
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Mon, 30th Mar 2009 23:08    Post subject:
Teniak wrote:
What sabin ? (sorry i dont undersand some english"expression" :/ Question


You said that it was running great on the last driver (181.71) but then with the other drivers, it was running shit. Right?

Or did you mean that the drivers BEFORE 181.71 were bad? If so, ignore me.. lol.
Back to top
Teniak




Posts: 2602
Location: Tic Tac
PostPosted: Mon, 30th Mar 2009 23:13    Post subject:
For gtaiv , yup old drivers were bad ( under vista and win7) except 185.20 .
Back to top
moosenoodles




Posts: 18411

PostPosted: Mon, 30th Mar 2009 23:14    Post subject:
Teniak wrote:
What sabin ? (sorry i dont undersand some english"expression" :/ Question

Glottis wrote:

I forgot your spec but wasn't your CPU outdated? GTA4 is very CPU hungry game so having old CPU would explain your bad performance.
And what bugs do you speak of? I finished the game with patch 1.0.2.0 and encountered no bugs.


yup , i need a new Cpu but it's enought for many game for the moment , i wait a bit more to upgrade my spec .My cpu is e6300 (1.Cool oc 2.8 with 6gb ddr2 800 /8800u.
About bug.. not for me , i'm talking about people who have it.


i dont think 2.8 o/c dual core is shit to be honest, you should still be running all games out with that.. When i used to check the cpu activity on my cores it would be mostly spread evenly 50% on both with plenty of spare room for the most part...

Quad works well yes but im still not convinced yet that its a major improvement due to the fact when reading about gamers using quads and they give the old feedback and fps and how it runs, I tend to get the same regardless using dual core..

With the exception of running outside apps of your game etc that is.
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Mon, 30th Mar 2009 23:18    Post subject:
moosenoodles wrote:

i dont think 2.8 o/c dual core is shit to be honest, you should still be running all games out with that.. When i used to check the cpu activity on my cores it would be mostly spread evenly 50% on both with plenty of spare room for the most part...

Quad works well yes but im still not convinced yet that its a major improvement due to the fact when reading about gamers using quads and they give the old feedback and fps and how it runs, I tend to get the same regardless using dual core..

With the exception of running outside apps of your game etc that is.


There are a couple of games that utilise Quads properly, and effectively .. and then there are games like GTA4 which practically NEED the Quads. Almost every bench I've seen has shown significant performance boosts with Quads over Duals.

Other than those exceptions, a Dual is every bit as good as a Quad in gaming.
Back to top
Teniak




Posts: 2602
Location: Tic Tac
PostPosted: Mon, 30th Mar 2009 23:18    Post subject:
agree with both of you Smile

Some screen ( Blur are bad on screen , but i'd prefer it(on move) than noAA shit)
 Spoiler:
 


Settings


My Youtube Channel - -


Last edited by Teniak on Mon, 30th Mar 2009 23:34; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
tonizito
VIP Member



Posts: 51432
Location: Portugal, the shithole of Europe.
PostPosted: Mon, 30th Mar 2009 23:21    Post subject:
Is it possible to disable the legal screens and Rockstar logos that pop up before the main menu? They're starting to piss me off... Mad


boundle (thoughts on cracking AITD) wrote:
i guess thouth if without a legit key the installation was rolling back we are all fucking then
Back to top
moosenoodles




Posts: 18411

PostPosted: Mon, 30th Mar 2009 23:24    Post subject:
yeah not to say its not gonna help, its just i think its not always needed for majority i suppose ive found game wise of late.. And gta IV was not a problem either I know alot of folks had trouble with performance but from day one it just run as im guessing it was supposed to for a semi port whatever..

btw sabin im loving the AA quality im getting with this 4870 (not talking about gta), I never noticed to much before but with nvidia cards and AA in games like say age of conan, warhammer. or any mmo really, if one was looking at say the foliage and you start running forwards, with the nvidia I got like a white shimmer around the outside of such foliage, tree's etc bushes whatever. With the Ati I dont see none of that..

Used to bug the living shit out of me lol..
Back to top
sabin1981
Mostly Cursed



Posts: 87805

PostPosted: Mon, 30th Mar 2009 23:35    Post subject:
ATi have always had the upper-hand with anti-aliasing techniques, most certainly now with their cards that are powerful enough to run decent levels of filtering without TOO much of a performance hit (except Mass Effect. Damn, I have no idea why it drops from 62fps locked to 35fps with 4xAA -- and anyone who claims their card "does it fine" - show proof or crawl back under your rock) Edge-Detect AA and Transparency AA (transparency AA for trees, wires, gates, etc) look SPECTACULAR!

ATi's only issue now are their drivers. God they're a mess. Each new release seems to break xxx amount of older titles Rolling Eyes
Back to top
moosenoodles




Posts: 18411

PostPosted: Mon, 30th Mar 2009 23:41    Post subject:
nvidia break shit all the time with the 20 releases a day dont worry lol..

regarding mass-effect, the game is coded for shit frames, its locked down, the game engine ini shows that, and I read thats true also.. No escaping it if you want it to run as efficiently as possible you have to leave the min and max settings for fps alone via the game engine ini file.

Shitty but what you expect from ports Smile even games that are not supposed to be full ports are ports somewhere, its always just some annoying emulator poking its nose in im sure..
Back to top
Glottis
Banned



Posts: 6313

PostPosted: Mon, 30th Mar 2009 23:42    Post subject:
moosenoodles wrote:
with nvidia cards and AA in games like say age of conan, warhammer. or any mmo really, if one was looking at say the foliage and you start running forwards, with the nvidia I got like a white shimmer around the outside of such foliage, tree's etc bushes whatever. With the Ati I dont see none of that..

Used to bug the living shit out of me lol..

I never ever saw anything like what you describe in any games (including the ones you named) with any of my Nvidia cards. Maybe you just didn't have transparency antialiasing turned on with Nvidia, but you have with Ati (without even knowing about it). That would explain your confusion.

sabin1981 wrote:
ATi have always had the upper-hand with anti-aliasing techniques, most certainly now with their cards that are powerful enough to run decent levels of filtering without TOO much of a performance hit

The hell? How exactly ATI has upper hand with 'anti-aliasing techniques'? Any proof? Comparison? Anything?


C2D E6750 @ 3.2Ghz, 4GB 800MHz DDR2 4-4-4-12, GeForce GTX 260 c216 OC 896MB, 3.2TB, Windows 7 Ultimate x64

Xbox 360 Elite, PS2 Slim, Xbox


Last edited by Glottis on Mon, 30th Mar 2009 23:45; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
Page 88 of 156 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - PC Games Arena Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 87, 88, 89 ... 154, 155, 156  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group