|
Page 3 of 34 |
hahe
Posts: 1685
Location: US
|
Posted: Sat, 18th Dec 2004 22:12 Post subject: |
|
 |
Ok. Just making sure I wasn't going crazy.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Wed, 22nd Dec 2004 00:03 Post subject: |
|
 |
Wow....good screens I can't wait for this game
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Losion
Posts: 139
Location: 403 Forbidden
|
Posted: Fri, 24th Dec 2004 03:44 Post subject: |
|
 |
I don't care about graphics is this awesome game.
Remember the old times.... There was GTA1 and GTA London! It was in 2D !!!! and there were many people playing this. Even in Multiplayer Mode in GTA.... That was fun....
Now youre talking about graphics in San Andreas... lol. Dude, play gta or gta2, then you'll see and respect SA as it is!
GTA was the first great R* game, then followed by GTA2 and so on... GTA3 was better than GTA2, Vice City was better than GTA3, and now I'm right if I say that San Andreas is MUCH better than Vice City... I want to mention, that R* games get better, and who knows... maybe in the future we will see GTA4 with better graphic than HL2...
And be happy that GTA:SA is better than --> "Enter the matrix" (square car-wheels) if you know what I mean...
"Vice City" was worse in graphics, and nobody cares about it. Here in SA you've got better graphic as it was in Vice City.. Right?!! So whats the problem?????
Looking forward to the PC version of this BEST GAME EVER.
I think, its 50$ worth, EVEN WITH SOME CRAPPY GRAPHICS!
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
upstart_69
Posts: 1094
Location: Right behind you!
|
Posted: Fri, 24th Dec 2004 07:39 Post subject: |
|
 |
Losion wrote: | I don't care about graphics is this awesome game.
Remember the old times.... There was GTA1 and GTA London! It was in 2D !!!! and there were many people playing this. Even in Multiplayer Mode in GTA.... That was fun....
Now youre talking about graphics in San Andreas... lol. Dude, play gta or gta2, then you'll see and respect SA as it is!
GTA was the first great R* game, then followed by GTA2 and so on... GTA3 was better than GTA2, Vice City was better than GTA3, and now I'm right if I say that San Andreas is MUCH better than Vice City... I want to mention, that R* games get better, and who knows... maybe in the future we will see GTA4 with better graphic than HL2...
And be happy that GTA:SA is better than --> "Enter the matrix" (square car-wheels) if you know what I mean...
"Vice City" was worse in graphics, and nobody cares about it. Here in SA you've got better graphic as it was in Vice City.. Right?!! So whats the problem?????
Looking forward to the PC version of this BEST GAME EVER.
I think, its 50$ worth, EVEN WITH SOME CRAPPY GRAPHICS! |
i think ppl are dissapointed with the graphics with san andreas, and rightly so, because its such a small step from the last game. yes, the 2d GTA games had horrible graphics, especially london. but with gta3 rockstar changed that by making a gta game that was using the latest graphics and technologies to date.
however since gta3 the visuals in vice city and san andreas have been advancing in small steps while every other game series is advancing in leaps in bounds. and besides this, pc gamers come to expect gorgeous graphics from games. thats why we update video cards and processors and so on. to have the latest and greatest. if rockstar is too lazy to make san andreas graphics look better for the better system, then its not worth the 50 bucks, imho.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Fri, 24th Dec 2004 10:03 Post subject: |
|
 |
i agree with the merit that gta:sa is worth the 50 bucks on gameplay alone.
however
as anyone knows, a ps2 game on a computer screen (hd for arguements sake since any moniter can do 1080 vertical lines now adays) looks like crap. a tv has only 400 someodd lines of resolution. so obviously its gonna look like crap ported to a pc, it wasn't made for it. i'm just playing devils advocate tho, i think they should definately liscense a new graphics engine for the pc versions, or someone should hack the hl2 gfx engine to work with san andreas. my 2c anyways.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wyhpower
Posts: 68
Location: Still at Vice City, Sometimes LC. Heading to SA
|
Posted: Fri, 24th Dec 2004 10:14 Post subject: |
|
 |
in ps2, gta:sa has 2-play function, anyone think of how will it be implemented??
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Fri, 24th Dec 2004 10:34 Post subject: |
|
 |
Too lazy to search on the internet; What is 2-play function?
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wyhpower
Posts: 68
Location: Still at Vice City, Sometimes LC. Heading to SA
|
Posted: Fri, 24th Dec 2004 12:20 Post subject: |
|
 |
IN ps2 gta:sa, some side missions need to be finished by 2 players, called "2 Player Freeroam"
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Fri, 24th Dec 2004 12:43 Post subject: |
|
 |
I think they will use an AI-player for that, I allways hate such 'Don't let Mr X or Woman Y get killed'-mission because they always die on me...
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Losion
Posts: 139
Location: 403 Forbidden
|
Posted: Fri, 24th Dec 2004 14:59 Post subject: |
|
 |
upstart_69 wrote: | Losion wrote: | I don't care about graphics is this awesome game.
Remember the old times.... There was GTA1 and GTA London! It was in 2D !!!! and there were many people playing this. Even in Multiplayer Mode in GTA.... That was fun....
Now youre talking about graphics in San Andreas... lol. Dude, play gta or gta2, then you'll see and respect SA as it is!
GTA was the first great R* game, then followed by GTA2 and so on... GTA3 was better than GTA2, Vice City was better than GTA3, and now I'm right if I say that San Andreas is MUCH better than Vice City... I want to mention, that R* games get better, and who knows... maybe in the future we will see GTA4 with better graphic than HL2...
And be happy that GTA:SA is better than --> "Enter the matrix" (square car-wheels) if you know what I mean...
"Vice City" was worse in graphics, and nobody cares about it. Here in SA you've got better graphic as it was in Vice City.. Right?!! So whats the problem?????
Looking forward to the PC version of this BEST GAME EVER.
I think, its 50$ worth, EVEN WITH SOME CRAPPY GRAPHICS! |
i think ppl are dissapointed with the graphics with san andreas, and rightly so, because its such a small step from the last game. yes, the 2d GTA games had horrible graphics, especially london. but with gta3 rockstar changed that by making a gta game that was using the latest graphics and technologies to date.
however since gta3 the visuals in vice city and san andreas have been advancing in small steps while every other game series is advancing in leaps in bounds. and besides this, pc gamers come to expect gorgeous graphics from games. thats why we update video cards and processors and so on. to have the latest and greatest. if rockstar is too lazy to make san andreas graphics look better for the better system, then its not worth the 50 bucks, imho. |
Yes, youre right, BUT don't forget, we talk about San Andreas, the best worldwide game.
We can only hope, that the PC version will be better in graphics. In my opinion, I would give 50$ only for gameplay, (as cdox already said)
I don't think that you'll not buy the game when it comes out in cause of crappy graphics... Lets look at statistics of PS2 version.... how many millions of copies sold?..... And I think all people like this game.
As someone said, some of us still play nintendo or snes or sth...
For me personally the GAMEPLAY has a higher priority than GRAPHICS.
I give you an example.... Remember 30.9.2003 one hacker stole the sourcecode of Half-Life 2. And there were graphics, but no correct gameplay.... it sucked....... and remember "mario" for snes. It had shitty graphics but it was funny...
Conclusion:
SA has not the best graphics, but its acceptable
IGN - 9.9 of 10 ---> http://ps2.ign.com/articles/559/559560p1.html
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Thu, 27th Jan 2005 07:19 Post subject: |
|
 |
Hmmmm, they say they have the first 4 screenshots of GTA SA for the PC but if you click on the thumbnail it says: Platform: PS2 and one screenshots shows: Press X (playstation controller button) to continue...
Check it out here:
http://www.gamershell.com/news/19786.html
I think they'd better wait before showing us some shitty images....
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
arlon
Posts: 211
Location: Evrope
|
Posted: Thu, 27th Jan 2005 07:37 Post subject: |
|
 |
I just HOPE those aren't PC screenshots (I don't think so), they pretty much suck
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Thu, 27th Jan 2005 11:21 Post subject: |
|
 |
Apparently Gamershell has already removed the new screenshots so the 4 'new' ones are in fact old ones...So don't bother to have a look because they are PS2 screens.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sun, 30th Jan 2005 10:57 Post subject: |
|
 |
I cant wait to GTA : SA! I still have GTA 3 & GTA VC istalled!
I just love shooting & sniping at pedestrians , chainsaw them , braeking heads with hammer or baseball bat , throw the molotov at group of people...
I just love that violent shit: I have some much fun in mindless killing in the games , blowing cars , gore everywhere , blood at my feet , fire , bullets , gunsmoke , drugs , whores , fun as shit:)
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sun, 30th Jan 2005 12:04 Post subject: |
|
 |
Evil Undead Dolphin wrote: | I cant wait to GTA : SA! I still have GTA 3 & GTA VC istalled!
I just love shooting & sniping at pedestrians , chainsaw them , braeking heads with hammer or baseball bat , throw the molotov at group of people...
I just love that violent shit: I have some much fun in mindless killing in the games , blowing cars , gore everywhere , blood at my feet , fire , bullets , gunsmoke , drugs , whores , fun as shit:) |
me 2
u forgot driving ...........
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sun, 30th Jan 2005 12:26 Post subject: |
|
 |
i hated the GTA series up to this one,
This one is the best!, and after sampling it on m8's ps2, i went out and got a PS2 just for this game.
Well worth it, even on the shitty ps2, but its a game i will deffo re-play on PC/Xbox
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Supino
Posts: 699
Location: Norway
|
Posted: Sun, 30th Jan 2005 13:43 Post subject: |
|
 |
I don't understand how you could hate the previous ones?
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sun, 30th Jan 2005 14:04 Post subject: |
|
 |
Supino wrote: | I don't understand how you could hate the previous ones? |
the GTA series is one of the best serieses EVER !!!

|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sun, 30th Jan 2005 16:23 Post subject: |
|
 |
weird0 wrote: | FakeBitchKillah.inc wrote: | Supino wrote: | I don't understand how you could hate the previous ones? |
the GTA series is one of the best serieses EVER !!!
 |
ehehehe...but yeah, agreed  |

|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Sun, 30th Jan 2005 17:26 Post subject: |
|
 |
Ok - i mean not liked as much as i expected untill this version cam out..
I just didn't like the time period that the other games in the series represented, this one has just sorta grabbed my attention more i suppose.
Anyway i am indeed looking forward to gettting this one on the pc
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 31st Jan 2005 22:33 Post subject: |
|
 |
|nSaNe wrote: | am I really the only person in the world who just finds them boring ? |
nah man,, i do too,,but i only like ncaa,,madden, mlb, and nhl games,, nothin else interests me.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 31st Jan 2005 22:59 Post subject: |
|
 |
copecowboy wrote: | |nSaNe wrote: | am I really the only person in the world who just finds them boring ? |
nah man,, i do too,,but i only like ncaa,,madden, mlb, and nhl games,, nothin else interests me. |
Why are you posting here then?
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 31st Jan 2005 22:59 Post subject: |
|
 |
Only way ill be playing this game is if-
A.) They use some better textures
B.) They do an overhaul on the graphics engine
C.) Multiplayer, finished, no gay 3rd party hack
(NOTE: IT MUST INCLUDE ALL THESE UPDATES, NOT JUST ONE)
If they are able to do those things, then the game will be worthwhile for the PC. If they dont, it will be pretty stupid. Back when GTA3 and vice city came out for PC, those kind of graphics were acceptable, but now that we have games like farcry and doom3 which push PC's to their limit, showing amazing things, porting SA straight to the PC is a joke. By the time it comes out, your average PC game will look at least like what you see in HL2, and at best, quake4.
I do agree that gameplay is important, but in this day in age graphics are just as important. Why? What the hell do you think we have been doing for the past 2 decades. I should not have my audio/visual experiance less then what it could possibly be, just because the developers dont know how to make a game which has good gameplay, AND uses current/future gen audio/visual techniques.
I doubt rockstar will make the game look good on the PC though, I wont really care though. The GTA series is now over-used, and in my eyes dead. I have had enough of the same overused crap. Every GTA since GTA3 has been the same crap, only with minor update to the graphics, new vehicles, new world, and some new things to do. Its the same crap over and over again. Not to mention I am not thrilled by the idea of having to "work-out" my guy in SA. WTF is that, you can rave about how cool that kind of stuff is all you want, but that is just plain stupid.
I buy FPS/action games so I can kill things, either with skill, or without skill. I dont buy them so I can waste time living a virtual life which is stupid to begin with. If I want to live a life, I think i'll live my own thank you very much. Want to workout? Go workout. Dont do it in some game.
Now that I am begining to ramble on about fat people, and their lazyness, I think ill stop, thats for a new thread .
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Tue, 1st Feb 2005 00:39 Post subject: |
|
 |
RubberChicken wrote: | copecowboy wrote: | |nSaNe wrote: | am I really the only person in the world who just finds them boring ? |
nah man,, i do too,,but i only like ncaa,,madden, mlb, and nhl games,, nothin else interests me. |
Why are you posting here then? |
Because he asked a question, so I answered it, hard to understand?
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Tue, 1st Feb 2005 01:10 Post subject: |
|
 |
copecowboy wrote: | RubberChicken wrote: | copecowboy wrote: | |nSaNe wrote: | am I really the only person in the world who just finds them boring ? |
nah man,, i do too,,but i only like ncaa,,madden, mlb, and nhl games,, nothin else interests me. |
Why are you posting here then? |
Because he asked a question, so I answered it, hard to understand? |
chill man, i was just wondering why you were in a GTA SA thread if your not interested in the game, hard to understand?
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Tue, 1st Feb 2005 04:12 Post subject: |
|
 |
RubberChicken wrote: | copecowboy wrote: | RubberChicken wrote: | copecowboy wrote: | |nSaNe wrote: | am I really the only person in the world who just finds them boring ? |
nah man,, i do too,,but i only like ncaa,,madden, mlb, and nhl games,, nothin else interests me. |
Why are you posting here then? |
Because he asked a question, so I answered it, hard to understand? |
chill man, i was just wondering why you were in a GTA SA thread if your not interested in the game, hard to understand? |
Dont have to like somthing to read it, hard to understand? Im not a geek but i still come to this site once or twice a month.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Tue, 1st Feb 2005 10:26 Post subject: |
|
 |
Quote: | Mchart: 'Every GTA since GTA3 has been the same crap' |
Every? How many GTA's did you think were out since GTA3
Last edited by killingBill on Tue, 1st Feb 2005 10:51; edited 1 time in total
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Page 3 of 34 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|
|
 |
|