The DLC/Special Edition Content Hate Thread
Page 2 of 3 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Do you hate the concept of paid DLC packs?
Yes
75%
 75%  [ 142 ]
No
12%
 12%  [ 24 ]
Depends (explain in thread)
12%
 12%  [ 23 ]
Total Votes : 189

vurt




Posts: 13551
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Sat, 30th May 2009 13:57    Post subject:
I agree with Glottis... There's no "it's good/bad" it all depends.
Back to top
suprman




Posts: 651
Location: On Your mum!
PostPosted: Sat, 30th May 2009 14:07    Post subject:
Mister_s wrote:
DLC's for free would not happen though, depending on the DLC of course. Look at Rockstar's "Lost and Damned", a mod can never come close to that. It's a developers right to ask some money for such work.


I think that Lost and damned is a isolated case and I would actually class it as an expansion pack Very Happy, Thats probably the only DLC I have seen that is actually worth some money.
Back to top
zmed




Posts: 9234
Location: Orbanistan
PostPosted: Sat, 30th May 2009 14:17    Post subject:
The problem is that DLCs are the complete opposite what people would expect them to be. We would think that they will offer more content for cheaper, but in reality, they offer less content for more money than they did with the expansion pack scheme.

And sadly, people still buy them so they won't go away. They will become more and more daring in their pricing.
Back to top
Veki




Posts: 381
Location: Croatia
PostPosted: Mon, 1st Jun 2009 14:42    Post subject:
Depends what DLC adds to the game.

Something like Oblivion Horse armor or a couple of new weapons/maps/cars I hate and consider stupid and insulting.
But DLC (for RPGs for example) that add new locations, characters and quests that's OK. But it should add a lot to the game not just one new quest + character that gives it to you. Like 2 new towns and 3 new smaller locations with 20-30 quests.

I understand that DLCs are very tempting for devs because they are easier and faster to develop that full expansions. And might be a better source of income that the original game (How are devs paid for DLC? Does some of the money go to the publisher?).

What I hate is that devs break down or even don't release mod tools on purpose so they can try to cash in on DLCs. Also I hate when devs threaten with cease and desist if your mod looks like their DLC that add new maps/units/weapons/horse armor. Evil or Very Mad


Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master.
Commisssioner Pravin Lal
"U.N. Declaration of Rights"
Back to top
LeoNatan
Banned



Posts: 73193
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Mon, 1st Jun 2009 14:44    Post subject:
Are there even expansions per se? More and more developers are moving toward these stupid DLC packs that are nothing more thank quick cash machines. Give us back the huge expansion packs, that would introduce about 1/3 of game content!
Back to top
Paintface




Posts: 6877

PostPosted: Mon, 1st Jun 2009 17:40    Post subject:
and most expansion packs are sold as full games(price) now not needing the original one.
Back to top
gandhi09
Banned



Posts: 52

PostPosted: Mon, 1st Jun 2009 17:58    Post subject:
DLC should be free always or just to pay for 1 2 $ at least low prices for the biggest. them are not anyway like full expansions. just add some stuffs but little things.


Last edited by gandhi09 on Mon, 1st Jun 2009 18:06; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Ashmolly




Posts: 1075
Location: Trump's Merica
PostPosted: Mon, 1st Jun 2009 18:03    Post subject:
Extra content, new and exciting items and gameplay additions, more replay of the game all rolled up into a DLC.....yes. Adding a fucking VS mode on a game that should have had it in the first place....No!

Sorry, but I'm tired of hearing "New Game XXXX is coming out with a DLC to follow." It's like, why didnt you just take your time and put it in the damn game. No one will be pissed at you, if you take a little extra time to make the game worth 60 dollars, as long as you aren't trying to make Duke Nukem Forever Part Deux or something lmao!


Back to top
LeoNatan
Banned



Posts: 73193
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Thu, 6th Aug 2009 17:58    Post subject:
Back to top
SuTuRa




Posts: 2445
Location: NFOHump
PostPosted: Thu, 6th Aug 2009 18:09    Post subject:
I like DLC! It gives me more content to play in the games I like most at the same old price Wink
Back to top
LeoNatan
Banned



Posts: 73193
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Thu, 6th Aug 2009 18:12    Post subject:
SuTuRa wrote:
same old price Wink

0? Laughing
Back to top
bogo24dk




Posts: 3043

PostPosted: Thu, 6th Aug 2009 18:19    Post subject:
There is good stories about DLC and bad ones. Games like gta 4 which have released a hole new camapaign/story is a positive story in my opinion. But there are also the bad ones where you almost have to buy a dlc if you want to play online without getting your ass kicked.

Activision with call of duty has been to generous with the map packs. 12 maps for cod waw and it's free. You can really can't complain and if you do then you are a spoiled brat.


Back to top
tombata
Banned



Posts: 868

PostPosted: Thu, 6th Aug 2009 20:42    Post subject:
Well i think it sucks. They can include this things in the whole game. Like for example in Tomb raider underworld Smile
Back to top
Aquma




Posts: 2805

PostPosted: Thu, 6th Aug 2009 21:28    Post subject:
Big DLC packs, like Fallout 3 ones or BDtS for Mass Effect are quire nice, but even those have one huge minus - they seem to have a bad influence on the industry as a whole, essentially killing big, comercial expansion packs, at least more often then not.

Because DLC came to be, expansions like Starcraft's Brood War, or BGII's Throne of Bhaal are probably a thing of the past , these days, and no matter how good F3 or ME DLC might have been, they are still nothing more then a glorified adventure packs, which simply can't in any way be compared to those mentioned expansions (and many more). Content-wise, gameplay-wise, not in any damn way. One huge, connected after-story beats 2h episodes, period.
Back to top
vinniec7




Posts: 223
Location: USA
PostPosted: Thu, 6th Aug 2009 22:57    Post subject:
Depends on content, i mean really when ya pay for 3 or 4 maps and maybe some weapons, that's the game industry itself screwing the public , because most game companies do it, i remember when consoles where simple and you played the game for the game...as long as people will pay they will whore it.....


ASUS M3A32-MVP Deluxe- AMD 64x2 6000 windsor 125w- 4 gig OCZ gold ddr 800- nvidia MSI 8800gt 512 OC- Audigy 2zs platinum- WD 250g sata 3 16mb -1 liteon dvd r/w non combo- Vista ultimate x64 -Antec 900 gamer -Coolmaster pro 650 psu
Back to top
SuTuRa




Posts: 2445
Location: NFOHump
PostPosted: Fri, 7th Aug 2009 04:40    Post subject:
iNatan wrote:
SuTuRa wrote:
same old price Wink

0? Laughing


Exactly Very Happy
Back to top
mtj




Posts: 2315
Location: Austria / Finland
PostPosted: Fri, 7th Aug 2009 14:37    Post subject:
I actually like the DLC in the case it expands the game (paying for just for extra items is awful). If there was no DLC, quite a lot of the games would be left at the point they are after the release.


Intel Core I-9 9900K @ stock, ASUS Z 390A MoBo, 32GB 3.6GHz, Zotac 3090 | BeQuiet 1000W PSU, Be Quiet Dark Base Pro 900 case, 49" Samsung G9
Back to top
dezztroy




Posts: 6590
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Fri, 7th Aug 2009 15:56    Post subject:
No, they would simply patch things in. Or release larger, proper expansion packs.
Back to top
LeoNatan
Banned



Posts: 73193
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Fri, 21st Aug 2009 06:16    Post subject:
Hurray fucking yay

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/pitchford-talks-up-borderlands-dlc

Game isn't even out, and already we are speaking about "how quickly we're coming, and with what content we're coming [with DLC]". Fantastic. Vomit
Back to top
Cedge




Posts: 1480

PostPosted: Fri, 21st Aug 2009 06:58    Post subject:
DLC, like anything, can be good or bad.

Good DLC is the GTA4 episodes, downloadable songs for Rock Band or Guitar Hero, that sort of thing.

Bad DLC is stuff that is basically for-pay cheats, like the "Elite" units in Empire Total War.

For-pay skins are a case-by-case thing. In most games, I wouldn't care, but in Killing Floor, it's nice, and I bought them. The new levels and weapons DLC are free, but the superficial things, like skins, are for-pay. I prefer that.


sabin1981 wrote:
Mister_s wrote:
I'm waiting for the first shooters where you have to buy the individual guns


Battlefield Heroes.

There was actually a game like that several years ago, where you paid for ammo. Don't remember the name.


Correcting people since 2007 even if they're not wrong.
Back to top
LeoNatan
Banned



Posts: 73193
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Fri, 21st Aug 2009 07:18    Post subject:
That's true, but these good DLCs you speak about are what we traditionally used to call expansions - a relatively big content pack for a certain price. On the other hand, if they are planning "quickly" and "volumes" of DLC from now, it means the content is already done and there is no reason not to include it in the game from the start but greed.
Back to top
jermore




Posts: 1087

PostPosted: Fri, 21st Aug 2009 07:32    Post subject:
Cedge wrote:
DLC, like anything, can be good or bad.

Good DLC is the GTA4 episodes, downloadable songs for Rock Band or Guitar Hero, that sort of thing.

Bad DLC is stuff that is basically for-pay cheats, like the "Elite" units in Empire Total War.

For-pay skins are a case-by-case thing. In most games, I wouldn't care, but in Killing Floor, it's nice, and I bought them. The new levels and weapons DLC are free, but the superficial things, like skins, are for-pay. I prefer that.


sabin1981 wrote:
Mister_s wrote:
I'm waiting for the first shooters where you have to buy the individual guns


Battlefield Heroes.

There was actually a game like that several years ago, where you paid for ammo. Don't remember the name.


Project Entropia? Disgusting game, truly.

I really hate DLC here.. although you have the great potential for addons and such with easy access.. It's not hard to see the fuckton of abuse publishers are doing with it. Now it's becoming standard practice to hold back original game content for DLC.

I mean come on, we're already getting shafted paying for copyprotection schemes and fucking online authentication basically raping your software to hire-ware, how many more ways do you want to take it in the ass here?
Back to top
Cedge




Posts: 1480

PostPosted: Fri, 21st Aug 2009 07:38    Post subject:
I always hear all this talk where people complain that early DLC is stuff that should have been in the initial release, but was held back to be sold as DLC. I never see any real corroborating evidence for such claims.

If that does ever happen, yeah, it's a drag, but it doesn't change the fact that, all I base my judgment on is what IS included in the package I buy, and if that content is good value for money. Even if they took out something huge, like 10% of the content, and instead sold it as DLC the week after the game is released, it still doesn't matter: it just doesn't enter the equation of whether or not the package I pay for is a good value. Sure, it could have been a better value if the stuff was included, but, oh well. There is always room to add value, so, I can't base the judgment off of that.

What I get for the money I pay, not what I DIDN'T get, is all that matters to me. Good value is good value.


Correcting people since 2007 even if they're not wrong.
Back to top
jermore




Posts: 1087

PostPosted: Fri, 21st Aug 2009 10:03    Post subject:
There's nothing wrong with your view on it.. but from an economic standpoint.. why wouldn't you hold back content for DLC. I don't think we need any evidence.

Publishers, unlike the developers themselves don't give a shit about the quality of a game, if they could make 20% extra profit from stripping 2 guns out of the game, I believe they will. I'm not saying every publisher is guilty either.

It's just such an easy way of making extra dollars, while I myself am looking for a complete/bigger game. If they could have fit 2 extra guns in, I want em.. I don't want to hear about having to pay extra for things developers planned for the game originally. Maybe i'm just greedy. (no i'm definitely greedy Very Happy)

If you're happy to pay for less, go ahead. I'll always be bitching for more Razz
Back to top
LeoNatan
Banned



Posts: 73193
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Fri, 21st Aug 2009 10:42    Post subject:
Well, as long as there are gullible Xbots to buy the DLC, this trend will get worse and worse... Sad
Back to top
JBeckman
VIP Member



Posts: 34608
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Fri, 21st Aug 2009 11:00    Post subject:
Warez the game and buy the DLC?

Though that might cause other issues and changes from the developers and publishers.

(Based on that the game uses LIVE - Or atleast I think it does - and that most LIVE DLC still aren't properly cracked outside of Fallout 3 - which only works as you can load the individual ESM files via the launcher - For other games like SF IV and Battlestation Pacific it isn't that easy, might not even be possible from what I've tried.)
Back to top
LeoNatan
Banned



Posts: 73193
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Fri, 21st Aug 2009 11:07    Post subject:
Well the DLC for Dawn of War 2 was cracked.
Back to top
JBeckman
VIP Member



Posts: 34608
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Fri, 21st Aug 2009 11:15    Post subject:
Haha, yeah you are right about that but hasn't Relic and Microsoft patched that DLL exploit now? or did one of the patches "unlock" all the content for everyone?
(I'm fairly certain I've seen both being mentioned, that is the .dll method not working anymore as of a recent update either to LIVE or the game itself and I also remember someone mentioning all bonus content being available from the beta of the 1.5.0 update or perhaps it was 1.4.0 but I don't know how it is at the moment.)

Nice trick though, at least there might be ways to hack future DLC if some work is put into it.
(Or how to say it and what to call that specific method, worked great while I used it anyway though that was a while ago before the bigger "There is only war" and later updates.)
Back to top
LeoNatan
Banned



Posts: 73193
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Fri, 21st Aug 2009 11:28    Post subject:
Well, it would be very silly of them not to unlock it. Now that people are starting to find ways how to edit the game, having artificially locked content is silly (ahem, Creative Assembly Wink).
Back to top
Cedge




Posts: 1480

PostPosted: Fri, 21st Aug 2009 18:26    Post subject:
jermore wrote:
If you're happy to pay for less, go ahead. I'll always be bitching for more Razz


That's the thing, though: games can ALWAYS have more. No game is perfect. If I sat here demanding more forever, then games would never get finished.
Back to top
Page 2 of 3 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - PC Games Arena Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group