I saw things like that in here and in other "woman problems" topics so...... Am I the only one that thinks some authorities needs to be alerted about Saner and him possibly being a rapist and/or kidnapper ?
Saner is not being serious. Unless its the subject of Santa!
I saw things like that in here and in other "woman problems" topics so...... Am I the only one that thinks some authorities needs to be alerted about Saner and him possibly being a rapist and/or kidnapper ?
Saner is not being serious. Unless its the subject of Santa!
I saw things like that in here and in other "woman problems" topics so...... Am I the only one that thinks some authorities needs to be alerted about Saner and him possibly being a rapist and/or kidnapper ?
Saner is not being serious. Unless its the subject of Santa!
"Enlightenment is man's emergence from his self-imposed nonage. Nonage is the inability to use one's own understanding without another's guidance. This nonage is self-imposed if its cause lies not in lack of understanding but in indecision and lack of courage to use one's own mind without another's guidance. Dare to know! (Sapere aude.) "Have the courage to use your own understanding," is therefore the motto of the enlightenment."
I think it's a conspiracy Our respective governments have been piping certain gasses and compounds into the air, slowly increasing our aggression factor and diminishing our tolerance in order to groom us for the upcoming wars.
And they blame you for not having rich parents, peasent scum
ragnarus wrote:
I saw things like that in here and in other "woman problems" topics so...... Am I the only one that thinks some authorities needs to be alerted about Saner and him possibly being a rapist and/or kidnapper ?
Saner is not being serious. Unless its the subject of Santa!
I think it's a conspiracy Our respective governments have been piping certain gasses and compounds into the air, slowly increasing our aggression factor and diminishing our tolerance in order to groom us for the upcoming wars.
Tss, the nutcases are coming out again.
Spoiler:
@Ankh
I think partial blame is also people getting more sensitive. A lot of stuff that is name calling or insults I wouldn't even classify as such. Just banter that you'd forget the next day, yet a lot is carried around for months.
At least the real nasty insults and name calling seems little to me. My perception could be off tho.
Last edited by Morphineus on Thu, 23rd Jul 2015 12:34; edited 1 time in total
Maybe the cause is summer and high temperatures. Many sleepless nights and people become nervous and therefore they think with their ass rather than brain. Speaking of which, maybe Pax's air conditioner is broken!?
Made in China is like a box of chocolates. You never know what you're gonna get.
Your take on this is just a more specific example of the original statement - its meaning did not change at all. One chooses to take offense, regardless of the intentions of the other party, hence offense is taken - not given
"Enlightenment is man's emergence from his self-imposed nonage. Nonage is the inability to use one's own understanding without another's guidance. This nonage is self-imposed if its cause lies not in lack of understanding but in indecision and lack of courage to use one's own mind without another's guidance. Dare to know! (Sapere aude.) "Have the courage to use your own understanding," is therefore the motto of the enlightenment."
Your take on this is just a more specific example of the original statement - its meaning did not change at all. One chooses to take offense, regardless of the intentions of the other party, hence offense is taken - not given
The reason for my re-formulation was rather that I wanted to keep the option open that it is indeed very well possible to intentionally give offense, you fucking moron.
I think giving offense can be more accurately termed as trying to make someone take offense.
You can attempt to offend someone by saying something that you think might offend them, but it will still be up to that person to be offended. They might not deem your actions offensive at all, and if no one is actually offended, then how were you offensive?
There is definitely a one-way direct proportionality between fucks and offense given, with the whole equation being determined by amount of fucks!
I suppose, when considering what "being offensive" means, a distinction has to be made between actions that result in someone truly being offended, and simply doing what is generally considered a vile and ugly affront to ones sensibilities, like ur mom.
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum