Page 1 of 1 |
ClaudeFTW
Posts: 5074
Location: Bucharest, Romania
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
couleur
[Moderator] Janitor
Posts: 14330
|
Posted: Mon, 23rd May 2011 09:46 Post subject: |
|
 |
I am not so sure you can really say Portal 2 ist to video games, what Space Odyssey 2001 was for cinema.
Also there are so many shitty games out there as there are bad movies, just like there are good movies and good games. Also Portal 2 and LA Noire are not the best video games ever. Did he just start playing Computer games or what?
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 23rd May 2011 09:58 Post subject: |
|
 |
Problem is the game industry is fast going the same derp road that movies have gone for some time now.
And that quote about game industry not shunning intelligent entertainment is kinda ironic with all the easily available games of the industry today.
Dont mess with God, he can impregnate your girlfriend/wife without taking his pants off!
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 23rd May 2011 10:16 Post subject: |
|
 |
Last edited by Interinactive on Tue, 5th Oct 2021 05:01; edited 1 time in total
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ClaudeFTW
Posts: 5074
Location: Bucharest, Romania
|
Posted: Mon, 23rd May 2011 11:42 Post subject: |
|
 |
I believe it's safe to say that for every retarded movie out there there are at least two, three bad games. (I'm talking about commercial titles, not obscure films(indies not included, in the obscure category).
I hate it when people without proper experience are making these types of articles, some of the paragraphs make me feel as though someone's scraping my brain with sand-paper. A similar thing happened with a romanian chick journalist. Didn't matter what game it was, she was comparing it with World of Warcraft, even though the game in clause wasn't even an MMO.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Werelds
Special Little Man
Posts: 15098
Location: 0100111001001100
|
Posted: Mon, 23rd May 2011 11:51 Post subject: |
|
 |
@ Couleur: Comparing 2001 to any form of entertainment is also pointless. It had good visual effects for its time, but other than that it's a gigantic piece of shit; the only reason it's considered a classic is because it's Kubrick.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Surray
Posts: 5409
Location: Europe
|
Posted: Mon, 23rd May 2011 12:48 Post subject: |
|
 |
that article is just stupid.
lots of movies aren't intelligent entertainment, but it's just the same for games.
just like there's a few games that move away from the mainstream and do something special, there's a few movies that do the same. I don't see how games are better than movies in that regard.
Likot Mosuskekim, Woodcutter cancels Sleep: Interrupted by Elephant.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 23rd May 2011 12:57 Post subject: |
|
 |
Black Ops it the most intelligent piece of gamin out there.... 
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 23rd May 2011 12:58 Post subject: |
|
 |
Gaming's ongoing push into the mainstream consciousness has entered a bold new phase – by appealing to the players' intelligence and imagination, it's starting to make Hollywood look embarrassing.
Ah, now I know why gaming has become so mainstream, it's because it finally appeals to the players' intelligence and imagination. Thanks The Guardian!! 
TWIN PEAKS is "something of a miracle."
"...like nothing else on television."
"a phenomenon."
"A tangled tale of sex, violence, power, junk food..."
"Like Nothing On Earth"
~ WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO SAY CAN ONLY BE SEEN ~
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHTUOgYNRzY
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
garus
VIP Member
Posts: 34200
|
Posted: Mon, 23rd May 2011 13:19 Post subject: |
|
 |
snip
Last edited by garus on Tue, 27th Aug 2024 21:54; edited 1 time in total
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 23rd May 2011 13:38 Post subject: |
|
 |
Werelds wrote: | @ Couleur: Comparing 2001 to any form of entertainment is also pointless. It had good visual effects for its time, but other than that it's a gigantic piece of shit; the only reason it's considered a classic is because it's Kubrick. |
yep, Shining and Full Metal Jacket were way better than 2001.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Mon, 23rd May 2011 14:10 Post subject: |
|
 |
Werelds wrote: | @ Couleur: Comparing 2001 to any form of entertainment is also pointless. It had good visual effects for its time, but other than that it's a gigantic piece of shit; the only reason it's considered a classic is because it's Kubrick. |
Sure, and you have a doctorate in film history to support your claim?
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Page 1 of 1 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |