Page 25 of 179 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Wed, 1st Jul 2009 11:36 Post subject: |
|
 |
cyclonefr wrote: | They are actually NOT punishing pirates doing so, but punishing people who will legitely buy the game : they will have to find workarounds (use some illegal fake battlenet) to actually play this game multiplayer without an internet access.... Shame on you Blizzard |
Simple question though, where would you find a place that have no internet?
If you go a bunch to a friend to do some LAN i'm sure you have internet.
If you go to a big LAN they always have internet.
Only time i can think of where you wouldnt have it is if you go camping and forgot your mobile internet at home.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Wed, 1st Jul 2009 12:20 Post subject: |
|
 |
Don't be an idiot, you have to hook up every single computer on a lan party to the internet which can cause a variety of problems, is time consuming and can clutter the connection plus internet is not free and of course if you end up in a shack that doesn't have internet you can't play.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Wed, 1st Jul 2009 12:38 Post subject: |
|
 |
Last edited by Yondaime on Mon, 2nd Dec 2024 16:01; edited 1 time in total
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Cohen
Posts: 7155
Location: Rapture
|
Posted: Wed, 1st Jul 2009 12:38 Post subject: |
|
 |
why the fuck would you go camping to play starcraft?
troll detected by SiN
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Wed, 1st Jul 2009 13:33 Post subject: |
|
 |
Well, welcome to the real world sir, not everybody on earth have internet access !
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Wed, 1st Jul 2009 13:42 Post subject: |
|
 |
cyclonefr wrote: | Well, welcome to the real world sir, not everybody on earth have internet access ! |
Just used to Swedish standards i guess =)
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Fri, 3rd Jul 2009 16:43 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Fri, 3rd Jul 2009 16:48 Post subject: |
|
 |
Crying peon pic was never more apt. Boohoo. No one cares.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
thudo
Posts: 6309
Location: Mellonville North, Canada
|
Posted: Fri, 3rd Jul 2009 20:07 Post subject: |
|
 |
No I would just pir8te SCII massively because its beyond moot that when SCII arrives someone will immediately build an online/Local LAN circumvention app because SCII has the same popularity as Windows7 -- everyone and their pet poodle will demand it and, thus, crackers of the planet will unite to bring it down for all to use. Its beyond inevitable.
MSI GT72S 6QF Dominator Pro S 29th Anniversary Intel i7 6820HK @ 4.0Ghz, 32GB DDR4-2133 RAM, 2x256GB Raid0 Toshiba NVMe 2.5 inch PCIe SSD, Nvidia Geforce GTX 980 OC'ed 200+ Core / 200+ Mem, 17.3 inch LG IPS HD Display @ 75Hz, Intel 7265AC Wifi, Windows 10 Pro BIOS version: .112 EC Firmware version: .105
Current Broadband speed record: 329.1 Mb/sec down // 21.73 Mb/sec up
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/3933292.png
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Surray
Posts: 5409
Location: Europe
|
Posted: Fri, 3rd Jul 2009 20:21 Post subject: |
|
 |
only thing that could accomplish that would be an emulated battle.net server, and chances are, it won't ever be created, seeing how the new battle.net will debut with starcraft 2 and I'm sure blizzard will do everything they can to keep it from getting emulated like the current one.
Likot Mosuskekim, Woodcutter cancels Sleep: Interrupted by Elephant.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
b0se
Banned
Posts: 5901
Location: Rapture
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Fri, 3rd Jul 2009 23:47 Post subject: |
|
 |
Surray wrote: | only thing that could accomplish that would be an emulated battle.net server, and chances are, it won't ever be created, seeing how the new battle.net will debut with starcraft 2 and I'm sure blizzard will do everything they can to keep it from getting emulated like the current one. |
Well, there are plenty of World of Warcraft private servers floating around. Some better than others, but emulating Battle.net will be a thousand times easier.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JBeckman
VIP Member
Posts: 34999
Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Wed, 5th Aug 2009 22:51 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Wed, 5th Aug 2009 22:59 Post subject: |
|
 |
it doesn't surprize me,and i bet it dowsn't surprize anybody
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Surray
Posts: 5409
Location: Europe
|
Posted: Wed, 5th Aug 2009 23:15 Post subject: |
|
 |
a few months ago I was still hoping, but considering the beta just didn't come I was definitely starting to expect a delay.
too bad..
it's a bit distrubing though that they're saying it's first half 2010 now... so it looks like they're not counting on a release in the first quarter either.
and second quarter 2010 is kinda when I'm expecting diablo 3.... hmhmhm!
Likot Mosuskekim, Woodcutter cancels Sleep: Interrupted by Elephant.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Surray
Posts: 5409
Location: Europe
|
Posted: Wed, 5th Aug 2009 23:44 Post subject: |
|
 |
now I'm just hoping that with their new *1 top title per year* policy this won't mean that diablo 3 won't be here until 2011. that'd suck.
Likot Mosuskekim, Woodcutter cancels Sleep: Interrupted by Elephant.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sin317
Banned
Posts: 24322
Location: Geneva
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Thu, 6th Aug 2009 00:02 Post subject: |
|
 |
Still no release date for this game?
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Thu, 6th Aug 2009 00:08 Post subject: |
|
 |
Blizzard sure takes it's sweet time, it's like they have 5 people working per game.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
-=Cartoon=-
VIP Member
Posts: 8823
Location: South Pacific Ocean
|
Posted: Thu, 6th Aug 2009 01:44 Post subject: |
|
 |
"Over the past couple of weeks, it has become clear that it will take longer than expected to prepare the new Battle.net for the launch of the game."
Fail blizzard
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sin317
Banned
Posts: 24322
Location: Geneva
|
Posted: Thu, 6th Aug 2009 01:53 Post subject: |
|
 |
-=Cartoon=- wrote: | "Over the past couple of weeks, it has become clear that it will take longer than expected to prepare the new Battle.net for the launch of the game."
Fail blizzard |
you fail maybe ....
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Thu, 6th Aug 2009 01:57 Post subject: |
|
 |
No, Blizzard does fail. Besides, your post makes no sense.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sin317
Banned
Posts: 24322
Location: Geneva
|
Posted: Thu, 6th Aug 2009 02:10 Post subject: |
|
 |
dezztroy wrote: | No, Blizzard does fail. Besides, your post makes no sense. |
hey, dont put me in the same boat with you ....
Blizzard NEVER stated when SC2 will be released. Never ever (because they never do lol). They made a rough estimate, and when you were following blizzard and the gaming industry, then you'd know to add a couple month to any estimate from blizzard. BECAUSE THEY CARE.
I rather have them doing their thing and get a polished product (which i'm buying, go figure) then to have a bugged flawed one. Just so you are happy and can leech it somewhere...
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Thu, 6th Aug 2009 02:12 Post subject: |
|
 |
Meh, I won't bother arguing.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sin317
Banned
Posts: 24322
Location: Geneva
|
Posted: Thu, 6th Aug 2009 02:13 Post subject: |
|
 |
dezztroy wrote: | Meh, I won't bother arguing. |
because you know im right and i speak the truth.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Thu, 6th Aug 2009 02:14 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Page 25 of 179 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |