Page 8 of 214 |
|
Posted: Tue, 28th Jul 2009 03:15 Post subject: |
|
 |
SpykeZ wrote: | am I the only one that thought it was kinda humerous? |
I thought so too
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Thu, 30th Jul 2009 22:30 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
garus
VIP Member
Posts: 34200
|
Posted: Thu, 30th Jul 2009 22:34 Post subject: |
|
 |
snip
Last edited by garus on Tue, 27th Aug 2024 21:11; edited 1 time in total
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ixigia
[Moderator] Consigliere
Posts: 65085
Location: Italy
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Fri, 31st Jul 2009 03:43 Post subject: |
|
 |
Spiderman wrote: | PS3 uses CPU to process graphics (means all gfx things are made in CPU software mode NOT IN GPU , gpu in ps3 is only used as a tvtuner for the output |
...No.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BKarza
Posts: 536
Location: /lazurus mode 1
|
Posted: Fri, 31st Jul 2009 04:28 Post subject: |
|
 |
Going to Quakecon in a couple weeks. Hopefully will get to see this in action.
Nui wrote: | Because digital shipping takes time. Think of all the digital boats and their digital captains. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
suprman
Posts: 651
Location: On Your mum!
|
Posted: Fri, 31st Jul 2009 05:23 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JBeckman
VIP Member
Posts: 34994
Location: Sweden
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vurt
Posts: 13843
Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Fri, 31st Jul 2009 16:12 Post subject: |
|
 |
I feel sorry for PS3 owners.. really crappy hardware.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ashmolly
Posts: 1075
Location: Trump's Merica
|
Posted: Fri, 31st Jul 2009 16:16 Post subject: |
|
 |
vurt wrote: | I feel sorry for PS3 owners.. really crappy hardware. |
Meh, I feel sorry for people who only own a PS3. I haven't bought a multiplat game for my PS3 yet, exclusives only.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vurt
Posts: 13843
Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Fri, 31st Jul 2009 16:22 Post subject: |
|
 |
Ashmolly wrote: | vurt wrote: | I feel sorry for PS3 owners.. really crappy hardware. |
Meh, I feel sorry for people who only own a PS3. I haven't bought a multiplat game for my PS3 yet, exclusives only. |
I dont think it has any interesting exclusives at all, ok 1 or 2 that i could be interested in maybe trying out (little big planet and maybe MGS though im not that found of that series). I was thinking about purchasing it as a BR-player but i think i'll skip that.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Parallax_
VIP Member
Posts: 6422
Location: Norway
|
Posted: Fri, 31st Jul 2009 16:27 Post subject: |
|
 |
vurt wrote: | I feel sorry for PS3 owners.. really crappy hardware. |
Crappy hardware? Don't know what you are talking about. Do you own a PS3 yourself? I am very happy with mine.
Not sure what's the cause of the huge framerate difference, but I'll be playing RAGE on PC because of this. 
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ashmolly
Posts: 1075
Location: Trump's Merica
|
Posted: Fri, 31st Jul 2009 16:37 Post subject: |
|
 |
Parallax_ wrote: | vurt wrote: | I feel sorry for PS3 owners.. really crappy hardware. |
Crappy hardware? Don't know what you are talking about. Do you own a PS3 yourself? I am very happy with mine.
Not sure what's the cause of the huge framerate difference, but I'll be playing RAGE on PC because of this.  |
Same here.
Offtopic really quick. My PS3 was a huge paperweight for a while because I only played Uncharted, and that was about it. It wasn't until this year when i started buying new games for it, and I'm glad I did purchase the PS3. I wont miss out on any exclusives at all this year...
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Fri, 31st Jul 2009 17:15 Post subject: |
|
 |
You really think they release som crappy PS3 port?
It probably just mean that their multiplatform engine doesn't scale too well to PS3 and will require serious optimization.
There's still a lot time to release.
But who knows...
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Fri, 31st Jul 2009 17:17 Post subject: |
|
 |
Don't give a shit about ps3. As long as it runs at around 60 fps on the pc, it's fine.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Fri, 31st Jul 2009 17:32 Post subject: |
|
 |
Console fanboy arena that a way --->
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
garus
VIP Member
Posts: 34200
|
Posted: Fri, 31st Jul 2009 21:33 Post subject: |
|
 |
snip
Last edited by garus on Tue, 27th Aug 2024 21:12; edited 1 time in total
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Fri, 31st Jul 2009 23:18 Post subject: |
|
 |
yea wouldnt say "crappy hardware" but maybe they just are used to optimizing for that console. But i do agree that Sony's had it rough ever since the PS3's release...exclusives becoming not-exclusive, developers having trouble with the hardware, etc. Ico3 i guess is whats left looking forward to.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Teniak
Posts: 2602
Location: Tic Tac
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Wed, 12th Aug 2009 23:43 Post subject: |
|
 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Thu, 13th Aug 2009 23:44 Post subject: |
|
 |
New trailer is fucking amazing. Anyone that thinks this game will be anything less then awesome is a fucking idiot.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ixigia
[Moderator] Consigliere
Posts: 65085
Location: Italy
|
Posted: Thu, 13th Aug 2009 23:59 Post subject: |
|
 |
Yeah, the game will be surely a blast, but looking at the pure gfx side of the trailer, the Tech5 is far from being a really revolutionary engine. (models are very Doom3-like, and landscapes aren't so different from Fallout3 ones). But as I said, gameplay seems fun and the game will be surely great.
Last edited by ixigia on Fri, 14th Aug 2009 00:04; edited 1 time in total
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Fri, 14th Aug 2009 00:03 Post subject: |
|
 |
ixigia wrote: | Yeah, the game will be surely a blast, but looking at the pure gfx side of the trailer, the Tech5 is far from being a really revolutionary engine. |
I totally disagree. Just look at it. It's far beyond anything else on the market. They aren't going for 100% realistic graphics like Crysis. They are going for a nice mix, and it looks outstanding.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73212
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
Posted: Fri, 14th Aug 2009 00:33 Post subject: |
|
 |
When I said I wasn't impressed earlier on, I didn't mean because the art direction was not realistic. Art direction has nothing to do with it. Just look at the lighting, the shadows, the model rendering. Very crude, way too rough. Models still look like plastic, a problem even the aging, 3 years old UE3 managed to solve, let alone recent engines like Chrome Engine 3 & 4, CryEngine 2 & 3 and even the new Riddick engine). Everything just looks like an outdoor mod for Doom 3 with some of the shader mods (parallax, hdr, bloom, etc) already available in http://doom3.filefront.com/. Certainly not the industry leading graphics we've come to expect from Carmack.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ixigia
[Moderator] Consigliere
Posts: 65085
Location: Italy
|
Posted: Fri, 14th Aug 2009 00:36 Post subject: |
|
 |
Mchart wrote: | ixigia wrote: | Yeah, the game will be surely a blast, but looking at the pure gfx side of the trailer, the Tech5 is far from being a really revolutionary engine. |
I totally disagree. Just look at it. It's far beyond anything else on the market. They aren't going for 100% realistic graphics like Crysis. They are going for a nice mix, and it looks outstanding. |
It's true, Rage has a great post-apocaliptic atmosphere, but I was trying to say (in a graphics whore and cynic way) that there are still the same 2004's low-poly models and Fallout-a-like static landscapes , that's it.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Fri, 14th Aug 2009 00:43 Post subject: |
|
 |
you gotta keep in mind that they knocked it down for consoles too
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73212
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
Posted: Fri, 14th Aug 2009 00:45 Post subject: |
|
 |
FireMaster wrote: | you gotta keep in mind that they knocked it down for consoles too |
Well, that's not a real excuse. All the engine I mentioned above look better and run on consoles as well.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ixigia
[Moderator] Consigliere
Posts: 65085
Location: Italy
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Page 8 of 214 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |