| Page 3 of 38 |
thyttel
Posts: 488
Location: Denmark
|
 Posted: Sat, 27th Mar 2010 02:05 Post subject: |
|
 |
| moosenoodles wrote: | why are u telling me to google for it lol, Ive been around long enough to know what fooking games have it ffs..
and none of those games even come close to the mark yet, asscreed i have on 360, sh5 im not yet convinced its better than the others albeit inside of sub stuff.. (run it without buying it to see), rest can kiss my ass, sam fisher is gay, his games are as well, gr4 is gonna blow like a consolised bit of turn no doubt.. and ponce of persia is well a ponce lol..
its pretty grim looking drm or not...
oh p.s thyttel, kiss my ass if u want anymore gifting on steam  |
hehe, love you too m8te
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 27th Mar 2010 10:52 Post subject: |
|
|
| Twinny wrote: | | moosenoodles wrote: | | this game dont get my money then.. |
Splinter Cell: Conviction
Silent Hunter 5: Battle of the Atlantic
Assassin's Creed 2
Prince of Persia: The Forgotten Sands,
Ghost Recon 4
All those games will get DRM said Ubisoft (google for it). |
i hate Ubisoft for making me to play all these games on the Xbox....
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 27th Mar 2010 12:16 Post subject: |
|
|
Like yahtzee from escapist said WTF is up with the USA vs Russia with the late FPS games... I understood in WW2 games it was Hitler and Germany bad but now every modern and future game it is USA vs Russia... Like its Cold War over again. Cant they throw maybe some other country in..
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ankh
Posts: 23342
Location: Trelleborg
|
| Posted: Sat, 27th Mar 2010 12:21 Post subject: |
|
|
| Stinky244 wrote: | | Like yahtzee from escapist said WTF is up with the USA vs Russia with the late FPS games... I understood in WW2 games it was Hitler and Germany bad but now every modern and future game it is USA vs Russia... Like its Cold War over again. Cant they throw maybe some other country in.. |
China and <insert random arabic country> has been in lots of games too.
They pick russia as they have pretty much similar equipment and are both big nations.
shitloads of new stuff in my pc. Cant keep track of it all.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Sat, 27th Mar 2010 12:35 Post subject: |
|
|
Who else would you fight in modern warfare game other than Chinese, Russians or Arabs? Here and there there are some Latin American separatists, etc, but these are even less likely. It has to be one of the big three.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ankh
Posts: 23342
Location: Trelleborg
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 27th Mar 2010 15:50 Post subject: |
|
|
| iNatan wrote: | | Who else would you fight in modern warfare game other than Chinese, Russians or Arabs? Here and there there are some Latin American separatists, etc, but these are even less likely. It has to be one of the big three. |
It's whoever is in the news lately. Occasionally we'll get games with North Korea too.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 27th Mar 2010 17:24 Post subject: |
|
|
a modern american civil war conflict might be interesting
sarah palin and glenn beck starting a crusade in clowntown to lynch the ni^K^K people of the north with their brains in their heads the right way round
oh wait, they already did something like that
seriously though.. a civil war in a first world country might be interesting from the gaming perspective if done right
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 27th Mar 2010 18:50 Post subject: |
|
|
Russia is the easiest target for video games' villains, cold war movies have done a good job creating the stereotypical evil commie Russian bad guy that we see in games today.
Russia doesnt give a fuck what US says, and do whatever they want.
Semi-totalitarian leader (Putin) -check.
Formidable arsenal -check.
US doesnt own them trillions of dollars (unlike China) - check.
Communist past (hence ultra-nationalists) -check.
Aggressive -check.
So we have China and Russia that fit the bill, but what looks more badass, some small Asian dude or a bald, scarred, executing civilians, eastern-European accented dude?
At least MOH is set in Afghanistan and no sight of Russians. Who knows, maybe we'll find a band of Russian soldiers left there from Afghan war, who are pissed at US and acquired a nuke and can only be stopped by a single FBI agent with looks and dexterity of a cat who was wrongfully arrested but escaped and now the only chance THE WORLD HAS OF BEING SAVED!!!! EXPLOSIONS!!
Sig too big. -Nothing is too big for Fedor. Expect a nasty armbar.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CRAIG2
Banned
Posts: 347
Location: ;(
|
| Posted: Sat, 27th Mar 2010 18:52 Post subject: |
|
|
| iNatan wrote: | | Who else would you fight in modern warfare game other than Chinese, Russians or Arabs? Here and there there are some Latin American separatists, etc, but these are even less likely. It has to be one of the big three. |
Power hungry corporations
oh wait,hawx had that and it sucked balls
i would like to fight skynet or something non-human
but its ubisoft they are never original
i miss rayman
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
twobells
Banned
Posts: 2878
Location: England
|
| Posted: Sat, 27th Mar 2010 21:24 Post subject: |
|
|
| xGAME007 wrote: | But why are always Americans good guys in games, they always save the world -.-, its stupid, we all know they are the real terrorists  |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JBeckman
VIP Member
Posts: 34974
Location: Sweden
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JBeckman
VIP Member
Posts: 34974
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Mon, 12th Apr 2010 21:14 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon, 12th Apr 2010 21:32 Post subject: |
|
|
| JBeckman wrote: | http://worthplaying.com/article/2010/4/12/news/73621/
List of features/highlights in this game. |
Not even a ticket to the beta of GR4 could get me to buy the new Splinter Cell.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JBeckman
VIP Member
Posts: 34974
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Tue, 13th Apr 2010 06:28 Post subject: |
|
|
You only get the beta invite on X360 as it's a X360 beta test only as far as I know, heh.
(Funny but true, probably mostly to build up hype or stress test servers.)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 27th Apr 2010 14:18 Post subject: |
|
|
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/tomclancysghostreconfuturesoldier/news.html?sid=6257679&om_act=convert&om_clk=picks&tag=picks;title;6&mode=previews
Oh wow:
| Quote: | | Link-up can be activated by pressing a single button, which gives control of your player to one of your teammates, making him or her the squad leader. Your character will then automatically follow the squad leader across the battlefield. You are only required to use the look stick to aim your gun and take out enemies, allowing you to provide cover to the rear without having to worry about losing sight of the squad leader. |
i5 6600k @ 4.3 GHz | MSI z170 Gaming M7 | 32GB Kingston HyperX Fury | 850 Evo 500GB | EVGA 1070 SC | Seasonic X-660 | CM Storm Stryker
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Tue, 27th Apr 2010 14:31 Post subject: |
|
|
Well what do you expect after a turd like Conviction and its M&E?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 27th Apr 2010 15:57 Post subject: |
|
|
Games for handicapped persons ?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Maus0r
Posts: 424
Location: Manchester
|
| Posted: Tue, 27th Apr 2010 16:27 Post subject: |
|
|
I see lots of butthurtz over countries in games here. TBH I don't give a toss WHO I'm fighting or representing as long as the game kicks ass.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 27th Apr 2010 16:53 Post subject: |
|
|
| difm wrote: | http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/tomclancysghostreconfuturesoldier/news.html?sid=6257679&om_act=convert&om_clk=picks&tag=picks;title;6&mode=previews
Oh wow:
| Quote: | | Link-up can be activated by pressing a single button, which gives control of your player to one of your teammates, making him or her the squad leader. Your character will then automatically follow the squad leader across the battlefield. You are only required to use the look stick to aim your gun and take out enemies, allowing you to provide cover to the rear without having to worry about losing sight of the squad leader. |
|
I actually don't think that's a bad feature. I suspect some people here stopped reading after "single button". It keeps you from having to constantly spin around as you're walking if you're trying to cover the rear. Since, in most FPS games, you can't just swivel your head it's not really practical to walk backwards, while firing, while following your teammates. But by pressing a key on the keyboard and turning this mode on the walking backward part gets automated and, like it says, you can concentrate on covering without worrying about moving.
It'll be interesting to see how it actually works in practice though. That's one thing I hated in the RB6 games was not being able to properly cover the rear. Sure it could be done but it was a hassle having to spin all the time. imho
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Tue, 27th Apr 2010 16:57 Post subject: |
|
|
Well of course, why would you need to do anything in a tactical game? Click a button and watch a movie - much better.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 27th Apr 2010 17:14 Post subject: |
|
|
| iNatan wrote: | | Well of course, why would you need to do anything in a tactical game? Click a button and watch a movie - much better. |
Except that it's not just clicking a button and watching a movie. It's not removing anything from the game. It's changing how one specific action is performed.
In a real life situation you have a certain situational awareness that you don't have in a FPS type game. You have a much greater FOV. You can just slightly turn your head alone, not your body, to see where your team members are and back along as they move. You can't do this in a FPS so you end up having to spin your whole body, then spin back. That's not terribly practical. It's a little easier with a 3rd person game as you get your wide FOV back so you can somewhat see where you're going while keeping track of what's behind you - but this isn't a 3rd person game (as far as I know). Perhaps a more "realistic" option would be to keep the follow-mode out of the game and make a 3rd person mode available (one that wasn't half-assed and didn't suck).
Similar to ARMA II. I saw in one of the dev videos he specifically talked about the 3rd person view being more realistic because you had a better FOV and better situation awareness - even though a lot of gamers don't like the third person view.
We're obviously going to disagree on this though. You think the follow mode is dumbing the game down and making it automatic. I think it's changing a way a certain function is performed and making it so you can perform it better (not easier. Better.)
Last edited by dodger2020 on Tue, 27th Apr 2010 17:21; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 27th Apr 2010 17:18 Post subject: |
|
|
| dodger2020 wrote: | | iNatan wrote: | | Well of course, why would you need to do anything in a tactical game? Click a button and watch a movie - much better. |
Except that it's not just clicking a button and watching a movie. It's not removing anything from the game. It's changing how one specific action is performed. |
Cum again?
Did YOU read it yourself?
It says you just have to use mouse for aiming. YOU don't have to move yourself, your movements are automatic after the leader.
What is the point of a tactical game for you?
If you find it too difficult to cover your ass while advancing, then I don't know... you're either too lazy or dumb for that...
i5 6600k @ 4.3 GHz | MSI z170 Gaming M7 | 32GB Kingston HyperX Fury | 850 Evo 500GB | EVGA 1070 SC | Seasonic X-660 | CM Storm Stryker
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 3 of 38 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
