| Page 42 of 432 |
|
|
 Posted: Fri, 25th Mar 2011 22:36 Post subject: |
|
 |
fixed | randir14 wrote: | | The recommended cards seem pretty low, I guess this game will be nicely consolized. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
upstart_69
Posts: 1094
Location: Right behind you!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 25th Mar 2011 23:04 Post subject: |
|
|
A true PC game should require a triple GPU solution. This will run with a HD4850? Puh, will look like shit.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73219
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Fri, 25th Mar 2011 23:08 Post subject: |
|
|
| upstart_69 wrote: | | me7 wrote: | fixed | randir14 wrote: | | The recommended cards seem pretty low, I guess this game will be nicely consolized. |
|
Yeah, that's why it's being released for PC before they even start on any console version.
Moron. |
No need to insult.
The developers have already stated that they are keeping the design of the game such that should they want to, they could make a console game out of it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 25th Mar 2011 23:22 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73219
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Fri, 25th Mar 2011 23:25 Post subject: |
|
|
| H4wkeye wrote: | So, does that mean, if I press a button, something awesome happens?  |
Well, PC is still the leading platform... There are already signs of the console, like no top-down perspective and much more focus on the action, but still doubt it's anywhere to the DA2 level of shit.
The Witcher 3, however... Something awesome has to happen... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chiv
Posts: 27530
Location: Behind You...
|
| Posted: Fri, 25th Mar 2011 23:52 Post subject: |
|
|
i actually much preferred the OTS view for witcher. its a singular character game, not a tactical one, so i wont miss the iso view.. hell, never used it in the first one anyway - it definately didnt need it.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ashok0
Posts: 1733
Location: Ohio
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 26th Mar 2011 01:20 Post subject: |
|
|
| chiv wrote: | | i actually much preferred the OTS view for witcher. its a singular character game, not a tactical one, so i wont miss the iso view.. hell, never used it in the first one anyway - it definately didnt need it. |
QFT
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 26th Mar 2011 01:22 Post subject: |
|
|
It's kinda weird. Minimum card is steep (8800), but recommended is relatively low (4850).
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ClaudeFTW
Posts: 5074
Location: Bucharest, Romania
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ixigia
[Moderator] Consigliere
Posts: 65085
Location: Italy
|
| Posted: Sat, 26th Mar 2011 02:42 Post subject: |
|
|
| Mister_s wrote: | 4850 is low? Fuck you man  My 4850 is still awesome. |
So is my 4870; who needs to upgrade when our cards are true highlanders.. DirectX11 they say? Pfff, just a gimmick!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 26th Mar 2011 02:48 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 26th Mar 2011 08:41 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 26th Mar 2011 10:40 Post subject: |
|
|
| peter980 wrote: | | But performance difference between 8800gt and 4850 is hardly big. Yet one is low and other recommended. |
I think you're mistaken there. I went from a 8800GT to a HD4850, the HD4850 is almost twice as fast.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 26th Mar 2011 11:33 Post subject: |
|
|
| Mister_s wrote: | | peter980 wrote: | | But performance difference between 8800gt and 4850 is hardly big. Yet one is low and other recommended. |
I think you're mistaken there. I went from a 8800GT to a HD4850, the HD4850 is almost twice as fast. |
That's a bold statement. The diffrence is about 15-20% though.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 26th Mar 2011 12:52 Post subject: |
|
|
Here you go: a 4850 review - included are also chart comparisons with the 8800GT.
Make sure to browse multiple pages/games to see how they behave in different games/engines.
_____
I think there is a small typo or smtg in those recommended specs. The 4850 is VERY close to the 8800GT. Unless this game favors a "certain" brand, it makes little sense to take those specs very serious.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JBeckman
VIP Member
Posts: 34994
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Sun, 27th Mar 2011 07:00 Post subject: |
|
|
Strange comparison.
I got the newsletter as well (But deleted it, should have taken a image seeing this discussion.)
Recommended ATI GPU was a 4850, NVIDIA a 260
Minimum was a 8800 GT for NVIDIA and a 3850 for ATI.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 27th Mar 2011 07:28 Post subject: |
|
|
Last edited by Interinactive on Tue, 5th Oct 2021 05:04; edited 1 time in total
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 27th Mar 2011 09:57 Post subject: |
|
|
| JBeckman wrote: | Strange comparison.
I got the newsletter as well (But deleted it, should have taken a image seeing this discussion.)
Recommended ATI GPU was a 4850, NVIDIA a 260
Minimum was a 8800 GT for NVIDIA and a 3850 for ATI. |
I think the newsletter you're talking about is this:
 Spoiler: | |
Tell Us Your Story Contest results are in!
Coverage and Recognition - March 2011
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun, 27th Mar 2011 10:06 Post subject: |
|
|
when the game is due to release ?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chiv
Posts: 27530
Location: Behind You...
|
| Posted: Sun, 27th Mar 2011 10:34 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dsergei
Posts: 4059
Location: Moscow, Russia
|
| Posted: Sun, 27th Mar 2011 10:37 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢
Posts: 73219
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel 🇮🇱
|
| Posted: Sun, 27th Mar 2011 10:41 Post subject: |
|
|
The playing cards look nice actually, but I wonder if they won't be just some cheap plastic ones. :\
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 42 of 432 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
