I'd kill for a proper Matrix game
Page 1 of 2 Goto page 1, 2  Next
Radicalus




Posts: 6422

PostPosted: Mon, 28th Mar 2011 15:38    Post subject: I'd kill for a proper Matrix game
Like I said, I'd kill for it. An open world game, where perhaps stealth would be most important, otherwise you get agents on you. I know there were three matrix games even, but none of them captured the feeling, yet I think this IP could be grand for a good single player stealth RPG of some sort. I still need to think out the details, but I'd pay 100$ easy for a good Matrix game.
Back to top
human_steel




Posts: 33269

PostPosted: Mon, 28th Mar 2011 15:38    Post subject:
Depends on who you would kill.
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Mon, 28th Mar 2011 15:40    Post subject: Re: I'd kill for a proper Matrix game
Radicalus wrote:
but I'd pay 100$ easy for a good Matrix game.

Confused Laughing
Back to top
consolitis
VIP Member



Posts: 27318

PostPosted: Mon, 28th Mar 2011 15:40    Post subject:
Sadly the Matrix IP is dead. Sad


TWIN PEAKS is "something of a miracle."
"...like nothing else on television."
"a phenomenon."
"A tangled tale of sex, violence, power, junk food..."
"Like Nothing On Earth"

~ WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO SAY CAN ONLY BE SEEN ~

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHTUOgYNRzY
Back to top
zmed




Posts: 9234
Location: Orbanistan
PostPosted: Mon, 28th Mar 2011 15:41    Post subject:
I enjoyed that "path of neo" game, had decent combat.

Also liked Matrix Online (!GASP!) when they had free-offers, too bad it was shut down.
Back to top
Surray




Posts: 5409
Location: Europe
PostPosted: Mon, 28th Mar 2011 15:41    Post subject:
consolitis wrote:
Sadly the Matrix IP is dead. :(


arent 2 new movies coming? that'd definitely revive it and give rise to a new game... or 5.


Likot Mosuskekim, Woodcutter cancels Sleep: Interrupted by Elephant.
Back to top
consolitis
VIP Member



Posts: 27318

PostPosted: Mon, 28th Mar 2011 15:42    Post subject:
Surray wrote:
consolitis wrote:
Sadly the Matrix IP is dead. Sad


arent 2 new movies coming? that'd definitely revive it and give rise to a new game... or 5.


No.


TWIN PEAKS is "something of a miracle."
"...like nothing else on television."
"a phenomenon."
"A tangled tale of sex, violence, power, junk food..."
"Like Nothing On Earth"

~ WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO SAY CAN ONLY BE SEEN ~

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHTUOgYNRzY
Back to top
Surray




Posts: 5409
Location: Europe
PostPosted: Mon, 28th Mar 2011 15:44    Post subject:
too bad.


Likot Mosuskekim, Woodcutter cancels Sleep: Interrupted by Elephant.
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Mon, 28th Mar 2011 15:46    Post subject:
Surray wrote:
too bad.

I guess you haven't watched the first three yet? Laughing


My IMDb Ratings | Fix NFOHump Cookies | Hide Users / Threads | Embedded Content (Videos/GIFs/Twitter/Reddit) | The Derps Collection

Death smiles at us all; all we can do is smile back.


Last edited by LeoNatan on Mon, 28th Mar 2011 15:47; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
ixigia
[Moderator] Consigliere



Posts: 65081
Location: Italy
PostPosted: Mon, 28th Mar 2011 15:47    Post subject:
It's very hard to achieve what you're asking for (an underpified open world game with proper stealth mechanics and the intact Matrix atmosphere), especially today, with the "awesome button" generation and derps everywhere.


(On a side note, It's not Matrix, but Batman Arkham City kinda looks similar to this "concept", let's hope it will turn out as good as it sounds.)
Back to top
consolitis
VIP Member



Posts: 27318

PostPosted: Mon, 28th Mar 2011 15:51    Post subject:
Surray wrote:
too bad.


Nah, I don't want new matrix films (this soon) because they would ruin the trilogy. However there are so many other ways to keep the IP alive (comics, games, TV series, books, etc etc) but WB isn't interested at all it seems. Even the official website: http://whatisthematrix.warnerbros.com/ which was considered innovative back in the day has been removed.


TWIN PEAKS is "something of a miracle."
"...like nothing else on television."
"a phenomenon."
"A tangled tale of sex, violence, power, junk food..."
"Like Nothing On Earth"

~ WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO SAY CAN ONLY BE SEEN ~

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHTUOgYNRzY
Back to top
madmax17




Posts: 19415
Location: Croatia
PostPosted: Mon, 28th Mar 2011 15:52    Post subject:
It had the setting to be the coolest pc game ever based on a movie, why it didn't I don't know.
Back to top
dsergei




Posts: 4055
Location: Moscow, Russia
PostPosted: Mon, 28th Mar 2011 15:53    Post subject:
consolitis wrote:

Nah, I don't want new matrix films (this soon) because they would ruin the first one even more.


Fixed.
Back to top
Surray




Posts: 5409
Location: Europe
PostPosted: Mon, 28th Mar 2011 15:54    Post subject:
It's probably all for the best... if it came out now it'd probably be console only where 'something awesome happens every time you press any button'....


Likot Mosuskekim, Woodcutter cancels Sleep: Interrupted by Elephant.
Back to top
consolitis
VIP Member



Posts: 27318

PostPosted: Mon, 28th Mar 2011 16:06    Post subject:
dsergei wrote:
consolitis wrote:

Nah, I don't want new matrix films (this soon) because they would ruin the first one even more.


Fixed.


They are not that bad, it's just that they were rushed into production to shoot both of them ASAP together. If you read the earlier 1996 & 1997 drafts of the original Matrix and finally the 1998 shooting script you'll find out that while the core storyline remained the same each newer revision improved significantly the dialogue, characterization, etc. Also note that there are even earlier drafts (which aren't publicly available though) from 1994..

That didn't happen with the sequels that were released in 2003 but had their scripts written in 2000-2001, directly after the original was released mid-1999, with no chance to improve them again and again over time. But the core of the plot is good IMO.


TWIN PEAKS is "something of a miracle."
"...like nothing else on television."
"a phenomenon."
"A tangled tale of sex, violence, power, junk food..."
"Like Nothing On Earth"

~ WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO SAY CAN ONLY BE SEEN ~

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHTUOgYNRzY
Back to top
zipfero




Posts: 8938
Location: White Shaft
PostPosted: Mon, 28th Mar 2011 16:10    Post subject:
I played the HalfLife mod a bit, that was fun


8 out of 10 dentists prefer zipfero to competing brands(fraich3 and Mutantius)!
Back to top
Radicalus




Posts: 6422

PostPosted: Mon, 28th Mar 2011 17:15    Post subject:
consolitis wrote:
dsergei wrote:
consolitis wrote:

Nah, I don't want new matrix films (this soon) because they would ruin the first one even more.


Fixed.


They are not that bad, it's just that they were rushed into production to shoot both of them ASAP together. If you read the earlier 1996 & 1997 drafts of the original Matrix and finally the 1998 shooting script you'll find out that while the core storyline remained the same each newer revision improved significantly the dialogue, characterization, etc. Also note that there are even earlier drafts (which aren't publicly available though) from 1994..

That didn't happen with the sequels that were released in 2003 but had their scripts written in 2000-2001, directly after the original was released mid-1999, with no chance to improve them again and again over time. But the core of the plot is good IMO.


I think Reloaded was pretty good, the talk with the Architect, I didn't see that coming, it seemed like a pretty good twist and believable.

Revolutions is where the problems were, too much "real word" action, too little matrix philosophy.

The thing that redeemed it for me though, was that this time around, humanity in Zion was able to remain free, not only because of love (the trivial answer to the movie) - but because of Agent Smith, and the bargaining chip he became for Neo vs. The Source. That part was brilliant.
Back to top
Roger_Young




Posts: 1408
Location: Portugal
PostPosted: Mon, 28th Mar 2011 17:31    Post subject:
Well, I too am glad that there was no Blade Runner trilogy.
Back to top
consolitis
VIP Member



Posts: 27318

PostPosted: Mon, 28th Mar 2011 17:32    Post subject:
I agree that it was a mistake to make Revolutions take place in the real world for the most part of the movie. But the sequels definitely had moments of brilliance and some great new characters.

The Oracle scenes were great IMO in both films, even though Revolutions had a new actress. The Architect scene was well.. perfect. The Merovingian scenes were great in both films. Bane in Revolutions? Fucking awesome! The Deus Ex Machina encounter was great as well.

But there were many other characters introduced that were pretty weak/pointless.. The Kid, the Trainman, Persephone, Charra.. meh...

I don't mind the so called "lack of answers" in the third movie, I believe it answered what had to be answered in its own way (mostly via its visual language and symbolism).


TWIN PEAKS is "something of a miracle."
"...like nothing else on television."
"a phenomenon."
"A tangled tale of sex, violence, power, junk food..."
"Like Nothing On Earth"

~ WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO SAY CAN ONLY BE SEEN ~

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHTUOgYNRzY
Back to top
consolitis
VIP Member



Posts: 27318

PostPosted: Mon, 28th Mar 2011 17:34    Post subject:
Roger_Young wrote:
Well, I too am glad that there was no Blade Runner trilogy.


Welp.. about that.. http://io9.com/#!5774950/a-warner-bros+financed-production-company-buying-the-rights-to-do-a-blade-runner-sequel-or-prequel


TWIN PEAKS is "something of a miracle."
"...like nothing else on television."
"a phenomenon."
"A tangled tale of sex, violence, power, junk food..."
"Like Nothing On Earth"

~ WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO SAY CAN ONLY BE SEEN ~

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHTUOgYNRzY
Back to top
fable2




Posts: 6054

PostPosted: Mon, 28th Mar 2011 17:38    Post subject:
consolitis wrote:
Roger_Young wrote:
Well, I too am glad that there was no Blade Runner trilogy.


Welp.. about that.. http://io9.com/#!5774950/a-warner-bros+financed-production-company-buying-the-rights-to-do-a-blade-runner-sequel-or-prequel


oh god no .
why ruin such a masterpiece buy mainstreaming it and introducing it to a much shallower audience


Last edited by fable2 on Mon, 28th Mar 2011 17:39; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Roger_Young




Posts: 1408
Location: Portugal
PostPosted: Mon, 28th Mar 2011 17:39    Post subject:
consolitis wrote:

Welp.. about that.. http://io9.com/#!5774950/a-warner-bros+financed-production-company-buying-the-rights-to-do-a-blade-runner-sequel-or-prequel

I knew it sooner or later, one day...
(sigh) We know what will happen. Crying or Very sad
Back to top
consolitis
VIP Member



Posts: 27318

PostPosted: Mon, 28th Mar 2011 17:46    Post subject:
fable2 wrote:
consolitis wrote:
Roger_Young wrote:
Well, I too am glad that there was no Blade Runner trilogy.


Welp.. about that.. http://io9.com/#!5774950/a-warner-bros+financed-production-company-buying-the-rights-to-do-a-blade-runner-sequel-or-prequel


oh god no .
why ruin such a masterpiece buy mainstreaming it and introducing it to a much shallower audience


At least they want Nolan instead of say.. Michael Bay to direct it.. Nolan has made some great mainstream (Batman, etc) and non-mainstream (Memento, Following) movies.. http://www.movieweb.com/news/christopher-nolan-wanted-for-blade-runner-sequel-or-prequel

There's still some hope Very Happy


TWIN PEAKS is "something of a miracle."
"...like nothing else on television."
"a phenomenon."
"A tangled tale of sex, violence, power, junk food..."
"Like Nothing On Earth"

~ WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO SAY CAN ONLY BE SEEN ~

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHTUOgYNRzY
Back to top
fable2




Posts: 6054

PostPosted: Mon, 28th Mar 2011 17:49    Post subject:
consolitis wrote:
fable2 wrote:
consolitis wrote:


Welp.. about that.. http://io9.com/#!5774950/a-warner-bros+financed-production-company-buying-the-rights-to-do-a-blade-runner-sequel-or-prequel


oh god no .
why ruin such a masterpiece buy mainstreaming it and introducing it to a much shallower audience


At least they want Nolan instead of say.. Michael Bay to direct it.. Nolan has made some great mainsteam (Batman, etc) and non-mainsteam (Memento, Following) movies.. http://www.movieweb.com/news/christopher-nolan-wanted-for-blade-runner-sequel-or-prequel

There's still some hope Very Happy


yeah i guess but still a newer audience wouldn't appreciate a perfect sequel for this movie (if made)

listening to blade runner - blues right now Smile
Back to top
NFOAC




Posts: 6015
Location: India
PostPosted: Mon, 28th Mar 2011 17:50    Post subject:
Now where is Christopher Nolan
Back to top
ixigia
[Moderator] Consigliere



Posts: 65081
Location: Italy
PostPosted: Mon, 28th Mar 2011 17:51    Post subject:
Nolan would be the only one able to save Blade Runner's sequels from the inevitable fail Razz
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73196
Location: Ramat Gan, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Mon, 28th Mar 2011 17:53    Post subject:
ixigia wrote:
Nolan would be the only one able to save Blade Runner's sequels from the inevitable fail Razz

True. Sadly, not even Scott himself would do a proper job these days. Sad
Back to top
consolitis
VIP Member



Posts: 27318

PostPosted: Mon, 28th Mar 2011 17:55    Post subject:
fable2 wrote:
yeah i guess but still a newer audience wouldn't appreciate a perfect sequel for this movie (if made)


It's not like Blade Runner was universally appreciated when it was released.. It was called slow, with weak plot, etc. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blade_Runner#Reception

The Wachowskis have actually said about BR:

Quote:
Q: Any influence from Blade Runner?

WachowskiBros: Blade Runner was a benchmark science fiction film, a masterpiece. Of course there's influence. But we were like the only guys who liked that movie when we saw it, everyone else hated it.


TWIN PEAKS is "something of a miracle."
"...like nothing else on television."
"a phenomenon."
"A tangled tale of sex, violence, power, junk food..."
"Like Nothing On Earth"

~ WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO SAY CAN ONLY BE SEEN ~

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHTUOgYNRzY
Back to top
fable2




Posts: 6054

PostPosted: Mon, 28th Mar 2011 18:02    Post subject:
but in time it gathered more and more fans . sadly i don't think bringing a sequel would broader the fan base
instead it would just a good movie that came out some year

BR as a singular movie has more charm than the sequel would be .


Last edited by fable2 on Mon, 28th Mar 2011 18:05; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
ixigia
[Moderator] Consigliere



Posts: 65081
Location: Italy
PostPosted: Mon, 28th Mar 2011 18:03    Post subject:
Blade Runner was definitely too cutting-edge and innovative for those times, people were probably expecting the typical action-oriented Sci-fi movie with tons of explosions...I mean, it's not like today...oh wait. Laughing Razz
Back to top
Page 1 of 2 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - PC Games Arena Goto page 1, 2  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group