| Page 7 of 9 |
|
|
 Posted: Fri, 28th Oct 2005 00:58 Post subject: |
|
 |
Really? Were was this annouced? Most likely the forums, but I haven't seen that yet. Link?
i7 - 2500k
8GB RAM
AMD XFire 6950s
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Baleur
Posts: 2343
Location: South Sweden
|
| Posted: Fri, 28th Oct 2005 01:06 Post subject: |
|
|
lumpyhead thats prolly because most people are idiots running 5 year old drivers, or the absolute newest without any idea of preformance on the different ones, and having the game completely maxed out with soft shadows and 8s AA 18x AF at 1600x1200, i know how people can be..
Then again, it may just be needing a new nvidia driver, no biggie =)
http://www2.egosoft.com/viewtopic.php?t=95575
^^ no choppyness for him =) Glad its not a 100% of everyone issue
CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 RAM: 4gb Kingmax DDR2 800mhz Video: Asus GeForce 250GTS 1gb Sound: Asus Xonar.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 28th Oct 2005 11:04 Post subject: |
|
|
Today egosoft is releasing 1.2 patch.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 28th Oct 2005 13:14 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Baleur
Posts: 2343
Location: South Sweden
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 28th Oct 2005 15:06 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ady5
Posts: 263
Location: A planet near you
|
| Posted: Fri, 28th Oct 2005 15:16 Post subject: |
|
|
It's clear now. I think this thing becomes a trend now. A game is launched with bugs intentionally, so that a couple of patches will follow(or even preceed the game itself in some cases) immediately after, with minor upgrades in protection programs with blacklisting, so it's harder and harder to brake the code for one game 2-3 times in a matter of days. It's happened with Silent Hunter 3, it's happening again now. The initial release plays awfull, and then 2 patches launched almost simoultaneous with the game repairs that. It makes me wonder why they didn't observed that behaviour before it went gold (i understood it underwent quite a few betatesting)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Baleur
Posts: 2343
Location: South Sweden
|
| Posted: Fri, 28th Oct 2005 15:22 Post subject: |
|
|
It aint some kind of undercover anti-piracy method ady5, its simply because they set the release date, the publisher pushed it forward, and its better to have the game mass-produced and shipped for sale today, along with a patch also today, than stalling the entire manufacturing lines for the patch to be completed. Really.
CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 RAM: 4gb Kingmax DDR2 800mhz Video: Asus GeForce 250GTS 1gb Sound: Asus Xonar.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Fri, 28th Oct 2005 17:12 Post subject: |
|
|
After patch 1.2 starforce 3.5.10.6. Not 3.6!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Baleur
Posts: 2343
Location: South Sweden
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Epsilon
Dr. Strangelove
Posts: 9240
Location: War Room
|
| Posted: Fri, 28th Oct 2005 23:14 Post subject: |
|
|
I got it with mail today, and sfcure works fine after the patch 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Epsilon
Dr. Strangelove
Posts: 9240
Location: War Room
|
| Posted: Fri, 28th Oct 2005 23:24 Post subject: |
|
|
| Samiel wrote: | | Epsilon wrote: | | I got it with mail today, and sfcure works fine after the patch |
so where the fuck is a clone rls? |
Demanding stuff from me gets you nowhere.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Epsilon
Dr. Strangelove
Posts: 9240
Location: War Room
|
| Posted: Fri, 28th Oct 2005 23:36 Post subject: |
|
|
| qwertyqwerty wrote: | | Epsilon wrote: | | I got it with mail today, and sfcure works fine after the patch |
Just a question, before you patched the game did sfcure work also fine? The reason I ask this is because I read on the Protection Bitch'n forum that in Russia they made a working clone of a game protected with StarForce version 3.7.11.00. The only extra thing they needed to do was setting the speed of the virtual drives to 1x by using Nero DriveSpeed. And we know that before the patch X3 only used SF version 3.6.10.6. So I assume that sfcure should work fine with X3, even without patching the game. |
I could not get it to work before, may have been a prob with sfn, though i'm not sure, besides the game stuttered at my computer so i needed the patch. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
javlar
Posts: 1921
Location: Kalmar, Sweden
|
| Posted: Sat, 29th Oct 2005 03:54 Post subject: |
|
|
Uff. I dont know why they havent released this yet. Guess cause it isnt a "big" game in the Civ4/FEAR/Q4-sense. Hope a release will come soon though cause this game deserves it. I cba buying it, im a poor student damnit and i've already decided to buy Civ4 
Gaming - Intel Quad Q9450 @ 3.2GHZ | Radeon HD 4870 X2 2GB | SB X-Fi | PC6400 8GB | 300GB Velociraptor
HTPC - Antec Fusion Remote | AMD Athlon 7850 X2 | PC6400 2GB | 74GB Raptor
Server - Athlon 64 X2 4200+ | Radeon HD 3450 | SB X-Fi | PC5300 2GB | 4TB+ total space
XBOX360 Gamertag: javlarmate
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 29th Oct 2005 04:01 Post subject: |
|
|
heard it runs like shit the same as the second one did even on the highest end pcs u can have :S
probably a waste of a release if i was a release group i wouldnt bother
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
thyttel
Posts: 488
Location: Denmark
|
| Posted: Sat, 29th Oct 2005 04:30 Post subject: |
|
|
| snop1050 wrote: | heard it runs like shit the same as the second one did even on the highest end pcs u can have :S
probably a waste of a release if i was a release group i wouldnt bother |
Not true......1.0 ran like shit. Now after patch 1.2 it runs just fine.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 29th Oct 2005 04:33 Post subject: |
|
|
| snop1050 wrote: | heard it runs like shit the same as the second one did even on the highest end pcs u can have :S
probably a waste of a release if i was a release group i wouldnt bother |
Apparently though, the patch that they released today greatly improved the performance of the game. Most people on the egosoft forums said almost all of their issues were solved. Either way I'm crossing my fingers that someone out there is eventually kind enough to make an image and upload it to a tracker...especially since they said sfcure works after the patch. While we probably wont see a release for awhile still, I can hope.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Baleur
Posts: 2343
Location: South Sweden
|
| Posted: Sat, 29th Oct 2005 06:46 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 29th Oct 2005 08:23 Post subject: |
|
|
A say again for some ppl: in patch 1.2 starforce 3.5.10.6!
About starforce 3.7.11.0: sfcure not work on this version! And usb method don't work! Only when mount mini image into dt 3.47 and select speed for this driver 1x in nero cd/dvd speed. Its need for enables emulation in dt. In new sf 3.7.11.0 sectors read in other order.
Read about sf 3.6 and 3.7 here: http://www.cdsteam.net/modules/news/
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nightlith
Posts: 744
Location: Land of Bagged Milk
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kondor
Posts: 228
Location: Here
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat, 29th Oct 2005 10:30 Post subject: |
|
|
there was no starforce downgrade. the dvd is starforce 3.5.10.6 and the installed game is starforce 3.5.10.6.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 7 of 9 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
oh i would laugh soo hard if that was part of the reason =D
) I refuse to takes the coward's route and back down from my anti-starforce position. You should all be ashamed for supporting such horrid copy protection!
