| Page 27 of 37 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
 Posted: Sun, 24th Apr 2016 20:54 Post subject: |
|
|
| Mr.Tinkles wrote: | AFAIK fast boot only puts your computer into just that, hibernation and that's why it "boots" so quickly.
If you open up task manager you'll see that the uptime hasn't reset to 0 when doing a fast boot (unless you actually reboot) and just picks up where you left off last time. |
nope, uefi fast boot has nothing to with the windows stuff with half hibernation / half shutdown (which isnt present in 8.1, only in 10 afaik)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Famou
Posts: 713
Location: Amsterdam
|
| Posted: Mon, 16th May 2016 21:22 Post subject: |
|
|
Got a new 850 SSD 500gb from Samsung. Now I am wondering if I should clone my 7 year old 64gb OS windows 7 onto it or install fresh. That one is on a ssd aswel and never had any problems. I was thinking to just install a fresh copy but don't know if it matters that much for ssd's.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Morphineus
VIP Member
Posts: 24883
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Mon, 16th May 2016 21:24 Post subject: |
|
|
You might as well roll over for Win 10 already. It's almost time 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Famou
Posts: 713
Location: Amsterdam
|
| Posted: Tue, 17th May 2016 00:21 Post subject: |
|
|
Was reading a bit briefly today and win 7 is better no? I edit professionally with Photoshop and Light room and can't have them not work.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 17th May 2016 01:00 Post subject: |
|
|
why should 7 be better? its not. and ofc every adobe stuff works flawless, even 10 years old versions of it
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Famou
Posts: 713
Location: Amsterdam
|
| Posted: Tue, 17th May 2016 01:17 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 17th May 2016 01:36 Post subject: |
|
|
works as flawless as every other not legal activated os from ms in the past -> no problems at all. just install without entering a key (huehue cause you dont have one) and use the ms toolkit (head over to the mydigitallife forums for it) and use the one click ez-activator stuff in it (and exclude c:\windows\autokms from your av, atleast the windows defender will detect it. dunno about other stuff like kaspersky)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Famou
Posts: 713
Location: Amsterdam
|
| Posted: Tue, 17th May 2016 01:38 Post subject: |
|
|
Sounds good, just got windows 10 Ill try in a bit.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 17th May 2016 11:09 Post subject: |
|
|
| Janz wrote: | | why should 7 be better? its not. and ofc every adobe stuff works flawless, even 10 years old versions of it |
| Lutzifer wrote: | | and yes, mine is only average |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Famou
Posts: 713
Location: Amsterdam
|
| Posted: Tue, 17th May 2016 15:44 Post subject: |
|
|
Pfff the disc is performing like half of what it should now in win 10. Trying hard to fix it.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 17th May 2016 15:51 Post subject: |
|
|
well you obviously didn't do something right. SSD's are faster in win10 vs win7, especially in random read/writes.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Famou
Posts: 713
Location: Amsterdam
|
| Posted: Tue, 17th May 2016 16:06 Post subject: |
|
|
On the 500 gb 850 I get about 380 write now. Tried updating the ahci drivers, not sure what else to do. It's in the 6gb port with a 6gb cable.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 17th May 2016 16:11 Post subject: |
|
|
just install the chipset drivers manually and you should be good to go
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Famou
Posts: 713
Location: Amsterdam
|
| Posted: Tue, 17th May 2016 17:08 Post subject: |
|
|
Didn't work. Tried to update the bios even. My windows 7 boot shows the disk doing 370 write and shit as well. Is this just a bad disk or am I missing something?
Fixed it. I put it in the marvell controller sata ports. Didn't know they can't go above 400.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 17th May 2016 22:07 Post subject: |
|
|
good ole marvell  , there you go, I knew you did something wrong 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Famou
Posts: 713
Location: Amsterdam
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 7th Jun 2016 03:33 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue, 7th Jun 2016 12:30 Post subject: |
|
|
RAID0 is useless with ssds. you might loose all data for slightly better transferrates (which actually dont matter when using ssds and are not as high as you might expect them) AND on the downside you get way worse access times <-- which is the biggest value on using ssds, so u crush that. unless you need those higher transferrates for work its more than dumb to use raid0 on ssds
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JBeckman
VIP Member
Posts: 34974
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Wed, 10th Aug 2016 16:22 Post subject: |
|
|
http://www.guru3d.com/news_story/seagate_announces_pcie_ssd_with_10gbs_and_shows_60tb_ssd.html
| Quote: |
Seagate annnounces the Nytro XP7200, a PCI-Express add-on card that has been fitted with four NVMe SSDs based on M2. The card will produce numbers above the 10.000 MB per second.
An PCIe-SSD series with a speed of 10GB/s was already mentioned in March by Seagate. The manufacturer now announced the actual product. The Nytro XP7200 is a PCIe plug-in card, which is equipped with four-m2 SSD's. To reach the speed of 10GB/s, four of the recently announced XM1440-m2-nvme modules are used with a capacity of 1920GB each. The total storage space is thus 7,7TB. There will also be a version with a capacity of 3,8TB, which uses four 960GB SSDs.
To reach the claimed speeds these nvme SSDs are setup in a RAID 0 set up using software. A rather old trick that does not always work out well.
According to Seagate has the Nytro XP7200 than a sequential read speed of 10GB/s and a sequential write speed of 3,6GB/s. Random read operations match 940,000 IOPS and 160,000 IOPS for writes. The first samples will be sent in September and the card should be on the market in the fourth quarter. Prices have not been announced.
Seagate also showed a SAS SSD in 3.5" format that holds a massive of 60TB. The SSD uses 3D TLC-NAND from Micron and a single controller. The sequential read and write speeds, according to the manufacturer 1500 and 1000 MB/s. Random read is 150,000 iOPS, according to Seagate. Information about random writes was not disclosed. Seagate has given this 60TB SSD no product name yet as at this moment it is just for demonstration purposes.
|
The 10 GB/s SSD (Read, write was around 4 GB/s) sounds interesting although it's accomplished via Raid-0 which I believe has a few drawbacks.
That other SAS 60 TB SSD would handily solve the lower storage capacity on SSD's although a product like that would probably cost a small fortune. 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DaLexy
Posts: 3041
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Wed, 10th Aug 2016 16:53 Post subject: |
|
|
Guys, i want to sell my 770 GTX and someone from the next town was offering me a Samsung 850 Evo 500 GB factory sealed. Should i take the deal ? Pricewise i wanted 125€ for my card including shipping and the Evo costs new 144€. Sounds like a good deal to me but i dont know, has the 850 evo not some sort of issues with old files or something along those lines ?
My SysProfile ッ
I ΓУPΞ LIҜΞ Д БФSS, УФЦЯ ДЯGЦMΞИΓ I$ IИVДLłD
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nec
Posts: 234
Location: Israhell
|
| Posted: Wed, 10th Aug 2016 17:21 Post subject: |
|
|
Nope, that was the 840 EVO with the issues.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neon
VIP Member
Posts: 18934
Location: Poland
|
| Posted: Wed, 10th Aug 2016 19:02 Post subject: |
|
|
A quick question, what would you buy:
-a new Samung Evo 750 500 GB for 107 EUR
or
- a used Samsung Evo 850 500 GB for 114 EUR
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dr-nix
Posts: 996
Location: Sweden
|
| Posted: Wed, 10th Aug 2016 20:32 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
| Posted: Thu, 11th Aug 2016 22:06 Post subject: |
|
|
| Neon wrote: | A quick question, what would you buy:
-a new Samung Evo 750 500 GB for 107 EUR
or
- a used Samsung Evo 850 500 GB for 114 EUR |
For what it's worth, I totally recommend them 850 Evos. Really good and fast SSDs for the price. And that VNand has gotten alot of praise. And you really get the speeds that are advertised contrary to many other SSD manufacturers and models.
2011 - 2016 Build • Fractal Design R5 Titanium (Window) • i5-2500K @ 4,5GHz • Corsair Hydro h115i • ASRock Fatal1ty P67 Performance • 2x4Gb G.Skill Ripjaws F3-10666CL9-4GBRL • EVGA GeForce GTX 970 SSC ACX 2.0+ • Corsair RM550(W) PSU • 2x Samsung 850 Evo (120gb/500gb) •
2018 - x Build • Fractal Design Define R6 Gunmetal • Intel Core i9 9900K • Corsair H150i Pro RGB AIO • Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI HERO • 2x16Gb Corsair Dominator Platinum DDR4-3200 • EVGA GeForce GTX 970 SSC ACX 2.0+ • Corsair HX850i PSU • 1x Samsung 970 Evo M.2, 1x Samsung 860 Evo SATA, 1x Samsung 850 Evo SATA •
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DaLexy
Posts: 3041
Location: Germany
|
| Posted: Fri, 12th Aug 2016 09:56 Post subject: |
|
|
Ill wait for this beauty:
Intel SSD Pro 6000p 1TB, M.2 (SSDPEKKF010T7X1) 418,78 €
My SysProfile ッ
I ΓУPΞ LIҜΞ Д БФSS, УФЦЯ ДЯGЦMΞИΓ I$ IИVДLłD
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
high3r
Posts: 67
Location: Budapest
|
| Posted: Sun, 14th Aug 2016 15:10 Post subject: |
|
|
| DaLexy wrote: | Ill wait for this beauty:
Intel SSD Pro 6000p 1TB, M.2 (SSDPEKKF010T7X1) 418,78 € |
I'd rather go for Samsung SM961 1TB m.2 for around the same price. (3200MB/s / 1800MB/s , 4K: 450k/400k)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Page 27 of 37 |
All times are GMT + 1 Hour |
).
