Epic announces the Epic Games $tore
Page 54 of 65 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 53, 54, 55 ... 63, 64, 65  Next
Sin317
Banned



Posts: 24322
Location: Geneva
PostPosted: Wed, 9th Sep 2020 19:49    Post subject:
They signed a contract. They didn't have to. You can be mad about the 30%, but then don't sign a contract with apple...
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73246
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Wed, 9th Sep 2020 19:56    Post subject:
I see, so if you sign a contract under duress to be my slave, it makes that contract valid.
Back to top
Sin317
Banned



Posts: 24322
Location: Geneva
PostPosted: Wed, 9th Sep 2020 19:59    Post subject:
What duress lol?

What the fuck are you on about?
Back to top
Prandur




Posts: 2685

PostPosted: Wed, 9th Sep 2020 20:34    Post subject:
I agree with Sin... there's no duress here. Apple have a platform and have every right to require whatever stupid conditions they want in order to offer access to third parties. The clause about duress applies primarily to situations where you're, e.g., holding someone hostage, threatening them with violence etc.

I sympathize with Epic in this fight because it would have tangible benefits for the consumer, but based on what information I have seen I think that Apple is in the right.
Back to top
prudislav
VIP Member



Posts: 29148
Location: The land of beer and porn
PostPosted: Wed, 9th Sep 2020 21:13    Post subject:
Prandur wrote:
I sympathize with Epic in this fight because it would have tangible benefits for the consumer,....

remember hen lower cut of EGS as supposed to trickle down to prices?


http://i.imgur.com/SYIa3w4.png
http://i.imgur.com/PtROKGv.gif
Sometimes i just want to see NFOHUMP burn \o/
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73246
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Wed, 9th Sep 2020 21:14    Post subject:
Apple's mobile store makes the vast majority of money in mobile space. The duress is making much less money on mobile if you don't comply with Apple's racketeering contract.

Microsoft also had a "platform" and "had every right" to bundle Explorer and be anti-competitive. Oh wait, no they didn't, and were broken up by regulation. Apple's time should come too. Even if Epic's lawsuit fails, lawmaker is already breathing Apple's neck (based on the questions asked during the congressional hearing not long ago). Change is acoming.
Back to top
zmed




Posts: 9234
Location: Orbanistan
PostPosted: Wed, 9th Sep 2020 21:25    Post subject:
prudislav wrote:
Prandur wrote:
I sympathize with Epic in this fight because it would have tangible benefits for the consumer,....

remember hen lower cut of EGS as supposed to trickle down to prices?
Just like how tax cuts for the super-rich supposed to trickle down to the working class. Laughing

People seem to forget that Epic doesn't set the prices, publishers/devs do.
Back to top
prudislav
VIP Member



Posts: 29148
Location: The land of beer and porn
PostPosted: Thu, 10th Sep 2020 02:31    Post subject:
that didnt stopped timmy tencent from promising it


http://i.imgur.com/SYIa3w4.png
http://i.imgur.com/PtROKGv.gif
Sometimes i just want to see NFOHUMP burn \o/
Back to top
Civ01




Posts: 1294

PostPosted: Thu, 10th Sep 2020 11:19    Post subject:
Think positively. If Apple will kill half of the Fortnite fortune for Epic then they wont have money to buy PC exclusives anymore.

Win-win.
Well, we lose with Apple, since this will enforce their oligopoly even further but eh
Back to top
Sin317
Banned



Posts: 24322
Location: Geneva
PostPosted: Thu, 10th Sep 2020 11:30    Post subject:
Don't Sony and Microsoft take 30% or so as well on games on their respective consoles?
Back to top
Nodrim




Posts: 9607
Location: Romania
PostPosted: Thu, 10th Sep 2020 11:52    Post subject:
Civ01 wrote:
Think positively. If Apple will kill half of the Fortnite fortune for Epic then they wont have money to buy PC exclusives anymore.

Win-win.
Well, we lose with Apple, since this will enforce their oligopoly even further but eh


Who buys stuff from Apple anyway? Laughing
Back to top
prudislav
VIP Member



Posts: 29148
Location: The land of beer and porn
PostPosted: Thu, 10th Sep 2020 11:58    Post subject:
Sin317 wrote:
Don't Sony and Microsoft take 30% or so as well on games on their respective consoles?

yup


http://i.imgur.com/SYIa3w4.png
http://i.imgur.com/PtROKGv.gif
Sometimes i just want to see NFOHUMP burn \o/
Back to top
Sin317
Banned



Posts: 24322
Location: Geneva
PostPosted: Thu, 10th Sep 2020 12:31    Post subject:
I wonder if Epic will try to pull the same stunt on the PS platform, lol. Which is probably their biggest market.
Back to top
garus
VIP Member



Posts: 34197

PostPosted: Thu, 10th Sep 2020 12:54    Post subject:
snip


Last edited by garus on Tue, 27th Aug 2024 21:21; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Sin317
Banned



Posts: 24322
Location: Geneva
PostPosted: Thu, 10th Sep 2020 13:02    Post subject:
Probably, but I don't think Epic can retroactively revoke a license for games already made. And if they would threaten to revoke their license for future games, in order to bully e.g. Sony to let them "have their own store" or bs like that, it would probably be a massive shot in their own face.

People maybe like to work with UE4, but it's not the only engine and people CAN create a new engine, if the need arises.

Epic pretty much is playing itself into a corner at this point, imho.

They tried to bully steam, that doesn't seem to work out, they try to bully apple, not working out... I wonder how much money they really have to "brute force" this thing Smile
Back to top
Nodrim




Posts: 9607
Location: Romania
PostPosted: Thu, 10th Sep 2020 16:22    Post subject:
I despise their actions, but I think Epic's battle against Steam is working on some level. I don't think there are many white knights switching to EGS just because of the revenue cut for developers. But Epic is certainly winning some people over with all the free stuff while forcing others with exclusivity deals to sequels and whatnot. It's also worth noting that the future will most likely look much better for them when the kids they got in their pockets with free games and Fortnite will grow to have some purchasing power.
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73246
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Thu, 10th Sep 2020 16:39    Post subject:
garus wrote:
Sin317 wrote:
I wonder if Epic will try to pull the same stunt on the PS platform, lol. Which is probably their biggest market.

I don't think so, if judging by Apple's reaction, Sony could just ban ANY developer using their Unreal Engine.
Plus I think Sony also uses Unreal for some games?

You misunderstood what happened. Apple was threatening to revoke the Developer ID certificate of the Epic account, this not allowing the Unreal Editor to launch on macOS (because all apps must be signed and not revoked or else macOS won't allow launching software by default).
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73246
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Thu, 10th Sep 2020 16:41    Post subject:
Sin317 wrote:
Don't Sony and Microsoft take 30% or so as well on games on their respective consoles?

It's equally retarded. And it should be possible to sideload software on these machines. I do hope that some over-reaching legislation comes from this, where any device that allows digital purchase of software must allow third party sideloading from "unofficial" sources.
Back to top
djaoni




Posts: 8061

PostPosted: Thu, 10th Sep 2020 16:54    Post subject:
Next he'll be suing his own store.

Back to top
Sin317
Banned



Posts: 24322
Location: Geneva
PostPosted: Thu, 10th Sep 2020 16:58    Post subject:
He doesn't have as much of a point as he thinks. Apple, Google, Sony, Microsoft, Nintendo have not just their own "app" stores, but they also have their own platform. They can sell or refuse to sell whatever they well like.

Imagine you having a shop and someone comes in and sets up shop, inside your shop, selling the same kind of products you are selling...

Hm, I really like that analogy Smile
Back to top
Stormwolf




Posts: 23734
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Thu, 10th Sep 2020 17:37    Post subject:
Well, he's just the normal self serving idiot who is preaching a "worthy" cause and is getting traction from that alone and people dont see it, which is normal. He'd be no different if he was a top player. No different at all.
Back to top
Il_Padrino




Posts: 7580
Location: Greece by the North Sea
PostPosted: Thu, 10th Sep 2020 17:56    Post subject:
I think the argument they are going to make is that Apple and Google have a monopoly on something that is now widely used. The fact that the companies are private is slowly becoming irrelevant, as they have huge social/economic responsibilities.

A bit like Facebook and other social media, perhaps? They've gotten so big that a lot of people and companies are now depending on them. If Apple were a country, it would currently be the 5th biggest economy Very Happy

The analogy of the store would be better if you consider Apple and Google as shopping malls, and 99% of the people do their shopping there. Sure you can try to compete with a new mall/device, but that is way too late now.


There must have been a door there in the wall, when I came in.
Truly gone fishing.
Back to top
Stormwolf




Posts: 23734
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Thu, 10th Sep 2020 17:59    Post subject:
Which is why after some grumbling no doubt he figured the tactic he'd use is to lure developers to his side and trick every god damned fool out there. Nothing but a ploy to get big.
Back to top
Sin317
Banned



Posts: 24322
Location: Geneva
PostPosted: Thu, 10th Sep 2020 18:04    Post subject:
Il_Padrino wrote:
I think the argument they are going to make is that Apple and Google have a monopoly on something that is now widely used. The fact that the companies are private is slowly becoming irrelevant, as they have huge social/economic responsibilities.

A bit like Facebook and other social media, perhaps? They've gotten so big that a lot of people and companies are now depending on them. If Apple were a country, it would currently be the 5th biggest economy Very Happy

The analogy of the store would be better if you consider Apple and Google as shopping malls, and 99% of the people do their shopping there. Sure you can try to compete with a new mall/device, but that is way too late now.


Yeah, I guess shopping mall fits better. You want to set up shop, you'll have to pay the rent. But you're free not to.
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73246
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Thu, 10th Sep 2020 18:33    Post subject:
Sin317 wrote:
Imagine you having a shop and someone comes in and sets up shop, inside your shop, selling the same kind of products you are selling...

Hm, I really like that analogy Smile

It's good that you are amusing yourself with completely unrelated analogies.

The correct analogy is having a country where only one store is allowed to sell all products, and no one else is allowed to open a store.

If you like it so much, move to North Korea, that's how it is there. It's amazing. Rolling Eyes
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73246
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Thu, 10th Sep 2020 18:36    Post subject:
Isn't it funny lol how lol some of the most lol quote unquote lol human rights advocates lol are the ones lol arguing how it's the right of a company lol to have a monopoly lol because it's their lol platform lol

lol



lol
Back to top
Stormwolf




Posts: 23734
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Thu, 10th Sep 2020 18:53    Post subject:
LeoNatan wrote:
Isn't it funny lol how lol some of the most lol quote unquote lol human rights advocates lol are the ones lol arguing how it's the right of a company lol to have a monopoly lol because it's their lol platform lol

lol



lol


Epic is doing its damnest to monopoloze though Wink
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73246
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Thu, 10th Sep 2020 19:00    Post subject:
Spending money is not monopolizing. It's ugly business, but any developer can say "fuck off" and not take the money. I hate their buying off developers as the next one, but it's unrelated to this lawsuit here.
What Apple is doing is monopoly. The classic percentage that is often touted (that comes from the 18th century law) makes no sense in the context of modern mobile usage.
Back to top
djaoni




Posts: 8061

PostPosted: Thu, 10th Sep 2020 19:25    Post subject:
Does the monopoly Apple even have 20% of the phone market? No one is forcing anyone to buy Apple trash.
Back to top
LeoNatan
☢ NFOHump Despot ☢



Posts: 73246
Location: Ramat HaSharon, Israel 🇮🇱
PostPosted: Thu, 10th Sep 2020 19:30    Post subject:
djaoni wrote:
Does the monopoly Apple even have 20% of the phone market? No one is forcing anyone to buy Apple trash.

Yes. Instead of posting nonsense, how about you read any economic research on the subject? Whatever your opinion of Apple users is, they are much more likely (orders of magnitude) to spend money on their devices. This makes the "just don't develop on Apple platforms" a ridiculous stance that is divorced from economic reality. If a business wants to survive, it has to be on iOS. This is why regulation is important here.

If you don't want to buy Apple, don't. But it's a fact that you cannot change, that those that do buy Apple, are much bigger spenders.
Back to top
Page 54 of 65 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - PC Games Arena Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 53, 54, 55 ... 63, 64, 65  Next
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group