Not sure about that. You have to have your head in the sand to not realize the power women currently have. And some will exploit it for their own benefit. Or at least try.
The feminist activity on this case though is insane, but thats nothing new. Doesnt matter if he's right or wrong, men has to lose by default. That is what they want. Some equality eh?
A lawyer says that people without evidence should be believed, just like that.
While I am not defending the decision or the lawyer. That IS how it works.
The other side provides proof you are guilty that you can try to refute. Not your burden to start with providing evidence you are innocent that the other side refutes.
if I accused you of theft in a store while shopping, can you prove when the cops show up at your house you didn't steal that thing? What are you going to do, show them the lack of things in your possession that was stolen by you [look at all the nothings I have that I stole]? That only proves you dont have it now. You cannot provide proof you didn't steal something (proving a negative) it's on me to prove you did. THEN they can refute my claims/accusations with discrepancies between it and the truth.
Burden of proving guilt is on the accuser. Not the accused.
Unless you are talking about the other bit where they are the accuser, and not the accused. Hard to tell which part you mean that she should be believed as innocent without proof she is, or if HER claims of guilt should be without evidence...if so then ignore this whole post.
-We don't control what happens to us in life, but we control how we respond to what happens in life.
-Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times. -G. Michael Hopf
Disclaimer: Post made by me are of my own creation. A delusional mind relayed in text form.
Now she can sue the jury, the judge, JD, and his legal team, all the YouTubers, twitter, google, the archivist at the courthouse for defaming her and her losing her role.
They should get the team that did army of the dead or whatever that zackfaddy Netflix feature with a dead pixel was. They can easily replace her. Heck replace her in the first one too and re-release it.
Gauging public reactions to what the studio is thinking.
Possibly risking making another billion at the box office. They kinda wanna keep making the monies. If public was happy with the test screenings. And are outraged at the news. Then they don't have to cut her out. If public thinks test screenings were shit and public is happy that she's being replaced then they'll cut her out.
Weighing their options.
Weird how they didn't give JD the same courtesy. Lol.
Her big 8million dollar interview is on Friday. Who's gonna watch?
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
