Encryption Chip Will End Piracy, Says Atari Founder
Page 3 of 3 Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
djaoni




Posts: 8061

PostPosted: Sat, 24th May 2008 17:19    Post subject:
That's some great thinking right there, Big_Gun..
Back to top
Big_Gun




Posts: 3017
Location: My mother's womb originally. . .
PostPosted: Sat, 24th May 2008 17:31    Post subject:
cnZ wrote:
well, here the difference is that one is a physical object and the other is a virtual bits and bytes. you are just copying the source.


I undertsnad. I am just having some fun.
Back to top
Big_Gun




Posts: 3017
Location: My mother's womb originally. . .
PostPosted: Sat, 24th May 2008 17:31    Post subject:
djaoni wrote:
That's some great thinking right there, Big_Gun..

Thanks!
Back to top
valkyrian




Posts: 119

PostPosted: Sat, 24th May 2008 17:35    Post subject:
Games are just like S3X. Its better when its Fr33. Razz


Intel® Core™ 2 Duo E6600 2.4 GHz, (2x 1GB) G.E.I.L. DDR2 - 1066, ASUS P5K DELUXE/WIFI-AP LGA 775 Intel P35, MSI 8800 GTX OC 630/2000, Western Digital Caviar SE16 500 GB, Zalman ZM600-HP 600W - HP 744, HP 7280 - GBA, CG, XBOX, X360, PS2, PS3, PSP, WII
Back to top
Big_Gun




Posts: 3017
Location: My mother's womb originally. . .
PostPosted: Sat, 24th May 2008 17:46    Post subject:
valkyrian wrote:
Games are just like S3X. Its better when its Fr33. Razz


Some of them are certainly not worht buying that's for sure. i usually end up buying hte ones i really like anyway. being able to pirate something usually acts as an extra long preview for myself.
Back to top
Marinou




Posts: 84

PostPosted: Sat, 24th May 2008 18:17    Post subject:
Stealing =/= Copyright Infrigement


I guess some people are incapable of understanding the difference between the two.
Back to top
snoop1050
Banned



Posts: 5057

PostPosted: Sat, 24th May 2008 18:46    Post subject:
Marinou wrote:
Stealing =/= Copyright Infrigement


I guess some people are incapable of understanding the difference between the two.

borrowing a game/music/movie to someone is stealing aswell, i hope none of you ever do such a thing because the company is losing a sale Laughing better not let your friends around to watch a movie either
Back to top
Pluvius




Posts: 127

PostPosted: Sat, 24th May 2008 21:26    Post subject:
EwarWoo1 wrote:
Look at the definition of steal:
1. to take (the property of another or others) without permission or right, esp. secretly or by force: A pickpocket stole his watch.


So what exactly is being taken from the game developer? It can't be the game, because the developer still has it. And it can't be money, because the developer didn't have that to begin with.

Rob
Back to top
Spiderman
Banned



Posts: 5877

PostPosted: Sun, 25th May 2008 01:00    Post subject:
Pluvius wrote:
EwarWoo1 wrote:
Look at the definition of steal:
1. to take (the property of another or others) without permission or right, esp. secretly or by force: A pickpocket stole his watch.


So what exactly is being taken from the game developer? It can't be the game, because the developer still has it. And it can't be money, because the developer didn't have that to begin with.

Rob

they call it now intellectual property a word taken from e-managers that manage intellectual wisdom / experience and use it as a money capital
Back to top
EwarWoo1




Posts: 868

PostPosted: Sun, 25th May 2008 01:52    Post subject:
cnZ wrote:
that's a valid point that good games sell and shit ones won't, and devs are always attacking piracy for their poor sales (which is incorrect ofc).

Not really. If you look at the people who download games and say they buy them, they say if they're a great game they buy.

So basically, if it's a great game it sells but in reduced numbers.

If it's a mediocre -> good game it sells sweet FA. People play but don't pay. Where as without piracy it would sell.

If it's a crap game the above kind of applies but hard to feel sorry for them when it shouldn't sell.

But any of them piracy does affect sales. Just the lesser the game the more it is affected.

So just a less honest pussy assed way of saying "Stop protection, it's threatening my free gaming!"
Back to top
Spiderman
Banned



Posts: 5877

PostPosted: Sun, 25th May 2008 15:06    Post subject:
oh yeah you are so right i believe you and those hyped trailers that killed off the demo
Back to top
cnZ
Banned



Posts: 3091

PostPosted: Sun, 25th May 2008 15:22    Post subject:
Quote:
Playing a protected game on a TPM PC:

Checking TPM chip...
Checking Serial key...
Checking Program File...
Checking for Virtual Drives...
Checking IDE/Sata ports...
Incrypting IDE/Sata ports...
Checking TPM game drivers...
Checking position of file on DVD/CD...
Checking internet connection...
Authenticating with the games online server...
Updating TPM drivers...
Checking your fingerprint and retinal...
Checking for crimes user has commited...
Starting game...
Checking Intro movie...
Checking map E1L1...
Loading map E1L1...

Cracked TPM user:

Starting game...
Loading map E1L1...


Smile


yes
Back to top
Mortibus




Posts: 18053
Location: .NL
PostPosted: Sun, 25th May 2008 15:41    Post subject:
they can never optimize games good enough for real hw now they have to worry about some chip which will probably fuk with game perfomance aswell

this shit will never fly
Back to top
EwarWoo1




Posts: 868

PostPosted: Sun, 25th May 2008 16:06    Post subject:
Mortibus wrote:
they can never optimize games good enough for real hw now they have to worry about some chip which will probably fuk with game perfomance aswell

this shit will never fly

If there's a dedicated chip doing the job of SF or SR or whatever protection the particluar develop uses at the moment it will indeed affect performance - it will improve it.
Back to top
Sajuuk_Khar




Posts: 526
Location: TM, RO
PostPosted: Sun, 25th May 2008 16:12    Post subject:
Mortibus wrote:
they can never optimize games good enough for real hw now they have to worry about some chip which will probably fuk with game perfomance aswell

this shit will never fly

Wink Wink Wink


Back to top
Mortibus




Posts: 18053
Location: .NL
PostPosted: Sun, 25th May 2008 16:56    Post subject:
EwarWoo1 wrote:
Mortibus wrote:
they can never optimize games good enough for real hw now they have to worry about some chip which will probably fuk with game perfomance aswell

this shit will never fly

If there's a dedicated chip doing the job of SF or SR or whatever protection the particluar develop uses at the moment it will indeed affect performance - it will improve it.


yeah right, so was AGEIA PhysX card which is nothing but failure
Back to top
Spiderman
Banned



Posts: 5877

PostPosted: Sun, 25th May 2008 20:56    Post subject:
wait didn't they say Nvidia bought them and now the X series will have one of those Ageia chips ? is it bull like with they Havoc 4 in GF8
Back to top
GeorgeIvanovich




Posts: 361

PostPosted: Sun, 25th May 2008 21:08    Post subject:
People do the rules ,not developers not nvidia ati amd or intel.

If nobody buys the crap they can´t survive
Back to top
Karmeck




Posts: 3349
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Sun, 25th May 2008 21:47    Post subject:
The amount of people that understand this and for some reason have something against it not grate enuf to make a difference.


Back to top
Submiqent




Posts: 1213

PostPosted: Sun, 25th May 2008 23:34    Post subject:
stealing denies someone ownership of an item. if i steal a ferrari from a dealer, they are down 1 ferrari. if pirate or copy that ferrari, they still have theirs, but i'm driving an exact duplicate. the law hasn't really caught up, but that's why it's copyright infringement and not stealing.

and yeah this idea (TPM/Trusted computing) has been around for a while, there was a bit of talk when 'longhorn' was going to support it, not sure if it still does, but it probably does.

EDIT: D'oh!! only read first page.
Back to top
EwarWoo1




Posts: 868

PostPosted: Mon, 26th May 2008 09:26    Post subject:
Mortibus wrote:
EwarWoo1 wrote:
Mortibus wrote:
they can never optimize games good enough for real hw now they have to worry about some chip which will probably fuk with game perfomance aswell

this shit will never fly

If there's a dedicated chip doing the job of SF or SR or whatever protection the particluar develop uses at the moment it will indeed affect performance - it will improve it.


yeah right, so was AGEIA PhysX card which is nothing but failure

Completely different thing. That was sold as an optionaly extra to improve performasnce. And it did in circumstances where it was utilised properly.

Hardly compares to a chip that would be enforced. Was just saying it's hardly going to make performance worse having the protection hardware instead of software.
Back to top
FusionDexterity




Posts: 1834

PostPosted: Mon, 26th May 2008 09:40    Post subject:
cnZ wrote:
Quote:
Playing a protected game on a TPM PC:

Checking TPM chip...
Checking Serial key...
Checking Program File...
Checking for Virtual Drives...
Checking IDE/Sata ports...
Incrypting IDE/Sata ports...
Checking TPM game drivers...
Checking position of file on DVD/CD...
Checking internet connection...
Authenticating with the games online server...
Updating TPM drivers...
Checking your fingerprint and retinal...
Checking for crimes user has commited...
Starting game...
Checking Intro movie...
Checking map E1L1...
Loading map E1L1...

Cracked TPM user:

Starting game...
Loading map E1L1...


Smile
you forgot the DNA Scan
Back to top
Nidhogg




Posts: 490
Location: Old Europe
PostPosted: Mon, 26th May 2008 16:00    Post subject:
And the anal probe


http://steamcommunity.com/id/drakhor/games?tab=all
ASUS Maximus IV Gene-Z - i5 2500K - Thermalright Silver Arrow - 4x4GB DDR3 G.Skill RipjawsX- ASUS ENGTX570 DCII - Gigabyte M8000X - Logitech G15 v.2/Rumblepad 2 Refresh + Xbox 360 Controller- Iiyama B2403WS + ASUS VW191D - Sennheiser PC350 - Win7 Pro SP1 64-bit
Back to top
Parallax_
VIP Member



Posts: 6422
Location: Norway
PostPosted: Mon, 26th May 2008 16:17    Post subject:
EwarWoo1 wrote:
Was just saying it's hardly going to make performance worse having the protection hardware instead of software.

Well that depends. Most copy protection software just runs checks when you start up a game, so where's the benefit really?


Upcoming PC games 2009 and onwards
Bravery is not a function of firepower.
Back to top
Cohen




Posts: 7155
Location: Rapture
PostPosted: Mon, 26th May 2008 16:44    Post subject:
I guarantee there will be flashes available days to a week after release if this ever did come to life.


troll detected by SiN
Back to top
Spiderman
Banned



Posts: 5877

PostPosted: Mon, 26th May 2008 18:19    Post subject:
still to this day the best protection has Midway make the games 24 gig big Laughing
Back to top
EwarWoo1




Posts: 868

PostPosted: Tue, 27th May 2008 09:36    Post subject:
Parallax_ wrote:
EwarWoo1 wrote:
Was just saying it's hardly going to make performance worse having the protection hardware instead of software.

Well that depends. Most copy protection software just runs checks when you start up a game, so where's the benefit really?

And wheres the negative? Wish you people would learn to read frickin context. Not trying to say it's a super positive PC speeder upper, just saying the post that it will slow down your PC is balls
Back to top
Necros




Posts: 136

PostPosted: Wed, 28th May 2008 09:29    Post subject:
EwarWoo1 wrote:
Not really. If you look at the people who download games and say they buy them, they say if they're a great game they buy.

So basically, if it's a great game it sells but in reduced numbers.

If it's a mediocre -> good game it sells sweet FA. People play but don't pay. Where as without piracy it would sell.

If it's a crap game the above kind of applies but hard to feel sorry for them when it shouldn't sell.

But any of them piracy does affect sales. Just the lesser the game the more it is affected.

So just a less honest pussy assed way of saying "Stop protection, it's threatening my free gaming!"

That's BS. Piracy is a problem but it's not the only/main reason why some games aren't selling well. As others have mentioned before me, the weak ports, the short game time, the dumbed down gameplay/stories, lack of optimization for the PC, few demos (and even most of those isn't really good) are the main reasons (I'm sure I've missed a few though).
Back to top
Jenni
Banned



Posts: 9526
Location: England.
PostPosted: Wed, 28th May 2008 10:32    Post subject:
If they sold games for a decent price then they would sell more. They're saying that piracy is driving these games companies to the wall. Yet look at the GTA series. Good games sell well, crap games go down the pan and rightly so. Look at who Japans richest man recently. Only the expresident of Nintendo.


Back to top
EwarWoo1




Posts: 868

PostPosted: Wed, 28th May 2008 15:40    Post subject:
Jenni wrote:
If they sold games for a decent price then they would sell more. They're saying that piracy is driving these games companies to the wall. Yet look at the GTA series. Good games sell well, crap games go down the pan and rightly so. Look at who Japans richest man recently. Only the expresident of Nintendo.

Exactly. Great games do sell. But doesn't say much for the rest of the industry. Good games still deserve to sell.

And bad example there. He's made his money from consoles. Not PC gaming.
Back to top
Page 3 of 3 All times are GMT + 1 Hour
NFOHump.com Forum Index - PC Games Arena Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Signature/Avatar nuking: none (can be changed in your profile)  


Display posts from previous:   

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.8 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group